<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id>0718-9516</journal-id>
<journal-title><![CDATA[Journal of soil science and plant nutrition]]></journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title><![CDATA[J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr.]]></abbrev-journal-title>
<issn>0718-9516</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Chilean Society of Soil Science/Sociedad Chilena de la Ciencia del Suelo]]></publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id>S0718-95162012000200007</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4067/S0718-95162012000200007</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Crop residue grazing and tillage systems effects on soil physical properties and corn (Zea mays L.) performance]]></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Agostini]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M. de los A]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A01"/>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A04"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Studdert]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.A]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A02"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[San Martino]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A02"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Costa]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.L]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A02"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Balbuena]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.H]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A03"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ressia]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.M]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A04"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Mendivil]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.O]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A04"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lázaro]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A04"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="A01">
<institution><![CDATA[,Fellow Comisión de Investigaciones Científicas  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[La Plata ]]></addr-line>
<country>Argentina</country>
</aff>
<aff id="A02">
<institution><![CDATA[,Unidad Integrada Balcarce  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[Balcarce ]]></addr-line>
<country>Argentina</country>
</aff>
<aff id="A03">
<institution><![CDATA[,Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias y Forestales  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[La Plata ]]></addr-line>
<country>Argentina</country>
</aff>
<aff id="A04">
<institution><![CDATA[,Facultad de Agronomía  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[Azul ]]></addr-line>
<country>Argentina</country>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="pub">
<day>00</day>
<month>00</month>
<year>2012</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>00</day>
<month>00</month>
<year>2012</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>12</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<fpage>271</fpage>
<lpage>282</lpage>
<copyright-statement/>
<copyright-year/>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&amp;pid=S0718-95162012000200007&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso&amp;tlng=en"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&amp;pid=S0718-95162012000200007&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso&amp;tlng=en"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_pdf&amp;pid=S0718-95162012000200007&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso&amp;tlng=en"></self-uri><abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="en"><p><![CDATA[Abstract Crop-livestock systems under no till (NT) could negatively affect soil physical properties and crop performance, due to the additive effects of reduced soil cover and cattle trampling due to livestock grazing, and the absence of tillage. We evaluated the effects of four grazing strategies and of a shallow tillage (ST) on soil physical properties and corn (Zea mays L.) performance for a mollisol after 15 years under crop-livestock systems under NT in Argentina. Grazing strategies evaluated were: closure (C), one grazing (OG), high stocking rate (HR) and farmer's management (FM), and the tillage systems were: NT and ST. Bulk density (BD), penetration resistance (PR), hydraulic conductivity (k s), plant population, surface root distribution, aboveground dry matter accumulation, aboveground total N (TN) accumulation and corn yield were evaluated. High stocking rate and FM increased RP. On the other hand, ST decreased PR and BD and increased k s Corn yield was higher under ST than under NT, and under HR than under the other grazing strategies. Total N accumulation was higher under HR than under the rest of grazing strategies. Rational grazing management and use of tillage systems on resilient soils could have prevented soil physical properties be affected beyond critical thresholds.]]></p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[crop]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[tillage]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[trampling]]></kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front><body><![CDATA[ <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2"><i>Journal    of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition,</i> 2012, 12 (2), 271&#45;282</font></p>     <p align="justify">&nbsp;</p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="4"><b>Crop    residue grazing and tillage systems effects on soil physical properties and    corn (Zea <i>mays</i> L.) performance</b></font></p>     <p align="justify">&nbsp;</p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2"><strong>M.    de los A. Agostini<sup>1,4</sup>, G.A. Studdert<sup>2</sup>*, S. San Martino<sup>2</sup>,    J.L. Costa<sup>2</sup>, R.H. Balbuena<sup>3</sup>, J.M. Ressia<sup>4</sup>,    G.O. Mendivil<sup>4</sup>, L. L&aacute;zaro<sup>4</sup></strong></font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2"><sup>1</sup><i>Fellow    Comisi&oacute;n de Investigaciones Cient&iacute;ficas, (1900) La Plata, Argentina.        <br>   <sup>2</sup>Unidad Integrada Balcarce, C.C. 276, (7620) Balcarce, Argentina.Corresponding    author:.<a href="mailto:gstuddert@balcarce.inta.gov.ar">gstuddert@balcarce.inta.gov.ar</a>    <sup>    <br>   3</sup>Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias y Forestales, UNLP, (1900) La Plata,    Argentina.     <br>   <sup>4</sup>Facultad de Agronom&iacute;a, UNCPBA, (7300) Azul, Argentina.    <br>   *Corresponding    author: Telephone #: 54&#45;2266&#45;439100 ext. 766, E&#45;mail address:</i>    <a href="mailto:gstuddert@balcarce.inta.gov.ar" target="_blank"></a><i><wbr>.    Fax #: 54&#45;2266439101. </i></font></p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p align="justify"><hr width="100%" size="1">     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2"><b>Abstract</b></font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Crop&#45;livestock    systems under no till (NT) could negatively affect soil physical properties    and crop performance, due to the additive effects of reduced soil cover and    cattle trampling due to livestock grazing, and the absence of tillage. We evaluated    the effects of four grazing strategies and of a shallow tillage (ST) on soil    physical properties and corn (Zea <i>mays</i> L.) performance for a mollisol    after 15 years under crop&#45;livestock systems under NT in Argentina. Grazing    strategies evaluated were: closure (C), one grazing (OG), high stocking rate    (HR) and farmer&#39;s management (FM), and the tillage systems were: NT and    ST. Bulk density (BD), penetration resistance (PR), hydraulic conductivity <i>(k<sub>s</sub>),</i>    plant population, surface root distribution, aboveground dry matter accumulation,    aboveground total N (TN) accumulation and corn yield were evaluated. High stocking    rate and FM increased RP. On the other hand, ST decreased PR and BD and increased    <i>k<sub>s</sub></i> Corn yield was higher under ST than under NT, and under    HR than under the other grazing strategies. Total N accumulation was higher    under HR than under the rest of grazing strategies. Rational grazing management    and use of tillage systems on resilient soils could have prevented soil physical    properties be affected beyond critical thresholds.</font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2"><b>Keywords:</b>    crop, tillage, trampling</font></p>     <p align="justify"><hr width="100%" size="1">     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="3"><b>1.    Introduction</b></font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Soil    compaction is one of the major problems of modern agriculture and it occurs    in a wide range of soils and climates. Some soil textual classes are more susceptible    to harmful compaction than others, especially those with high silt content (Alvarez    and Steinbach, 2009) which show poor resilience.