Marine environments are often very vulnerable and exposed to xenobiotics because of their proximity to human activities through industrial emissions, urban runoff, municipal discharges and biocides used in agriculture (Muñoz & Becker, 1999; Bargagli, 2008). Metals can be bioaccumulated in aquatic organisms and magnified throughout the food chain, affecting human health (Zhou et al., 2008). Bioaccumulation is a type of metal absorption through which it can be incorporated in biota and immobilized through complexation with intracellular proteins (Harms et al., 2011). Most non-essential metals (e.g., Cd, Hg) show a high affinity for proteins (Nordberg & Nordberg, 2009). These chemicals may alter the synthesis and metabolism of proteins, because a wide range of harmful free radicals are formed when metals bind to proteins (Flora et al., 2008), thus causing pathophysiological effects in the organism and even suppression of the immune system (Géret et al., 2002; Sharma et al., 2009). The current evidence has demonstrated that lesser-known high-technology metals (e.g., Ta, rare earth elements) are contaminants of emerging concern (Gwenzi et al., 2018). Despite that, there is a lack of studies on those metals such as Ta, which are elements that are rapidly increasing because they possess vital properties for the development of emerging technologies in the field of electronics, biomedicine and advanced engineered systems (Karn, 2011).
The exposure of marine organisms (such as snails, mussels, gastropods, crustaceans and fish) to toxic metals can affect some physiological functions such as protein turnover; thus, those animals can be used as alert signs of the presence of these contaminants in the environment (Dallinger et al., 2000; Ivanina & Sokolova, 2015). For that reason, it is crucial to develop tools to predict and detect these effects as soon as possible, particularly in remote marine ecosystems. Antarctica and Patagonia have marine ecosystems that have not been profoundly affected by human presence, and can still be considered as pristine environments, although both can be exposed to the impact of global anthropogenic activities (Commendatore & Esteves, 2007; Bargagli, 2008). Some marine animals have developed physiological adaptations such as ice-binding (antifreeze) proteins that allow them to survive at low temperatures (Beers & Jayasundara, 2015; Duman, 2015). A recent study showed that Ta bioaccumulates and biomagnifies throughout cold marine food chains (Espejo et al., 2018), but it is not known if this metal is bound to proteins or lipids. Some chemicals (e.g., persistent organic pollutants) tend to accumulate in lipid-rich tissues of organisms (Loganathan & Kannan, 1994). We hypothesize that there is a positive relationship between Ta and protein contents across marine food webs conformed by macroinvertebrates and fishes in cold and pristine environments. Considering that Ta will be increasingly demanded, it is indispensable to study its possible implications in the environment and biota health. To date no studies have been conducted to show whether there is any relationship between Ta and protein contents in fauna of marine environments. The present study was conducted to investigate if there is any relationship between the contents of total protein and Ta from different marine coastal food webs. This work is a complement of our previous study (Espejo et al., 2018), in which we reported the Ta concentrations in the same organisms and locations studied here.
Samples of macroinvertebrates and fishes were collected during the austral summer of 2015 from different coastal marine ecosystems: a) Pan de Azúcar Bay (26°09'S, 70°40'W) of northern Chile (a site which has been heavily contaminated in the past by mining tailings); b) La Leona Island (44°01'S, 73°07'W) and Marchant River Mouth (44°05'S, 73°05'W) of Chilean Patagonia (despite their proximity, Marchant River Mouth and La Leona Island have different aquatic environments; while the sea surrounds the La Leona Island, Marchant River Mouth is located at the mouth of a freshwater river, which drags and discharges sediments with high organic matter content into the sea; both sites are far from human activities and with aquatic systems still considered pristine in Chilean territory); c) Fildes Bay (62°12'S, 58°58'W) of South Shetland Islands, Antarctic Peninsula area (is a site belonging to the specially protected areas of Antarctica, as it has scientific and natural values). The samples of aquatic invertebrates were obtained using a Van Veen grab sampler or by scuba diving. Soft tissues of mollusks were extracted, whereas the whole body was retained for other macroinvertebrates. Fishes were captured using a harpoon and nets, anesthetized with 5% benzocaine (BZ-20®, Veterquimica), euthanized through spinal severance, and then sampled for muscle tissue. All samples collected were washed with saline water and stored at −20°C until their analysis in the laboratory. Later, samples were freeze-dried until dry masses were constant and then were homogenized into a fine powder using a glass mortar and pestle pre-cleaned with 2% Conrad solution (Merck) for 24 h, washed with deionized water and HCl 1 M and rinsed with distilled water.
