SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados




Links relacionados

  • En proceso de indezaciónCitado por Google
  • No hay articulos similaresSimilares en SciELO
  • En proceso de indezaciónSimilares en Google


Journal of the Chilean Chemical Society

versión On-line ISSN 0717-9707

J. Chil. Chem. Soc. vol.58 no.4 Concepción dic. 2013 





Departamento de Química, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile. * e-mail:


The solid solutions Cu2Fe1-XCoXSnS4, with stannite-type structure are stable up to about 800°C. The electrical properties of the Cu2Fe0.4Co0.6SnS4 ceramic were investigated by complex impedance. The real and imaginary dielectric permittivity dependence with the temperature were measured between 10kHz and 1 MHz in temperature range 77-280K, finding that the ceramic present the characteristics behavior of a dielectric relaxation between 100 and 250 K, with a maximum at approximately 200 K. The electric permittivity found has orders of magnitude between 102 and 103. A space charge polarization mechanism is suggested to explain the observed electric relaxation.

Key words: Quaternary sulfides, dielectric relaxation, stannite



Quaternary Cu2MIIMIVS4 sulfides have been the subject of a variety of research due to their interesting properties, which are technologically useful. Their potential technical applications include uses as nonlinear optics [1,2], photovoltaic absorbers [3-5], and thermoelectric materials at high temperature [6,7].

These sulfides are known as diamond semiconductor materials because they crystallize in the stannite structure derived from the diamond family [8,9]. The technological applications of these materials have made them the subjects of extensive studies to determine their physical properties, including the magnetic properties of these quaternary sulfides, particularly the stannite Cu2FeSnS4[10,11].

However, the electrical properties of these quaternary sulfides have been studied by various techniques. Using the Van der Pauw method on single crystals, the conductivities and the activation energies of Cu2CoGeS4 and Cu2MnSnS4 were determined, and the obtained conductivity values were 7.69 S/cm and 6.25 S/cm, respectively. The activation energy was found to be 0.03 eV at room temperature [1]. In a subsequent study using this same technique, it was determined that Cu2CdGeS4 also has an Ea = 0.03 eV [12]. In addition, using theoretical calculations it was estimated that the band gaps (Eg) were approximately 1.5 eV in Cu2ZnSnS4 and 1.0 eV in Cu2ZnSnSe4 [2,13]. Recently, a number solid solutions derived from Cu2ZnSnS4 (CZTS), due to their potential applications as absorbent photovoltaic solutions in solar cells have been the object of thin-film electrical characterization using the measurements of the Hall effect and photoluminescence, and they have been shown to reach efficiency up to 10.1% [3-5].

To study the dielectric character of this type of compound, it is necessary to use complex impedance measurements in samples that have been previously transformed into ceramics, which presents a challenge for this type of phase. The electroceramics are usually formed by oxides, and all of the thermal processes are carried out in air conditions. Publications describing electroceramics based on chalcogenides are rare because of the oxidation of these compounds. Previously, our group studied new solid solutions from different families of quaternary sulfide stannites, such as Cu2Mn1-xCoxSnS4 [14], Cu2MnxFe1-xSnS4 and Cu2Fe1-xCoxSnS4, and this last family is focus of the current study.

In this paper, we describe the preparation and characterization of the electroceramics from solid solutions of the type Cu2Fe1-xCoxSnS4 and its end-members, Cu2CoSnS4 and Cu2FeSnS4; in particular, the electrical behaviour of a Cu2Fe0.4Co0.6SnS4 ceramic was studied.


2.1 Synthesis

The polycrystalline Cu2Fe1-XCoXSnS4 compounds were prepared by direct combination of powders of the corresponding high purity elements (99.99%, Aldrich) in stoichiometric amounts. All manipulations were carried out under Argon atmosphere. The reaction mixture was sealed in evacuated quartz ampoules, placed in a programmable furnace, heated to 850 °C for about 72 hours, and then cooled by quenching in liquid nitrogen. The products appeared to be air- and moisture-stable over several weeks.

