SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.60 issue1A NON-CENTROSYMMETRIC POLYMORPH OF 5-HYDROXY-7-METHOXY-2-PHENYLCHROMAN-4-ONE author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


Journal of the Chilean Chemical Society

On-line version ISSN 0717-9707

J. Chil. Chem. Soc. vol.60 no.1 Concepción Mar. 2015

http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0717-97072015000100021 

 

EFFECT OF THE AMOUNT OF WATER ON THE SYNTHESIS OF LiMn2O4, USED AS CATHODE MATERIAL IN LITHIUM-ION BATTERIES

 

F. HERRERA1*, E. YEDINAK1**, A. CABELLERO2, O. VARGAS2, J. L. GAUTIER1

1 LEFES, Departamento de Química de los Materiales, Facultad de Química y Biología, Universidad de Santiago de Chile, Av,. L.B. O'Higgins 3363, 7254758, Santiago, Chile
2
Departamento de Química Inorgánica e Ingeniería Química, Facultad de Ciencias, Campus Rabanales, Universidad de Córdoba, Crta de Madrid, km 36, 14071, Córdoba, España.
e-mail:francisco.herrera.d@usach.cl.


ABSTRACT

LiMn2O4 with nanostructured morphologies possess rapid kinetics which is favorable for the intercalation of lithium ions in battery electrodes1. In this work, we have studied the effect of varying the amount of water in the hydrothermal synthesis of nanostructured LiMn2O4 spinel. It was found that three distinct nanostructured morphologies of this compound are obtained when the volume of water used during the synthesis is varied. The powders were morphologically and structurally characterized using TEM, XRD, and BET yielding particle sizes ranging from 1 to 50 nm, with 90 % of the sample possessing a particle size of 21.7 nm. X-ray diffraction analysis show characteristic peaks and confirm the compound's identity and crystalline structure. Furthermore, the electrochemical behavior of this material in lithium ion batteries was studied. The results indicate that the electrochemical performance is strongly influenced by the size and shape of the (α-LiMn2O4 nanoparticles.


 

INTRODUCTION

In recent years, much research has focused on the synthesis of spinel LiMn2O4 as a potential candidate to replace lamellar oxides of Ni and Co which are often used as the cathode material in electronic devices such as lithiumion batteries. Particularly interesting has been the work of the Tarascon's group using LiMn2O4 as cathode who reported capacity of 120 mAh when the cell were cycled at a rate of 0.1C or 0.2C in the voltage range 0.9-4.1V at temperatures de 25 and 55oC2,3. The equilibrium properties of the cathode material can be affected by reduction of its size, which results in modification of the phase transformation behavior upon Li insertion/extraction. Reduction of the particle size of LiMn2O4 has been shown to change de mechanism of Li ion insertion from a two phase-transformation with a miscibility gap to a singlephase solid-state reaction4. A review about nanomaterials for rechargeable lithium batteries see ref 5.

In addition to these important features, LiMn2O4 with nanostructured morphologies possess rapid kinetics which are favorable for the intercalation of lithium ions in battery electrodes1. Currently, lithium ions represent a large share in the development of electronic products, particularly in electric vehicles. However, a key problem limiting the marketing of batteries based on LiMn2O4 is the severe electrochemical capacity loss during cycling6. Two main factors are cited for causing the gradual capacity loss of LiMn2O4: the JahnTeller distortion7-11 and the dissolution of manganese to Mn2+ from surface particles into the electrolyte12-16.

The morphology and surface area of the particles has a profound effect on the electrochemical properties of a material. Through the synthesis of electrode materials with nanoscale dimensions, the electrochemical performance of many materials has been greatly improved 17-21. In recent years, with the rapid development of nanostructure synthesis, electrode materials from mesoporous nanostructures have attracted much attention since it has been shown to provide a significant increase in rechargeable lithium ion battery performance with respect to energy density, life cycle, and speed performance 22-29. This comes as a direct consequence of a greater specific surface area leading to a concomitant increase in current density. Moreover, the walls of the pores are much thinner which implies a shorter route for the transport of lithium ions, thereby increasing the diffusion of Li+ ions. In addition, the pore walls can also act as a buffer layer to relieve the volume expansion of the electrode materials during lithiation/delithiation 30-31. The synthesis technique used in this work is complementary to ceramics, co-precipitation, frezee-drying, salts-hydrolysis, sputtering and spray pyrolysis techniques previously employed by our group in the synthesis of mixed oxides with spinel structure 33.