For protein analysis, a standard assay with Bradford reagent was used, which is based on the binding of Coomassie brilliant blue G-250 (SD Fine-Chem Limited) dye to basic amino acid residues at acidic pH (Noble & Bailey, 2009). A Gen5's calibration protocol was used, with R2 values >95%. Calibration curves were obtained using bovine serum albumin (BSA) as a standard, prepared in Eppendorf tubes with concentrations ranging from 0.25 up to 1 mg mL-1 and then measured at 595 nm. Simultaneously, approximately 5 mg of each lyophilized sample were placed in Eppendorf tubes. Then 1 mL of distilled water was added to each tube and mixed with plate shaker (Wise Cube, WIS-20) for 60 s. Then, 10 μL of this solution were extracted and placed in each well of 96-well polystyrene microplates. Finally, 250 μL of Bradford reagent was added to each tube and mixed well. Protein solutions were assayed in triplicate. The absorbance values of all the samples and controls were measured at 595 nm after 5 min incubation at room temperature (BioTek Instruments, Inc., Winooski, VT, USA). In all cases, the coefficient of variation within triplicates was less than 20%. For tantalum analysis, subsamples (0.2 g) were placed into 50 mL Teflon beaker with 5 mL of ultrapure nitric acid and heated (at 110°C) until almost dry (about 3 h). Then 5 mL of ultrapure nitric acid and 1 mL of hydrogen peroxide were added, and the mixture was heated again to near dryness (about 3 h). The residue was dissolved in 5 mL of 1% ultrapure nitric acid, filtered with glass fiber filter® (<0.45 μm), and then transferred to a centrifuge tube. The last point was repeated four times to a final volume of 25 mL. Total Ta was determined by mass spectrometry coupled with a plasma inductor (ICP-MS, NexION-350D, Perkin Elmer) at the Environmental Health Science Laboratory, Toyo University, Japan.
The relationship between Ta and protein content was analyzed by regressions of log10 Ta versus protein content in macroinvertebrates and fish at each location. We used analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) to determine whether the relationship between Ta level and protein content was significantly different among locations, which was achieved by comparison of the slopes obtained from the linear regressions. The differences among data were considered statistically significant when P < 0.05. Statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS version 15.0 software (IBM Corp., Chicago, IL, USA).
The results showed that at Pan de Azúcar Bay (Table 1), the highest levels of proteins were found in Concholepas concholepas (a carnivorous gastropod, which feeds on peaks, limpets and mussels), while the highest Ta levels were found in Trachurus symmetricus murphyi (jack mackerel, a pelagic fish typical of the coast of northern Chile), which feeds on euphausiids and mesopelagic fish (Medina & Arancibia, 1992). At La Leona Island (Table 2), the highest levels of protein and Ta were found in Sebastes capensis (false jacopever, a pelagic fish typical of southern South America coast and western coast of South Africa, which feeds on small benthic invertebrates). At Marchant River mouth (Table 2), the highest levels of protein in macroinvertebrates were found in Cancer coronatus (crustacean, commonly called queen crab, which feeds on small mollusks and crustaceans of limited mobility), while the highest Ta levels were found in Eleginops maclovinus (a benthopelagic species which preferably consumes amphipods, polychaetes and crustaceans). At Fildes Bay (Table 3), the highest protein content was found in Pagothenia borchgrevinki (a cryopelagic species that usually feeds on copepods and krill), and the highest Ta levels were found in Notothenia kempi (striped-eyed rockcod, a demerso-pelagic fish widely distributed near the South Shetland Islands, which feeds on sedentary polychaetes, amphipods and mollusks).
Table 1 Content of total protein (g g-1, dry weight), protein (%) and Ta (ng g-1, dry weight) ± standard deviation in marine species from Pan de Azúcar Bay (northern Chile).
Species | n | Total protein | % Protein3 | Ta4 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Macroinvertebrate1 | ||||
Cancer edwardsii | 5 | 0.149 ± 0.062 | (8.1-22.8) | 0.47 ± 0.16 |
Fissurella spp. | 4 | 0.326 ± 0.068 | (27.3-42.6) | 0.31 ± 0.04 |
Concholepas concholepas | 5 | 0.34 ± 0.086 | (25.9-47.6) | 0.26 ± 0.02 |
Loxechinus albus | 5 | 0.252 ± 0.089 | (11-34.1) | 0.51 ± 0.09 |
Aulacomya ater | 4 | 0.20 ± 0.203 | (3.1-45.1) | 0.37 ± 0.32 |
Tegula atra | 5 | 0.256 ± 0.038 | (19.5-28.6) | 0.34 ± 0.17 |
Crucibulum scutellatum | 5 | 0.093 ± 0.031 | (6.1-13.1) | 0.17 ± 0.07 |
Forcipulatida spp. | 5 | 0.276 ± 0.073 | (20.1-37.6) | 0.83 ± 1.09 |
Fish2 | ||||
Hemilutjanus macrophthalmos | 4 | 0.09 ± 0.041 | (3.9-13.7) | 2.68 ± 0.28 |
Cheilodactylus gayi | 5 | 0.085 ± 0.035 | (3.3-12.2) | 2.22 ± 0.60 |
Pinguipes chilensis | 2 | 0.067 ± 0.012 | (5.8-7.5) | 2.09 ± 0.39 |
Trachurus symmetricus murphyi | 1 | 0.081 | 0.081 | 2.86 |
1Soft tissue (whole-body).
2Muscle.
3Minimum-maximum values.
4Reported by Espejo et al. (2018).
Table 2 Content of total protein (g g-1, dry weight), protein (%) and Ta (ng g-1, dry weight) ± standard deviation in marine species from La Leona Island and Marchant River mouth, Chilean Patagonia.
Species | n | Total protein | % Protein3 | Ta4 |
---|---|---|---|---|
i) La Leona Island | ||||
a) Macroinvertebrate1 | ||||
Concholepas concholepas | 3 | 0.30 ± 0.051 | (25.4-35.4) | 0.38 ± 0.17 |
Cosmasterias lurida | 5 | 0.19 ± 0.09 | (10.3-29.7) | 0.34 ± 0.22 |
Trophon geversianus | 5 | 0.174 ± 0.053 | (9.9-23.4) | 0.29 ± 0.12 |
Aulacomya ater | 5 | 0.08 ± 0.054 | (3.7-15.7) | 0.23 ± 0.11 |
b) Fish2 | ||||
Genypterus chilensis | 1 | 0.161 | 16.1 | 1.83 |
Sebastes capensis | 5 | 0.312 ± 0.052 | (26.3-39.4) | 1.84 ± 0.28 |
Pinguipes chilensis | 3 | 0.194 ± 0.085 | (14.4-29.2) | 0.61 ± 0.07 |
ii) Marchant River Mouth | ||||
a) Macroinvertebrate1 | ||||
Cancer coronatus | 7 | 0.277 ± 0.075 | (19.2-37.9) | 1.51 ± 1.05 |
Fissurella spp. | 5 | 0.144 ± 0.088 | (8.0-29.7) | 1.40 ± 0.55 |
Aulacomya ater | 4 | 0.089 ± 0.052 | (2.3-13.9) | 1.05 ± 1.81 |
Hemigrapsus crenulatus | 5 | 0.055 ± 0.030 | (2.0-9.8) | 1.25 ± 0.55 |
b) Fish2 | ||||
Eleginops maclovinus | 5 | 0.232 ± 0.050 | (17.5-30.8) | 2.48 ± 0.27 |
Salmo trutta | 1 | 0.103 | 10.3 | 2.03 |
Salmo salar | 2 | 0.139 ± 0.017 | (12.6-15.1) | 2.20 ± 0.12 |
Genypterus chilensis | 2 | 0.210 ± 0.032 | (18.8-23.3) | 2.08 ± 0.06 |
Graus nigra | 2 | 0.215 ± 0.044 | (18.4-24.6) | 2.36 ± 0.12 |
1Soft tissue (whole-body).
2Muscle.
3Minimum-maximum values.
4Reported by Espejo et al. (2018).
Table 3 Content of total protein (g g-1, dry weight), protein (%) and Ta (ng g-1, dry weight) ± standard deviation in marine species from Fildes Bay (South Shetland Islands, Antarctic Peninsula area).
Species | n | Total protein | % Protein3 | Ta4 |
---|---|---|---|---|
a) Macroinvertebrate1 | ||||
Nacella concinna | 4 | 0.061 ± 0.026 | (3.9-9.6) | 1.22 ± 2.17 |
Diplasterias brucei | 1 | 0.246 | 24.6 | 5.09 |
Odontaster validus | 1 | 0.076 | 7.6 | 7.8 |
Cnemidocarpa verrucosa | 1 | 0.057 | 5.7 | 3.48 |
Actinia sp. | 5 | 0.124 ± 0.071 | (5.1-22.2) | 2.35 ± 1.03 |
Parborlasia corrugatus | 1 | 0.188 | 18.8 | 0.97 ± 0.10 |
Abatus agassizii | 1 | 0.054 | 5.4 | 0.43 ± 0.25 |
Sterechinus neumayeri | 5 | 0.063 ± 0.020 | (4.6-9.8) | 0.43 ± 0.44 |
Glyptonotus antarcticus | 3 | 0.041 ± 0.029 | (1.1-6.9) | 1.33 ± 0.40 |
b) Fish2 | ||||
Trematomus scotti | 6 | 0.281 ± 0.070 | (18.6-34.9) | 8.00 ± 3.31 |
Pagothenia borchgrevinki | 1 | 0.393 | 39.3 | 13.7 |
Notothenia coriiceps | 6 | 0.207 ± 0.028 | (18.3-25.4) | 5.78 ± 7.86 |
Notothenia rossii | 4 | 0.220 ± 0.025 | (18.7-24.8) | 3.07 ± 0.28 |
Pagothenia hansoni | 2 | 0.159 ± 0.033 | (13.5-18.2) | 2.23 ± 0.06 |
Notothenia kempi | 5 | 0.192 ± 0.049 | (12.6-26.1) | 14.04 ± 20.38 |
Trematomus newnesi | 1 | 0.223 | 22.3 | 2.8 ± 0.68 |
1Soft tissue (whole-body).
