SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

Referencias del artículo

IBANEZ, Romualdo. La comprensión del discurso escrito: Una propuesta teórico-metodológica para su evaluación. Rev. signos [online]. 2012, vol.45, n.78, pp.20-43. ISSN 0718-0934.

    Afflerbach, P. (2004). National Reading Conference policy brief: High stakes testing and Reading achievement. Oak Creek, WI: National Reading Conference. [ Links ]

    Ahumada, P. (1983). Principios y procedimientos de evaluación educacional. Valparaíso: EUVSA. [ Links ]

    Ahumada, P. (2002). La evaluación en una concepción de aprendizaje significativo. Valparaíso: EUVSA. [ Links ]

    Alderson, J. C. (2000). Assessing Reading. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [ Links ]

    Alderson, J. C. & Banerjee, J. (2002). Language testing and assessment (Part 2) Language Teaching, 35, 79-113. [ Links ]

    Anderson, N., Bachman, L., Perkins, K. & Cohen, A. (1991). An exploratory study into the construct validity of a reading comprehension test: Triangulation of data sources. Language Testing, 8(1), 41-66. [ Links ]

    Bachman, L. F. (1990). Fundamental considerations in language testing. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [ Links ]

    Bachman, L. F. (2004). Statistical analyses for language assessment. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press. [ Links ]

    Bachman, L. F. & Palmer, A. S. (1996). Language testing in practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [ Links ]

    Bennett, M. J. (1993). Towards ethnorelativism: A developmental model of intercultural sensitivity (revised). En R. M. Paige (Ed.), Education for the Intercultural Experience (pp.21-71).Yarmouth, Me: Intercultural Press. [ Links ]

    Biber, D. (1988). Variation across speech and writing. New York: Cambridge University Press. [ Links ]

    Bunge, M. (2004). Emergencia y convergencia. Barcelona: Gedisa. [ Links ]

    Carlisle, J. & Rice, M. (2004). Assessment of reading comprehension. En A. Stone, E. Silliman, B. Ehren & K. Apel (Eds.), Handbook of language and literacy (pp. 521-555). New York: Guilford Press. [ Links ]

    Chapelle, C. (1999). Validity in language assessment. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 19, (54-72). [ Links ]

    Cronbach, L. J. (1971). Test validation. En R. L. Thorndike (Ed.), Educational Measurement (pp. (443-507).Washington, D. C.: American Council on Education. [ Links ]

    Crossley, S. A., Allen, D. & McNamara, D. S. (2011). Text simplification and comprehensible input: A case for an intuitive approach, Language Teaching Research (Aceptada). [ Links ]

    Davey, B. (1988). Factors affecting the difficulty of reading comprehension items for successful and unsuccessful readers. Journal of Experimental Education, 56(1), 67-76. [ Links ]

    Eeds, M. (1988). Holistic assessment of coding ability. En S. M. Glazer, L. W. Searfoss & L. M. Gentile (Eds.), Reexamining reading diagnosis: New trends and procedures (pp. 48-66). Newark, DL: International Reading Association. [ Links ]

    Engineer, W. (1977). Proficiency in reading English as a second language. Tesis doctoral no publicada, University of Edinburgh. [ Links ]

    Fredrickson, J.W. (1984).The comprehensiveness of strategic decision processes: Extension, observations, future directions. Academy of Management Journal, 27, 445-466. [ Links ]

    Golden, R. M. & Goldman, S. R. (2006). An empirical feasibility study of the ARCADE system. En R. Sun (Ed.), Proceedings of the 28th Annual Cognitive Science Society Conference (pp.1376-1381). Mahwah, NJ: Lauwrence Erlbaum. [ Links ]

    Graesser, A. (2007). An introduction to strategic reading comprehension. En D.S.McNamara (Ed.), Reading comprehension strategies: Theories, interventions, and technologies (pp. 3-26). Mahwah, NJ: Lauwrence Erlbaum. [ Links ]

    Graesser, A., Singer, M. & Trabasso, T. (1994). Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension. Psychological Review, 101(3), 371-395. [ Links ]

    Graesser, A. & Wiemer-Hasting, W. (1999). Situation models and concepts in story comprehension. En S. Goldman, A. Graesser & P. van den Broek (Eds.), Narrative comprehension, causality, and coherence (pp. 77-92). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. [ Links ]