</font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">This    process adversely affects soil physical properties such us, bulk density (BD),    infiltration rate and penetration resistance (PR) (Greenwood and Mac Kenzie,    2001) and consequently, affects root growth and crop yield (Hamza and Anderson,    2005). Cattle trampling, machinery traffic, and inappropriate soil management    have been reported to cause soil compaction (Botta <i>et al.,</i> 2004; Hamza    and Anderson, 2005).</font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Changes    in soil physical properties caused by grazing have received little research    attention in comparison with compaction due to cropping (Greenwood and McKenzie,    2001). The depth of trampling&#45;induced soil compaction ranges from 2.5 to    20 cm depth (Hamza and Anderson, 2005) affecting soil physical properties and    crop growth, particularly under wet soil condition (Di <i>et al.,</i> 2001).    The magnitude of trampling effects is related to the pressure exerted on the    soil, which is a function of animal mass and foot size, grazing intensity, soil    characteristics (texture, organic matter (OM), soil water content (WC)), and    soil residue cover. Depending on the magnitude of trampling effects on soil    physical properties, it should be recommended either to remove the animals from    the field or to implement tillage operations to reverse the effects (Greenwood    and McKenzie, 2001; Hamza and Anderson, 2005).</font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">No&#45;till    (NT) has become a popular conservation practice in recent years in Argentina,    occupying at present about 70% of the surface under annual cropping (Alvarez    and Steinbach, 2009). No&#45;till contributes. to reduce or prevent erosion    problems, and degra</font><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">dation    of soil physical and chemical properties. On the other hand, is contributes    to increase soil water storage because the soil is not tilled and crop residues    are left on the surface. Crop residues on soil surface are the major advantage    of NT (Lal <i>et al.,</i> 1994). However, one of the reported disadvantages    of NT is soil compaction caused by traffic intensity of heavy machinery, especially    when the operations are carried out on wet soil or with high tire&#45;inflation    pressure (Botta <i>et al.,</i> 2004). Furthermore, NT is associated with less    N availability to the crops (Dominguez <i>et al.,</i> 2009).</font></p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p align="justify"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Crop&#45;livestock    systems under NT, where crop residues are grazed, are being implemented in Argentina    and in some other parts of the world. These systems could increase economic    return as well as the diversification of production (Franzluebbers and Stuedemann,    2008). As mentioned before, soil physical properties and crop performance could    be negatively affected by integrated systems due to less soil cover during animal    grazing and to the absence of tillage under NT.</font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Even    though surface residue cover reduces cattle trampling impact (Greene <i>et al.,</i>    1994), stubble grazing reduces residue cover and increases the exposure to trampling    effects. Therefore, for the implementation of crop&#45;livestock systems under    NT, management practices that reduce the additive effect of trampling and traffic    should be considered. Grazing management to ensure a minimum surface residue    mass to diminish trampling effects (Franzluebbers and Stuedemann, 2008) and    surface tillage (ST) before planting (Munkholm <i>et al.,</i> 2003) are recommended    practices when treading and NT are expected to result in detrimental soil physical    conditions for crop growth. This would contribute to maintaining soil health    and improving crop performance and both profitability and environmental sustainability    would be improved (Franzluebbers and Stuedemann, 2008).</font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Crop&#45;livestock    systems effects on soil physical properties and crop performance have not been    widely investigated. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of trampling    of animals grazing crop stubble and NT and ST on some soil surface physical    properties and on the performance of corn <i>(Zea mays</i> L.). The experiment    was carried out on soils with high OM content and loam clay surface texture.</font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="3"><b>2.  Materials and methods</b></font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2"><i>2.1&nbsp;Site    description</i></font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Experimental    site was established in 2006 at "Los Angeles" farm in <i>Azul, Buenos Aires,    Argentina</i> (37&#176; <i>T</i> 46" S; 59&#176; 44&#39; 23" W). The soil was    a fine clayey, mixed, thermic Typic Argiudoll (Soil Taxonomy) or Luvic Phaeozem    (FAO Classification), with a slope ranging from 3% to 5%. Surface horizon texture    is loam clay and its OM content ranged from 6.1 % in the top 0&#45;10 cm to    4.3% at 10&#45;20 cm (Crespo, J. personal communication).</font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Prior    to the establishment of the experiment, the site had been under pasture from    1979 to 1992. Since 1992 an integrated crop&#45;livestock system under NT had    been implemented. Crop rotation was wheat <i>(Triticum aestivum</i> L.) / corn.    Wheat and corn stubble, volunteer wheat, and weeds have been grazed during winter    seasons by breeding cows.</font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2"><i>2.2&nbsp;Treatments    and experimental design</i></font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">The    experiment was conducted with a split block design (also known as a strip plot)    with two treatment factors and two replications. Treatment factors were: grazing    strategy (four levels) and tillage system for corn planting (two levels). Tillage    system levels were: NT and ST (disc harrow, 10 cm depth).</font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Grazing    strategy levels were: C) Closure: not grazed; OG) One grazing: the animals (breeding    cows) entered the plot to graze volunteer wheat and wheat stubble during twelve    days (90 days after wheat harvest) with regular stocking rate, after grazing,    the animals were removed and did not enter again, this grazing is referred to    as initial grazing and coincided with the farmer&#39;s grazing period; HR) High    stocking rate: initial grazing as for OG and a second grazing period for one    week (250 days after wheat harvest) with high stocking rate; and FM) Farmer&#39;s    management: initial grazing as for OG and a second continuous grazing period    until one month before corn planting with regular stocking rate. The regular    stocking rate was 4 animals ha<sup>&#45;1</sup> and the high stocking rate was    12 animals ha<sup>&#45;1</sup>. The average weight of the animals was 420 kg.</font></p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p align="justify"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Six    sampling points were defined in each subplot and were located 10 m away one    from each other and from the experimental unit boundaries. Before the tillage    system was applied, measurements were made in each of the grazing strategy plots    at the twelve (in total) sampling points.</font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">One    month before corn planting, weeds were controlled with glyphosate &#91;N&#45;(phosphonomethyl)    glycine&#93; and tillage operations were applied to ST strips. On October 12,    2006, corn hybrid Ax 884 IT (NIDERA) was planted with a population of 75000    seeds ha<sup>&#45;1</sup> and a fertilizer rate of 16 kg N ha<sup>&#45;1</sup>    and 18 kg P ha<sup>&#45;1</sup> as diamonium phosphate was applied next to the    seeds. Additional 69 kg N ha<sup>&#45;1</sup> were surface broadcasted as urea    at corn six leaf stage (V6) (Ritchie and </font><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Hanway,    1982).</font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2"><i>2.3    Soil determinations</i></font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">All    soil variables were determined at three times: 1: one month before corn planting;    2: Corn V6 stage, and 3: six months after corn harvest. Soil physical properties    assessed were:</font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2"><i>Bulk    density:</i> Soil samples were taken from 0 to 5 and 5 to 15 cm depth layers    with a 44.7 mm diameter soil core sampler (Doran and Mielke, 1984). Soil core    volume was registered and WC determined gravimetrically, to calculate BD. One    sample was taken per sampling point.</font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2"><i>Penetration    resistance:</i> Cone index (CI) was measured with a Rimick CP20 (Toowoomba,    Queensland, Australia, ASAE Standard S313) recording penetrometer from soil    surface to 15 cm depth, at 2.5 cm depth intervals. The CI obtained from each    sampling point and at each depth interval is the average of three measurements.</font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2"><i>Saturated    hydraulic conductivity (k):</i> Infiltration rate was measured with a simple    ring infiltrometer (Ankeny, 1986). Four measurements were done before planting    in each grazing strip and after corn planting two measurements were done in    each experimental unit.