SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.14 número1Modelo de riesgos competitivos para deserción y graduación en estudiantes universitarios de programas de pregrado de una universidad privada de Medellín (Colombia)Uso de minería de textos para comparar los contenidos relacionados a calidad y acreditación generados en redes sociales por universidades de Perú y Chile índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • Em processo de indexaçãoCitado por Google
  • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO
  • Em processo de indexaçãoSimilares em Google

Compartilhar


Formación universitaria

versão On-line ISSN 0718-5006

Resumo

LARRAIN, Antonia; BRASI, Leandro De; CALDERON, Maribel  e  CALZETTA, Alejandro. Professor beliefs regarding the teaching of argumentation in undergraduate education. Form. Univ. [online]. 2021, vol.14, n.1, pp.99-110. ISSN 0718-5006.  http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-50062021000100099.

The aim of the present research study is to describe professor beliefs and their role in the teaching of argumentative skills in higher education. An explorative-descriptive study with a qualitative approach is performed. The population surveyed is composed of 16 professors that taught the first two years of philosophy and law undergraduate degrees at a private Chilean university in 2019. Interviews are performed with thematic analysis. The results show high agreement between professors in their beliefs: argumentation is valued as a key competence, but it is suggested that argumentation should be taught once knowledge of the discipline is acquired. Although professors report to promote argumentative practices in their teachings, they do not do it to develop argumentative skills. Learning evaluations implies knowing how to argue, but no assessment argumentation guidelines are provided. It is concluded that surveyed philosophy and law professors do not differ radically in their beliefs about the value of argumentation in professional practice.

Palavras-chave : teaching argumentation; professor beliefs; university pedagogy.

        · resumo em Espanhol     · texto em Espanhol     · Espanhol ( pdf )