## Servicios Personalizados

## Revista

## Articulo

## Indicadores

- Citado por SciELO
- Accesos

## Links relacionados

- Citado por Google
- Similares en SciELO
- Similares en Google

## Compartir

## Ciencia e investigación agraria

##
*versión On-line* ISSN 0718-1620

### Cienc. Inv. Agr. v.37 n.1 Santiago abr. 2010

#### http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-16202010000100001

*Cien. Inv. Agr. 37(1):5-15. 2010 *

**RESEARCH PAPER**

**An assessment of volume-ratio functions for Eucalyptus globulus and E. nitens in Chile**

**Funciones de razón de volumen para Eucalyptus globulus y Eucalyptus nitens en Chile**

**Horacio Gilabert, and Carlos Paci**

Facultad de Agronomía e Ingeniería Forestal, Pontifcia Universidad Católica de Chile. Vicuña Mackenna 4860. Macul, Santiago, Chile.

**Abstract**

Volume-ratio and total volume models for *Eucalyptus nitens *and *E. globulus *grown in southern Chile were ftted independently. The validation process considered the bias and the total error in the volume estimates, as well as the age classes close to thinning and harvesting operations. Volume estimates from the system of functions (volume and ratio) were compared to the volume estimates from a taper function (Bruce model) to estimate the volume at different top stem diameters. The results indicated that general (as opposed to local) logarithmic functions performed better in their estimation of the total volume for both species, while a unique polynomial model was the best model for the ratio estimates for both *Eucalyptus *species. The system of functions (total volume + ratio models) was an unbiased estimator for a top stem diameter of 5 and 10 cm for *E. nitens, *and was a slightly biased estimator for *E*. *globulus*. Estimates of the volume of top stems with 18 cm diameters had a large bias and a large total error for both species. These total errors were generally related to errors in the total volume function rather than to errors in the ratio estimates. When the volume estimates were compared with estimates from a taper function, the volumne-ratio system performed better for *E*. *nitens *while the taper function performed better for *E*. *globulus*.

**Key words: ***Eucalyptus*, models, timber products estimates, volume-ratio functions.

**Resumen**

Se calibraron modelos de razón de volumen y de volumen total para Eucalyptus nitens y Eucalyptus globulus en el sur de Chile. Los modelos fueron ajustados en forma independiente y fueron sometidos a una validación tradicional. Esta validación consideró el sesgo y error total en estimaciones de volumen de productos considerando distintos índices de utilización o diámetros límite. Asimismo, las estimaciones de volumen de productos del sistema de razón de volumen fueron comparadas con las estimaciones de un modelo de ahusamiento (modelo de Bruce). Los resultados indican que funciones generales (comparadas con funciones locales) del logaritmo del volumen entregan mejores estimaciones del volumen total para ambas especies, mientras que un único modelo polinomial estima en mejor forma la razón de volumen en ambas especies. El sistema de funciones (modelos de volumen total + razón) estima insesgadamente volúmenes a diámetros límite de 5 y 10 cm para E. nitens y con un ligero sesgo para E. globulus. Para volúmenes a un diámetro límite de 18 cm las magnitudes de sesgo y error total son muy altas para ambas especies. Se encontró que estos errores totales están más relacionados con los errores en las estimaciones de volumen total que con los errores en las estimaciones de la razón de volumen. Cuando se comparan las estimaciones de volumen con la del modelo de ahusamiento se encontró que el sistema de razón de volumen tiene mejores estimaciones para E. nitens, pero para E. globulus las estimaciones del modelo de ahusamiento son mejores.

**Palabras clave**: Eucalyptus, modelos, estimaciones de productos madereros, volumen de productos.

**Introduction**

Over the last decade, technology has improved considerably in the exotic species plantation forest sector in Chile, especially with regard to wood processing and utilization. This improvement has mainly been due to a focus on export markets where there is a growing demand for diverse and high-quality log products. In this scenario, the concept of product volume replaces the total timber volume as the primary standard indicator for stand quality.

Changes in forest product demands combined with recent increases in the planted area have pushed the national ranking of the *Eucalyptus *sector. The total area that is now planted in managed Eucalyptus plantations is the second largest planted area in Chile. There is now a need to develop information systems for forest planning to meet the demands of this growing industry. The estimation of commercial volumes present in a stand represents a very important piece of information for the short-term and long-term planning harvest, pruning and valuation of the operation.