</font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Saturated    hydraulic conductivity was calculated using the model (method 2) proposed by    Wu <i>et al.</i> (1999). To estimate model parameters, the cumulative infiltration    data were adjusted to an exponential&#45;plateau model through non linear regression    (NLIN procedure, of the Statistical Analysis System (SAS) (Littell <i>et al.,</i>    2006). The data of <i>k<sub>s</sub></i> were log<sub>10</sub>&#45;transformed    due to variance heterogeneity. The transformed variable was called transformed    saturated hydraulic conductivity <i>(k<sub>s</sub>t).</i></font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2"><i>2.4    Crop determinations</i></font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2"><i>Plant    population:</i> Number of plants achieved was quantified in twelve 7.15 m&#45;long    rows at corn physiological maturity (PM, Ritchie and Hanway, 1982). <i>Surface    root distribution:</i> It was determined by the grid method proposed by Bohm    (1979). For this determination a square 28 x 28 cm frame with 2 x 2 cm cells    was used. Two holes per experimental unit were dug, with a corn plant in the    middle. Presence or ab</font><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">sence    of roots within each cell was registered. This determination was done at corn    V6 stage. <i>Aboveground dry matter accumulation (DMA):</i> Thirty plants were    cut at ground level at V6 and PM corn stages. Plant samples were weighed and    then dried at 60&#176;C. Dry weight was registered, and dry matter (DM) content    and accumulation were calculated. <i>Aboveground total N accumulation (TN):</i>    A fraction of grain and of the rest of the plant samples taken at PM was ground    to pass a 1 mm sieve. Nitrogen content of each fraction was determined by the    Dumas dry combustion method at 950&#176;C using a TruSpec analyzer (LECO, St.    Joseph, Michigan, USA). Aboveg&#45;round total N accumulation was calculated    from grain N content and grain yield plus rest of the plant N content and aboveground    DMA (without grain).</font></p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p align="justify"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Corn    yield: Grain yield of corn was determined by collecting ears from 20 m<sup>2</sup>    of each experimental unit and threshing them with a stationary thresher. Yield    was corrected to 14.5 % moisture content.</font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2"><i>2.5    Statistical analyses</i></font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Soil    variable data were analyzed through a linear mixed model which takes into account    the experimental design employed and considers the sampling times as repeated    measures. Interaction with tillage system at sampling times 2 and 3 and comparisons    between sampling times 1 and 2 were analyzed through orthogonal contrast. The    analyses for BD and PR were done at each depth.</font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Corn    variables were analyzed through a linear mixed model considering different random    errors associated with the experimental design. All the analyses were performed    using the MIXED procedure of SAS (Littell <i>et al.,</i> 2006). For all statistical    analysis the significance level was 0.05.</font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="3"><b>3.  Results and discussion</b></font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2"><i>3.1&nbsp;Rainfall    and soil water content (WC) during the experiment</i></font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Precipitation    from April/2006 to September/2006 (231.7 mm) was lower than the 91 yr average    precipitation (292.5 mm). Precipitation during the initial grazing period was    14 mm. On the other hand, during the FM grazing strategy the precipitation registered    was 58.5 mm.</font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Precipitation    during the 2006/2007 corn growing season (from corn planting to harvest) (778    mm) was higher than the 91 yr average precipitation (519 mm; 1911&#45;2001).    There was a slight water deficit during the critical period of grain yield determination.</font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">There    was no interaction nor grazing, tillage or sampling time effects on WC at any    depth. At all sampling times WC was above field capacity (27% v/v).</font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2"><i>3.2&nbsp;Grazing    strategies and tillage system effects on soil physical properties</i></font></p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p align="justify"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Grazing    system effects on soil physical properties have been reported to be strongly    associated with stocking rate. Also, it has been observed that BD, and PR increase    whereas infiltration rate decreases (Greenwood <i>et al.,</i> 2001) when stocking    rate or/and grazing period increase. On the contrary, Donkor <i>et al.</i> (2002)    found the same degree of compaction under a short grazing period with high stocking    rate and under a long grazing period with low stocking rate.</font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">In    our experiment, with different stocking rates and grazing periods, grazing strategy    x tillage system interaction effect on soil physical properties evaluated was    not significant. One month before corn planting, <i>kt</i> was not significantly    affected by grazing strategies. However, coinciding with generally reported    trends when no animals were present on the field (C treatment) the <i>kt</i>    was slightly higher <i>(kt</i> = 1.92 &#177; 0.09) than under OG, HR or FM <i>(kt</i>    average = 1.74 &#177; 0.07). Fernan</font><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">dez    <i>et al</i> (2006) found higher k in non grazed plots in comparison with grazed    plots in soils with textural characteristics similar to the one used in this    study. On the other hand, Pietola <i>et al.</i> (2005) reported that k was lowest    under grazed plots in clay and sand loam soils.</font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Bulk    density was not significantly affected by grazing strategies (sampling time    1), except at 0&#45;5 cm depth (<a href="#Tabla1">Table 1</a>). Despite the    expected result, BD under HR and FM was significantly lower than under C or    OG at 0&#45;5 cm depth (<a href="#Tabla1">Table 1</a>, sampling time 1). Similar    behavior was observed in 5&#45;15 cm depth (although the difference between    grazing strategies was not significant). Our results disagree with those reported    by other authors (Greenwood and Mac Kenzie, 2001; Franzluebbers and Stuedemann,    2008) who showed BD increases due to animal treading.</font></p>     <p align="center"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><a name="Tabla1"></a></font>    <br> </p> <table width="55%" border="0" align="center">   <tr>     <td><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2"><b>Table    1.</b> Bulk density at 0&#45;5 cm and 5&#45;15 cm depth layers for different    grazing strategies (C: not grazed; OG: One grazing; HR: high stoking rate; FM:    farmer&#39;s management), at sampling time 1 (one month before corn planting),    sampling time 2 (corn V6 stage), and sampling time 3 (six months after corn    harvest). For each depth, different letters indicate significant differences    (p&lt;0.05).</font></td>   </tr>   <tr>     <td align="center"><img src="/fbpe/img/jsspn/v12n2/art07Tabla1.jpg" alt="" width="314" height="266"></td>   </tr> </table>      
<p align="justify"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Penetration    resistance was significantly affected by grazing strategies (sampling time 1)    only in the first 5 cm depth, being higher under HR and FM than under C and    OG (<a href="#Fig1">Figure 1)</a>. This agrees with the results reported by    da Silva <i>et al</i> (2003). The effects of livestock trampling are greater    when surface cover declines (Greene <i>et al.,</i> 1994) and when soil WC increases    (Di et al., 2001).</font></p>     <p align="center"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><a name="Fig1"></a></font>    <br> <img src="/fbpe/img/jsspn/v12n2/art07Fig1.jpg" width="306" height="546"></p>     