EXPERIMENTAL

The synthesis of ultrathin LiMn2O4 nanostructure particles was carried out in a two-stage synthesis. First, the α-MnO2 particles were synthesized. These were prepared using as precursor Mn(CH3COO)2, (NH4)2S2O8 and (NH4)2SO4 all Aldrich reagents, mixed in a molar ratio of 2:2:1, respectively, placed within a bomb Parr, using a solvothermal reaction at 140°C for 14 hours. The solvent used was a mixture of 40 mL octanol with x mL water, which is summarized in Table 1.

 

Table1: Summary of the synthesis conditions.

 

The next step in the synthesis was to obtain the LiMn2O4 phase using a solid state reaction between the α-MnO2 particles prepared in previous step, with the addition of LiOH in a molar ratio of 2:1, respectively, using ethanol as solvent. Subsequently, the precursor was heated to 400°C at a rate of 0.5°C/min, held at 400 °C for 30 min, then heated to 800°C at a rate of 5°C /min where the sample was then allowed to cool. The LiMn2O4 morphology was characterized by XRD, XPS, and TEM. For the electrochemical studies, the electrodes were prepared using a mixture of 80 wt% LiMn2O4 active material, 10 wt% conductive carbon black, and 10 wt% organic binder, PVDF. The as-prepared electrodes were tested against 2032 coin-type lithium cells. Electrochemical studies of charge/discharge were carried out in the potential range of 3.6 V to 4.5 V. In the following electrochemical results, all values are reported vs. the Li+/Li couple.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The hydrothermal synthesis employed is based on a mixture of polar (water) and nonpolar (octanol) solvents, allowing the formation of micelles that can act as nano-reactors inside which the desired product is generated. To optimize the different experimental variables, it was first proposed to study the effect of the amount of water added to the reaction mixture on the morphology of LiMn2O4 nanoparticles, since the morphology directly influences the electrochemical behavior of the electrode paste. The LiMn2O4 nanoparticles were characterized by XRD, which produced the diffraction pattern shown in Figure 1. The diffraction pattern shows present an important background noice. Nevertheless shows the characteristic signals corresponding to planes of a spinel type structure with the cubic phase (space group Fd3m 227, No. 35-0782 JCPDS data). This was consistent for all LiMn2O4 samples synthesized, regardless of the volume of water used during synthesis.

 

Fig. 1: XRD pattern of LiM2nO4 obtained for all
samples synthesized.

 

The size and surface area of the particles formed were estimated using the BET method. These results are shown in Figures 2A and 2B. Figure 2A depicts the distribution curve of the particle size determined by adsorption of N2 molecules. It was determined that 90% of LiMn2O4 particles have an average particle size of 21.7 nm. From the isotherm type I shown in Figure 2B, the surface area of the sample was determined to have an average value of 11.7 m2/g. These same trends have been observed for all samples synthesized.

 

Fig. 2. BET analysis of LiMn2O4 A) pore volume vs. pore diameter, B) volume of gas adsorbed
vs. relative pressure.

 

Figures 3A, 3B, and 3C show TEM images obtained for samples Li50, Li70, and Li90, respectively. It can be seen that the morphology of the particles varies depending on the volume of water using during the synthesis. The sample Li50 exhibits a hexagonal laminar type morphology, whereas the Li70 sample is characterized by a mixture of hexagonal and wire-like forms. In the case of the Li90 sample, only nanowire-like structure is observed. Contrary to the results obtained from XRD and BET analysis, where no significant discrepancies were observed as a result of the volume of water used during synthesis, a clear effect on the morphology is observed. The morphology also had a marked effect on the electrochemical behavior as show below.. The coin-type cells were cycled 200 consecutive times in a range between 3.6 V and 4.5 V versus a Li+/Li at a capacity rate of C/5.

 

Fig. 3: TEM imagen of (α-LiMn2O4 as obtained from hydrotermal reaction. (A) Li50, (b) Li70
y (c) Li90.

 

Figures 4A, 4B, and 4C represent the potential response as a function of the specific capacity for samples Li50, Li70, and Li90, respectively. It can be observed during the first 10th charging cycles, a characteristic curve for the LiMn2O4 spinel appears which exhibits two pseudo-plateau around 3.9 V and 4.2 V. These plateau have been assigned to the redox couple Mn3+/Mn4+. Furthermore, from Figures 4A and 4B, it can be seen that the specific capacity attains a maximum value of 7.5 mAh/g (at 4.5V), after which it begins to decrease with cycling. This may be due to insertion/extraction process becoming less reversible, causing a polarization of the battery. This phenomenon is reflected in Figures 4A and 4B by the increase in resistibility of the system. As a result, the amount of active material (Li+ ion) available for transportation from one electrode to another decreases for each charge-discharge cycle. This same trend was observed for the cell prepared with Li90, with a notable difference. As shown in Figure 4C, a significant increase in specific capacity occurs during 200 cycles, reaching a specific capacity of about 200 mAh/g.

 

Fig. 4. Galvanostatic response of (A) Li50, (B) Li70 and (C) Li90
samples obtained at different charge cycles: (-) 1er cycle (---)
5 cycle (.....) 10 cycle () 50 cycle (o) 100 cycle
and () 200
cycle. In Figure 4d, the specific capacity obtained at 200 cycle
is compared for each sample () Li50, (o) Li70 and () Li90.

 

Because XRD and BET analyses yield similar conclusions in all cases, indicating an appropriate methodology for synthesis and product homogeneity, a discussion of the notable difference in the electrochemical behavior must be centered with respect to the morphology of the active material. As mentioned, the sample Li90 was characterized principally by nanowire-like structures, which can act as a tunnel for the efficient intercalation of lithium ions. Further this should favor the diffusion compared to the other more amorphous structures.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study shows a clear relationship between the amount of water added to the reaction mixture and the morphology of spinel LiMn2O4 powder obtained. This study also confirmed a direct correlation between the type of morphology and the oxide electrochemical properties. It was found that LiMn2O4 powder with nanowire morphology shows a higher specific capacity (200 mAh/g) than other morphologies.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

In memory of Dr. Luis Nuñez. The support of the Chilean Agency CONI-CYT (Grant 1131019 Fondecyt) is gratefully acknowledged. J.L.G. also acknowledged to CIAM 20001.

 

REFERENCES

1. C.M. Hayner, X. Zhao, H.H. Kung in Annu. Rev. Chem. Biomol. Eng. 3 445 (2012) Materials for Rechargeable Lithium-Ion Batteries        [ Links ]

2. P. Poizot, S. Laruelle, S. Grugeon, L. Dupont, J.M Tarascon, J. Power Sources 235 97(2001)        [ Links ]

3. F. Badway, I. Plitz, S. Grugeon, S. Laruelle, L .Dupont, J.M. Tarascon, Electrochem. Solid-State Lett. 5 A115 (2002)        [ Links ]

4. J. Baxter, Z.X. Bian, G. Chen, D. Danielson, MS Dresselhaus , Energy Environ. Sci 2 559 (2009)        [ Links ]

5. P. Bruce, B. Scrosati, J.M. Tarascon, Angewandte Chemie 47, 2930 (2008)        [ Links ]

6. D. Singh, W.S. Kim, V. Craciun, H. Hofmann, R.K. Singh, Appl. Surf. Sci. 197/198 516(2002)        [ Links ]

7. E. Wolska, M. Tovar, B. Andrzejewski, W. Nowicki, J. Darul, P. Piszora, M. Knapp, Solid State Sci. 8 31(2006)        [ Links ]

8. S.R. Das, I.R. Fachini, S.B. Majumder, R.S. Katiyar, J. Power Sources 158 518(2006)        [ Links ]

9. M. Molenda, R. Dziembaj, E. Podstawka, W. Lasocha, L.M. Proniewicz, J.Phys. Chem. Solids 67 1347(2006)        [ Links ]

