SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.20 número3Los estilos de liderazgo y la gestión de recursos humanos: una reflexión acerca del impacto sobre el desempeño de los estudiantes en la educación mediaProducción de biohidrógeno a partir de residuos mediante fermentación oscura: una revisión crítica (1993-2011 índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

Compartir


Ingeniare. Revista chilena de ingeniería

versión On-line ISSN 0718-3305

Resumen

CARRIZO MORENO, Dante. Comparison on effectiveness of the software requirements elicitation techniques: novice and expert vision. Ingeniare. Rev. chil. ing. [online]. 2012, vol.20, n.3, pp.386-397. ISSN 0718-3305.  http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-33052012000300013.

Requirements engineering can use a lot of techniques to gather the users' needs. However, currently there are few practical guidelines and criteria for selecting techniques in a software development project. This paper tries to know the vision that novice requirements engineers have about the effectiveness of requirements elicitation techniques and compare it with the requirements experts' vision. To carry out the comparison, repertory grid technique was used. This technique allows knowing indirectly the subject's opinion on the techniques. The results show a substantial difference between both visions with regard to the techniques and elicitation context. This implies that a more extensive training, and primarily practice, is necessary in order for novice engineers to recognize differences in techniques effectiveness and decide with greater certainty about the most appropriate techniques to use in requirements elicitation sessions.

Palabras clave : Requirements engineering; requirements elicitation; elicitation techniques; contextual attributes; repertory grid.

        · resumen en Español     · texto en Español     · Español ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License Todo el contenido de esta revista, excepto dónde está identificado, está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons