SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

Referencias del artículo

SALAMI, Reza  y  SOLTANZADEH, Javad. Comparative Analysis for Science,Technology and Innovation Policy; Lessons Learned from Some Selected Countries (Brazil, India, China, South Korea and South Africa) for Other LdCs Like Iran. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation [online]. 2012, vol.7, n.1, pp. 211-227. ISSN 0718-2724.  http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-27242012000100014.

    AMMAN, E., & Baer, W. (2002). The Development of Brazil’sTechnology Capabilities in the post war period. Latin American Business Review , 3 (1), 1-29. [ Links ]

    BARNES, J., Bessant, J., Dunne, N., & Mor, M. (2001). Developing manufacturing competitiveness within South African industry: the role of middle management. Technovation , 21 (5), 293-309. [ Links ]

    BARTzOKAS, A. (2008). Monitoring and analysis of poli- cies and public financing instruments conducive to higher levels of R&D investments The “POLICY MIX” Project Country Review Korea. Maastricht, The Netherlands: United Nations University. [ Links ]

    BRANSCOMB, L. (1993). U.S. SCIENCE AND TECH- NOLOGY POLICY: ISSUES FOR THE 1990s. Cambridge: Harvard University. [ Links ]

    CAMPOS, N. (2005). Building a Science and Technology Sector in Brazil - a Historical Approach. Sao Paulo: Spanish chamber of Commerce in Brazil. [ Links ]

    CHAKRABORTY, C., & Nunnenkamp, P. (2008). Economic Reforms, FDI, and Economic Growth in India: A Sector Level Analysis. World development , 36 (7), 1192-1212. [ Links ]

    CHOW, G. (2002). China’s Economic Transformation. Oxford : Blackwell Publishing, 2002. [ Links ]

    CHRISTIE, P. (2006). Changing regimes: Governmentality and education policy in post-apartheid South Africa. International Journal of Educational Development , 26 (4), 373–381. [ Links ]

    CHUNG, S. (2003). Innovation in Korea. In L. V. Shavinina, The International Handbook on Innovation (pp. 890-903). Oxford: Pergamon. [ Links ]

    DARYL, E. C., & Pearson Jr, W. (2002). Report Policy for science, people for science. Technology in Society , 145–154. [ Links ]

    DAYASINDHU, N., & Chandrashekar, S. (2005). Indian remote sensing program: A national system of innovation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change , 72 (3), 287-299. [ Links ]


    ETzKOWITz, Henry., & Brisolla, Sandra N. (1999), Failure and success: the fate of industrial policy in Latin America and South East Asia, Research Ploicy, 28(4): 337–350
    [ Links ]

    ETzKOWITz, H., Henry, J. M., & Almeida, M. (2005). Towards “meta-innovation” in Brazil: The evolution of the incubator and the emergence of a triple helix. Research Policy , 411– 424. [ Links ]

    FAGERBERG, J., & Srholec, M. (2008). National innovation systems, capabilities and economic development. 37 (9). [ Links ]

    FAGERBERG, J., Srholec, M., & Knell, M. (2007). The Competitiveness of Nations: Why Some Countries Pros- per While Others Fall Behind. World Dvelopment , 35 (10), 1595–1620. [ Links ]

    FAN, P., & Watanabe, C. (2006). Promoting industrial de- velopment through technology policy: Lessons from Japan and China. Technology in Society , 28 (3), 303-320. [ Links ]

    GA´SPA´R, T., Gervai, P., & Trautmann, L. (2003). The end of neoliberal history—the future of economics. Futures , 589– 608. [ Links ]

    GORE, C. (2000). The Rise and Fall of the Washington Consensus as a Paradigm for Developing Countries. World Development , 28 (5), 789-804. [ Links ]

    GROSSE, R. (2005). International Business Strategies in Brazil. In S. Jane, Emerging Economic and the transformation of international business. Edward Elgar. [ Links ]

