SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

Referencias del artículo

PADILLA, Carlos; VILLALOBOS, Pablo; SPILLER, Achim  y  HENRY, Guy. Consumer Preference and Willingness to Pay for an Officially Certified Quality Label: Implications for Traditional Food Producers. Agric. Téc. [online]. 2007, vol.67, n.3, pp.300-308. ISSN 0365-2807.

    Aaker, D., V. Kumar, and G. Day. 2003. Marketing research. 800 p. 7th ed. John Wiley and Sons, New York, USA. [ Links ]

    Alvensleben, R., and S. Schrader. 1999. Consumer attitudes towards regional food products: a case-study for Northern Germany. The European Food Consumer 5:10-19. [ Links ]

    Cattin, P., and D. Wittink. 1982. Commercial use of conjoint analysis: a survey. J. Marketing 46(3):44-53. [ Links ]

    Cowan, C., N. Riordan, and M. McCarthy. 2000. Irish consumers willingness to pay for safe beef. p. 14. The National Food Centre, Dublin, Ireland. [ Links ]

    Fotopoulos, C., and A. Krystallis. 2003. Quality labels as a marketing advantage: the case of the PDO Zaragoza apples in the Greek market. Eur. J. Marketing. 37(10):1350-1374. [ Links ]

    Gan, C., and E. Luzar. 1993. A conjoint analysis in waterfowl hunting in Louisiana. J. Agric. Appl. Econ. 25:36-45. [ Links ]

    Govindasamy, R., and J. Italia. 1999. Predicting willingness to pay a premium for organically grown fresh produce. J. Food Distrib. Res. 30:44-53. [ Links ]

    Grannis, J., S. Hine, and D. Thilmany. 2001. Marketing premium food products in emerging economies: the case of Macedonian cheese. J. Int. Food Agribus. Mark. 13:59-76. [ Links ]

    Grannis, J., N. Hooker, and D. Thilmany. 2000. Consumer preference for specific attributes in natural beef products. p. 13. Western Agricultural Economics Association Annual Meeting, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. June 29-July 01. Western Agricultural Economics Association, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. [ Links ]

    Green, P., A. Krieger, and Y. Wind. 2001. Thirty years of conjoint analysis: reflections and prospects. Interfaces 31:56-73. [ Links ]

    Green, P., and V. Srinivasan. 1978. Conjoint analysis in consumer research: issues and outlook. J. Consum. Res. 5:103-123. [ Links ]

    Green, P., and V. Srinivasan. 1990. Conjoint analysis in marketing: new developments with implications for research and practice. J. Marketing 54(4):3-19. [ Links ]

    Green, P., and Y. Wind. 1975. New way to measure consumers judgments. Harvard Business Review 53:107-117. [ Links ]

    Hair, J., R. Anderson, R. Tatham, y W. Black. 1999. Anlisis multivariante. 832 p. 5a ed. Prince Hall Iberia, Madrid, Espaa. [ Links ]

    Halbrendt, C., Q. Wang, C. Fraiz, and L. ODierno. 1995. Marketing problems and opportunities in mid-Atlantic seafood retailing. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 77:1313-1318. [ Links ]

    Harrison, R., J. Gillespie, and D. Fields. 2001. Theoretical and empirical considerations of eliciting preferences and model estimation in conjoint analysis. p. 17. American Agricultural Economics Association Annual Meeting, Chicago Illinois, USA. August 5-8. American Agricultural Economics Association, Chicago Illinois, USA. [ Links ]

    Harrison, R., A. zayan, and S. Meyers. 1998. A conjoint analysis of new food products processed from underutilized small crawfish. J. Agric. Appl. Econ. 30:257-265. [ Links ]

    Jahn, G., M. Schramm, and A. Spiller. 2005. The reliability of certification systems: quality labels as consumer policy tool. J. Consum. Policy 28:53-73. [ Links ]

    Jolly, D. 1999. Home Made the paradigms and paradoxes of changing consumer preferences: implications for direct marketing. p. 8. Agricultural Outlook Forum, Arlington, Virginia, USA. February 22-23. United States Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC, USA. [ Links ]

    Kinsey, J., B. Senauer, R. King, and P. Phumpiu. 1996. Changes in retail food delivery: signals for producers, processors and distributors. Working Paper 96-03. p. 36. The Retail Industry Center, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, Minnesota, USA. [ Links ]