<p align="justify"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">During    the second grazing (HR and FM), the forage source comprised weeds, volunteer    wheat re&#45;growth and some wheat stubble. Reentry of animals after the initial    grazing under HR and FM caused a fast loss of cover and consequently a higher    exposure of the soil to cattle trampling effects (Greene <i>et al.,</i> 1994).    However, differences in PR between grazing strategies were negligible from the    agronomic point of view.</font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">The    difference between C&#45;OG and HR&#45;FM was 0.16 </font><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">MPa    at 2.5 cm depth and 0.32 MPa at 5.0 cm depth.</font></p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p align="justify"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">After    tillage system application (sampling time 2), neither grazing strategy x tillage    system interaction nor grazing strategy effects were significant. The extent    of the effect of grazing strategies on soil physical properties was less in    comparison with the effect of tillage system. Sampling done three months after    tillage system application (at V6, sampling time 2), showed that ST improved    soil physical properties by decreasing PR (<a href="#Fig2">Figure 2</a>) and    BD (<a href="#Tabla2">Table 2</a>, sampling time 2), and increasing <i>kt.</i>    Penetration resistance was significantly affected by the tillage system. Surface    tillage showed lower PR up to 12.5 cm depth, but below this depth no difference    between tillage systems was observed (<a href="#Fig2">Figure 2</a>). Our results    agree with those reported by Botta <i>et al.</i> (2004). Taboada <i>et al.</i>    (1998) reported that NT increases significantly PR in sandy loam and silty clay    loam soils. These higher PR&#39;s could not be attributed to compaction but    rather to soil hardening. This process could be considered a consequence of    ageing of undisturbed agricultural topsoils.</font></p>     <p align="center"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><a name="Fig2"></a></font>    <br> <img src="/fbpe/img/jsspn/v12n2/art07Fig2.jpg" width="631" height="397"></p>     
<p align="justify"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">As    previously mentioned, BD was not significantly affected by tillage systems (<a href="#Tabla2">Table    2</a>, sampling time 2).However, our result follow the generally reported trend    of soil BD increases because of NT implementation (Taboada <i>et al.,</i> 1998).</font></p>     <p align="center"><a name="Tabla2"></a>    <br> <img src="/fbpe/img/jsspn/v12n2/art07Tabla2.jpg" width="305" height="313"></p>     
<p align="justify"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Transformed    saturated hydraulic conductivity was significantly affected by tillage systems    (<a href="#Fig3">Figure 3,</a> sampling time 2). Transformed saturated hydraulic    conductivity was higher under ST (2.04 &#177; 0.24, <i>k<sub>s</sub></i> = 123.42    mm h<sup>&#45;1</sup>) than under NT (1.32 &#177; 0.37, k<sub>s</sub> = 31.24    mm h<sup>&#45;1</sup>). In agreement with Ferreras <i>et al.</i> (2000) and    Sasal <i>et al.</i> (2006), <i>kt</i> under NT was lower than under tillage.    This behavior has been reported by others authors (Sasal <i>et al.,</i> 2006),    who attributed this tendency to horizontal reorientation (parallel to the soil    surface) of macropores associated to NT. Soil pore dynamics may be reflected    in BD and PR variations. As mentioned above, in our experience, NT showed higher    PR (<a href="#Fig2">Figure 2</a>) and BD (<a href="#Tabla2">Table 2</a>, sampling  time 2) than ST, consequently, these properties may have affected <i>k<sub>s</sub>t</i></font></p>     <p align="center"><i><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><a name="Fig3"></a></font></i>    <br> <img src="/fbpe/img/jsspn/v12n2/art07Fig3.jpg" width="627" height="356"></p>     
<p align="justify"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Six    months after crop harvest (sampling time 3), tillage system effect on soil physical    properties disappeared. In general, BD (<a href="#Tabla2">Table 2</a>, sampling    time 3), RP (<a href="#Fig2">Figure 2</a>b) and <i>k<sub>s</sub>t</i> (<a href="#Fig3">Figure    3</a>, sampling time 3) showed lower values than in sampling time 2. The recovery    of the initial soil condition can be explained by the high OM content and the    loam clay surface horizon texture. Soil physical properties behavior depends    to a great extend, on its carbon stock (Dom&iacute;nguez <i>et </i></font><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2"><i>al.,</i>    2009) and texture (Alvarez and Steinbach, 2009).</font></p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p align="justify"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Organic    matter may increase aggregate strength and thus help prevent soil pore structure    degradation, and consequently the impact of compaction. On the other hand, OM    may also improve soil aggregation, resulting in a higher total porosity and    wider pore&#45;size distribution. This characteristic determines the magnitude    of soil mechanical resilience (Zhang <i>et al.,</i> 2005). Another explanation    could be that corn root growth could have helped to ameliorate soil physical    properties (Dom&iacute;nguez <i>et al.,</i> 2001).These character</font><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">istics    could have helped the soil to recover the physical condition after soil disturbance.</font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">In    summary, neither BD nor PR increases reached critical threshold for root growth.    Regarding PR, the threshold is 2 MPa (Gupta and Allmaras, 1987) whereas for    BD critical value has been demonstrated to be 1.4 Mg m<sup>&#45;3</sup> for    corn root growth (Chidichimo <i>et</i> al., 1997). Anyway, BD, PR and <i>k<sub>s</sub></sub>t</i>    values indicated that the soil did not show structural problems due to grazing    strategies and/or tillage systems. These results could be attributed to the    good structure and high OM content of this mollisol, and to the rational application    of grazing strategies and tillage systems along time.</font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2"><i>3.3    Grazing and tillage system effects on corn crop behavior</i></font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Statistical    analyses did not show significant interaction between tillage system and grazing    strategy nor a significant effect of grazing strategies on the number of plants    achieved, surface root distribution and DMA (neither at V6 nor at PM). Also,    neither the number of plants achieved (66937&#177; 5975 plants ha<sup>&#45;1</sup>)    nor surface root distribution were significantly affected by tillage system    (<a href="#Fig4">Figure 4</a>a). However, a relatively higher number of roots    under ST than under NT (<a href="#Fig4">Figure 4</a>a), was observed. This behavior    can be attributed to the observed lower BD (<a href="#Tabla2">Table 2</a>, sampling    time 2) and PR (<a href="#Fig2">Figure 2</a>) under ST, since root density decreases    with increasing PR and BD (Ferreras <i>et al.,</i> 2000). Increases in these    soil parameters can finally be reflected in lower crop yield (Ferreras <i>et    al.,</i> 2000; Hamza and Anderson, 2005). Rizalli (1998) working on a physically    degraded like soil due to previous long term aggressive cropping, did not find    any difference </font><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">in    corn root growth between NT and conventional tillage. Therefore, given the better    soil physical conditions and the precipitation distribution in our experiment,    no differences between tillage systems could have been expected. <a href="#Fig4">Figure    4</a>b shows surface root distribution for the different grazing strategies    and it can be seen lower number of roots under C than under OG, FM, and HR.    Surface root distribution was C&lt;OG&lt;FM&lt;HR, which relates to the BD value    (<a href="#Tabla2">Table 2</a>, sampling time 2).As mentioned before, increases    in BD and PR affect normal root growth and consequently crop yield (Hamza and    Anderson, 2005). In our experiment, the number of roots was greater when BD    declined. This difference was unimportant from an agronomic point of view.</font></p>     <p align="center"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><a name="Fig4"></a></font>    <br> <img src="/fbpe/img/jsspn/v12n2/art07Fig4.jpg" width="629" height="448"></p>     
<p align="justify"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">At    V6 (sampling time 2), DMA under NT (2279 kg DM ha<sup>&#45;1</sup>) was significantly    lower than under ST (3096 kg DM ha<sup>&#45;1</sup>), since plant sampling had    been done at one time and plants were at different phenological stages between    tillage systems. However, at PM, (sampling time 3) tillage systems did not affect    DMA (ST: 15935 kg DM ha<sup>&#45;1</sup>; NT: 15290 kg DM ha<sup>&#45;1</sup>).    These results agree with those reported by Rizzalli (1998) and Dom&iacute;nguez    <i>et al.</i> (2001).</font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Feces    and urine deposition from livestock increase within&#45;farm nutrient cycling    (Franzluebbers <i>et al.,</i> 2000). In our experiment, TN accumulation was    significantly affected by grazing strategies, being TN accumulation higher under    HR (215.4 kg N ha<sup>&#45;1</sup>) than under C (147.8 kg N ha<sup>&#45;1</sup>),    OG (170.0kg N ha<sup>&#45;1</sup>) and FM (202.4 kg N ha<sup>&#45;1</sup>).    Although TN was not significantly affected by tillage system, it showed a trend    to slightly higher TN under ST than under NT (172.8 kg N ha<sup>&#45;1</sup>    and 195.0 kg N ha<sup>&#45;1</sup>, respectively).</font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Grazing    crop stubble does not imply a complete removal of biomass from the plant&#45;soil    system since much of the ingested forage is transformed into manure that is    returned to the field (Quiroga <i>et al.,</i> 2009), contributing to total carbon    and N stock recycling (Maughan <i>et al,</i> 2009). Franzluebbers <i>et al.