SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

vol.39 issue3Anatomical Graphic Symbolism in the Communication ProcessInhibition of Diabetes Mellitus-Induced Knee Joint Injury in Rats by a Combination of Metformin and Captopril author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand




Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO
  • On index processSimilars in Google


International Journal of Morphology

On-line version ISSN 0717-9502

Int. J. Morphol. vol.39 no.3 Temuco June 2021 


Comparative Assessment of Auricular Measurements in Young Males and Females

Evaluación Comparativa de las Medidas Auriculares en Hombres y Mujeres Jóvenes

Elif Esra Kent1 

Mehmet Emirzeoglu1 

Emrah Altunsoy1 

Mahmut Özel1 

Ahmet Uzun1 

1 Department of Anatomy, Ondokuz Mayıs University, Samsun, Turkey.


Personal identification is mostly done by facial assessment. The auricle plays a key role in the evaluation and recognition of the craniofacial complex. The aim of this study was to provide normative database using the measurements of the auricle among young males and females by anthropometric methods. Anthropometric measurements were taken from 115 participants, (56 men and 59 women) between 18-30 years old. Participants werestudents at Yasar Dogu Faculty of Sport Sciences of Ondokuz Mayis University. Each participant signed an informed consent form and then participated to the study. We found that the mean length of the right and left auricles were 58.30-58.52 mm, the mean width of the right and left auricles were 30.04-29.73 mm, the mean length of right and left lobules were 16.05-16.45 mm, and the mean width of the right and left lobules were 17.61-18.76 mm in female participants. The mean length of right and left auricles were 62.33-62.49 mm, the mean width of the right and left auricles were 33.60-33.96 mm, the mean length of right and left lobules were 18.49-18.11 mm, and the mean width of the right and left lobules were 19.19-20.47 mm in male participants. The data obtained from the present study may be useful for further studies. Also, the results may be useful for reconstructive surgeons to analyze the size and shape of the auricle.

KEY WORDS: Auricle; Craniofacial complex; Anthropometry; Lobulus auriculares


La identificación personal se realiza principalmente mediante evaluación facial. El pabellón auricular tiene un papel clave en la evaluación y el reconocimiento del complejo craneofacial. El objetivo de este estudio fue proporcionar una base de datos normativa utilizando las medidas de la oreja entre hombres y mujeres jóvenes por métodos antropométricos. Se tomaron medidas antropométricas de 115 participantes, (56 hombres y 59 mujeres) entre 18 y 30 años. Los participantes eran estudiantse de la Facultad de Ciencias del Deporte Yasar Dogu de la Universidad Ondokuz Mayis. Cada participante firmó un formulario de consentimiento informado y luego participó en el estudio. Encontramos que en las mujeres la longitud media de las aurículas derecha e izquierda era de 58,30-58,52 mm, el ancho medio de las aurículas derecha y izquierdas era de 30,04 a 29,73 mm, la longitud media de los lóbulos derecho e izquierdo era de 16,05 a 16,45 mm y el ancho medio de los lóbulos derecho e izquierdo era de 17,61 a 18,76 mm. En los hombres, la longitud media de las aurículas derecha e izquierda era de 62,33-62,49 mm, el ancho medio de las aurículas derecha e izquierda era de 33,60-33,96 mm, la longitud media de los lóbulos derecho e izquierdo era de 18,49-18,11 mm, y el ancho medio de los lóbulos derecho e izquierdo era de 18,49-18,11 mm. Los datos obtenidos del presente estudio pueden ser útiles para estudios posteriores. Además, los resultados pueden ser útiles para que los cirujanos reconstructivos analicen el tamaño y la forma del pabellón auricular.

PALABRAS CLAVE: Aurícula; Complejo craneofacial; Antropometría; Lóbulos auriculares


The auricle is an important component of the natural and symmetrical appearance of the human face and contributes to the aesthetic appearance of the face. It is also arecognizable feature of the face (Brucker et al., 2003). Previously, the parts of the human body are examined anthropometrically and the measurements of these structures are investigatedin many studies (Jahanbin et al., 2013; Ahmed & Omer, 2015; Bronfman et al., 2015). The fact that these studies are carried out in different societies and still there is no consensus on the standards of ear anthropometric measurements (Farkas et al., 1992). Anthropometry is considered to be an important method in the evaluation of facial features (Farkas, 1994). It is the basic method to determine the face malformation mathematically (Farkas et al., 2007). The head and face anthropometry is a useful method in numerical determinations and very helpful for clinicians to define the shapelessness and to plan reconstructive procedures for surgeons (Oskarsdóttir et al., 2008). Direct anthropometric or indirect anthropometric measurement methods are used in the studies such as three- dimensional laser scanning, two-dimensional photographic evaluation, and radiographic measurements (Farkas et al., 2005). The application of direct anthropometric methods is easy and has an advantage in terms of both cost and avoiding damage to the individuals.