10. C.Q. Xu, Y.W. Tian, Y.C. Zhai, L.Y. Liu, Mater. Chem. Phys. 98 532(2006)        [ Links ]

11. K.Y. Chung, K.B. Kim, Electrochim. Acta 49 3327(2004)        [ Links ]

12. C. Li, H.P. Zhang, L.J. Fu, H. Liu, Y.P. Wu, E. Rahm, R. Holze, H.Q.Wu,Electrochim. Acta 51 3872(2006)        [ Links ]

13. J.S. Chen, L.F.Wang, B.J. Fang, S.Y. Lee, R.Z. Guo, J. Power Sources 157 515(2006)        [ Links ]

14. R. Benedek, M.M. Thackeray, Electrochem. Solid State Lett. 9 A265(2006)        [ Links ]

15. L.J. Fu, H. Liu, C. Li, Y.P. Wu, E. Rahm, R. Holze, H.Q. Wu, Solid State Sci. 8 113(2006)        [ Links ]

16. W. Choi, A. Manthiram, J. Electrochem. Soc. 153 1760(2006)        [ Links ]

17. H. Li, L.H. Shi. W. Lu, X.J. Huang, L.Q.J. Chen, Electrochem. Soc., 148 A915(2001)        [ Links ]

18. H. Li, X. Wu, L.Q. Chen, X.J. Huang, Solid State Ionics 149 185(2003)        [ Links ]

19. S.S. Zhang, M.S. Ding, K. Xu, J. Allen, T.R. Jow, Electrochem. Solid-State Lett. 4 A206(2001)        [ Links ]

20. H. Li, L.H. Shi, Q. Wang, L.Q. Chen, X,J, Huang, Solid State Ionics 148 247(2002).         [ Links ]

21. T. Doi, Y. Iriyama, T. Abe, Z. Ogumi, Z. Chem. Mater. 2005, 17, 1580 (2005)        [ Links ]

22. H.S. Zhou, S.M. Zhu, M. Hibino, I. Honma, M. Ichihara, Adv. Mater. 15 2107 (2003)        [ Links ]

23. S.M. Zhu, H.S. Zhou, T. Miyoshi, M. Hibino, I. Honma, M. Ichihara, Adv. Mater. 16 2012 (2004).         [ Links ]

24. E. Kim, D. Son, T.C. Kim, J. Cho, B. Park, K.S. Ryu, S.H. Chang, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 43 5987( 2004).         [ Links ]

25. P. Liu, S.H. Lee, C.E. Tracy, Y.F. Yan, J.A. Turner, Adv. Mater., 14 27(2002)        [ Links ]

26. H.S. Zhou, Lin, M. Hibino, I. Honma, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 44 797(2005)        [ Links ]

27. H.S. Zhou, H.S.; Lin, D.L.; Honma, I. Nat. Mater., 3 65( 2004)        [ Links ]

28. H.Y. Wang, H.Y.; Abe, T.; Maruyama, S.; Iriyama, Y.; Ogumi, Z.; Yoshikawa, K. Adv. Mater. 17 2857 (2005)        [ Links ]

29. M. Yoshio, M.; Wang, H.Y.; Fukuda, K. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 42 4203(2003)        [ Links ]

30. J. Yao, L.L. C. Shen, P. Zhang, K. Aguey-Zinsou, L. Wang, Ceramics Internat. 39 3359(2013)        [ Links ]

31. X. Zhou, M. Chen, H. Bai, C. Su, L. Feng, J. Guo, Vacuum 99 49(2014)        [ Links ]

32. X. Zhou, M. Chen, M. Xiang, H. Bari, J. Guo, Ceramics International 39 4783(2013)        [ Links ]

33. J.L. Gautier and J. Ortiz , in N. Alonso-Vante (Ed) Electroquímica y Electrocatálisis vol 1a, e-libro net 2002, Propiedades electrocatalíticas de óxidos mixtos de elementos de transición (Chapter 3) and references therein.         [ Links ]

 

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License