SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

vol.42 issue3Conceptual bases for implementing a management strategy evaluation (MSE) for common sardine (Strangomera bentincki) and anchovy (Engraulis ringens) in south-central zone of ChileShark catches in the northwest region of Cuba author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand




Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO
  • On index processSimilars in Google


Latin american journal of aquatic research

On-line version ISSN 0718-560X


HERNANDEZ, Martha; GASCA-LEYVA, Eucario; GRESSLER, Pablo  and  KRISE, Dione. Effects of farm and commercial inputs on carp polyculture performance: participatory trial in an experimental field station. Lat. Am. J. Aquat. Res. [online]. 2014, vol.42, n.3, pp.468-476. ISSN 0718-560X.

The carp polyculture production system is the most widely used system by small-scale fish farmers in southern Brazil (States of Paraná, Santa Catarina and Rio Grande do Sul). The aim of this study was to compare biotechnical and economic parameters between a farm system (FS) using farm inputs (chicken manure, maize and grass) and a commercial system (CS) using commercial inputs (triple super phosphate, ammonium nitrate and balanced food) feeding to apparent satiation. The experiment was carried out for 196 days in earthen ponds of 500 m2, with three replicates per system. The stocking density was 2,000 fish ha-1, consisting of 35% grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idella), 30% of mirror common carp (Cyprinus carpio var. specularis), 20% of bighead carp (Aristichthys nobilis) and 15% silver carp (Hypophthalmichthys molitrix). In both systems, a low level of total phosphorus in water (0.06 mg L-1) and in the sediment (4 mg L-1) was observed. Production was significantly increased in the CS (76 kg 500 m-2196 days-1) than in the FS (43 kg 500 m-2 196 days-1). Costs and revenues were higher in the CS and profits were similar in the two systems. Similar profits do not mean that CS is necessarily more convenient. Advantages and drawbacks for small-scale farmers considering labor, land and availability of money are discussed.

Keywords : carp; polyculture; feed; water quality; cost-benefit; aquaculture; Brazil.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in English     · English ( pdf )


Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License