SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.24Comparative study on weathering durability property of phenol formaldehyde resin modified sweetgum and southern pine specimensInfluence of growth parameters on wood density of Acacia auriculiformis author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


Maderas. Ciencia y tecnología

On-line version ISSN 0718-221X

Maderas, Cienc. tecnol. vol.24  Concepción  2022  Epub Mar 01, 2022

http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/s0718-221x2022000100418 

ARTÍCULO

Effect of the thermal treatment on the chemical components, sorption, and shrinkage properties of Tectona grandis juvenile wood

Juliana de Oliveira Lopes1 
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0276-5675

Claudia B. Cáceres2 
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4899-8856

Roger E. Hernández2 
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3655-9028

Rosilei A. Garcia1  2 
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1636-3095

1Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro (UFRRJ). Departamento de Produtos Florestais, Instituto de Florestas. Seropédica, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

2Université Laval. Faculté de foresterie, de géographie et de géomatique. Département des sciences du bois et de la forêt. Centre de recherche sur les matériaux renouvelables (CRMR), Québec, Canada.

Abstract:

The effect of thermal treatment on the chemical components, equilibrium moisture content (EMC), and shrinkage of teak juvenile wood was studied. Heartwood and sapwood samples were thermally-treated at 180 ºC and 200 ºC. Extractive, Klason lignin, holocellulose, and α-cellulose contents, as well as pH on untreated and thermally-treated woods, were determined. The EMC was reached at five relative humidity (RH) levels using saturated salt solutions: 86 % (KCl), 76 % (NaCl), 58 % (NaBr), 33 % (MgCl2), and 0 % (P2O5). Linear and volumetric shrinkages were calculated for all EMCs. The ratio of sorption (S), coefficient of shrinkage (h), and fiber saturation point (FSP) were also determined. Thermally-treated wood exhibited lower holocellulose and α-cellulose contents than untreated wood and increased acidity due to degradation of the hemicelluloses. The thermal treatment reduced the EMC of heartwood and sapwood. However, sapwood was more sensitive to RH variations than heartwood regardless of the treatment. Thermally-treated woods had higher hygroscopic and dimensional stabilities, and lower FSP than untreated wood. The thermal treatment did not affect radial shrinkage of the heartwood between 33 % and 86 % RH. Heartwood was more sensitive to the effect of the thermal treatment on shrinkage and degradation of cell wall polymers compared to sapwood.

Keywords: Chemical modification; dimensional stability; equilibrium moisture content; shrinkage; teak; Tectona grandis.

Introduction

Thermal modification is a technique that has been extensively studied in the last years because it enhances several wood properties such as lower hygroscopicity and higher dimensional stability (Giebeler 1983) and decay resistance (Weiland and Guyonnet 2003). The treatment provokes physical and chemical changes to wood, such as extractive volatilization, formation of new compounds (e.g. anhydrosugars and phenolic compounds), degradation of the hemicelluloses (Esteves et al. 2011), changes in the lignin structure (Kim et al. 2014), increase of crystalline cellulose (Li et al. 2015), and mass losses (Garcia et al. 2012), among other modifications. These chemical changes reduce the OH- groups available in cell walls, promoting lower hygroscopicity and higher dimensional stability to thermally-treated woods.

The teak (Tectona grandis) plantations in Brazil have shorter cutting cycles (15 to 25 years) compared to those in its native region and other regions around the world (Tsukamoto Filho et al. 2003, FAO 2000) due to favorable edaphoclimatic conditions and management techniques. However, teak wood from fast-grown plantations exhibits high proportions of juvenile wood and sapwood, which have different anatomical, physical, chemical, and aesthetic properties than those of mature wood and heartwood (Bhat et al. 2001, Lopes 2012, Darmawan et al. 2015). Studies have shown that the proportion of juvenile wood measured at breast height (1,3 m) is 80-100 % for 20-year-old trees (Bhat et al. 2001) and 100 % for 10-year-old trees (Darmawan et al. 2015). Juvenile wood presents, for example, lower density, lower shrinkage, shorter fibers, higher microfibril angle, and lower bending strength than mature wood (Darmawan et al. 2015). Teak heartwood presents good dimensional stability and high biological durability due to some substances such as caoutchouc (Yamamoto et al. 1998), tectoquinone (β-methyl anthraquinone), 2-(hydroxymethyl) anthraquinone, and lapachol (Niamké et al. 2011). On the other hand, teak sapwood presents a lighter color, lower dimensional stability and low resistance to the attack of xylophagous organisms than heartwood (Lopes 2012, Motta et al. 2013). Therefore, treatments to improve the properties of sapwood are required to increase the yield of this raw material. Previous studies have shown that thermal treatments provide color uniformity to pieces of teak wood containing heartwood and sapwood (Lopes et al. 2014). In addition, thermally-treated teak wood can show higher color stability after exposure to ultraviolet radiation depending on the treatment conditions (Garcia et al. 2014).

Studies about the dimensional stability of wood are essential for its use because it depends on the relationships between specific gravity and the relative humidity (RH) of the air (Tsoumis 1991). Particularly for teak species, studies have reported the volumetric swelling (Kartikawati et al. 2020) and anti-swelling efficiency of heat-treated and untreated 15-year-old teak wood from Indonesia (Priadi et al. 2019), the maximum shrinkage of teak wood from the West Africa region (tree age was not specified) (Govorčin et al. 2010) among others. However, there are no studies on the dimensional stability of thermally-treated teak juvenile wood under different RH conditions, in particular teak wood from fast-growing plantations in Brazil, which highlights the originality of our study. In general, teak wood is popular in outdoor applications (Weaver 1993), which require materials with attractive color, high dimensional stability under different climatic conditions, and high resistance to pathogens and weathering (Kokutse et al. 2006).