2.2 Powder X-ray diffraction measurements

Powder X-ray diffraction patterns were collected, at room temperature, on Siemens D5000 powder diffractometer, with CuKα radiation (λ = 1.541871 Å) in the range 5° < 2θ< 80°. The XRD patterns were indexed with the computer program CHECKCELL [15].

2.3 SEM-EDS analysis

The chemical compositions of the samples were determined by scanning electron microscopy with the aid of energy-dispersive X-ray analysis (SEM-EDS) using a JEOL 5400 system equipped with an Oxford LinK ISIS microanalyzer. The working distance was 35 mm and the accelerating voltage was set to 22.5 kV. Samples were mounted onto double-sided carbon tape, which was adhered to an aluminum specimen holder. EDS data were collected for 60 s. A FE-SEM FEI Nova NANOSEM 230 equipment was also used for the study of microstructure of the ceramics used in the electrical characterization of quaternary sulfides.

2.4 DTA-TG analysis

The thermal behavior of the activated mixtures was investigated by differential thermal (DTA) and thermogravimetric analysis (TG). The measured were carried out in argon, from room temperature to 1000°C, using a Simultaneous Thermal Analysis, NETZCH STA 409. The heating-cooling rates were 10°C/min and the quantity of sample used was about 20 mg.

2.5 Raman spectroscopy

The Raman spectra in selected crystals and powder samples were recorded in the frequency range between 150 and 3500 cm-1 using a micro-Raman Renishaw system 1000 equipped with Leica-DMLM microscope. The spectra data were collected at room temperature with laser line of 633 nm and laser power of 1 mW.

2.6 Processing of Ceramics

Synthesized fine powders were used as precursors to process Cu2Fe1-xCoxSnS4 (x = 0.6 and 1) ceramics. Powders were shaped by isostatically pressing at 312 MPa as thin disks of 6 mm diameter and 0.6 mm thickness. These disks reached densification of about 75%, and finally conventional sintering was carried out in evacuated quartz ampoules with Argon atmosphere, placed in a programmable furnace was reached at temperatures from 700 to 800 °C with a heating rate of 5 °C/min. The density of the ceramics was obtained by the Archimedes method with paraffin.

2.7 Electrical properties

Au electrodes were sputtered on the major faces on the thinned ceramic discs for electrical characterization. The dependence of the dielectric permittivity on the temperature at frequencies between 10 kHz and 1 MHz was measured with a HP4194A impedance analyzer, were carried out from 77 to 280 K during heating at 1.5 °C/min.


Ceramic materials are based on polycrystalline samples obtained through a preparation process that includes the synthesis of the precursor powder (proposed quaternary sulfides), pressing to form cylindrical pellets and, finally, sintering, during which the densification and growth of ceramic grain occurs.

3.1 Synthesis, X-ray powder diffraction and compositional characterization

The quantitative contents of the constituent elements were examined by an energy dispersive SEM-EDS analysis of the pelletized materials over many grains and micro-crystals. It was found that the average concentrations of the elements Cu, Fe, Co, Sn, and S were close to nominal compositions (Table 1).

Table 1. Chemical composition analysis (% mass) of Cu2Fe1-xCoxSnS4 and end-members.

The X-ray powder patterns (XRD) showed sharp lines that reflected the crystallinity and homogeneity of the samples. Representative diffraction profiles are shown in Figure 1. The experimental XRD powder patterns of the solid solutions were compared with simulated XRD patterns (from single-crystal X-ray diffraction data). The XRD patterns of the solid solutions of Cu2Fe1-xCoxSnS4 (x = 0.2, 0.4, 0.6 and 0.8) were fully indexed in the space group, I-42m, and were found to have a stannite-type structure (Figure 2). We propose that these samples existed as a continuous solid solution on the basis of the cell parameter trends determined by X-ray powder diffraction data (Table 2).

Figure 1. X-ray powder diffraction patterns obtained for Cu2Fe1-xCoxSnS4 (x = 0, 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8 and 1.0). The mirror-like representation shows the calculated powder patterns of stannite [8]

Figure 2. Unit Cell of Cu2Fe1-xCoxSnS4 stannite-type [8]

Table 2. Cell parameters data for Cu2Fe1-xCoxSnS4 and end-members (space group I-42m).