At the level of the tree, there have traditionally been three methodological solutions to solve the problem of products volume estimation (Prodan *et al.*, 1997): (i) functions for the tree volume at different limit diameters; (ii) taper functions (TF); and (iii) volume ratio functions (VRF).

The VRFs correspond to a system of equations with two functions operating jointly to estimate the tree product volumes. The system is developed with a traditional volume function (local or general) that estimates the total volume (v) of the tree and a function for the volume ratio (Alemdag, 1988; Amateis *et al.*, 1986; Cao *et al.*, 1980). The volume ratio function estimates the proportion of the total volume (R) that is accumulated at a specifc top diameter or commercial height; the coeffcients of the volume ratio are generally estimated through regression analysis. The ratio function uses the top diameter or the commercial height, the diameter at 1.3 m, the total tree height, and in some cases the stump height, as the predictor variables. The commercial volume that is then calculated is the product of the proportion factor and the total stem volume (Alemdag, 1988). Equations conforming to VRFs are generally ftted separately and independently using the same set of data (Lynch, 1986); recent approaches also consider autocorrelation among measurements taken from the same tree (gregoire and Schabenberg-er, 1996).

The development of VFRs is based on analyzing the volumetric content of two trees that are identical in shape and therefore possess proportional dimensions. For each (d_{i}/d) or (h_{i}/h) relation there is only one (v_{i}/v) relation (Alemdag, 1988). It is therefore possible to calculate the products volume within a stem using the total volume and the proportion of a certain top stem diameter by using the independent variables that were previously described. The relationship among the diameters and the superior stem heights is proportional when the tree shape is constant. This principle is illustrated in Figure 1, which shows the proportionality among the diameters measured at height (DE and gH) and basal diameters (AB and AF). This same proportionality is repeated among the distances between the tree apex and the height measurements at the diameters DE and gH (ℓ_{1} y ℓ_{2}) and the trees heights (H_{1} and H_{2}).

VRFs have traditionally not been used in Chile because product estimation in plantation forestry (the most developed forest sector) is conducted using taper functions, which are generally more versatile and fexible than VRFs. In addition, VRFs provide volume estimations for logs with specifc lengths and minimum diameters. Despite these characteristics, taper functions also have limitations since they sometimes cause considerable errors in the estimation of stem volumes and they tend to be poor estimates at the extremes of the tree (i.e., the tip and the stump) (Newberry *et al, *1985). These functions often yield biased estimates for important attributes such as volume and the diameters at different stem sizes since the dependent variable in the regression model for a taper equation is a relative diameter or a relative squared diameter.

VRFs are considered an alternative to volume functions that have a series of disadvantages for different top limit diameters (i.e., taper functions). Problems associated with top limit functions include the generation of inconsistencies when estimating the commercial volume at different top diameters, infexibility in the process and the large number of functions that must be managed. VRFs allow for a different approach to product volume estimation than taper functions do when the relevant volume is defned on a limit diameter basis without establishing restrictions on the log length, such as the stand pulpwood volume.

The objective of this work was to propose and validate volume ratio functions (VRF) to estimate tree volumes at different utilization diameters for *Eucalyptus *species (*E. globulus *and *E. nitens*) in Chile, and to compare the estimates of product volumes from these functions with the estimates of the Bruce taper function.

**Material and methods**

*Nomenclature*

The following nomenclature is used in this document: d, stem diameter (cm) with bark at 1.3 m of height from the ground; d_{i}, stem diameter (cm) without bark, measured at stem height h_{i}; h, total height (m) of the tree; h_{i}, height (m) from the ground where the stem diameter is d_{i}; v, total stem volume (m^{3}) without bark, calculated with the function of volume; v_{i}, volume (m^{3}) without bark up to diameter d_{i} or height h_{i}; r_{i}, proportion (ratio) of total stem volume (m^{3}) up to a limit diameter of utilization d_{i}; b_{i}, regression coeff-cient; i, sub-index.

*Data*

The data that was used for ftting and validating the models included tree measurements form juvenile and adult stands in *Eucalyptus *plantations (*E. globulus *and *E. nitens*) in the South of Chile. The descriptive statistics of the data from the tree and the cross-cut section levels for both species are shown in Table 1.