With the ultimate goal of contributing to a better understanding of the properties of teak wood after heat treatment and to enhance the use of teak wood from young plantations in Brazil, this study aimed, in the first part, to assess the effect thermal treatments on the chemical composition of juvenile teak wood (heartwood and sapwood), while in the second part, we studied the EMC and the variation of shrinkage under different RH of thermally-treated wood.

Material and methods

Material and thermal treatment

Twelve-year-old teak (Tectona grandis Linn. f.) trees were harvested from a plantation located in Caceres city, Mato Grosso State, Brazil (Latitude: 16º 04' 14'' S, Longitude: 57º 40' 44" W). Based on previous studies (Bhat et al. 2001, Flórez et al. 2014, Darmawan et al. 2015), we have assumed that the samples contained only juvenile wood as they were obtained from fast-growing young trees. In addition, samples were taken from the second log cut from the diameter at breast height, where the proportion of juvenile wood is greater. Samples of 150 mm (L) x 75 mm (T) x 20 mm (R) were prepared from heartwood or sapwood.

Wood samples were heat-treated in a muffle furnace of 600 mm x 600 mm x 700 mm equipped with a temperature and time controller. The treatment was performed at four steps: (1) heating up to 100 ºC for 2 h, (2) heat increasing from 100 ºC to final temperature (180 ºC or 200 ºC) for 30 min, (3) thermal exposure at the final temperature for 2,5 h; and (4) cooling for approximately 24 h. Before and after thermal treatment, samples were conditioned at 20 ºC and 65 % RH until mass equilibrium was reached.

Chemical analysis

Chemical analyses were done according to ASTM-D1105-96 (2001) and ASTM-D1106-96 (2001) to determine extractive, Klason lignin, holocellulose, and α-cellulose contents. The extractive contents were obtained after extractions in a Soxhlet apparatus for 24 h using three organic solvents of increased polarity: cyclohexane, ethyl acetate, and methanol.

The Klason lignin was obtained after treatment of approximately 300 mg extractive-free dry ground wood with 72 % sulfuric acid (H2SO4) in a water bath at 30 °C for 1 h, followed by dilution to 84 mL distilled water and refluxing for 4 h. The residue was washed with 500 mL hot distilled water and oven-dried at 103 ºC ± 2 °C for 24 h. The Klason lignin content was estimated by dividing the oven-dry weight of the residue (insoluble lignin) by the weight of the extractive-free wood.

The holocellulose fraction was determined by the chlorination method using 2,5 g of extractive-free dry wood added of 80 mL hot distilled water, 0,5 mL acetic acid, and 1 g sodium chlorite (NaClO2). The mixture was heated in a water bath at 70 °C, and another dose of 0,5 mL acetic acid and 1 g NaClO2 were added every 1 h until the fibers were completely separated. The mixture was left for 24 h without reagent addition and was then filtered under vacuum and washed with distilled water until the yellow color and chlorine odor completely disappeared. The residue was oven-dried at 103 ºC ± 2 °C for 24 h and weighed. The holocellulose content was then estimated by dividing the oven-dry weight of the residue (holocellulose) by the weight of the extractive-free wood.

The α-cellulose was obtained after treatment of 2 g dry holocellulose with 10 mL of 17,5 % sodium hydroxide (NaOH) in a water bath at 20 ºC. Another 5 mL of 17,5 % NaOH was added to the mixture at 5 min intervals for a total treatment of 45 min. A 33 mL distilled water at 20 °C was added and left for 1 h. The mixture was filtered under vacuum and subsequently washed with 100 mL of 8,3 % NaOH and with distilled water. The cellulose residue was oven-dried at 103 ºC ± 2 °C for 24 h. The cellulose content was estimated by dividing the oven-dry weight of the cellulose residue by the weight of the dry holocellulose residue.

The pH of wood was determined as described by Lelis (1995). A 5 g of ground wood oven-dried at 103 ºC ± 2 °C for 24 h was mixed with distilled water at room temperature and left for 24 h. The mixture was filtered and the pH was measured with an electronic pHmeter.

Three replicates per treatment were used for each chemical component and pH analysis.

Sorption tests

Samples of 20 mm (L) x 15 mm (T) x 13 mm (R) were prepared with the untreated and heat-treated wood pieces of each wood type: heartwood and sapwood. Firstly, the samples were full saturated following a mild procedure in three steps: (1) adsorption in desiccators containing potassium chloride - KCl (86 % RH) at 21 ºC with mass measurements until equilibrium was reached; (2) adsorption in desiccators over deionized water until mass equilibrium was reached; and (3) immersion in deionized water for seven days until full saturation was reached. Afterward, samples were separated into five matched groups. One group was immediately put in a desiccator over phosphorus pentoxide - P2O5 (0 % RH). The other four groups were placed for desorption in desiccators at four levels of RH: 86 %, 76 %, 58 %, and 33 %, by using saturated salt solutions of potassium chloride (KCl), sodium chloride (NaCl), sodium bromide (NaBr), and magnesium chloride (MgCl2), respectively. A total of 42 samples, 7 replicates for each treatment (wood type (sapwood and heartwood) and temperature (control or untreated, and treated at 180 ºC, and 200 ºC)) were used for each sorption condition. Samples were placed into two desiccators per RH condition.

Desorption tests were conducted simultaneously on all samples using sorption vats as described by Hernández and Pontin (2006). The temperature of the vats was established at 21 °C. These vats provided temperature control of ± 0,01 °C for long periods and thus allowing control of RH in the various desiccators serving as small sorption chambers. The samples were placed in plastic supports with a perforated base to promote the exchange of moisture. The weight of samples was measured periodically without removing them from the desiccators until a constant mass was reached.

All mass of samples was taken to the nearest 0,001 g and their dimensions were measured in the three principal directions with a micrometer to the nearest 0,001 mm after full saturation. Dimensions and mass of the four groups of conditioned samples were also measured once their corresponding sorption equilibrium condition was reached and then they were immediately oven-dried at 103 °C for 24 h. Samples dimensions at the oven-dried state were measured after a 20 min period of cooling over P2O5.

Equilibrium moisture content and ratio of sorption

The EMC of untreated and thermally-treated woods was calculated with the mass of the samples at equilibrium and the oven-dried mass, expressed as a percentage of oven-dry mass.

The sorption ratio (S) is a parameter of hygroscopicity proposed by Noack et al. (1973) to characterize the sensitivity of the EMC variation (ΔEMC) related to the variation in RH (ΔRH) (Equation 1). This parameter assumes that there is a linear relationship between EMC and RH. Therefore, the S-ratio was calculated for desorption between 33 % and 76 % RH.

(1)

Shrinkage and coefficient of shrinkage

The linear shrinkages in the tangential (βT), radial (βR), and longitudinal (βL) directions were calculated in percentage. Volumetric shrinkage was estimated as the sum of these three directional measurements (βV involves the product βT x βR in order to achieve sufficient accuracy within the range of βT and βR values normally found for wood, as described by Skaar (2012)) (Equation 2 ). Shrinkages of untreated and thermally-treated woods were obtained for all EMCs.

(2)

The coefficient of shrinkage (h) is a general index of dimensional stability proposed by Noack et al. (1973) to determine the swelling/shrinkage of the wood for every 1 % RH. The h-coefficient was calculated with the volumetric shrinkage (ΔβV) for desorption between 33 % and 76 % RH (Equation 3).

(3)

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were done with a STATISTIC 10.0 software. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey’s tests (at 0,01 of the probability level) were used to verify the effects of the wood type (heartwood and sapwood) and temperature (control or untreated and treated at 180 °C, and 200 °C) on the extractives, Klason lignin, hemicellulose, and α-cellulose contents, pH, EMC, and shrinkage components (βT, βR, βL, and βV). The normality and homogeneity of variance were verified by the Shapiro-Wilk and Levene’s tests.

Results and discussion

Chemical changes

A significant interaction was found between wood type (heartwood, sapwood) and temperature for all chemical components (extractive, Klason lignin, holocellulose, and α-cellulose) and pH (Table 1 and Table 2). The untreated heartwood had a higher extractive content than the untreated sapwood. The extractive content gradually increased as the temperature of treatment increased for both wood types (Table 3). The total extractive content of treated heartwood and sapwood respectively increased by 53 % and 64 % at 180 °C and by 122 % and 100 % at 200 ºC compared to untreated woods. Similar behavior for the extractive content was observed by other authors after thermal treatments (Gašparík et al. 2019, Bellon 2013, Lengowski 2011). Gašparík et al. (2019) found an increase of 56 % on teak extractive after the ThermoWood® treatment at 210 ºC. Also, the extractive content increased by 135 % (Bellon 2013) and 158 % (Lengowski 2011) in the 160 °C-treated teak wood from VAP HolzSysteme® industrial process compared to untreated wood. However, these studies did not separate heartwood from sapwood material. The increase of the extractive content is not related to the natural extractives of wood, which are in large part volatilized during the thermal treatment, but to by-products formed mainly from the degradation of the hemicelluloses. According to International ThermoWood Association (2003), temperatures ranging from 120 °C to 180 °C increase the extractive content of wood while the temperature up to 230 °C causes a decrease in extractives.

Table 1: F-values obtained from the ANOVA of the effects of the wood type (heartwood, sapwood) and temperature treatment on the extractive content of teak wood. 

**Significant at the 1 % probability level.

Table 2: F-values obtained from the ANOVA of the effects of the wood type (heartwood, sapwood) and temperature treatment on the chemical components and pH of teak wood. 

* Significant at the 5 % ** Significant at the 1 % probability level; ns not significant.

Table 3: Means of the extractive contents of untreated and thermally-treated teak heartwood and sapwood. 

The number in parentheses are standard errors. Means within a column followed by the same letters are not significantly different at the 1 % probability level.

Table 4: Means of the chemical component contents and pH of untreated and thermally-treated teak heartwood and sapwood. 

The number in parentheses are standard errors. Means within a column followed by the same letters are not significantly different at the 1 % probability level.

The treatment at 200 °C increased the Klason lignin content in heartwood but not in sapwood (Table 4). The increase in lignin content was also found in thermally-treated teak (Bellon 2013, Lengowski 2011), Caribbean pine (Poubel et al. 2013), and eucalypt (de Moura et al. 2012) woods. Several works have reported chemical changes in lignin structure due to thermal treatments. Chemical analysis of thermally-treated teak wood assessed by Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy showed an increase in band intensity at 1328 cm-1 assigned to C-H vibration in cellulose and C1-O vibration in syringyl derivative-condensed structures in lignin, which suggest the formation of condensed structures (Li et al. 2015). Kim et al. (2014) also reported depolymerization (cleavage of β-O-4 linkage) and condensation between lignin fragments during thermal treatment. Although the thermal treatment affects lignin due to depolymerization, hemicelluloses reach a more advanced stage of degradation starting at 180 °C compared to lignin, which results in an apparent lignin increase in relation to the other components of the cell wall (Sundqvist 2004).