</i>    (2000) reported that areas with high animal presence get enriched with soil    carbon and N probably because of the high organic deposition from cattle defecation    and urination. This would have increased fertility and subsequent forage growth.    In our experiment, grain yield was the only crop parameter significantly affected    by tillage systems and by grazing strategies. Grain yield under HR and FM (8.510    kg ha<sup>&#45;1</sup> and 7.903 kg ha<sup>&#45;1</sup>, respectively) was higher    than under C and OG (6.439 kg ha<sup>&#45;1</sup> and 7.576 kg ha<sup>&#45;1</sup>,    respectively) which was also reflected in higher TN. It is important to highlight    that HR and FM treatments had higher animal presence in comparison with C and    OG. It is worth noting that both grain yield and TN for grazing strategies could    be </font><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">ordered    as C&lt;OG&lt;FM&lt;HR which in turn relates to the time of presence and the    stocking of the animals on the field. Therefore, high animal presence leads    to organic deposition from cattle (feces and urine), contributing to N stock    recycling and increased crop yield.</font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Corn    yield is mostly related to water and N availability during the crop growing    season (Barbieri <i>et al.,</i> 2008). In our experiment, precipitation during    this period was unevenly distributed but it reasonably covered crop water requirement    (data not shown). However, a slight water deficit occurred during a critical    period for corn (January). In general, soils under NT have higher water availability    than bare soils, which might contribute crops tolerating water deficits during    critical periods.</font></p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p align="justify"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Contrarily    to what it could have been expected because of such slight water deficit, corn    grain yield under ST was significantly higher than under NT (8090 kg ha<sup>&#45;1</sup>    and 7124 kg ha<sup>&#45;1</sup>, respectively). Stubble cover, absence of tillage,    low mineralization rate and high microbial activity under NT promote N loss    (volatilization, denitrification, leaching) and low N availability (Dom&iacute;nguez    <i>et al.,</i> 2001; 2009). On the other hand, N fertilization rate was 85 kg    N ha<sup>&#45;1</sup> for NT and ST plots, but tilling the soil increases N    mineralization (Dom&iacute;nguez <i>et al.,</i> 2009) and supposedly the corn    under ST had more N available. Therefore, given the distribution of rainfall    and the low rate of N fertilization, the lower yield under NT could be attributed    to a limited N availability.</font></p>     <p align="justify">&nbsp;</p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="3"><b>4.    Conclusions</b></font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Rational    grazing management and use of tillage systems on resilient soils (high soil    OM content, and loam clay texture) could have prevented soil physical properties    to be affected beyond critical thresholds. On the other hand, according to the    N accumulation and grain yield differences among grazing strategies, we inferred    that they influenced N dynamics and availability because of urine and manure    droppings. However, N availability should be monitored in order to detect N    unavailability and its effect on crop behavior in crop&#45;livestock systems    under NT.</font></p>     <p align="justify">&nbsp;</p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="3"><b>Acknowledgements</b></font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">We    express our gratitude to <i>Azul&#45;Chillar CREA</i> Group, <i>ESTANCIA "LOS    ANGELES"</i> and <i>FACULTAD DE AGRONOMIA</i> (UNCPBA) and to Ricardo Illarragorri,    Jorge Celiberti, Cristina de Pablo, Oscar Basterrechea and Germ&aacute;n Dom&iacute;nguez    for their collaboration.</font></p>     <p align="justify">&nbsp;</p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="3"><b>References</b></font></p>     <!-- ref --><p align="justify"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">&Aacute;lvarez,    R., Steinbach, H.S. 2009. A review of the effects of tillage systems on some    soil physical properties, water content, nitrate availability and crop yield    in the Argentine Pampas. Soil Till. Res. </font><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">104,    1&#45;16.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=2654055&pid=S0718-9516201200020000700001&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></font></p>     <!-- ref --><p align="justify"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Ankeny,    M. 1986. Methods and theory for unconfined infiltration measurements in Klute,A    (ed). 1986. Methods of soil analysis. Part I: Physical and mineralogical methods.    2nd ed. ASA and SSSA, Madison, WI. Agron. Monogr. 9. Pp 123&#45;141</font>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=2654057&pid=S0718-9516201200020000700002&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p align="justify"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Barbieri,    P.A., Echeverr&iacute;a, H.E., Sa&iacute;nz Rozas, H.R. 2008. Presidedress soil    nitrogen test for no tillage maize at different row spacing. Agron. J. 100,    1101&#45;1105.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=2654058&pid=S0718-9516201200020000700003&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></font></p>     <!-- ref --><p align="justify"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Bohm,    W. 1979. Methods of studying root systems. Ecol. Stud. 33.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=2654060&pid=S0718-9516201200020000700004&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></font></p>     <!-- ref --><p align="justify"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Botta,    G F., Jorajuria, D., Balbuena, R.H., Rosatto, D. 2004. Mechanical and cropping    behavior of direct drilled soil under different traffic intensities: effects    on soybean (Glycine max L) yields. Soil Till. Res. 78, 53&#45;58.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=2654062&pid=S0718-9516201200020000700005&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></font></p>     <!-- ref --><p align="justify"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Chidichimo,    H., Asborno, M., Arag&oacute;n, A. 1997. Enraizamiento de ma&iacute;z: respuesta    genot&iacute;pica a tratamientos de compactaci&oacute;n y humedad del suelo.    Proceedings 6&#176; Congreso Nacional de Ma&iacute;z. Pergamino.Tomo III: 173&#45;179.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=2654064&pid=S0718-9516201200020000700006&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></font></p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<!-- ref --><p align="justify"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">da    Silva, A.P., Imhoff, S., Corsi, M. 2003. Evaluation of soil compaction in an    irrigated short duration grazing system. Soil Till. Res. 70, 83&#45;90.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=2654066&pid=S0718-9516201200020000700007&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></font></p>     <!-- ref --><p align="justify"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Di,    H.J., Cameron, K.C., Milne, J., Drewry, J.J., Smith, N.P., Hendry, T., Moore,    S., Reijnen, B. 2001. A mechanical hoof for simulating animal treading under    controlled conditions. New Zeal. J. Agric. Res. 44, 111&#45;116.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=2654068&pid=S0718-9516201200020000700008&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Dom&iacute;nguez,    G F., Studdert, G.A., Echeverr&iacute;a, H.E., Andrade, F.H. 2001. Sistemas    de cultivo y nutrici&oacute;n nitrogenada en ma&iacute;z. Ciencia del suelo.    </font><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">19, 47&#45;56.</font></p>     <!-- ref --><p align="justify"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Dom&iacute;nguez,    G.F., Diovisalvi, N.V., Studdert, G.A., Monterubbianesi, M.G. 2009. Soil organic    C and N fractions under continuous cropping with contrasting tillage systems    on mollisols of the southeastern Pampas. Soil Till. Res. 102, 93&#45;100.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=2654071&pid=S0718-9516201200020000700009&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></font></p>     <!-- ref --><p align="justify"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Donkor,    N.T., Gedir, J.V., Hudson, R.J., Bork, E.W., Chanasyk, D., Naeth, M.A. 2002.    Impacts of grazing systems on soil compaction and pasture production in Alberta.    Can. J. Soi Sci. 82, 1&#45;8.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=2654073&pid=S0718-9516201200020000700010&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></font></p>     <!-- ref --><p align="justify"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Doran,    J.W., Mielke, L.N. 1984. A rapid, low cost method for determination of soil    bulk density. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 48, 717&#45;719.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=2654075&pid=S0718-9516201200020000700011&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></font></p>     <!