The TGA and DTA were carried out under an argon atmosphere to study the thermal stability. Figure 3 shows the thermal analysis of Cu2Fe0.4Co0.6SnS4. The studied phases all exhibited similar behaviors, and all of the phases were stable up to approximately 800 °C. Above this temperature the samples began to decompose. The DTA, in all of the samples, presented an important endothermic signal, which is consistent with an incongruent melting point that has also reported for the related compounds Cu2MnSnSe4 [16], Cu2ZnSnSe4, Cu2ZnGeSe4, Cu2CdSnSe4 [17] and Cu2MnGexSn1-xS4 [18] (Table 3).

Figure 3. Thermal analysis (DTA/TG) of Cu2Fe0.4Co0.6SnS4

Table 3. Melting points of quaternary chalcogenides.

The Raman spectra (Figure 4) showed two main peaks; the most intense peak occurred at approximately 320 cm-1, and a smaller shoulder was found at 290 cm-1, which can be assigned to the symmetry mode (A1). These vibrations can be interpreted as the "breathing" mode of the MS4 tetrahedral (M = Fe, Co) and SnS4, according to the assignment proposed by Koschel et al. [19,20]. Finally, there was no evidence supporting the presence of metal polysulfide impurities of the types Cu2FeS2, Cu2CoS2 and SnS2 due to the absence of signals at 350 cm-1, which are characteristic of this type of compounds [21,22].

Figure 4. Raman spectra of Cu2FexCo1-xSnS4 solid solutions (0 < x < 1)

3.2 Ceramic Processing

Different sintering tests were carried out on the studied phases of Cu2FexCo1-xSnS4. The end-member Cu2FeSnS4 could not be prepared as a ceramic, possibly, because in the thermal process, the grain size increased so rapidly that pores were generated between the grains, which decreased the hardness of Cu2FeSnS4 to the point of becoming brittle. However, the other end-member, Cu2CoSnS4, was transformed into a ceramic with a 97% densification. In general, the Co-rich phases were able to transform into ceramics with densifications greater than 80%. It should be noted that the chosen temperatures were based on the DTA-TG because in the preparation of ceramics, the melting point must not be exceeded. The percentage of densification as a function of the temperature of the phase of Cu2Fe0.4Co0.6SnS4 is shown in Figure 5. The curve, characteristic of this type of phenomenon, demonstrates a temperature zone (25-600 °C) in which there was practically no variation in density. Then, a second zone was observed with an increase in the densification percentage where temperature variations of 50 °C caused important changes in the densities.

Figure 5. Cu2Fe0.4Co0.6SnS4 density as a function of temperature with an increase of grain size.

The DRX on the sides of the pellets prepared with Cu2Fe0.4Co0.6SnS4 confirmed the presence of the studied phase and discarded the presence of secondary phases (Figure 6). With a gradual increase in the density, it was possible to observe that there was a widening of signals, which was the product of the overlapping growth of the grain. Therefore, the structural changes in the material do not occur in the formation of the ceramics.

Figure 6. X-ray diffraction of Cu2Fe0.4Co0.6SnS4 pellets with densities of 75%, 80%, 88%, and 98%. (bottom) The mirror-like representation shows the calculated powder patterns of stannite [8]

Figure 7 shows the FE-SEM backscattered electron images of the polished surfaces of the sintered Cu2Fe0.4Co0.6SnS4 ceramics at different temperatures: at 700 °C the grain size ranged from 3-5 µm, at 750 °C from 20-30 µm and finally at 800 °C increases the grain size between 60-100 µm. These images corroborate the aforementioned increase in size of the grains with increasing temperature.

Figure 7. Micrographs of the polished surfaces of Cu2Fe0.4Co0.6SnS4 ceramics sintered at 700 °C, 750 °C and 800 °C.