The untreated sapwood exhibited the highest holocellulose and α-cellulose contents (Table 4). According to Stamm (1964), hemicellulose and cellulose (amorphous portion and crystallite surfaces) are the main responsible for the hygroscopicity of wood while lignin plays a secondary role.

Holocellulose content decreased gradually with the temperature increase for both wood types (Table 4). The holocellulose content of treated heartwood and sapwood decreased by 10 % and 4 % at 180 °C, and by 26 % and 11 % at 200 ºC, respectively. The holocellulose decrease in treated woods was probably due to the degradation of hemicelluloses. The results regarding the heartwood and sapwood behavior confirm those of previous works. Lopes et al. (2018) used infrared spectroscopy to assess the chemical modification of the surface of thermally-modified teak wood. A more pronounced decrease in OH- groups in heartwood than in sapwood after heat treatment was observed. The authors provide a good discussion about the different chemical changes in teak heartwood and sapwood after heat treatment and the greater sensitivity of the heartwood to thermal degradation compared to sapwood, but it is not yet clear why this occurs. No significant differences were found between α-cellulose contents of untreated and 180 oC-treated woods. On the other hand, the α-cellulose content decreased in the 200 °C-treated heartwood and sapwood. Among the chemical constituents of the cell wall, hemicelluloses are primarily consumed because they are easily degraded at low temperatures (140 °C) while cellulose is more resistant to thermal degradation (Sundqvist 2004). Other authors reported a holocellulose decrease of 24-25 % in teak (Bellon 2013, Lengowski 2011), 18,6 % in Eucalyptus grandis, and 4,6 % in Pinus taeda woods after thermal treatment at 160 °C by the VAP HolzSysteme® process (Lengowski 2011).

In summary, the chemical changes caused by the thermal treatment were more important in heartwood than in sapwood (Figure 1). The apparent total extractive content (or by-products formed mainly from the degradation of hemicelluloses) increased more in the thermally-treated heartwood than in the thermally-treated sapwood due to greater susceptibility to thermal degradation of the former. The relative lignin content increased by 20 % in 200 °C-treated heartwood while no significant change was found in the sapwood. The holocellulose content decreased more in heartwood than in sapwood at both thermal treatment degrees. The α-cellulose content decreased by 12,8 % in heartwood and 5,4 % in sapwood after the treatment at 200 °C. Studies realized by Lopes et al. (2018) using FTIR spectroscopy also reported a more important thermal degradation in heartwood than in sapwood.

Figure 1: Chemical component contents of untreated and thermally-treated teak wood. 

The untreated heartwood was more acid (pH = 5,55) than the untreated sapwood (pH = 6,53) (Table 4). The high acidity of heartwood compared to sapwood has often been reported in the literature for several hardwood species (Kakavas et al. 2018, Passialis et al. 2008). Untreated woods usually have a pH near to 5,0-5,5 (Boonstra et al. 2007), however, pH values depend on the extraction conditions (Geffert et al. 2019). Lower pH values are found with hot water extraction compared to cold water, due to the greater release of acetic acid (Geffert et al. 2019). Therefore, the extraction method used in our study can explain the high pH values found in untreated teak woods, principally sapwood. The thermal treatment significantly decreased the pH values of both types of wood, principally of the heartwood. The most expressive chemical degradation in the heartwood after thermal treatment can be also confirmed by its higher acidity. The increased acidity in thermally-treated woods can be explained by the hemicellulose degradation and formation of acetic acid. This acid also acts as catalysts in the depolymerization process of the cellulose microfibrils breaking them into smaller chains (Boonstra et al. 2007), in addition to the condensation and degradation reactions in lignin structure (Li et al. 2015) that result in the formation of phenolic groups (Kim et al. 2014).

Equilibrium moisture content

The ANOVAs showed respectively a significant effect of the heat treatment and wood type on the EMC for all moisture sorption conditions, except in the anhydrous state (Table 5). As expected, the analysis of untreated samples showed that the EMC was lower in heartwood than sapwood (Table 6). This can be attributed to the higher proportion of extractives present in heartwood (Table 3). Previous work about the chemical composition of teak juvenile wood assessed by FTIR spectroscopy also showed a higher extractive content (quinones, oils, and waxes) in heartwood than sapwood (Lopes et al. 2018). In fact, several works have shown that teak wood and other tropical woods have a hydrophobic behavior due to the presence of extractives in their tissues (Hernández 2007a, Jankowska et al. 2017). Furthermore, EMC decreased due to the heat treatments (control to 180 °C to 200 °C) for all moisture sorption conditions and wood types (Table 6). For instance, the EMC of heartwood and sapwood treated at 180 °C significantly decreased 3,9 % and 1,1 % MC compared to the corresponding untreated samples in desorption at 86 % RH, respectively. EMC decreased even more for samples treated at 200 °C, namely 4,9 % for heartwood and 4,7 % MC for heartwood and sapwood at the same RH. For all cases, the decrease in EMC due to the heat treatment was higher for heartwood than for sapwood.

Table 5: F-values obtained from the ANOVAs of the effects of the wood type (heartwood, sapwood) and temperature treatment on the EMC and each shrinkage component. 

*Significant at the 5% probability level ** Significant at the 1 % probability level; ns not significant.

Table 6: Means of the equilibrium moisture content (EMC) of untreated and thermally-treated teak heartwood and sapwood for different sorption conditions at 21 oC. 