-- ref --><p align="justify"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Fernandez,    P.L., Alvarez, C.R., Correa Luna, M., Taboada, M. 2006. Propiedades f&iacute;sicas    en sistemas de producci&oacute;n mixta y de agricultura cont&iacute;nua en SD.    Proceedings 20th Congreso Argentino de la Ciencia del Suelo. September 20&#45;23,    2006, Salta&#45;Jujuy, Argentina, 5 p. (in CD&#45;ROM).    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=2654077&pid=S0718-9516201200020000700012&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></font></p>     <!-- ref --><p align="justify"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Ferreras,    L.A., Costa, J.L., Garcia, F.O., Pecorari, C. 2000. Effect of no&#45;till on    some soil physical properties of a structural degraded Petrocalcic </font><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Paleudoll    of the southern "Pampa" of Argentina. Soil Till. Res. 54, 31&#45;39.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=2654079&pid=S0718-9516201200020000700013&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></font></p>     <!-- ref --><p align="justify"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Franzluebbers,    A.J., Stuedemann, J.A. 2008. Early response of soil organic fraction to tillage    and integrated crop&#45;livestock production. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 72, 613&#45;625.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=2654081&pid=S0718-9516201200020000700014&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></font></p>     <!-- ref --><p align="justify"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Franzluebbers,    A.J., Stuedemann, J.A., Schomberg, H.H. 2000. Spatial distribution of soil carbon    and nitrogen pools under grazed tall fescue. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 64, 635&#45;639.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=2654083&pid=S0718-9516201200020000700015&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></font></p>     <!-- ref --><p align="justify"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Greene,    R.S.B., Kinnell, P.I.A., Wood, J.T. 1994. Role of plant cover and stock trampling    on runoff and soil erosion from semiarid wooded range&#45;</font><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">lands.    Aust. J. Soil Res. 32, 953&#45;973.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=2654085&pid=S0718-9516201200020000700016&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></font></p>     <!-- ref --><p align="justify"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Greenwood,    K.L., McKenzie, B.M. 2001. Grazing effects on soil physical properties and the    consequences for pastures: a review. Aust. J. Exp. Agr. 41, 1231&#45;1250.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=2654087&pid=S0718-9516201200020000700017&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></font></p>     <!-- ref --><p align="justify"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Gupta,    S.C., Allmaras, R. 1987. Models to assess the susceptibility of soils to excessive    compaction. Adv. Soil Sci. 6, 65&#45;100.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=2654089&pid=S0718-9516201200020000700018&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></font></p>     <!-- ref --><p align="justify"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Hamza,    M.A.M., Anderson, W. K. 2005. Soil compaction in cropping systems. A review    of the nature, causes and possible solutions. Soil Till. Res. 82, 121&#45;145.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=2654091&pid=S0718-9516201200020000700019&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></font></p>     <!-- ref --><p align="justify"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Lal,    R., Mohboubi, A.A., Faussey, R.R. 1994. Long term tillage and rotation effect    on properties of a central Ohio Soil. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 58, 517-522.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=2654093&pid=S0718-9516201200020000700020&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></font></p>     <!-- ref --><p align="justify"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Littell,    R.C., Milliken, G.A., Stroup, W.W., Wolfinger, R.D., Schabenberger, O. 2006.    SAS&#174; for Mixed Models, second edition. SAS Institute Inc, </font><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Cary,    NC, USA.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=2654095&pid=S0718-9516201200020000700021&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></font></p>     <!-- ref --><p align="justify"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Maughan,    M.W., Flores, J.P.C., Anghinoni, I., Bollero, G., Fernandez, F.G., Tracy, B.    2009. Soil quality and corn yield under crop&#45;livestock integration in Illinois.    Agr. J. 101, 1503&#45;1510.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=2654097&pid=S0718-9516201200020000700022&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></font></p>     <!-- ref --><p align="justify"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Munkholm,    L.J., Schjonning, P., Rasmussen, K.J., Tanderup, K. 2003. Spatial and temporal    effects of direct drilling on soil structure in the seedling environment. Soil    Till. Res. 71, 163&#45;173.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=2654099&pid=S0718-9516201200020000700023&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></font></p>     <!-- ref --><p align="justify"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Pietola,    L., Horn, H., Yli&#45;Halla, M. 2005. Effects of trampling by cattle on the    hydraulic and mechanical properties. Soil Till. Res. 82, 98&#45;108.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=2654101&pid=S0718-9516201200020000700024&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></font></p>     <!-- ref --><p align="justify"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Quiroga,    A., Fernandez, R., Noellemeyer, E. 2009. Grazing effect on soil properties in    conventional and no&#45;till systems. Soil Till.Res. 105, 164&#45;170.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=2654103&pid=S0718-9516201200020000700025&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></font></p>     <!-- ref --><p align="justify"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Ritchie,    S.W., Hanway, J.J. 1982. How a corn plant develops. Iowa State University of    Science and Technology. Cooperative Extension Service. Ames, Iowa, EEUU. Special    report N&#176; 48. 24 p.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=2654105&pid=S0718-9516201200020000700026&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></font></p>     <!-- ref --><p align="justify"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Rizzalli,    R. H., 1998. <i>Siembra directa y convencional de ma&iacute;z ante distintas    ofertas de nitr&oacute;geno. Tesis. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata, Facultad    de Ciencias Agrarias, Unidad Integrada Balcarce, Argentina. Argentina.</i> 60    p.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=2654107&pid=S0718-9516201200020000700027&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></font></p>     <!-- ref --><p align="justify"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Sasal,    M.C., Andriulo, A.E., Taboada, M.A. 2006. Soil porosity characteristics and    water movement under zero tillage in silty soils in Argentinian Pampas. Soil    Till. Res. 87, 9&#45;18.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=2654109&pid=S0718-9516201200020000700028&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></font></p>     <!-- ref --><p align="justify"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Taboada,    M.A., Micucci, F.G., Cosentino, D.J., Lavado, R.S. 1998. Comparison of compaction    induced by conventional and zero tillage in two soils of the Rolling Pampa of    Argentina. Soil Till. Res. 49, 57&#45;63.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=2654111&pid=S0718-9516201200020000700029&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></font></p>     <!-- ref --><p align="justify"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Wu,    L., Pan, L., Mitchell, J., Sanden, B. 1999. Measuring saturated hydraulic conductivity    using a generalized solution for single&#45;ring infiltrometer. Soil Sci. Soc.    Am. J. 1318&#45;1322.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=2654113&pid=S0718-9516201200020000700030&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></font></p>     <!-- ref --><p align="justify"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Zhang,    B., Horn, R., Hallett, P.D. 2005. Mechanical resilience of degrade soil amended    with organic matter. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 69, 864&#45;871.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=2654115&pid=S0718-9516201200020000700031&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></font></p>      ]]></body><back>
<ref-list>
<ref id="B1">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Álvarez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Steinbach]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H.S]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[A review of the effects of tillage systems on some soil physical properties, water content, nitrate availability and crop yield in the Argentine Pampas]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Soil Till. Res.]]></source>