Human face morphology varies depending on the age, race and sex. The harmony, symmetry, equality and proportion of the face are studied by many artists and surgeons (Tamir, 2014; Harrar et al., 2018; Ghorbanyjavadpour & Rakhshan, 2019). Today, the facial rates developed by Leonardo da Vinci and Durer, some of the great Renaissance scholars, have been confirmed by orthodontists, jaw and facial surgeons (Malas et al., 1997). There are few studies in the literature that examined the mean auricular anthropometry in Turkish young population (Bozkir et al., 2004; Barut & Aktunc, 2006).

In this study, we aimed to reveal the anthropometric properties of the auricle in Turkish population. The collected measurements in the present study may provide a guide and database for craniofacial surgeons, clinicians, anthropologic evaluation, and biomedical engineering.We believe that the present study may further provide beneficial effects in cosmetic and reconstructive auricular surgery in Turkish population.


A total of 115 healthy students (56 males and 59 females) who were selected by the random sampling method between the ages of 18 and 30 (mean age was 21 for male, 22 for female) participated in the study. The ethical permission of the study was obtained from the Ondokuz Mayis University Medical Research and Ethics Commission. The volunteers were informed about "Informed Volunteer Form" and their consents were received. Participants were selected from healthy individuals who did not have a significant asymmetric appearance in the craniofacial and the auricle area and had no history of disease, congenital anomaly, trauma or surgery that could cause any change in auricular development. For the application of measurements, the volunteers were seated on a chair and heads were aligned in the Frankfurt horizontal plane (Barbera et al., 2014; El Kattan et al., 2018). The landmarks which are previously determined in the literature were used (Farkas et al., 1992; Azaria et al., 2003; Ahmed & Omer) (Table I). The landmarks that were used for measurement from the auricle are shown (Fig. 1). In the study, three different measurements were taken by the two different researchers from the head and face region using direct anthropometric measurement techniques to ensure the reliability of the results. Also, eight different anthropometric parameters were used for the measurement of the auricle (Table II).

Table I The landmarks and their explanations of the auricule. 

Fig. 1 Anthropometric landmarks of the auricle. sa: supraaurale, sba:subaurale, cs: concha superior, la:lobulus anterior, lp:lobulus posterior, pra:preaurale, pa:postaurale, ac:antihelical curvature, inf: incisura intertragica inferior, iaap: incisura anterior auris posterior. 

Table II The parameters and their explanations of the auricule. 

Additionally, the auricular, lobular and conchal indices were calculated by using following formulas:

Auricular index: Auricular width*100/ Auricular length

Lobular index: Lobular width*100/ Lobular length

Conchal index: Conchal width*100/ Conchal length

One digital caliper (0-150mm x 0.05mm), one double sliding caliper (Holtain Ltd. UK), a depth gauge (Model 01140, Lafeyetta, USA; 2 cm, 0-60 cm), a leather measuring instrument (Model 01128, Lafeyetta, USA; 0.5 mm, 0-100 mm), an angle measurement set, a tape measure, a height measuring instrument (Model of Seca 220, Hamburg, Germany; 0.5cm) and a scale (Model of Seca 220, Hamburg, Germany; 0.1 kg Maximum: 200 kg) were used for measurements.

The data were analyzed by Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) statistical software (version 15.0; SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). The mean values of the auricular measurements were calculated and analyzed to show statistical differences between the sexes. Independent sample ttest was used for comparing the values of sexes. The Wilcoxon test was used to compare the right and left auricle measurements in the same participants. The mean, the standard deviation, the maximum and minimum values of the auricles of the male and female participants were determined. The statistical significance level was accepted as p <0.05.


The anthropometric data and comparison of results for the right and left auricles of the participants are described in Table III. All sex-related changes of the auricular measurements were found to be statistically significant in males compared to females. The length and width of the right and left auricle, the right lobular width, the conchal width and length of the left auricle, protrusion at the tragal level of left auricle, protrusion at the supra- aurale level of right and left auricle showed a statistically significant difference (p<0.05). Lobular length of right and left auricle, lobular width of left auricle and the conchal length, the conchal width and the protrusion at the tragal level of the right auricle were larger in males than in females but did not have a significant difference (p>0.05).

The findings according to sex, all of the auricular indices apart from right lobular index had a statistically significant difference (p <0.05). Except for right lobular index, all of the indices were longer in males than in females (Table IV).

Table III Mean auricular measurements (mm) of males and females. 

Table IV Mean auricular ındices of males and females. 


Auricular morphometry is important for cosmetic compliance of the face. Auricle and ear lobe are an element of beauty in many cultures and ethnic groups and also the earlobe is decorated with earrings and similar objects (Yotsuyanagi et al., 2002). Auricular symmetry is very important for the smoothness of the aesthetic appearance of the face. As previously provided,there is no standard for the ear (Rubin et al., 1962). Even within the same ethnic group, the shape and size of the auricle may vary.Knowledge of the anthropometric measurements of the auricle is very useful to analyze morphological differences, to determine the appropriate time for surgical corrections, and to establish standards for the designing of hearing aids and applications (Farkas et al., 1992).

A number of reference points can be used to define the size, location and level of the auricle. Although visual evaluation of the ear, such approaches are subjective and may vary from person to person. The normal size of the ear is more than half of the distance between the nasion and the gnathion. The auricule width is found to be more than half of the auricle length (Farkas et al., 1992). Standard measurements require the use of the standard measuring instruments. Faults in the measurement are caused by the use of incorrect measuring instruments or by not using them properly. The scales of the anthropometric measuring instruments are in the form of millimeters or degrees. The accuracy of the digital caliper is 0.01 mm and the error margin is 0.02 mm in our study.

In a study conducted in the north of Italy with the age of participants between 31-40 it was found that auricle lengths were 62.40 mm and 35.30 mm in the ears (Gualdi- Russo, 1998), length was 62.92 mm; left auricle length was 63.16 mm; right auricle width was 38,80 mm; the width of the left auricle was 38.17 mm (Ferrario et al., 1999). In our study, we found that the right auricle length was 60.28 mm and the length of the left auricle was 60.46 mm. According to these results, it can be said that the auricle of the northern people of Italy are longer and wider than the ear of the young participants in our study. Another group studied onSephardic Jewish individuals aged between 20-40 years old found that the length of the right ear lobe was 17.50 mm and the length of the left earlobe was 17.30 mm (Azaria et al.). In our study, we found that the length of the right earlobe was 17.23 mm and the left earlobe length was 17.26 mm. The ear lobe length of the Sephardic Jewish individuals is higher than the ear lobe length of the participants in our study. Also, another study reported that the right auricle inclination angle of 18 - 40 year old male in China was 14,80 ± 6,1 mm, while it was 25.31 ± 1.01 mm in our study (Wang et al., 2011). According to these results, it was determined that the inclination angle of the male participants in China is narrower than that of the young males in our study. The same study showed that the right conchal width of the male subjects was 17,80 ± 2,0 mm, while the right conchal width of the male subjects in our study was 20,29 ± 0,36 mm (Wang et al.). According to these results, it was found that the male population in China has narrower right conchal width than the young males of our study. A study conducted in the Indian population (Purkait & Singh, 2007) found that the protrusion at the level of left tragus was 24,80 mm. In our study, the protrusion of male individuals at the level of left tragus was 17.00 mm. The protrusion of the auricle of the individuals in India is quite higher when compared to the measurements taken from the individuals in our study. The same researcher group reported that the right auricle length was 58.20 mm, the left auricle length was 57.70 mm, the right auricle width was 34.10 mm, the left auricle width was 33.00 mm (Purkait & Singh). In our study, the length of the right auricle was 62.33 mm, the left auricle length was 62.49 mm, the right auricle was 33.60 mm and the left auricle was 33.96 mm. According to these results, the auricle of the young males in our study is longer than Purkait’s study while they have the same auricular width. Ferrario et al., evaluated ear measurements of 314 adolescents and adults and the measurements of the males were statistically greater than females (Ferrario et al.). Similar results were also obtained in our study.

Mean values obtained in our study will be clinically beneficial in the facial aesthetics and the facial transplantation. In case of damage to the auricle formation, the average values of the ear in the relevant age and sex group are crucial in auricle surgical procedures. We live in the century of technology and information. The researchers should benefit from the technological developments. We recommend the use of a new reference point and different measurement technique in the auricle measurement using the opportunities provided by the technology.


Ahmed, A. A. & Omer, N. Estimation of sex from the anthropometric ear measurements of a Sudanese population. Leg. Med. (Tokyo), 17(5):313-9, 2015. [ Links ]

Azaria, R.; Adler, N.; Silfen, R.; Regev, D. & Hauben, D. J. Morphometry of the adult human earlobe: a study of 547 subjects and clinical application. Plast. Reconstr. Surg., 111(7):2398-402, 2003. [ Links ]

Barbera, A. L.; Sampson, W. J. & Townsend, G. C. Variation in natural head position and establishing corrected head position. Homo, 65(3):187-200, 2014. [ Links ]

Barut, C. & Aktunc, E. Anthropometric measurements of the external ear in a group of Turkish primary school students. Aesthetic Plast. Surg, 30(2):255-9, 2006. [ Links ]