The standard error is given in parentheses. Means followed by the same letters are not significantly different at the 5 % probability level. Uppercase letters: mean comparisons between wood types, for each temperature and RH separately. Lowercase letters: mean comparisons among thermal treatments within a column.

The difference in EMC between untreated samples and both treated woods (180 °C or 200 oC), increased as RH increased from 33 % to 86 %, for both heartwood and sapwood (Figure 2). The most important decrease in EMC occurred at 200 ºC. The 200 °C-treated wood had lower holocellulose and α-cellulose contents (Table 4) and higher total extractive content (by-products formed during thermal degradation) (Table 3) than other treatments. These chemical modifications may explain the lowest EMC of 200 ºC-treated heartwood and sapwood compared to the other treatments. Other studies have reported reductions in EMC of teak wood thermally-treated at 160 ºC (Lengowski 2011, Bellon 2013).

Generally, the sapwood had higher EMC than the heartwood after the heat treatments (Table 6, Figure 2). This is due to the higher holocellulose and α-cellulose contents in sapwood (Table 4) which are the most hygroscopic polymers of cell walls. The higher extractive content of treated heartwood could also affect the EMC because they decrease the wood hygroscopicity.

Figure 2: Equilibrium moisture content (EMC) in desorption of untreated and thermally-treated teak wood as a function of relative humidity (RH) at 21 °C. 

Shrinkage

The results of untreated samples confirmed that teak wood presents low values of partial and total shrinkages compared to other tropical hardwoods (FPL 2010). As expected, untreated heartwood had lower total and partial linear and volumetric shrinkages than untreated sapwood at all moisture sorption conditions. The total βT, βR, βL, and βV of heartwood were of 4,6 %, 2,6 %, 0,5 %, and 7,7 % while those of untreated sapwood were of 5,2 %, 3,3 %, 0,5 %, and 8,8 %, respectively (Table 7). However, given the very low values, no significant difference was found between heartwood and sapwood for βL. These results are similar to those reported by Miranda et al. (2011) to 50-70 years-old teak wood, which were 5,2 %, 3,5 %, and 7,6 % (mean from pith to bark) for βT, βR, and βV, respectively. The lower shrinkage in heartwood is attributed to the high extractive content observed in this wood type (Hernández 2007b, Jankowska et al. 2017).

Table 7: Means of the shrinkage of untreated and thermally-treated teak heartwood and sapwood for different sorption conditions at 21 oC. 

The standard error is given in parentheses. Means followed by the same letters are not significantly different at the 5 % probability level. Uppercase letters: mean comparisons between wood types within a row, for each RH separately. Lowercase letters: mean comparisons among temperatures within a column, for each shrinkage type separately.

The ANOVAs showed a significant effect of the wood type and the thermal treatment on the linear (except for βL) and volumetric shrinkages for almost all moisture sorption conditions. The wood type showed a more important effect on partial and total shrinkages compared to the temperature treatment (Table 5). The thermal treatment decreased partial shrinkage in both heartwood and sapwood, however, this effect would be more important in sapwood (Table 7, Figure 3). Total linear and volumetric shrinkages also decreased with the thermal treatments for both wood types but this effect would be more important in heartwood (Table 7). At 200 ºC, the βT of the heartwood and sapwood decreased respectively by 41 % and 29 %, βR decreased by 35 % and 36 % and βV decreased by 39 % and 31 %, compared to untreated woods.

Figure 3: Volumetric shrinkage (βv) of teak wood as a function of relative humidity (RH) at 21 °C. 

The effects of the thermal treatment were more important in βT than in βR. However, βL was not affected neither by the wood type nor the thermal treatment (Table 5). The greater dimensional variations of the wood occur in the tangential direction from 2,4 % to 11 % followed by radial direction from 3,5 % to 5 % while those in the longitudinal direction are almost negligible from 0,1 % to 0,6 % (Kollmann and Côté Jr. 1968). Several factors can explain the anisotropy of wood such as anatomical and chemical structure, mainly due to restriction of rays in the radial direction and the helical arrangement of the cellulose microfibrils in the cell wall (Kollmann and Côté Jr. 1968). Nevertheless, the relationships between anatomical structure, chemical composition, extractive content, and density cause variations in shrinkage and swelling among wood species.

The hygroscopic and dimensional stability of teak wood were improved after thermal treatment. The increase in the temperature treatment resulted in a decrease of the EMC. The S-ratio was calculated from the EMC-RH curve in the highest sorption linear range from 76 % to 33 % RH (Figure 2). The S-ratio was higher in sapwood than in heartwood in all thermal treatments (Table 8). It clearly shows that sapwood is more sensitive to RH changes than heartwood. These results can be explained by the higher holocellulose and α-cellulose contents in sapwood compared to heartwood (Table 4) and also by the lower natural extractive content in the untreated sapwood (Table 2). The caoutchouc found in the cell walls and lumens is responsible for the greater hydrophobicity of teak heartwood (Yamamoto et al. 1998) which has higher concentrations than that of the sapwood (Lopes et al. 2018). The highest decrease in the S-ratio was found with the 200 °C treatment in both wood types (heartwood and sapwood), which could be explained by the greater chemical changes.

Table 8: Ratio of sorption (S), coefficient of shrinkage (h), and estimated fiber saturation point (FSP) of untreated and thermally-treated teak woods. 

Heartwood was more dimensional stable compared to sapwood in untreated and thermally-treated conditions. Thermally-treated woods showed lower h-coefficient values compared to untreated woods (Table 8), which means that the temperature treatments improve the dimensional stability for both wood types. For sapwood, the treatment at 200 °C was more efficient compared to 180 °C since it provided greater dimensional stability (h-lower coefficient). For heartwood, both temperature treatments resulted in a similar h-coefficient. The curve of the βv as a function of EMC from 33 % to 76 % RH was used to estimate the FSP by the intersection to zero shrinkage method for all samples (Figure 4). Sapwood exhibited a higher FSP than heartwood for all treatments. Heartwood FSP was similar to that found by Kokutse et al. (2010). The higher h-coefficient and higher FSP of the sapwood (Table 8) again show that it is less stable than heartwood and more prone to defects caused by the shrinkage of wood during drying. The greater dimensional stability of thermally-treated woods is due to lower hygroscopicity caused by chemical changes in the cell wall polymers which decrease the water absorption sites (mainly OH- groups), and consequently the FSP, and shrinkage (Priadi and Hiziroglu 2013). Overall, the improvement of the dimensional stability of teak wood with temperature treatments, as a result of the diminution of its hygroscopicity (EMC, S, and FSP) and changes in its dimensions (h-values) will optimize the utilization of the wood in several end-uses, such as outdoor furniture, decks, and indoor flooring.

Figure 4: Volumetric shrinkage (βv) of teak wood as a function of equilibrium moisture content (EMC) between 33 % and 76 % RH.  

Conclusions

The effects of thermal modification of teak heartwood and sapwood on the chemical components, EMC, and shrinkage at various RHs were investigated. The following conclusions can be drawn:

The untreated heartwood had higher extractive and Klason lignin contents than those of untreated sapwood, which exhibited higher holocellulose and α-cellulose contents.

The thermal modification decreased the holocellulose and α-cellulose contents in heartwood and sapwood and increased the acidity of wood. The degradation of hemicelluloses started at 180 ºC while that of α-cellulose started at 200 ºC.

Chemical changes were more important in the heartwood than in the sapwood.

The thermal modification reduced the EMC of heartwood and sapwood at sorption conditions from 33 % to 86 % RH. The sapwood was more sensitive to RH variations than heartwood, regardless of the temperature.

The thermal modification provided higher dimensional and hygroscopic stabilities to wood. Generally, the thermal treatment decreased the shrinkage of heartwood and sapwood, however, shrinkage in heartwood was more sensible to the temperature treatment compared to sapwood. Thermally-treated woods also exhibited lower S and FSP compared to untreated ones.

Overall, the results of this research lead to a better understanding of dimensional stability of teak wood from young fast-growing plantations after thermal treatment, which may help define, from a practical point of view, the optimal use of juvenile teak wood in different relative humidity conditions.

Acknowledgments

This work was carried out during Juliana Oliveira Lopes’s doctorate with the support of a scholarship from CAPES - Brazilian Federal Agency for Support and Evaluation of Graduate Education within the Ministry of Education of Brazil within the scope of the project “Physical-chemical characterization and surface wettability of the thermally-modified teak juvenile wood” and ELAP - Emerging Leaders in the Americas Program of Canada that funded a research internship at Laval University.

References:

ASTM. 2001. Standard test method for acid-insoluble lignin in wood. ASTM D1106-96. 2001. ASTM: West Conshohocken, PA, USA. https://www.astm.org/DATABASE.CART/HISTORICAL/D1106-96R01.htmLinks ]

ASTM. 2001. Standard test method for preparation of extractive-free wood. ASTM D1105-96.2001. ASTM: West Conshohocken, PA, USA . https://www.astm.org/DATABASE.CART/HISTORICAL/D1105-96R01.htm Links ]

Bhat, K.M.; Priya, P.B.; Rugmini, P. 2001. Characterisation of juvenile wood in teak. Wood Sci Technol 34(6): 517-532. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002260000067 [ Links ]

Bellon, K.R.R. 2013. Modificação térmica da madeira de três espécies de florestas plantadas pelo processo VAP HolzSysteme®. M.Sc. Dissertation, Federal University of Paraná, Curitiba, Brazil (in portuguese) https://acervodigital.ufpr.br/handle/1884/37706Links ]

Boonstra, M.J.; Van Acker, J.; Kegel, E.; Stevens, M. 2007. Optimisation of a two-stage heat treatment process: durability aspects. Wood Sci Technol 41(1): 31-57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00226-006-0087-4 [ Links ]

Darmawan, W.; Nandika, D.; Sari, R.K.; Sitompul, A.; Rahayu, I.; Gardner, D. 2015. Juvenile and mature wood characteristics of short and long rotation teak in Java. IAWA 36(4): 428-442. https://doi.org/10.1163/22941932-20150112 [ Links ]

Esteves, B.; Videira, R.; Pereira, H. 2011. Chemistry and ecotoxicity of heat-treated pine wood extractives. Wood Sci Technol 45(4): 661-676. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00226-010-0356-0 [ Links ]

Flórez, J.B.; Trugilho, P.F.; Lima, J.T.; Hein, P.R.G.; Silva, J.R.M. 2014. Characterization of young wood Tectona grandis L. F. planted in Brazil. Madera Bosques 20(1): 11-20. http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1405-04712014000100002Links ]

FAO. 2000. Reforestación y plantaciones forestales. http://www.fao.org/montes/foda/wforcong/PUBLI/PDF/V3S_T12.PDF Links ]

Forest Products Laboratory. FPL. 2010. Wood handbook-Wood as an engineering material. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory: Madison, WI. U.S. https://www.fpl.fs.fed.us/documnts/fplgtr/fpl_gtr190.pdf Links ]