<year>2009</year>
<volume>104</volume>
<page-range>1-16</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ankeny]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Methods and theory for unconfined infiltration measurements]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Klute]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Methods of soil analysis: Part I: Physical and mineralogical methods]]></source>
<year>1986</year>
<month>19</month>
<day>86</day>
<volume>9</volume>
<edition>2</edition>
<page-range>123-141</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Madison^eWI WI]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[ASA and SSSA]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Barbieri]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P.A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Echeverría]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H.E.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Saínz Rozas]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H.R]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Presidedress soil nitrogen test for no tillage maize at different row spacing]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Agron. J.]]></source>
<year>2008</year>
<volume>100</volume>
<page-range>1101-1105</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bohm]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[W]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Methods of studying root systems]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Ecol. Stud]]></source>
<year>1979</year>
<volume>33</volume>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Botta]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G F.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Jorajuria]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Balbuena]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.H.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rosatto]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Mechanical and cropping behavior of direct drilled soil under different traffic intensities: effects on soybean (Glycine max L) yields]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Soil Till. Res.]]></source>
<year>2004</year>
<volume>78</volume>
<page-range>53-58</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<nlm-citation citation-type="confpro">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Chidichimo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Asborno]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Aragón]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="es"><![CDATA[Enraizamiento de maíz: respuesta genotípica a tratamientos de compactación y humedad del suelo]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Proceedings]]></source>
<year>1997</year>
<conf-name><![CDATA[6 Congreso Nacional de Maíz]]></conf-name>
<conf-loc> </conf-loc>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[da Silva]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.P.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Imhoff]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Corsi]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Evaluation of soil compaction in an irrigated short duration grazing system]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Soil Till. Res.]]></source>
<year>2003</year>
<volume>70</volume>
<page-range>83-90</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Di]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H.J.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Cameron]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[K.C.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Milne]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Drewry]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.J.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Smith]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[N.P.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hendry]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Moore]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Reijnen]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[A mechanical hoof for simulating animal treading under controlled conditions]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[New Zeal. J. Agric. Res.]]></source>
<year>2001</year>
<volume>44</volume>
<page-range>111-116</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Domínguez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.F.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Diovisalvi]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[N.V.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Studdert]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Monterubbianesi]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.G]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Soil organic C and N fractions under continuous cropping with contrasting tillage systems on mollisols of the southeastern Pampas]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Soil Till. Res.]]></source>
<year>2009</year>
<volume>102</volume>
<page-range>93-100</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Donkor]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[N.T.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gedir]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.V.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hudson]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.J.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bork]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E.W.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Chanasyk]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Naeth]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.A]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Impacts of grazing systems on soil compaction and pasture production in Alberta]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Can. J. Soi Sci.]]></source>
<year>2002</year>
<volume>82</volume>
<page-range>1-8</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Doran]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.W.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Mielke]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L.N]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[A rapid, low cost method for determination of soil bulk density]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J.]]></source>
<year>1984</year>
<volume>48</volume>
<page-range>717-719</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<nlm-citation citation-type="confpro">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Fernandez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P.L]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Alvarez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C.R]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Correa Luna]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Taboada]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="es"><![CDATA[Propiedades físicas en sistemas de producción mixta y de agricultura contínua en SD]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Proceedings]]></source>
<year>2006</year>
<conf-name><![CDATA[20 Congreso Argentino de la Ciencia del Suelo]]></conf-name>
<conf-date>September 20-23, 2006</conf-date>
<conf-loc>Salta-Jujuy </conf-loc>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ferreras]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L.A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Costa]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.L.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Garcia]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F.O.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Pecorari]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Effect of no-till on some soil physical properties of a structural degraded Petrocalcic Paleudoll of the southern "Pampa" of Argentina]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Soil Till. Res.]]></source>
<year>2000</year>
<volume>54</volume>
<page-range>31-39</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Franzluebbers]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.J.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Stuedemann]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.A]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Early response of soil organic fraction to tillage and integrated crop-livestock production]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J.]]></source>
<year>2008</year>
<volume>72</volume>
<page-range>613-625</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Franzluebbers]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.J.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Stuedemann]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Schomberg]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H.H]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Spatial distribution of soil carbon and nitrogen pools under grazed tall fescue]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J.]]></source>
<year>2000</year>
<volume>64</volume>