    HAK EUN, J., Lee, K., & Wu, G. (2006). Explaining the “University-run enterprises” in China: A theoretical framework for university–industry relationship in developing countries and its application to China. Research Policy , 1329–1346. [ Links ]

    HIPKIN, I., & Bennett, D. (2003). Managerial perceptions of factors influencing technology management in South Africa. Technovation , 23 (9), 719-735. [ Links ]

    KIM, L., & Dahlman, C. J. (1992). Technology policy for industrialization: An integrative framework and Korea’s experience. Research Policy , 21 (5), 437-452. [ Links ]

    KOSTOFF, R. N., Bhattacharya, S., & Pecht, M. (2007). Assessment of China’s and India’s science and technology literature — introduction, background and approach. Technological Forecasting & Social Change , 74 (4), 1519–1538. [ Links ]

    KRISHNAN, R. T. (2003). The Evolution of a Developing Country Innovation System During Economic Liberalization:The Case of India. The First Globelics Con- ference. [ Links ]

    LALL, S. (2003). Reinventing industrial strategy: The role of government policy in building industrial competitiveness. QEH Working Paper Series . [ Links ]

    LALL, S. (1995). The Creation Of Comaprative Advan- tage: Role of Industrial Policy. In I. Haque, Trade, Technology and industrial Competitivness (pp. 103-134). New York: World Bank. [ Links ]

    LALL, S., & Teubal, M. (1998). “Market-stimulating” technology policies in developing countries: A framework with examples from East Asia. World Development , 26 (8), 1369-1385. [ Links ]

    LEE,J.-d.,&Park,C.(2006).Researchanddevelopmentlinka- ges in a national innovation system: Factors affecting success and failure in Korea. Technovation , 26 (9), 1045-1054. [ Links ]

    LIANG, Q., & Teng, J.-z. (2006). Financial development and economic growth: Evidence from China. China Economic Review , 17 (4), 395-411. [ Links ]

    LUNDVALL, B.-Å., & Borrás, S. (2004). Science, Technology and Innovation Policy. In D. C. J. Fagerberg, The Oxford Hand Book Of Innovation (pp. 599-631). London: Oxford Press. [ Links ]

    MANI, S. (2002). Government, Innovation and Technology Policy: An Analysis of the South African experience since 1994. New Industrial Realities and Firm Behaviour in Africa. Oxford. [ Links ]

    METCALFE, J. (2005). science, technology and innovation policy. In G. Wignaraja, Competitiveness strategy in developing countries (pp. 95-130). New York: Routledge pub.LTD. [ Links ]

    MICHELSON, E. S. (2008). Globalization at the nano frontier: The future of nanotechnology policy in the United States, China, and India. Technology in Societ , 30 (3-4), 405-410. [ Links ]


    MOHAN, R., & Aggarwal, V. (1990). Commands and controls: Planning for indian industrialnext term develop- ment, 1951–1990. Comparative Economics , 681-712 . [ Links ]

    MUCHIE, M. (2004). Resisting the deficit model of development in Africa: Re-thinking through the making of an African national innovation system. Social Epistemology, 18 (4), 315-332. [ Links ]

    NARASIMHA, R. (2008). Science, technology and the economy: An Indian perspective. Technology in Society, 30 (3-4), 330 – 338. [ Links ]

    NELSON, R., & Rosenborg, N. (1993). Technologyical innovation and National Systems. In R. Nelson, National Innovation Systems. A Comparative Analysis (pp. 3-22). New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press. [ Links ]

    OECD. (2005). Innovation Policy And Performance A Cross-Country Comparison. Paris: Oecd. [ Links ]

    OECD. (2008). Oecd Science, Technology And Industry Outlook 2008. Paris: Oecd. [ Links ]

    OECD. (2006). OECD Science, Technology and Industy Outlook. Paris: Organization For Economic Co-Operation And Development. [ Links ]