Garcia, R.A.; Lopes, J.O.; Nascimento, A.M.; Latorraca, J.V.F. 2014. Color stability of weathered heat-treated teak wood. Maderas-Cienc Tecnol 16(4): 453-462. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-221X2014005000037 [ Links ]

Garcia, R.A.; Carvalho, A.M.; Latorraca, J.V.F.; Matos, J.L.M.; Santos, W.A.; Silva, R.F.M. 2012. Nondestructive evaluation of heat-treated Eucalyptus grandis Hill ex Maiden wood using stress wave method. Wood Sci Technol 46(1): 41-52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00226-010-0387-6 [ Links ]

Gašparík, M.; Gaff, M.; Kačík, F.; Sikora, A. 2019. Color and chemical changes in teak (Tectona grandis L. f.) and meranti (Shorea spp.) wood after thermal treatment. BioResources 14(2): 2667-2683. https://bioresources.cnr.ncsu.edu/resources/color-and-chemical-changes-in-teak-tectona-grandis-l-f-and-meranti-shorea-spp-wood-after-thermal-treatment/Links ]

Geffert, A.; Geffertova, J.; Dudiak, M. 2019. Direct method of measuring the pH value of wood. Forests 10(10): 852. https://doi.org/10.3390/f10100852 [ Links ]

Giebeler, E. 1983. Dimensional stabilization of wood by moisture-heat-pressure treatment. Holz Roh Werkst 41(3): 87-94. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02608498 [ Links ]

Govorčin, S.; Sinković, T.; Sedlar, T. 2010. Dimensional stability of olive (Olea europaea L.) and teak (Tectona grandis L.). Drvna Industrija 61(3): 169-173. https://hrcak.srce.hr/file/88588 Links ]

Hernández, R.E; Pontin, M. 2006. Shrinkage of three tropical hardwoods below and above the fiber saturation point. Wood Fiber Sci 38(3): 474-483.https://wfs.swst.org/index.php/wfs/article/view/1233 Links ]

Hernández, R.E. 2007a. Moisture sorption properties of hardwoods as affected by their extraneous substances, wood density, and interlocked grain. Wood Fiber Sci 39(1):132-145. https://wfs.swst.org/index.php/wfs/article/view/1008 Links ]

Hernández, R.E. 2007b. Swelling properties of hardwoods as affected by their extraneous substances, wood density, and interlocked grain. Wood Fiber Sci 39(1):146-158. https://wfs.swst.org/index.php/wfs/article/view/203Links ]

International ThermoWood Association. 2003. ThermoWood® Handbook. Helsinki, Finland. https://cfpwoods.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/CFP-Woods-Thermowood-Handbook-2020.pdf Links ]

Jankowska, A.; Drożdżek, M.; Sarnowski, P.; Horodeński, J. 2017. Effect of extractives on the equilibrium moisture content and shrinkage of selected tropical woods. BioResources 12(1):597-607. https://doi.org/10.15376/biores.12.1.597-607 [ Links ]

Kakavas, K.V.; Chavenetidou, M.; Birbilis, D. 2018. Chemical properties of Greek stump chestnut (Castanea sativa Mill.). Nat Prod Chem Res 6(4):1-4. https://www.longdom.org/open-access/chemical-properties-of-greek-stump-chestnut-castanea-sativa-mill-2329-6836-1000331.pdf Links ]

Kartikawati, A.; Wahyudi, I.; Pari, G.; Karlinasari, L. 2020. Color and dimensional stability of fast growing teakwood by mild pyrolysis and combination process. IOP Conf. Series: Materials Science and Engineering 935: 012014. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/935/1/012014 [ Links ]

Kim, J.Y.; Hwang, H.; Oh, S.; Kim, Y.S.; Kim, U.J.; Choi, J.W. 2014. Investigation of structural modification and thermal characteristics of lignin after heat treatment. Int J Biol Macromol 66: 57-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2014.02.013 [ Links ]

Kokutse, A.D.; Brancheriau, L.; Chaix, G. 2010. Rapid prediction of shrinkage and fibre saturation point on teak (Tectona grandis) wood based on near-infrared spectroscopy. Ann For Sci 67: 403. https://doi.org/10.1051/forest/2009123 [ Links ]

Kokutse, A.D.; Stokes, A.; Baillères, H.; Kokou, K.; Baudasse, C. 2006. Decay resistance of Togolese teak (Tectona grandis L. f.) heartwood and relationship with colour. Trees 20(2): 219-223. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-005-0028-0 [ Links ]

Kollmann, F.F.P.; Côté, W.A. Jr. 1968. Principles of wood science and technology. I Solid wood. Springer-Verlag: Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany. https://www.springer.com/gp/book/9783642879302Links ]

Lelis, R. 1995. Zur Bedeutung der Kerninhaltsstoffe obligatorisch verkernter Nadelbaumarten bei der Herstellung von feuchtebeständigen und biologisch resistenten Holzspanplatten, am Beispiel der Douglasie (Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirb.) Franco). Dissertation, Universität Göttingen, Germany. (in German) [ Links ]

Lengowski, E.C. 2011. Efeito da termorretificação nas propriedades anatômicas, físico-mecânicas e químicas das madeiras de Pinus taeda, Eucalyptus grandis e Tectona grandis. Monography, Federal University of Paraná, Curitiba, Brazil. (in Portuguese) [ Links ]