3.3 Electrical Characterization

The end-members of the Cu2FexCo1-xSnS4 solid solution presented totally different electrical behaviors. The Cu2FeSnS4 phase was measured in a pellet without sintering using the Van der Pauw method. This phase presented the behavior of a semiconductor with a conductivity of 0.071 S/cm at 250 K, which is a greater conductivity value than in single crystals of Cu2CdGeS4 (0.003 S/cm at 250 K) [12]. For its part, Cu2CoSnS4, which was transformed into a ceramic with a 97% densification, was measured with the impedance complex, which showed that it had the electrical behaviour of a semiconductor with a conductivity of 30 S/cm at 250 K. This conductivity is greater than that of the crystalline powder of Cu2MnSnS4 (0.10 S/cm at 296 K) [1]. In the plot of the electrical conductivity as a function of the inverse of the temperature (Figure 8), three changes in the slope were observed, which can be interpreted as; a zone in which the conductivity is dominated by free charge carriers (high temperature) and in another dominating hopping type mechanism [12].

Figure 8. Conductivity versus temperature for Cu2CoSnS4 with density 85%.

An interesting electrical behaviour was observed in the phase Cu2Fe0.4Co0.6SnS4. The electrical characterization of this ceramic, processed at 800 °C with a 98% densification, was performed using complex impedance. In this solid solution, the electric conductivity presented Arrhenius behaviour over the measured temperature range (80-300 K), indicating a thermally activated process with an activation energy of 0.067 eV (Figure 9). This activation energy was in accordance with the values reported for the single crystals of the related phases Cu2CdGeS4 (0.025 eV) [12], Cu2MnSnS4 (0.030 eV) [1] and Cu2CoGeS4 (0.030 eV) [1].

Figure 9. Arrhenius plot of Cu2Fe0 4Co0 6SnS4.

Figure 10 shows a plot of the real permittivity as a function of temperature. It can be observed that the electrical response due to the typical relaxation behavior in this frequency range at temperatures ranging from 100 to 250 K, with a maximum temperature of 200 K, was frequency independent. However, the imaginary component presented a constant increase over the entire range of frequencies. It is possible to suggest a space charge polarization mechanism was responsible for this electrical relaxation. It is known that quasi-free carriers can originate a space charge at the electrode/sample interfaces [23], and the application of an electric field breaks the symmetry of the space charge and creates macroscopic dipoles, these dipoles lead to dielectric relaxation. The space charge polarization model is often used to explain the experimental results in grain boundary layer capacitors, where the grains are semiconductors and the grain boundaries are insulators [24].

Figure 10. Cu2Fe0.4Co0.6SnS4: a) Real permittivity versus temperature at different frequencies, b) Imaginary permittivity versus temperature at different frequencies.


The solid solutions Cu2Fe1-xCoxSnS4 (x = 0.2; 0.4; 0.6 and 0.8) were fully indexed in the space group I-42m, in a stannite-type. These phases are stable up to approximately 800° C and present incongruent melting. In general, Co-rich phases formed ceramics with percentages of densification above 80%. The phases of the Cu2Fe1-xCoxSnS4 showed electrical behavior of semiconductors. In particular, the Cu2Fe0.4Co0.6SnS4 presents dielectric relaxation between 100 and 250 K, with a maximum at approximately 200 K, the electric permittivity found has orders of magnitude between 102 and 103, so it can be estimated that this phase presents important contributions of electron polarization.


The authors wish to dedicate this work to the memory of Dr. Juan Guillermo Contreras, a fine Professor and a very good friend. This work was supported by Becas Chile de Pasantía Doctoral en el Extranjero 201175110054. The collaboration of Dr. Miguel Algueró (ICMM-CSIC) in the electrical characterization is greatly acknowledged.