    Graesser, A., Wiemer-Hastings, P. & Wiemer-Hastings, K. (2001). Constructing inferences and relations during text comprehension. En T. Sanders, J. Schilperoord & W. Spooren, (Eds.)Text representation: Linguistic and psycholinguistic aspects (pp. 249-271). Amsterdam: Benjamins. [ Links ]

    Hatch, E. & Lazaraton, N. (1991). The research manual. Design and statistics for applied linguistics. Massachusetts: Heinle & Heinle Publishers. [ Links ]

    Heaton, J. B. (1988). Writing English Language Tests: A practical guide for teachers of English as a second or foreign language. Londres: Longman. [ Links ]

    Hughes, A. (1989). Testing for language teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [ Links ]

    Ibáñez, R. (2007). Cognición y comprensión. Una aproximación histórica y crítica al trabajo investigativo de Rolf Zwaan. Revista Signos. Estudios de Lingüística, 40(63), 81-100. [ Links ]

    Ibáñez, R. (2008). Comprensión de textos académicos escritos en inglés: Relación entre nivel de logro y variables involucradas. Revista Signos. Estudios de Lingüística, 41(67), 203-229. [ Links ]

    Kelly, E. L. (1927). Interpretation of educational measurements. Nueva York: Macmillan. [ Links ]

    Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension:A paradigm for cognition. Nueva York: Cambridge University Press. [ Links ]

    Kintsch, W. (2001). Predication. Cognitive Science, 25, 173-202. [ Links ]

    Kintsch, W. (2002). On the notions of theme and topic in psychological process models of text comprehension. En M. Louwerse & W. van Peer (Eds.), Thematics Interdisciplinary Studies (pp.157-170). Amsterdam: Benjamins. [ Links ]

    Kintsch, W. & van Dijk, T. (1978). Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review, 85(5), 363-341. [ Links ]

    Kintsch, W. & Rawson, K.A. (2005). Comprehension. En M. J. Snowling & C. Hulme (Eds.), The science of reading: A handbook (pp. 209-226). Malden, MA: Blackwell. [ Links ]

    Klare, G. R. (1974-1975). Assessing readability. Reading Research Quarterly, 10(1), 62-102. [ Links ]

    Koda, K. (1987). Cognitive strategy transfer in second language reading. En J. Devine, P. Carrell & D. Eskey (Eds.), Research in reading in English as a second language (pp. 125-144).Washington, DC:TESOL. [ Links ]

    Labov, W. & Waletzky, J. (1967). Narrative analysis. En J. Helm (Ed.), Essays on the verbal and visual arts (pp. 12-44). Seattle: University of Washington Press. [ Links ]

    Landauer, T., Foltz, P. & Laham, D. (1998). An introduction to latent semantic analysis. Discourse Processes, 25(2-3), 259-284. [ Links ]

    León, J.A., Otero, J. & Graesser, A.C. (Eds.) (2002). The psychology of science text comprehension. Mahwah, NJ: Lauwrence Erlbaum. [ Links ]

    Leslie, L. & Caldwell, J. (2009). Informal and formal measures of reading comprehension. En S.E. Israel & G. G. Duffy (Eds.), Handbook of research on reading comprehension (pp. 403-427). Nueva York: Routledge. [ Links ]

    Lomicka, L. (1998). To gloss or not to gloss:An investigation of reading comprehension online. Language Learning and Technology, 1(2), 41-50. [ Links ]

    Louwerse, M. (2004). Un modelo conciso de cohesión en el texto y coherencia en la comprensión. Revista Signos. Estudios de Lingüística, 37(56), 41-58. [ Links ]

    Louwerse, M. & Van Peer, W. (2002). Thematics: Interdisciplinary studies.Amsterdam: Benjamins. [ Links ]

    Louwerse, M. & Graesser, A. (2006). Macroestructure. En E. K. Brown (Ed.), Encyclopedia of language and linguistics (pp. 426-429). Amsterdam: Elsevier. [ Links ]

    Louwerse, M. & Jeuniaux, P. (2009). Computational psycholinguistic techniques to measure cohesion in discourse. En J. Renkema (Ed.), Discourse of course (pp.213-226). Amsterdam: Benjamins. [ Links ]

    Magliano, J. P. & Graesser, A. (1991). A three-pronged method for studying inference generation in literary text. Poetics, 20, 193-232. [ Links ]

    Magliano, J.P. & Millis, K.K.(2003). Assessing reading skill with a think-aloud procedure. Cognition and Instruction, 21, 251-283. [ Links ]

    Magliano, J. P., Millis, K. K., Ozuru, Y. & McNamara, D. (2007). A multidimensional framework to evaluate reading assessment tools. En D. McNamara (Ed.), Reading comprehension strategies: Theories, interventions, and technologies (pp. 107-136). Mahwah, NJ: Lauwrence Erlbaum. [ Links ]

    Mannes, S. & St. George, M. (1996). Effects of prior knowledge on text comprehension: A simple modeling approach. En B. K. Britton & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Models of Understanding Text (pp. 115-139). Mahwah, NJ: Lauwrence Erlbaum. [ Links ]

    McKoon, G. & Ratcliff, R. (1992). Inference during reading. Psychological Review, 99, 440-446. [ Links ]

    McNamara, D. (2004). Aprender del texto: Efectos de la estructura textual y las estrategias del lector. Revista Signos. Estudios de Lingüística, 37(55), 1-12. [ Links ]

    McNamara, D. & Kintsch, W. (1996). Learning from texts: Effects of prior knowledge and text coherence. Discourse Processes, 22, 247-288. [ Links ]

    Messick, S. (1989). Meaning and values in test validation: The science and ethics of assessment. Educational Researcher, 18(2), 5-11. [ Links ]

    Messick, S. (1994). The interplay of evidence and consequences in the validation of performance assessments. Educational Researcher, 23(2), 13-23. [ Links ]

    Nuttall, C. (1996). Teaching reading skills in a foreign language. Londres: Heinemann. [ Links ]

    O’Brien, E. J., Rizzella, M. L., Albrecht, J. & Halleran, J. G. (1998). Updating a situation model: A memory-based text processing view. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 24, 1200-1210. [ Links ]

    O’Brien, E., Cook, A. & Guéraud, S. (2010). Accessibility of outdated information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36(4), 979-991. [ Links ]

    Paris, S. G. & Paris, A. H. (2001). Classroom applications of research on self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 36, 89-101. [ Links ]

    Parodi, G. (1991). Comprensión inferencial y estructura textual. Revista Signos. Estudios de Lingüística (30), 81-89. [ Links ]

    Parodi, G. (2000). La conexión lectura-escritura: Estudio discursivo cognitivo. Revista de Lingüística y Literatura, 33, 109-127. [ Links ]

    Parodi, G. (2002). Comprensión y producción lingüísticas: Una nueva mirada al procesamiento del discurso escrito. Revista Versión, 11, 59-97. [ Links ]

    Parodi, G. (2005). La comprensión del discurso especializado escrito en ámbitos técnico profesionales: ¿Aprendiendo a partir del texto? Revista Signos. Estudios de Lingüística, (58), 221-267. [ Links ]

    Parodi, G. (2007). El discurso especializado escrito en el ámbito universitario y profesional: Constitución de un corpus. Revista Signos. Estudios de Lingüística, 40(63), 147-178. [ Links ]

    Parodi, G. (2010). La organización retórica del género manual a través de cuatro disciplinas: ¿Cómo se comunica y difunde la ciencia en diferentes contextos universitarios? Revista Boletín de Lingüística, 22(33), 43-69. [ Links ]

    Parodi, G. (2011). La Teoría de la Comunicabilidad: Notas para una concepción integral de la comprensión de textos escritos. Revista Signos. Estudios de Lingüística, 44(76), 145-167. [ Links ]

    Parodi, G., Peronard, M. & Ibáñez, R. (2010). Saber leer. Madrid: Aguilar. [ Links ]

    Pérez Zorrilla, M. J. (2005). Evaluación de la comprensión lectora: Dificultades y limitaciones. Revista de Educación, 121-138. [ Links ]

    Perfetti, C. A., Yang, C-L. & Schmalhofer, F. (2008). Comprehension skill and word-to-text processes. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22(3), 303-318. [ Links ]

    Peronard, M. (1989). Estrato social y estrategias de comprensión de lectura. Lenguas Modernas,16, 19-32. [ Links ]

    Peronard, M. (1992). La comprensión de textos escritos como proceso estratégico. En A. Bocaz (Ed.), Actas del primer simposio sobre cognición, lenguaje y cultura: Diálogo transdisciplinario en ciencia cognitiva (pp. 89-102). Santiago: Editorial Universitaria. [ Links ]

    Peronard, M. (1999). Metacognición y Conciencia. En G. Parodi (Ed.), Discurso, Cognición y Educación (pp. 43-57). Valparaíso: EUVSA. [ Links ]

    Peronard, M. (2007). Lectura en papel y en pantalla de computador. Revista Signos. Estudios de Lingüística, 40(63), 179-195. [ Links ]

    Peronard, M. & Gómez Macker, L. (1985). Reflexiones acerca de la comprensión lingüística: hacia un modelo. Revista de Lingüística Teórica y Aplicada (RLA), 23, 19-32. [ Links ]

    Peronard, M., Gómez Macker, L., Parodi, G., Núñez, P. & González, J. (1997). Programa L y C: Leer y Comprender. Santiago de Chile: Andrés Bello. [ Links ]

    Peronard, M., Crespo, N. & Velásquez, M. (2000). La evaluación del conocimiento metacomprensivo en alumnos de educación básica. Revista Signos. Estudios de Lingüística, 33(47), 167-180. [ Links ]

    Peronard, M., Crespo, N. & Guerrero, I. (2001). La metacomprensión en escolares chilenos de educación básica. Revista Signos, 34(49-50), 149-164. [ Links ]

    Peronard, M., Crespo, N. & Velásquez, M. (2002). Conocimiento metacognitivo del lenguaje escrito: Instrumento de medición y fundamentación teórica. Infancia y aprendizaje, 25(2), 131-145. [ Links ]

    Peronard, M., Velásquez, M., Ibáñez, R., Órdenes, J. & Alonzo, T. (2006). Guiones metodológicos para desarrollar estrategias de comprensión y producción de textos escritos. Valparaíso: EUVSA. [ Links ]

    Rauch, D. & Hartig, J. (2010). Multiple-choice versus open-ended response formats of reading test items: A two-dimensional IRT analysis. Psychological Test and Assessment Modeling, 52(4), 354-379. [ Links ]

    Rupp, A., Ferne, T. & Choi, H.(2006). How assessing reading comprehension with multiple-choice questions shapes the construct: a cognitive processing perspective. Language Testing, 23, 441-474. [ Links ]

    Sanders, T. & Spooren, W. (2001). Modeling causal and contrastive connectives: On domains, subjectivity and mental spaces. International Cognitive Linguistics Conference. Santa Barbara, CA: USA. [ Links ]

    Sanders, T. & Pander, H. (2006). Cohesion and Coherence: Linguistic approaches. En K. Brown (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics (pp. 591-595). Londres: Elsevier. [ Links ]

    Santana, A. (2010). Nivel de dominio del inglés, multimodalidad y nivel de comprensión en segunda lengua de textos académicos escritos en inglés: Una aproximación al fenómeno en el ámbito de la Física. Tesis para optar al grado de Magíster en Lingüística Aplicada, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso, Chile. [ Links ]

    Simon, H. (1957). A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice, in Models of Man, Social and Rational: Mathematical Essays on Rational Human Behavior in a Social Setting. Nueva York: Wiley. [ Links ]

    Thorndike, E. (1904). An introduction to the theory of mental and social measurements. Nueva York: Teachers College, Columbia University. [ Links ]

    Tyler, R. W. (1949). Basic principles of curriculum and instruction. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. [ Links ]

    van Dijk, T. A. (1980). Macrostructures. Hillsdale, NJ: Lauwrence Erlbaum. [ Links ]

    van Dijk, T. & Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of Discourse Comprehension. Nueva York: AcademicPress. [ Links ]

    Walter, C. (2004). Transfer of reading comprehension skills to L2 is linked to mental representations of text and to L2 working memory. Applied Psycholinguistics, 25, 315-339. [ Links ]

    Weir, C. J. (1990). Communicative language testing. Londres: Prentice Hall. [ Links ]

    Zwaan, R. A. & Madden, C. J. (2004). Updating situation models. Journal of ExperimentalPsychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, 283-288. [ Links ]

    Zwaan, R. A. & Radvansky, G. A. (1998). Situation models in language comprehension and memory. Psychological Bulletin, 123, 162-185. [ Links ]