SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
 número102Reescrituras en Procesos autónomos de Manuel Fernández: o cuando la poesía hace análisis socialNuevas experiencias de lectura para la Unidad Popular: la “novela tabloide” … Y corría el billete (1972) de Guillermo Atías índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • Em processo de indexaçãoCitado por Google
  • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO
  • Em processo de indexaçãoSimilares em Google

Compartilhar


Revista chilena de literatura

versão On-line ISSN 0718-2295

Resumo

JAROSZUK, Barbara. Masked ball or one most extraordinary inversion: El derecho de las bestias by Hugo Salas versus Amalia by José Mármol. Rev. chil. lit. [online]. 2020, n.102, pp.411-435. ISSN 0718-2295.  http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-22952020000200411.

In the Argentinian narrative after the last dictatorship, we can observe a strong tendency to reinterpret the XIXth century: to deconstruct the official version of the history of the period and to rewrite the literary canon. One of the examples is the novel by Hugo Salas entitled El derecho de las bestias (2015), a kind of pastiche of Amalia (1851) by José Mármol. The aim of this paper is to analyze how the contemporary novel retakes the discourse and the narrative structures of the classic, taking them, however, out of the original temporal and political context, since the anti-Rosism, omnipresent in Amalia, is replaced here by an anti-Peronism that seems grotesquely exagerated. Using some of the metahistorical concepts introduced by Reinhart Koselleck we will try to show what consequences, both semantic and political, may have these textual operations.

Palavras-chave : Recent Argentinian literature; rewriting the canon; Salas; Mármol; Koselleck.

        · resumo em Espanhol     · texto em Espanhol     · Espanhol ( pdf )