Li, M.Y.; Cheng, S.-C.; Li, D.; Wang, S.-N.; Huang, A.M.; Sun, S.Q. 2015. Structural characterization of steam-heat treated Tectona grandis wood analyzed by FT-IR and 2D-IR correlation spectroscopy. Chinese Chem Lett 26(2): 221-225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cclet.2014.11.024 [ Links ]

Lopes, J.O. 2012. Uniformity and stability of color of the heat-treated Tectona grandis L. f. wood. Dissertation, Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro, Seropédica, Brazil (in Portuguese). https://tede.ufrrj.br/jspui/handle/jspui/1530 Links ]

Lopes, J.O.; Garcia, R.A.; Nascimento, A.M.; Latorraca, J.V.F. 2014. Color uniformization of the young teak wood by heat treatment. Rev Árvore 38(3): 561-568. http://www.scielo.br/pdf/rarv/v38n3/v38n3a19.pdf Links ]

Lopes, J.O.; Garcia, R.A.; Souza, N.D. 2018. Infrared spectroscopy of the surface of thermally-modified teak juvenile wood. Maderas-Cienc Tecnol 20(4): 737-746. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-221X2018005041901 [ Links ]

Miranda, I.; Sousa, V.; Pereira, H. 2011. Wood properties of teak (Tectona grandis) from a mature unmanaged stand in East Timor. J Wood Sci 57(3): 171-178. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10086-010-1164-8 [ Links ]

Motta, J.P; Oliveira, J.T. S.; Paes, J.B.; Alves, R.C.; Vidaurre Dambroz, G.B. 2013. Natural resistance of Tectona grandis wood in laboratory assay. Cienc Rural 43(8): 1393-1398. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-84782013005000097 [ Links ]

de Moura, L.F.; Brito, J.O.; Silva Júnior, F.G. 2012. Effect of thermal treatment on the chemical characteristics of wood from Eucalyptus grandis W. Hill ex Maiden under different atmospheric conditions. Cerne 18(3): 449-455. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-77602012000300012 [ Links ]

Niamké, F.B.; Amusant, N.; Charpentier, J.-P.; Chaix, G.; Baissac, Y.; Boutahar, N.; Adima, A.A.; Kati-Coulibaly, S.; Jay-Allemand, C. 2011. Relationships between biochemical attributes (non-structural carbohydrates and phenolics) and natural durability against fungi in dry teak wood (Tectona grandis L. f.). Ann Forest Sci 68(1): 201-211. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13595-011-0021-2 [ Links ]

Noack, D.; Schwab, E., Bartz, A. 1973. Characteristics for a judgment of the sorption and swelling behavior of wood. Wood Sci Technol 7(3): 218-236. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF00355552Links ]

Passialis, C.; Voulgaridis, E.; Adamopoulos, S.; Matsouka, M. 2008. Extractives, acidity, buffering capacity, ash and inorganic elements of black locust wood and bark of different clones and origin. Holz Roh Werkst 66(6):395-400. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00107-008-0254-4 [ Links ]

Priadi, T.; Hiziroglu, S. 2013. Characterization of heat treated wood species. Mater Design 49: 575- 582. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2012.12.067 [ Links ]

Priadi, T.; Suharjo, A.A.C.; Karlinasari, L. 2019. Dimensional stability and colour change of heat-treated Young teak Wood. International Wood Products Journal 10(3): 119-125 https://doi.org/10.1080/20426445.2019.1679430 [ Links ]

Poubel, D.S.; Garcia, R.A.; Santos, W.A.; Oliveira, G.L.; Abreu, H.S. 2013. Effect of the heat treatment on physical and chemical properties of Pinus caribaea wood. Cerne 19(3): 391-398. http://www.scielo.br/pdf/cerne/v19n3/05.pdfLinks ]

Skaar, C. 2012. Wood-water relations. Springer Science & Business Media: U.S.A. [ Links ]

Stamm, A. J. 1964. Wood and cellulose science. Ronald Press: New York. U.S.A [ Links ]

Statistic. 2010. Statistic software version 10.0. Statsoft. https://www.statistica.com/en/Links ]

Sundqvist, B. 2004. Colour changes and acid formation in wood during heating. Doctoral Thesis, Luleå University of Technology, Skellefteå, Sweden. https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:999349/FULLTEXT01.pdfLinks ]

Tsukamoto Filho, A.A.; Silva, M.L.; Couto, L.; Müller, M. D. 2003. Economic analysis of a teak plantation submitted to thinning. Rev Árvore 27(4): 487-494. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-67622003000400009 [ Links ]

Tsoumis, G.T. 1991. Science and technology of wood: structure, properties, utilization. Verlag Kessel: Remagen-Oberwinter, Germany. [ Links ]

Yamamoto, K.; Simatupang, M.H.; Hashim, R. 1998 Caoutchouc in teak wood (Tectona grandis L. f.): formation, location, influence on sunlight irradiation, hydrophobicity and decay resistance. Holz Roh Werkst 56(3): 201-209. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001070050299 [ Links ]

Weaver, P.L. 1993. Tectona grandis L. f. Teak. Verbenaceae. Verbena family. USDA Forest Service, International Institute of Tropical Forestry. https://www.fs.fed.us/global/iitf/pubs/sm_iitf064%20%20(18).pdf Links ]

Weiland, J.J.; Guyonnet, R. 2003. Study of chemical modifications and fungi degradation of thermally modified wood using DRIFT spectroscopy. Holz Roh Werkst 61(3): 216-220. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00107-003-0364-y [ Links ]

Received: February 15, 2021; Accepted: January 04, 2022

Corresponding author: Rosilei.Aparecida-Garcia@sbf.ulaval.ca

Creative Commons License This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License