SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

Referencias del artículo

PONCE-DONOSO, Mauricio; VALLEJOS-BARRA, Óscar  y  DANILUK-MOSQUERA, Gustavo. Comparación de fórmulas chilenas e internacionales para valorar el arbolado urbano. Bosque (Valdivia) [online]. 2012, vol.33, n.1, pp. 69-81. ISSN 0717-9200.  http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0717-92002012000100008.

    AEPJP (Asociación Española de Parque y Jardines Públicos, ES). 2007. Norma Granada. Método para valoración de árboles y arbustos ornamentales. 3ª Edición. Madrid. España. Mundi-Prensa. 53 p. [ Links ]

    Caballer V. 1999. Valoración de árboles. Madrid, España. Mundi-Prensa. 247 p. [ Links ]

    Chueca J. 2001. La Norma de Granada; un método de valoración económica de los árboles ornamentales. Consultado 25 oct. 2007. Disponible en http://www.drac.com/pers/chueca/Granada.htm. [ Links ]

    Conover W. 1999. Practical nonparametric statistics. 3th Edition. New York, USA. John Wiley. 584 p. [ Links ]

    Contato-Carol ML, E Ayuga-Tellez, MA Grande-Ortiz. 2008. A comparative analysis of methods for the valuation of urban trees in Santiago del Estero, Argentina. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research 6(3): 314-352. [ Links ]

    CTLA (Council of Tree and Landscape Appraiser, US). 2000. Guide for plant appraisal. 9th Edition. International Society of Arboriculture, Champaign, IL. 143 p. [ Links ]

    Cullen S. 2002. Tree appraisal: can depreciation factors be rated greater than 100%? Journal of Arboriculture 28(3): 153-158. [ Links ]

    Cullen S. 2005. Tree appraisal: chronology of North American industry guidance. Journal of Arboriculture 31(4): 157-162. [ Links ]

    Cullen S. 2007. Putting a value on trees – CTLA guidelines and methods. Arboricultural Journal 30(1): 21–43. [ Links ]

    Kirk R.1995. Experimental design: procedures for the behavioral sciences. Pacific Grove. Brooks/Cole. An International Thompson. California, USA. 921 p. [ Links ]

    Konijnendijk C, S Syaka, T Randrup, L Schipperijn. 2004. Urban and peri-urban forestry in the development context: strategic and implementation. Journal of Arboriculture 30(5): 269-276. [ Links ]

    Konijnendijk C, N Kjell, T Randrup, J Schipperijn. 2005. Urban forest and trees. Amsterdam, Holanda. Springer Verlag. 520 p. [ Links ]

    Leal L, D Biondi, R Rochadelli. 2008. Investment on urban trees in the city of Curitiba: an approach based on the land income theory. Scientia Forestalis 36(78): 141-149. [ Links ]

    McPherson EG. 2007. Benefit-based tree valuation. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry 33(1): 1-11. [ Links ]

    Ministerio del Interior (CL). 2004. Subsecretaria de Desarrollo Regional y Administrativo. Ley Nº 18.695 Orgánica Constitucional de Municipalidades. Consultado 18 oct. 2007. Disponible en http://www.subdere.gov.cl/1510/articles-65813_recurso_1.doc. [ Links ]

    Moore GM. 1991. Amenity evaluation: A revised method. In The Scientific Management of Plants in the Urban Environment. Proceedings of the Burnley Centenary Conference. Centre of Urban Arboriculture, Melbourne, Australia. p. 166-171. [ Links ]

    Municipalidad de Talca (CL). 2006. Informe de costos de mantenimiento de especies arbóreas urbanas. Talca. Departamento de aseo y ornato. Talca, Chile. Municipalidad de Talca. 12 p. [ Links ]

    Nowak D, D Crane, J Dwyer. 2002. Compensatory value of urban trees in the United States. Journal of Arboriculture 28(4): 194-199. [ Links ]

    Piolet S, N Jones, G García-Marín, JL García-Valdecantos, L Rivière, L Vidal Beaudet, M Bodson, T Raundrup. 2002. Tree establishment practice in towns and cities: results from European survey. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening 1(2): 83-96. [ Links ]

    Ponce-Donoso M, L Moya, O Bustos-Letelier. 2009. Evaluation of formula for the appraisal of urban trees in municipalities of Chile. Scientia Forestalis 37(83): 321-329. [ Links ]

    Randrup TB. 2005. Development of Danish model for plant appraisal. Journal of Arboriculture 31(3): 114-123. [ Links ]

    Tyrväinen L. 2001. Economic valuation of urban forest benefits in Finland. Journal of Environmental Management 62: 75-92. [ Links ]

    Tyrväinen L, H Silvennoinen, O Kolehmainen. 2003. Ecological and aesthetic value in urban forest management. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening 1(3): 135-150. [ Links ]

    Watson G. 2001. A study of CTLA formula values. Journal o Arboriculture 27(6): 289-297. [ Links ]

    Watson G. 2002. Comparing formula methods of tree appraisal. Journal of Arboriculture 28(1): 11-18. [ Links ]

    Wenger K. 1984. Urban Forestry. In Wenger K ed. Forestry Handbook. Washington, United States. Wiley Interscience. p. 887-983. [ Links ]