    Loureiro, M., and W. Umberger. 2003. Estimating consumer willingness to pay for country of origin labeling. J.Agr. Resour. Econ. 28:287-301. [ Links ]

    Marreiros, C., M. Neto, and L. Carvalho. 1997. Certification of agro-food quality products: a new reality in demand and farm management. p. 11. European Association of Agricultural Economist Seminar, 52nd, Parma, Italy. 19-21 June. University of Parma, Parma, Italy. [ Links ]

    Misra, S., C. Huang, and S. Ott. 1991. Consumer willingness to pay for pesticide-free fresh produce. West. J. Agric. Econ. 16:218-227. [ Links ]

    Oyarzn, M., y F. Tartanac. 2002. Estudio sobre los principales tipos de sellos de calidad en alimentos a nivel mundial. Estado actual y perspectivas de los sellos de calidad en productos alimenticios de la agroindustria rural en Amrica Latina. p. 70. FAO, Santiago, Chile. [ Links ]

    Snchez, G., y G. Gil. 1998. Evaluacin del potencial de mercado de los productos de agricultura ecolgica. Rev. Esp. Invest. Marketing 2:135-150. [ Links ]

    Schupp, A., and J. Gillespie. 2001. Consumer attitudes towards potential country of origin labelling of fresh or frozen beef. J. Food Distrib. Res. 32:34-44. [ Links ]

    Senauer, B. 1995. The evolution of an industrialized, globalized, consumer-driven food system. Working paper 95-3. p. 14. Minnesota Padova Conference on Food Agriculture and Environment, 4th, Wayzata, Minnesota, USA. September 4-10. University of Minnesota, Center for International Food and Agricultural Policy, Saint Paul, Minnesota, USA. [ Links ]

    Senauer, B. 2001. The food consumer in the 21st century. New research perspectives. Working Paper 01-03. p. 25. The Retail Industry Center. University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, Minnesota, USA. [ Links ]

    Sijtsema, S., A. Linnemann, T. Van Gaasbeek, H. Dagevos, and W. Jongen. 2002. Variables influencing food perception reviewed for consumer-oriented product development. CRC Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 42:565-581. [ Links ]

    Souza Monteiro, D., and M. Ventura. 2001. Conjoint measurement of preferences for traditional chesses in Lisbon. Br. Food J. 103:414-424. [ Links ]

    Spiller, A. 2003. Nuevas orientaciones para el aseguramiento de la calidad en la cadena agroalimentaria. p. 34-66. In Conferencia Internacional sobre Gestin de la Calidad en la Cadena Agroalimentaria, Santiago, Chile. Marzo de 1998. Instituto Interamericano de Cooperacin para la Agricultura (IICA), Santiago, Chile. [ Links ]

    SPSS. 1997. SPSS Conjoint 8.0. Marketing Department, SPSS Inc. Available at Accessed January 20, 2005. [ Links ]

    Universidad de Chile. 2002. Bases para la especificacin tcnica Especialidad Campesina Garantizada. Informe final. 124 p. Universidad de Chile, Facultad de Ciencias Agronmicas, Santiago, Chile. [ Links ]

    Villalobos, P. 2005. Bienestar animal como atributo de diferenciacin en la decisin de compra de los consumidores. p. 139-147. In G. Gonzlez et al. (eds.). Actas del Seminario La institucionalidad del bienestar animal, un requisito para su desarrollo normativo, cientfico y productivo, Santiago, Chile. 11-12 de noviembre de 2004. Servicio Agrcola y Ganadero, Santiago, Chile. [ Links ]

    Walley, K., S. Parsons, and M. Bland. 1999. Quality assurance and the consumer: a conjoint study. Br. Food J. 101:148-162. [ Links ]

    Wang, Q., and J. Sun. 2003. Consumers preference and demand for organic food: evidence from a Vermont survey. p. 12. American Agricultural Economics Association Annual Meeting, Montreal, Canada. July 27-30. American Agricultural Economics Association, Montreal, Canada. [ Links ]

    Wittink, D., and P. Cattin. 1989. Commercial use of conjoint analysis: an update. J. Marketing 53(3):91-96. [ Links ]

    Wittink, D., M. Vriens, and W. Burhenne. 1994. Commercial use of conjoint analysis in Europe: results and critical reflections. Int. J. Res. Mark. 11:41-52.
[ Links ]