2Muscle.
3Minimum-maximum values.
4Reported by Espejo et al. (2018).
The regression analysis (Table 4) revealed that the slopes for the relationship between Ta and proteins in macroinvertebrates and fishes were statistically different between Antarctica (Fildes Bay) and the other sites (P < 0.037). In contrast, there were no differences between the sites of Patagonia (La Leona Island and Marchant River mouth, P = 0.389). The slope for Fildes Bay was significantly higher than for all other sites, which could be explained as Antarctic marine food webs are simpler and mainly based on benthic and pelagic populations (Ballerini et al., 2014). The positive relationship between Ta and proteins we found here in marine species from Patagonia and Antarctica suggests that probably this metal binds to proteins, which would be consistent with evidence indicating that trace metals tend to bind to proteins (Hernández et al., 2006). Physiological characteristics, habitat, life cycle and environmental conditions can influence the chemical composition of biota (Diniz et al., 2012), which may explain why there was a negative relationship between these two variables at Pan de Azúcar Bay; heavy metals have impacted this northern location of Chile as a result of mining activities during the 20th century (Celis et al., 2014), and many pollutants were probably re-suspended from sediments into the water column by floods that occurred in 2015. Some studies suggest that there may be a reduction in total protein levels in some organisms from heavily chemical-contaminated environments (Sharma et al., 2009; Joseph & Raj, 2010), and under such conditions possibly another contaminant might be competing with Ta by binding to proteins (Beyersmann & Hartwig, 2008).
Table 4 Regressions of log10 Ta vs. protein content for invertebrates and fishes collected from coastal locations in northern Chile, Chilean Patagonia, and Antarctic Peninsula area.
Location | n | Slope | Intercept | R2 | P-value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pan de Azúcar Bayᵃ | 54 | -0.017 ± 0.005 | 0.064 ± 0.106 | -0.193 | 0.0004 |
La Leona Islandb | 27 | 0.020 ± 0.007 | -0.743 ± 0.146 | 0.27 | 0.003 |
Marchant River Mouthb | 33 | 0.012 ± 0.006 | -0.104 ± 0.118 | 0.12 | 0.024 |
Fildes Bayc | 47 | 0.041 ± 0.007 | -0.314 ± 0.135 | 0.415 | < 0.0001 |
Different letters indicate significant differences among slopes between different locations (P < 0.05).
Our results indicate that Ta may interfere to some degree with proteins and thus affecting the immuno-logical system of the species studied here. There is evidence that trace elements interfere with the physiological activity of proteins, thus reducing the immune capacity of the affected organism (Tamás et al., 2014). Metals interfere with the biological activity of proteins by binding to free thiols or other functional groups, displacing essential metal ions of metallo-proteins, or catalyzing the oxidation of the amino acid side chains (Sharma et al., 2009; Lemire et al., 2013). The functions of metalloproteins in cells are highly varied, acting as enzymes, transport and storage proteins, and in signal transduction (Waldron & Robinson, 2009). By interfering with proteins, heavy metals could profoundly affect protein metabolism and cell viability (Tamás et al., 2014). Some researchers have found that the oxidative deterioration of biological macromolecules is mainly due to the binding of heavy metals to DNA and proteins at the nuclear level (Flora et al., 2008). The exposure to toxic metals of marine organisms can cause some degree of genotoxicity in them and, in this sense, metalloproteins have the potential to be used as biomarkers of early warning against the presence of trace elements (Petrovic et al., 2001; Cherian et al., 2003). A recent study found that Ta biomagnified along the same marine food webs studied here (Espejo et al., 2018). Although our results did not prove that Ta binds with proteins, they are indicating that proteins are probably the pathway by which Ta bioaccumulates and biomagnifies in macroinvertebrates and fishes of specific environments such as pristine coastal marine ecosystems.
Nevertheless, the protein values found in this study may also be influenced by factors intrinsic to the species studied (e.g., size, weight, sex, state of sexual maturity). Our data suggest that site-specific factors may be relevant in determining Ta environmental fate. More studies are needed to elucidate any possible effects caused by Ta on marine fauna.