    OH, D., & Kim, Y. (2004). Evaluating National Research and Development Programs in Korea. Seoul: Korea Institute of S&T Evaluation and Planning, [ Links ]

    PARKA, H. W., & Leydesdorff, L. (2010). Longitudinal trends in networks of university–industry–government relations in South Korea: The role of programmatic incentives. ScienceDirect, 39, 640 – 649. [ Links ]

    PAYA, Ali & Baradaran Shoraka, Hamid-Reza. (2006). Futures Studies in Iran: Learning through trial and error, Futures, 42 (5): 484 – 495. [ Links ]

    PEREIRA, Jose Matias et al.. (2006). Brazilian New Patterns of an Industrial, Technological and Foreign Trade Policy, Journal of Technology Management & Innovation,vol.1 issue 3.17-28. [ Links ]

    RATCHFORD, J. T., & Blanpied, W. A. (2008). Paths to the future for science and technology in China, India and the United States. Technology in Society , 30 (3-4), 211-233. [ Links ]

    REDDY, P. (1997). New trends in globalization of corporate R&D and implications for innovation capability in host countries: A survey from India. Prasada Reddy , 25 (11), 1821-1837. [ Links ]

    RONGPING, M. (2004). Dvelopment Science & Technology Policy in China. Beijing: Insititue Policy & Management, Chinese Academy Of Science. [ Links ]

    RONGPING, M., & Wan, Q. (2008). The development of science and technology in China: A comparison with India and the United States. Technology in Society , 30 (3-4). [ Links ]

    RYAN, M. P. (2010). Patent Incentives, Technology Markets, and Public–Private Bio-Medical Innovation Networks in Brazil. World Development , 38 (8), 1082-1093. [ Links ]

    SAKAKIBARA, M., & Cho, D.-S. (2002). Cooperative R&D in Japan and Korea: a comparison of industrial policy. Research Policy , 31 (5), 673-692. [ Links ]

    SARKISIAN, A., (2008). Intellectual property rights for developing countries: Lessons from Iran, Technovation 28 (2008), 786 –798. [ Links ]

    SALAMI, R. (2008). Reshaping and Reforming National Innovation System toward Knowledge Based economic. SLPTMD Conference. [ Links ]

    THORBECKE, E. (2006). The Evolution of the Development Doctrine, 1950-2005. Helsinki, Finland: World Institute for Development Economics Research. [ Links ]

    THROPE, C. (2007). Political Theory in Science and Technology Studies. In E. J. Hackett, O. Amsterdamska, M. Lynch, & J. Wajcman, The Handbook Of Science & Technology Studies. London, England: MIT Press. [ Links ]

    TUAN, C., Ng, L. F., & Zhao, B. (2009). China’s post-economic reform growth: The role of FDI and productivity progress. Journal of Asian Economics , 20 (3), 280-293. [ Links ]

    UNCTAD. (2005). Science, Technology and Innovation Policy Review The Islamic Republic of Iran. Geneva: United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. [ Links ]


    VERSPAGEN. (1991). A new empirical approach to catching up or falling behind. 2 (2). [ Links ]

    VIOTTI, E. B. (2002). National Learning Systems: A new approach on technological change in late industrializing economies and evidences from the cases of Brazil and South Korea. Technological Forecasting and Social Change , 653-680. [ Links ]

    WALCOTT, S. M. (2002). Chinese Industrial and Science Parks: Bridging the Gap. The Professional Geographer, 54 (3), 349-364. [ Links ]

    WEF. (2010). World Competitiveness Report. Geneva: World Economic Forum. [ Links ]

    WORLD BANK. (2009). Annual Report 2009. New York: World Bank. [ Links ]

    WORLD BANK. (2010). Brazil Data. Retrieved from world bank: www.worldbank.org [ Links ]

    XIWEI, Z., & Xiangdong, Y. (2007). Science and techno- logy policy reform and its impact on China ’ s national innovation system. Technology in Society , 317-325. [ Links ]