SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.43 número1ALCANCE Y LÍMITES DEL PRINCIPIO DE PROPORCIONALIDADDIAGNÓSTICO PARA UN CAMBIO: LOS DILEMAS DE LA REGULACIÓN DE LAS AGUAS EN CHILE índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • En proceso de indezaciónCitado por Google
  • No hay articulos similaresSimilares en SciELO
  • En proceso de indezaciónSimilares en Google

Compartir


Revista chilena de derecho

versión On-line ISSN 0718-3437

Resumen

ALVARADO MARAMBIO, José Tomás. INCOMMENSURABILITY OF BASIC VALUES AND PROPORTIONALISM: PHILOSOPHICAL PRESUPPOSITIONS OF THE PROPORTIONALIST INTERPRETATION OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS. Rev. chil. derecho [online]. 2016, vol.43, n.1, pp.311-334. ISSN 0718-3437.  http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-34372016000100013.

The proportional construction of fundamental rights understands them as principles of maximization. No principle has direct legal consequences. The legal consequences that follow from a norm of fundamental rights depend on the other principles with which it may be in conflict. It is a presupposition of this interpretation that the 'interest' or 'value' represented by a norm should be commensurable with any other value. It is argued here that there are very forceful reasons to doubt that there is such a commensuration. Even granting the commensuration between basic values alleged by the defender of the proportional interpretation, there are models in which this commensuration makes no sense. There are no reasons, then, to accept the proportional interpretation.

Palabras clave : Fundamental rights; proportionalism; basic values; incommensurability of basic values.

        · resumen en Español     · texto en Español     · Español ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License Todo el contenido de esta revista, excepto dónde está identificado, está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons