SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.40 número2Side effects of the natural pesticide Spinosad (GF-120 Formulation) on Eretmocerus paulistus (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae), a parasitoid of the whitefly Aleurothrixus floccosus (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae), under laboratory conditionsProductividad y colaboración científica en viticultura y enología en los países latinoamericanos índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

Compartir


Ciencia e investigación agraria

versión On-line ISSN 0718-1620

Resumen

SOUZA, Carlos H. Wachholz de; MERCANTE, Erivelto; PRUDENTE, Victor H. R.  y  JUSTINA, Diego D.D.. Methods of performance evaluation for the supervised classification of satellite imagery in determining land cover classes. Cienc. Inv. Agr. [online]. 2013, vol.40, n.2, pp.419-428. ISSN 0718-1620.  http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-16202013000200016.

C.H.W Souza, E. Mercante, V.H.R. Prudente and D.D.D. Justina. 2013. Methods of performance evaluation for the supervised classification of satellite imagery in determining land cover classes. Cien. Inv. Agr. 40(2): 419-428. Satellite imagery, in combination with remote sensing techniques, provides a new opportunity for monitoring and assessing crops with lower cost and greater objectivity than traditional surveys. The present research employed Landsat 5/TM satellite imagery to identify the land cover classes in Cafelândia (Paraná, Brasil), a predominantly agricultural town. Five supervised classification methods (parallelepiped (PL), minimum distance (MND), Mahalanobis distance (MHD), maximum likelihood classifier (MLC) and spectral angle mapper (SAM)) were tested in this work. To assess the efficiency of the classifications, accuracy indices and error metrics obtained through total confusion matrices were used. The results indicated that the Mahalanobis and SAM methods generated the smallest errors for the four studied land use classes (soybean, corn, forest, and bare soil), with overall accuracy values of 88% and 86%, respectively, and kappa index values 0.83 and 0.80, respectively. The values of these methods for the applied metrics were 0.88 and 0.86 for the sensitivity index, 0.96 and 0.95 for the total specificity index and 0.84 and 0.81 for Matthews correlation coefficient, respectively. The different classification methods clearly exhibited large variations in their performance for land cover mapping. The use of measures obtained from the error matrix is a suitable method for comparisons of thematic maps.

Palabras clave : Accuracy indices; agricultural landscape; classifiers; remote sensing.

        · resumen en Español     · texto en Inglés     · Inglés ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License Todo el contenido de esta revista, excepto dónde está identificado, está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons