SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

Referencias del artículo

ARAYA, Carolina; TAUT, Sandy; SANTELICES, Verónica  y  MANZI, Jorge. Validez consecuencial del programa de asignación de excelencia pedagógica en Chile. Estud. pedagóg. [online]. 2011, vol.37, n.2, pp. 25-42. ISSN 0718-0705.  http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-07052011000200001.

    American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association & National Council on Measurement in Education. (1999). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. [ Links ]

    Araya, Taut, Santelices, Manzi & Mio (en prensa). Teora de accin del programa de Asignacin de Excelencia Pedaggica en Chile. Revista de Educacin, Espaa (ISSI), 359, Septiembre-diciembre 2012. Fecha de entrada: 10-03-2010 Fecha de aceptacin: 17-09-2010. [ Links ]

    Arn, A.M. & Milicic, N. (2000). Climas Sociales Txicos y Climas Nutritivos para el Desarrollo Personal en el Contexto Escolar. Revista Psykh, Vol. 9(1), pp. 117-124. [ Links ]

    Avalos, B. & Assael, J. (2006). Moving from resistance to agreement: the case of the chilean teacher performance evaluation. International Journal of Educational Research. 45, 254-266. [ Links ]

    Baker, E.L. y Linn, R.L. (2002). Validity Issues for Accountability Systems. Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing (CRESST), Graduate School of Education & Information Studies, University of California Los Angeles: Technical Report 585. [ Links ]

    Castillo, E. & Vsquez, L. (2003). El rigor metodolgico en la investigacin cualitativa. Revista Colombia Mdica. 3(34), 164-167. [ Links ]

    Cox, C. (2003). Polticas educacionales en el cambio de siglo. Santiago, Chile: Editorial Universitaria. [ Links ]

    Darling-Hammond, L. (1999). Target time toward teachers. Journal of Staff Development. 20(2), 31-36. [ Links ]

    Elmore, R. (2008). School Reform from the Inside Out. Cambridge, M.A.: Harvard Education Press. [ Links ]

    Fast, E.F. y Hebbler, S., with ASR-CAS Joint Study Group on Validity in Accountability Systems (2004). A framework for examining validity in state accountability systems. Documento de la serie: Implementing the State Accountability System Requirements Under the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (NCLB). Washington, D.C.: Council of Chief State School Officers. [ Links ]

    Flick, U. (2004). Introduccin a la investigacin cualitativa. Madrid: Ediciones Morata. [ Links ]

    Fullan, M. (2004). Learning to lead change. Building system capacity. Core concepts. Publication produced in partnership with Microsoft's Partnership in Learning (PiL) Initiative. Extrado el 14 marzo 2011 de http://www.michaelfullan.ca/Articles_04/CoreConcepts.pdf. [ Links ]

    Goldhaber, D. (2009). Teacher Pay Reforms: The Political Implications of Recent Research. Center for American Progress Working Paper. Extrado el 4 febrero 2010 de http://www.americanprogress.org/issues/2006/12/pdf/teacher_pay_report.pdf. [ Links ]

    Harvey-Beavis, O. (2003). Performance-Based Rewards for Teachers: A Literature Review. Paper prepared for the Organisation for economic co-operation and development (OECD), Paris, France. Extrado el 4 febrero 2010 de http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/17/47/34077553.pdf. [ Links ]

    Hsieh, H.F. & Shannon, S.E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 9(15), 1277-1288. http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0013/001330/133010e.pdf. [ Links ]

    Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation (1988). The personnel evaluation standards. Newbury Park, CA: Corwin Press. [ Links ]

    Kane, M. (2002). Validating high-stakes testing programs. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice. N 21(1), pp. 31-41. [ Links ]

    Lane, S. & Stone, C.A. (2002). Strategies for examining the consequences of assessment and accountability programs. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice. 21(1), 23-30. [ Links ]