*Selection of a volume ratio model*

The general selection strategy considered the frst developmental stage where the total volume and the VRFs were ftted separately by specie. The tested models were extracted from the literature. Once the best function, or functions from each group, was selected, the full estimation system was validated. For example, volumes at different top diameters were estimated with both functions operating together.

The following set of functions was ftted in order to select the best model from each group, which was then validated using a ranking system (Prodan *et al.*, 1997; Norambuena and La-roze, 1996; Avery and Burkhart, 1994; Martin, 1992; Amateis *et al.*, 1986):

For each of these models, a set of statistics for the goodness of ft and for the predictive ability was calculated. These statistics were then used to produce the relative arrangement that defnes the ranking system. An integer grade was assigned to each model according to its position after the models were sorted; the lowest grade was assigned to the best model and the highest grade was assigned to the worst model based on the interpretation of the individual statistics. For example, the model with the best adjusted coeffcient of determination R_{aj}^{2} (highest) would obtain a grade of 1, the second best model would be given a grade of 2, and so on. This sorting and grading was performed with each model type. The goodness of ft criteria that were used included the adjusted coeffcient of determination (R^{2}aj) and the graphical analysis of the residues that were used to determine heteroscedasticity. The predictive ability criteria included the mean squared error (ECM%) and the mean difference ( D I FA%):

The indicators of the DIFA% and the ECM% were calculated for the total stem volume for the total volume models, as well as for the volume ratio in the ratio models. The ECM% is a measurement of the total estimation error (systematic + random error), while the DIFA% accounts for the expected bias of the estimates (systematic error).

The model fts were calculated independently for each model and for each species using the entire data set in SAS® (SAS Institute, 2001). The Ordinary Least Square (OLS) method was used for the estimation of the parameters in each model as well as for the coeffcients for each parameter, the R_{aj}^{2}, and the signifcance of the parameter estimators (t-Student) generated for each candidate model. Residual plots were also developed to detect problems of heteroscedasticity and normal- the models were evaluated considering the gen-plots in an effort to ensure the normality of the eral predictive performance for each commer-regression residuals. The presence of clear het- cial volume. This process generated an overall eroskedasticity in a model removed it from use, picture of each model. regardless of its position in the ranking.

*Comparison of the volume ratio model with the Bruce taper function*

**Results and discussion**

*Fit and selection of the total volume functions*

Once the best model for the volume ratio (functions of the total volume and the ratio) was selected, the model was compared with the predictions of the same system determined using a taper function - the standard method used by the majority of forest frms in their processing systems. For this purpose, the model selected for each species was used to calculate the volume up to the utilization indexes of 5, 10, and 18 cm (v_{5}, v_{10} and v_{18}, respectively). Likewise, the estimates for the coeffcients of the Bruce taper function (Prodan *et al., *1997) were calculated using the same trees that were used to ft the total volume and the volume ratio functions. The Bruce taper function of was as follows:

This function was used to estimate the previously mentioned volumes. After these three utilization index volumes were estimated, the ECM% and the DIFA% for each prediction system was calculated. With these parameters estimated, it was possible to compare the predictions form the taper function and the predictions from the total volume and the volume ratio models. During the validation stage, only the trees whose diameter at the breast height (d) exceeded the index of utilization were considered. Initially,

The process of ftting and selecting the equations was conducted simultaneously for both *Eucalyptus *species. Table 2 shows the coeff-cients of the total volume models.

The test parameters established in the selection system by using the rankings for the total volume functions selected Model 6 (M6) (log v=b_{0}+b_{1}log(d^{2}h) ) for *E. nitens *and Model 5 (M5) (v=b_{1}d^{b1}h^{b2}) for *E. globulus *as the best models. The goodness of ft and the predictive ability statistics determined the selection of these volume models and they are summarized in Table 3.

A logarithmic model (M6) was selected for *E. ni-tens*, which included the diameter at 1.3 m (d) and the total stem height (h) as the predictor variables. The inclusion of both variables allows for a better representation of the stem volumes given the variability of the trees to which the model will be applied. The model selected for *E. nitens *presented a high coeffcient of determination R^{2}aj (close to 1), which indicates a good ft to the data as measured by the percentage of the explained variability in the dependent variable. A very low bias was obtained with this model, as seen by the DIFA% value of +0.82%. The ECM% (13.3%) is within the reasonable ranges for this type of model.