Bozkir, M. G.; Karakas, P. & Oguz, O. Vertical and horizontal neoclassical facial canons in Turkish young adults. Surg. Radiol. Anat., 26(3):212-9, 2004. [ Links ]

Bronfman, C. N.; Janson, G.; Pinzan, A. & Rocha, T. L. Cephalometric norms and esthetic profile preference for the Japanese: a systematic review. Dental Press J. Orthod, 20(6):43-51, 2015. [ Links ]

Brucker, M. J.; Patel, J.; Sullivan, P. K. & Department of Plastic Surgery, Brown Medical School and Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, 02905, USA. A morphometric study of the external ear: age- and sex-related differences. Plast. Reconstr. Surg, 112(2):647-52; discussion 653-4, 2003. [ Links ]

El Kattan, E.; El Kattan, M. & Elhiny, O. A. A new horizontal plane of the head. Open Access Maced. J. Med. Sci., 6(5):767-71, 2018. [ Links ]

Farkas, L. Anthropometry of the Head and Face. New York, Raven Press, 1994. [ Links ]

Farkas, L. G.; Katic, M. J. & Forrest, C. R. Comparison of craniofacial measurements of young adult African-American and North American white males and females. Ann. Plast. Surg., 59(6):692-8, 2007. [ Links ]

Farkas, L. G.; Katic, M. J.; Forrest, C. R.; Alt, K. W.; Bagic, I.; Baltadjiev, G.; Cunha, E.; Cvicelová, M.; Davies, S.; Erasmus, I.; et al. International anthropometric study of facial morphology in various ethnic groups/races. J. Craniofac. Surg., 16(4):615-46, 2005. [ Links ]

Farkas, L. G.; Posnick, J. C. & Hreczko, T. M. Anthropometric growth study of the ear. Cleft Palate Craniofac. J., 29(4):324-9, 1992. [ Links ]

Ferrario, V. F.; Sforza, C.; Schmitz, J. H. & Santoro, F. Three-dimensional facial morphometric assessment of soft tissue changes after orthognathic surgery. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. Endod., 88(5):549-56, 1999. [ Links ]

Ghorbanyjavadpour, F. & Rakhshan, V. Factors associated with the beauty of soft-tissue profile. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop., 155(6):832-43, 2019. [ Links ]

Gualdi-Russo, E. Longitudinal study of anthropometric changes with aging in an urban Italian population. Homo, 49(3):241-59, 1998. [ Links ]

Harrar, H.; Myers, S. & Ghanem, A. M. Art or science? An evidence-based approach to human facial beauty a quantitative analysis towards an informed clinical aesthetic practice. Aesthetic Plast. Surg., 42(1):137-46, 2018. [ Links ]

Jahanbin, A.; Rashed, R.; Yazdani, R.; Shahri, N. M. & Kianifar, H. Evaluation of some facial anthropometric parameters in an Iranian population: infancy through adolescence. J. Craniofac. Surg., 24(3):941-5, 2013. [ Links ]

Malas, M.; Salbacak, A. & Aler, A. Kranyofasiyal antropometrik deger ve indekslerin klinik önemi. Süleyman Demirel Üniv. Tıp Fak. Dergisi, 4(1):17-25, 1997. [ Links ]

Oskarsdóttir, S.; Holmberg, E.; Fasth, A. & Strömland, K. Facial features in children with the 22q11 deletion syndrome. Acta Paediatr., 97(8):1113-7, 2008. [ Links ]

Purkait, R. & Singh, P. Anthropometry of the normal human auricle: a study of adult Indian men. Aesthetic Plast. Surg., 31(4):372-9, 2007. [ Links ]

Rubin, L. R.; Bromberg, B. E.; Walden, R. H. & Adams, A. An anatomic approach to the obtrusive ear. Plast. Reconstr. Surg., 29:360-70, 1962. [ Links ]

Tamir, A. Not all faces are alike. J. Craniofac. Surg., 25(1):318-20, 2014. [ Links ]

Wang, B.; Dong, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Bai, S. & Wu, G. Computed tomography measurement of the auricle in Han population of north China. J. Plast. Reconstr. Aesthet. Surg., 64(1):34-40, 2011. [ Links ]

Yotsuyanagi, T.; Yamashita, K. & Sawada, Y. Reconstruction of congenital and acquired earlobe deformity. Clin. Plast. Surg., 29(2):249-55, 2002. [ Links ]

Received: October 14, 2020; Accepted: February 22, 2021

*Correspondence to: E-mail:

Corresponding author: Emrah Altunsoy, M.D. Department of Anatomy Ondokuz Mayıs University Samsun 55100 - TURKEY.

Creative Commons License This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License