    Lane, S., Park, C.S., & Stone, C.A. (1998). A framework for evaluating the consequences of assessment programs. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 17(2), 24-28. [ Links ]

    Linn, R.L. (1997). Evaluating the validity of assessments: the consequences of use. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 16, 14-16. [ Links ]

    Manzi, J., Araya, C., Gonzlez, R., Barros, E., Bravo, D., Peirano, C., Cadiz, J., y Torres, D. (2007). Validity evidence for the certification of teaching excellence in Chile: A pioneer experience in Latin America. Chicago: Documento presentado en la Reunin Anual de la Asociacin Americana de Investigacin en Educacin (AERA) el 13 de Marzo. [ Links ]

    Mc Kinsey & Company, Social Sector Office. (2007). How the world's Best-Performing School Systems Come Out On Top. Disponible en sitio web: http://www.mckinsey.com/locations/ukireland/publications/pdf/Education_report.pdf. [ Links ]

    Mehrens, W.A. (1997). The consequences of consequential validity. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 16, 16-19. [ Links ]

    Messick, S. (1994). The interplay of evidence and consequences in the validation of performance assessments. Educational Researcher, 23(2), 13-23. [ Links ]

    Messick, S. (1998). Test validity: a matter of consequence. Social Indicators Research, 45, 35-44. [ Links ]

    Mineduc (2002). Decreto con fuerza de ley. Fija las normas que estructuran y organizan el funcionamiento y operacin de la asignacin de excelencia pedaggica y la red maestros de maestros. Ministerio de Educacin de Chile. Extrado el 1 febrero 2010 de http://www.leychile.cl/Navegar?idNorma=195372&buscar=asignacion+excelencia+pedag%C3%B3gica. [ Links ]

    Mineduc (2004a). La educacin chilena en el cambio de siglo: polticas, resultados y desafos. Informe Nacional de Chile, Oficina Internacional de Educacin, UNESCO. Ministerio de Educacin. Santiago, Chile. [ Links ]

    Mineduc (2004b). Marco para la buena enseanza. Ministerio de Educacin. Santiago, Chile. [ Links ]

    Mizala, A. & Romaguera, P. (2002). Regulacin, incentivos y remuneraciones de los profesores en Chile. Documento sin publicar. Documento de Trabajo N 116, Serie Economa, Departamento de Ingeniera Industrial, Universidad de Chile. [ Links ]

    Moss, P.A. (1992). Shifting conceptions of validity in educational measurement: implications for performance assessment. Review of Educational Research, 62, 229-258. [ Links ]

    Moss, P.A. (1998). The role of consequences in validity theory. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 17(2), 6-12. [ Links ]

    National Research Council (2008). Assessing accomplished teaching: advanced - level certification programs. Washington, D.C.: The National Academic Press. [ Links ]

    Odden, A.R. & Kelley, C.J. (2002). Paying teachers for what they know and do. (2nd Ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press. [ Links ]

    Patton, M.Q. (2008). Utilization - focused evaluation (4rd Ed.). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. [ Links ]

    Patton, M.Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd Ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. [ Links ]

    Popham, W.J. (1997). Consequential validity: right concern-wrong concept. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 6, 9-14. [ Links ]

    Sclafani, S. (2010). Teacher Compensation around the globe. Kappan. Vol. 19(8), pp. 38-43. [ Links ]

    Shepard, L.A. (1997). Evaluating centrality of test use and consequences of test validity. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 6, 71-86. [ Links ]

    Vaillant, D. (2009). La profesin docente: lecciones para diseadores de polticas sobre reformas que funcionan. Cap. 4 En Schwartzman, S. & Cox, C. [Eds] Polticas educativas y cohesin social en Amrica Latina. Santiago, Chile: Uqbar Editores. [ Links ]

    Villegas-Reimers, E. (2003). Teacher professional development: an international review of the literature. Paris: UNESCO, Institute for Educational Planning. Disponible en sitio web: http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0013/001330/133010e.pdf. [ Links ]