For *E. globulus*, a logarithmic model (M5) was also selected with d and h as the predictor variables. The indicator of the goodness of ft R^{2}aj also achieved a value close to 1. This model presented DIFA% and ECM% values that can be considered as high (above 2% and 20%, respectively). However, this model performed better according to the strict application of the ranking system.

Figure 2 shows the residuals of the total volume models 2 and 3 plotted against the estimated value of the dependent variable. These models presented evidence of heteroscedasticity for both *Eucalyptus *species (EN=*E. globulus*, EN=*E. nitens*). Figure 3 shows the same plots for the residuals of volume in M5 and M6, which were the models selected where no evidence of het-eroscedasticity was observed. Models 1 and 4 presented patterns similar to the patterns of the models shown in Figure 3.

These plots were used to detect the non-random patterns in the residuals. Models 2 and 3 (Figure 2) showed the characteristic pattern of a funnel for both species - a signature of heteroscedas-ticity in the regression residuals. All of the other models showed the expected random patterns in the residual plots.

*Fit and selection of a volume ratio model*

Following the same procedure that was used for the total volume equations, the coeffcients for the volume ratio models were estimated. Table 4 shows the coeffcient estimates for these models.

Models 1, 2 and 4 were previously reported and Model 3 was proposed in order to eliminate the variables that generated multicollinearity, as observed in Model 2. Once the coeffcients for all of the models were estimated, the statistics of goodness of ft and the predictive ability were calculated (Table 5).

The system of the rankings selected Model 3 (r = 100+b_{3}X^{3}+b_{4}X^{4}+b_{5}X^{5}+b_{6}X^{6}) as the best model for both *Eucalyptus *species. Model 3 is a polynomial model and includes the diameter of reference d (dbh) and the merchantable diameter or index of utilization d_{i} as the independent variables. The explicit inclusion of d_{i} provided a remarkable fexibility for the estimation of different forest products as specifed by the top diameter. The model performed acceptably for both Eucalyptus species, with an adequate goodness of ft and low errors in estimation and in bias (Table 5).

*Validation of the selected functions*

The validation process was conducted using the estimation system composed of the best volume equation and the best volume ratio model for each species. The frst stage considered the estimation of the DIFA% and the ECM% for the volume estimation at the utilization indices of 5, 10 and 18 cm (v_{5}, v_{10} and v_{18}). The values of DIFA% and ECM% for this validation stage are indicated in Table 6.

In *E. nitens, *the estimations were satisfactory for v_{5} and v_{10}, and the system can be considered unbiased for these volumes. However, for v_{18} the estimations were completely biased with large, unacceptable levels of error. Considerable caution should therefore be used for the volume estimates at top diameters as high as 18 cm when estimating using this system of functions. These high levels of error were probably infuenced by the low number of observations (n=30) used in the estimation for v_{18}; in this regard, the comparison was provided as a reference only.

For *E. globulus, *the estimations had signifcant error levels for all of the index diameters; thus, the system could be considered as biased. For the v_{5} and v_{10} estimations, the bias may be regarded as moderate, but for the v_{18} estimations, as in the previous case, the use of the system is not recommendable given the size of the errors.

It seems reasonable to consider the quality of the estimations from this system to be composed of the quality of the two functions (ftted independently with errors that may be compensated for or not). When the values of the DIFA% and the ECM% for the volume functions selected in Table 3 (Model 5 and 6 for *E. globulus *and *E. nitens*, respectively) and the volume ratio functions in Table 5 (Model 3 for both species) were observed and compared with the DIFA% and ECM% values for v_{5}, v_{10} and v_{18} estimations in Table 6, it was observed that volume estimates errors at different index diameters were associated with the errors of the individual functions. The independent DIFA% and ECM% values for the estimations of the total volume and for the ratio functions were always in the same range of magnitude and had the same sign as the errors in the volume estimations at index diameters, with the exception of the errors for v_{18}. The magnitude of the estimation errors for the system that modeled the *E. globulus *volume for these index diameters might be explained by the bias and the total error in the total volume and the volume ratio functions. The same relationships between the estimation errors can explain the magnitude of the errors in the volume estimated at different index diameters for *E. nitens*.

As a fnal validation for the functions, the system estimations of the volumes for the index diameters were compared with the estimations from the Bruce taper function (Prodan *et al.*, 1997) that was ftted with the same information used in the system functions. The ECM% and the DIFA% statistics were calculated for v_{5}, v_{10 }and v (Table 7).

