SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.17 número1Simulación de eficiencia energética de marcos de ventana. Métodos adecuados según el clima y la tecnologíaRecomendaciones constructivas y de diseño para la distribución de las conexiones de la hoja exterior de un cerramiento con cámara de aire continua índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • En proceso de indezaciónCitado por Google
  • No hay articulos similaresSimilares en SciELO
  • En proceso de indezaciónSimilares en Google

Compartir


Revista de la construcción

versión On-line ISSN 0718-915X

Resumen

CARRETERO-AYUSO, Manuel J.  y  GARCIA-SANZ-CALCEDO, Justo. Comparison between building roof construction systems based on the LCA. Revista de la Construcción [online]. 2018, vol.17, n.1, pp.123-136. ISSN 0718-915X.  http://dx.doi.org/10.7764/rdlc.17.1.123.

Based on Life Cycle Assessment techniques, this research compares the environmental impact of 11 variants for the construction of roofs in residential buildings. Among others, the energy used, the carbon footprint and the waste associated to placement and packaging are found, leading to 9 sustainability indicators, which include socio-economic aspects such as the decennial maintenance cost, the maintainability ratio or the quantity of labour necessary. Each of the roofs was characterised based on 20 typologies of constituent layers, categorised under 6 construction functional groups, according to the function held in the roofs. Based on this study, it is demonstrated that the most sustainable roofs are non-trafficable flat roof with gravel finishing (with either a PVC or bituminous layer), followed by pitched roofs (with ceramic and cement mortar tiles) and green roofs with PVC layer. It was noted that trafficable flat roofs generate greater emissions of carbon dioxide and use more energy in their construction, and that flat roofs with gravel finishing require a lower cost of decennial maintenance. Furthermore, pitched roofs generate a higher amount of construction and packaging waste than flat roofs and require more labour, especially in the case of pitched roofs with tiles.

Palabras clave : Building roofs; sustainable design; sustainable construction; ecodesign; maintenance.

        · resumen en Español     · texto en Inglés     · Inglés ( pdf )