<page-range>635-639</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Greene]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.S.B.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kinnell]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P.I.A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Wood]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.T]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Role of plant cover and stock trampling on runoff and soil erosion from semiarid wooded range-lands]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Aust. J. Soil Res.]]></source>
<year>1994</year>
<volume>32</volume>
<page-range>953-973</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Greenwood]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[K.L.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[McKenzie]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B.M]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Grazing effects on soil physical properties and the consequences for pastures: a review]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Aust. J. Exp. Agr.]]></source>
<year>2001</year>
<volume>41</volume>
<page-range>1231-1250</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gupta]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S.C.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Allmaras]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Models to assess the susceptibility of soils to excessive compaction]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Adv. Soil Sci.]]></source>
<year>1987</year>
<volume>6</volume>
<page-range>65-100</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hamza]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.A.M]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Anderson]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[W. K]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Soil compaction in cropping systems: A review of the nature, causes and possible solutions]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Soil Till. Res]]></source>
<year>2005</year>
<volume>82</volume>
<page-range>121-145</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lal]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Mohboubi]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Faussey]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.R]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Long term tillage and rotation effect on properties of a central Ohio Soil]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J.]]></source>
<year>1994</year>
<volume>58</volume>
<page-range>517-522</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Littell]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.C]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Milliken]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.A]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Stroup]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[W.W]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Wolfinger]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.D]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Schabenberger]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[O]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[]]></source>
<year>2006</year>
<edition>second</edition>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Cary^eNC NC]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[SAS® for Mixed Models]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Maughan]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.W.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Flores]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.PC.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Anghinoni]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[I.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bollero]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Fernandez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F.G.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Tracy]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Soil quality and corn yield under crop-livestock integration in Illinois]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Agr. J.]]></source>
<year>2009</year>
<volume>101</volume>
<page-range>1503-1510</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Munkholm]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L.J.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Schjonning]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rasmussen]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[K.J.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Tanderup]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[K]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Spatial and temporal effects of direct drilling on soil structure in the seedling environment]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Soil Till. Res.]]></source>
<year>2003</year>
<volume>71</volume>
<page-range>163-173</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Pietola]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Horn]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Yli-Halla]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Effects of trampling by cattle on the hydraulic and mechanical properties]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Soil Till. Res.]]></source>
<year>2005</year>
<volume>82</volume>
<page-range>98-108</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B25">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Quiroga]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Fernandez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Noellemeyer]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Grazing effect on soil properties in conventional and no-till systems]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Soil Till.Res.]]></source>
<year>2009</year>
<volume>105</volume>
<page-range>164-170</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B26">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ritchie]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S.W]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hanway]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.J]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[How a corn plant develops]]></source>
<year>1982</year>
<page-range>24</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Ames^eIowa Iowa]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Iowa State University of Science and Technology. Cooperative Extension Service]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B27">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rizzalli]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R. H]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Siembra directa y convencional de maíz ante distintas ofertas de nitrógeno.]]></source>
<year>1998</year>
<page-range>60</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B28">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sasal]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.C.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Andriulo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.E.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Taboada]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.A]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Soil porosity characteristics and water movement under zero tillage in silty soils in Argentinian Pampas]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Soil Till. Res.]]></source>
<year>2006</year>
<volume>87</volume>
<page-range>9-18</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B29">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Taboada]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Micucci]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F.G.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Cosentino]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.J.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lavado]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.S]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Comparison of compaction induced by conventional and zero tillage in two soils of the Rolling Pampa of Argentina]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Soil Till. Res.]]></source>
<year>1998</year>
<volume>49</volume>
<page-range>57-63</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B30">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Wu]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Pan]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Mitchell]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sanden]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Measuring saturated hydraulic conductivity using a generalized solution for single-ring infiltrometer]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J]]></source>
<year>1999</year>
<page-range>1318-1322</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B31">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Zhang]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Horn]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hallett]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P.D]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Mechanical resilience of degrade soil amended with organic matter]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J.]]></source>
<year>2005</year>
<volume>69</volume>
<page-range>864-871</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