Table 7 and its comparison with Table 6 show that the system of functions yielded better volume estimates than the taper model only for *E. nitens*, where the DIFA% and ECM% indicate a much better prediction performance as compared to the taper function. However, the DIFA% and ECM% values for the taper function were still rather high. For *E. globulus*, the taper function provides volume estimates that are slightly better than the system of functions for v_{5} and slightly poorer than the estimates for v_{10}. However, these estimations were unsatisfactory, since the DIFA% was only under 2% for the v_{5}; all of the values that were positive (subestimation) and the ECM% that were above 20%, a level that was considered beyond the acceptable limits.

According to the results obtained, the models of the volume ratio estimated commercial volumes adequately only in some cases. The results of this work indicate that the quality of commercial volume estimates was dependent, to a great extent, on (i) the number of trees involved in the coeffcients estimates, and (ii) the estimation of quality for the individual functions (total volume and ratio) comprising the volume ratio system. In this work, the volume estimates for the utilization indices at 5 and 10 cm were satisfactory only in some cases (*E. nitens*). The estimates for the utilization index at 18 cm were unsatisfactory in all of the cases, partly because of the reduced number of trees that had a commercial volume for this particular utilization index.

From the comparative analysis for *E. nitens, *it was possible to conclude that the system of volume ratio has a better performance than the taper function. For *E. globulus *the opposite was true, but the differences were marginal.

The general trend for both *Eucalyptus *species was that poorer volume estimates were obtained for larger indices of utilization. This scenario suggested a decreasing model capacity when the calibration database lacks information on individuals with the commercial volume that was being estimated. The loss of model quality when estimating larger forest products indicated weakness in the model at lower sections of the stem.

It is important to highlight the strong impact that the total volume estimates have on the quality of the prediction when using the system of volume ratio functions. This situation was observed mainly for *E. globulus *as a strong bias that was transferred from the equation of the total volume into the system of function estimates. For *E. nitens*, the function for the total volume presented lower biases and, thus, the total volume function did not generate major errors in the commercial volume estimates.

The models presented in this paper represent important tools that can be used in the estimation of pulpwood products. Likewise, exploring and ftting methods that take into account the interactions between functions of the total volume and ratio is recommended. Strictly speaking, their parameters should be estimated simultaneously, or should consider the autocorrelation that exists among the data from the same tree. These approximations will be covered in a future study.

**References**

Alemdag, I.S. 1988. A ratio method for calculating stem volume to variable merchantable limits, and associated taper equations. The Forestry Chronicle 64:18-26.

Amateis, R.L., H.E. Burkhart, and T.E. Burk. 1986. A ratio approach to predicting merchantable yields of unthinned loblolly pine plantations. Forest Science 32:287-296.

Avery, T.E., and H.E. Burkhart. 1994. Forest Measurement. Fourth ed. Mcgraw-Hill, NY, USA. 408 pp.

Cao, Q.V., H.E. Burkhart, and T.A. Max. 1980. Evaluation of two methods for cubic-volume predictions of loblolly pine to any merchantable limits. Forest Science 26:71-80.

Gregoire, T.g., and O. Schabenberger. 1996. Nonlinear mixed-effects modeling of cumulative bole volume with spatially correlated within-tree data. Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environ mental Statistics 1:107-119.

Lynch, T.B. 1986. Total cubic volume equations implied by diameter-based merchantable to total volume ratio models. Forest Science 32:262-267.

Martin, L.F. 1992. Construcción de Modelos de Razón de Volumen. Tesis Ingeniería Forestal. Facultad de Ciencias Forestales, Universidad Austral de Chile. Valdivia, Chile. 88 pp.

Newberry, J.D., and H.E . Burkhart . 1985. Variable - form stem profle models for Loblolly pine. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 16:109-114.

Norambuena, A. 1996. Funciones de Ahusamiento para Plantaciones de *Eucalyptus globulus *en la Provincia de Valdivia, Décima Región. Tesis Ingeniería Forestal. Facultad de Ciencias Forestales, Universidad Austral de Chile. Valdivia. Chile. 98 pp.

Prodan, M., Peters, R., Cox, F., and P. Real. 1997. Mensura Forestal. Primera ed. IICA/gTZ, San José, Costa Rica. 586 pp.

Received 1 October 2008. Accepted 27 November 2008.

Corresponding author: __hgilab@uc.cl__