SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

Referencias del artículo

CANETE, Roberto; GUILHEM, Dirce  y  BRITO, Katia. Consentimiento informado: algunas consideraciones actuales. Acta bioeth. [online]. 2012, vol.18, n.1, pp. 121-127. ISSN 1726-569X.  http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S1726-569X2012000100011.

    1. Miller FG, Joffe S. Limits to research risks. J Med Ethics 2009; 35(7): 445-449. [ Links ]


    2. Villafranca R. Investigação científica: sociedade e responsabilidade. In: Guilhem D, Queiroz W, Sorokin P, Zicker F. Ética em pesquisa: compartilhando responsabilidades. Brasília: Letras Livres, Editora UnB, 2009. [ Links ]


    3. McCoy M. Autonomy, consent, and medical paternalism: legal issues in medical intervention. J Altern Complement Med 2008; 14(6): 785-792. [ Links ]


    4. Ocampo-Martínez J. La bioética y la relación médico-paciente. Cir Ciruj 2002; 70: 55- 59. [ Links ]


    5. González-Menéndez R. La relación médico-paciente y su significado en la formación profesional. Educ Med Sup 2003; 17(4). [ Links ]


    6. Oliva JE, Bosch C, Carballo R, Fernández-Britto JE. El consentimiento informado, una necesidad de la investigación clínica en seres humanos. Rev Cubana Invest Biomed 2001; 20(2):150-158. [ Links ]


    7. Humayun A, Fatima N, Naqqash S, Hussain S, Rasheed A, Imtiaz H, Imam SZ. Patients’ perception and actual practice of informed consent, privacy and confidentiality in general medical outpatient departments of two tertiary care hospitals of Lahore. BMC Medical Ethics 2008; 9(14). Disponible en: http://www.biomedcentral.com/content/pdf/1472-6939-9-14.pdf. Acceso el 24 de agosto de 2009. [ Links ]


    8. Chan HM. Informed consent Hong Kong style: an instance of moderate familism. J Med Philos 2004; 29: 195-206. [ Links ]


    9. Liseckiene I, Liubarskiene Z, Jacobsen R, Valius L, Norup M. Do family practitioners in Lithuania inform their patients about adverse effects of common medications? J Med Ethics 2008; 34: 137-140. [ Links ]


    10. Yousaf RM, Fauzi ARM, How SH, Rasool AG, Rohana K. Awareness, knowledge and attitude towards informed consent among doctors in two different cultures in Asia: a cross sectional comparative study in Malaysia and Kashmir, India. Singapore Med J 2007; 48: 559-565. [ Links ]


    11. Lower GM. Recordando al maestro Van Rensselaer Potter. En: Acosta Sariego JR, editor. Bioética para la sustentabilidad. La Habana: Publicaciones Acuario, Centro Félix Varela; 1992: 4-6. [ Links ]


    12. Annas GJ. Globalized clinical trials and informed consent. N Engl J Med 2009; 360(20): 2050-2053. [ Links ]


    13. Mfutso-Bengo J, Masiye F, Muula A. Ethical challenges in conducting research in humanitarian crisis situations. Malawi Med J 2008; 20(2): 46-49. [ Links ]


    14. Sass HM. Reichsrundschreiben 1931: Pre-Nuremberg German Regulations concerning New Therapy and Human Experimentation. The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 1983; 8: 99-111. [ Links ]


    15. Kottow ML. Investigación en seres humanos. Principios éticos internacionales. Cuadernos del Programa Regional de Bioética 1996; 3: 41-52. [ Links ]


    16. Katz J. The consent principle of the Nuremberg Code. En: Jonsen A. The birth of bioethics. New York: Oxford University Press;1998: 125-165. [ Links ]


    17. The Belmont Report. Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research. The National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research, April 18, 1979. Disponible en http://ohsr.od.nih.gov/guidelines/belmont.html [ Links ]


    18. Ad Hoc Committee on Medical Ethics. American College of Physician ethics Manual. Ann Intern Med 1984; 101; 129-137. [ Links ]


    19. Marshall PA. Ethical challenges in study design and informed consent for health research in resource-poor settings. TDR/SDR/SEB/ST/07.1. WHO, Serial Topics Nº 5. [ Links ]


    20. Eriksson S, Höglund AT, Helgesson G. Do ethical guidelines give guidance? A critical examination of eight ethics regulations. Camb Q Healthc Ethics 2008; 17(1): 15-29. [ Links ]


    21. Goering S. Postnatal reproductive autonomy: promoting relational autonomy and self-trust in new parents. Bioethics 2009; 23(1): 9-19. [ Links ]


    22. Schwartz PH, Meslin EM. The ethics of information: absolute risk reduction and patient understanding of screening. J Gen Intern Med 2008; 23(6): 867-870. [ Links ]


    23. Carvalho J, Dias E. Bioética e consentimento informado: revendo a proteção aos vulneráveis. Brasília: Tese Mestrado, Faculdade de Ciências da Saúde, Universidade de Brasília; 2005: 126 f. [ Links ]


    24. Bedrossian E, Fernández R. El Consentimiento Informado. Algunas reflexiones para compartir. Rev FASGO 2001; 1(1): 14. [ Links ]


    25. Islas-Saucillo M, Muñoz CH. El consentimiento informado. Aspectos bioéticos. Rev Med Hosp Gen Mex 2000; 63(4): 267-273. [ Links ]


    26. Brody BA. The ethics of biomedical research: an international perspective. New York: Oxford University Press, 1998. [ Links ]


    27. Dawson L, Kass NE. Views of the US researchers about informed consent in international collaborative research. Social Science & Medicine 2005; 61: 1211-1222. [ Links ]


    28. Woodsong C, Karim QA. A model designed to enhance informed consent: experiences from the HIV Prevention Trials Network. American Journal of Public Health 2005; 95: 412-419. [ Links ]