1. L. Guen, W.S. Glaunsinger, Journal of Solid State Chemistry 21 (1980) 10-21.         [ Links ]

2. C. Persson, Journal of Applied Physics 107 (2010) 053710.         [ Links ]

3. D.A.R. Barkhouse, O. Gunawan, T. Gokmen, T.K. Todorov, D.B. Mitzi, Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications 20 (2012) 6-11.         [ Links ]

4. J.P. Leitão, N.M. Santos, P. a. Fernandes, P.M.P. Salomé, a. F. da Cunha, J.C. González, G.M. Ribeiro, F.M. Matinaga, Physical Review B 84 (2011) 024120.         [ Links ]

5. X. Wu, W. Liu, S. Cheng, Y. Lai, H. Jia, Journal of Semiconductors 33 (2012) 022002.         [ Links ]

6. H. Yang, L. a Jauregui, G. Zhang, Y.P. Chen, Y. Wu, Nano Letters 12 (2012) 540-545.         [ Links ]

7. X.Y. Shi, F.Q. Huang, M.L. Liu, L.D. Chen, Applied Physics Letters 94 (2009) 122103.         [ Links ]

8. S.R. Hall, J.T. Szymansk, J.M. Stewart, Canadian Mineralogist 16 (1978) 131-137.         [ Links ]

9. S. Schorr, H.A.-J.O. Hoebler, M.I. Tovar, European Journal of Mineralogy 19 (2007) 65-73.         [ Links ]

10. E. Quintero, M. Quintero, E. Moreno, L. Lara, M. Morocoima, F. Pineda, P. Grima, R. Tovar, P. Bocaranda, J. a. Henao, M. a. Macías, Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids 71 (2010) 993-998.         [ Links ]

11. T. Fries, Y. Shapira, F. Palacio, M.C. Moro, G.J. Mcintyre, R. Kershaw, A. Wold, E.J. McNiff Jr., Physical Review B 56 (1997) 5424-5431.         [ Links ]

12. G.E. Davidyuk, O. V Parasyuk, S.A. Semenyuk, Y.E. Romanyuk, Inorganic Materials 39 (2003) 919-923.         [ Links ]

13. K. Timmo, M. Altosaar, J. Raudoja K. Muska, M. Pilvet, M. Kauk, T. Varema, M. Danilson, O. Volobujeva, E. Mellikov, Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells 94 (2010) 1889-1892.         [ Links ]

14. F. López-Vergara, A. Galdámez, V. Manríquez, P. Barahona, O. Peña, Journal of Solid State Chemistry 198 (2013) 386-391.         [ Links ]

15. P. for the I. of X. experiments CHECKCELL, J. Laugier, B. Bochu, Laboratoire Des Matériaux et Du Génie Physique Ecole Nationale Supérieure de Physique de Grenoble (INPG) Domaine Universitaire BP 46, 38402 Saint Martin d'Hères France, (n.d.         [ Links ]).

16. V.W. Schäfer, R. Nitsche, Zeitschrift Für Kristallographie 145 (1977) 356-370.         [ Links ]

17. H. Matsushita, T. Maeda, A. Katsui, T. Takizawa, Journal of Crystal Growth 208 (2000) 416-422.         [ Links ]

18. T. Bernert, M. Zabel, A. Pfitzner, Journal of Solid State Chemistry 179 (2006) 849-854.         [ Links ]

19. M. Altosaar, J. Raudoja, K. Timmo, M. Danilson, M. Grossberg, J. Krustok, E. Mellikov, Physica Status Solidi (a) 205 (2008) 167-170.         [ Links ]

20. W.H. Koschel, F. Sorger, J. Baars, Journal of Physiques Colloques 36 (1975)177-181.         [ Links ]

21. P.A. Fernandes, P.M.P. Salomé, A.F. Cunha, Thin Solid Films 517 (2009) 2519-2523.         [ Links ]

22. M. Himmrich, H. Haeuseler, Spectrochimica Acta Part A: Molecular Spectroscopy 47 (1991) 933-942.         [ Links ]

23. A.K. Jonscher, Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics 57 (1999) R57- R70.         [ Links ]

24. I. Burn, S. Neirman, Journal of Materials Science 17 (1982) 3510-3524.         [ Links ]


(Received: September 2, 2013 - Accepted: September 30, 2013)

Creative Commons License Todo el contenido de esta revista, excepto dónde está identificado, está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons