versión ISSN 0718-7106
AndGeo vol.39 no.2 Santiago mayo 2012
Andean Geology 39 (2): 279-294. May, 2012
formerly Revista Geológica de Chile www.andeangeology.cl
The Southern Central Andes vertical axis tectonic rotations: relations with the deformation pattern
Rotaciones tectónicas según ejes verticales en los Andes Centrales del Sur: relaciones con el patrón de deformación
Claudia Prezzi1, María Paula Iglesia Llanos1
1 Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET)-Instituto de Geofísica Daniel A. Valencio (INGEODAV), Departamento de Ciencias Geológicas, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales (FCEyN), Universidad de Buenos Aires, Ciudad Universitaria, Pabellón 2, 1428, Buenos Aires, Argentina. firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com
ABSTRACT. Along the Central Andes a pattern of vertical axis tectonic rotations has been paleomagnetically identified. Such rotations are counterclockwise north of Arica Deflection (~19°S) and clockwise to the south. Different hypothesis and models have been proposed to explain the Central Andean Rotation Pattern (CARP). However, the CARP is a subject of ongoing debate. Recently, the quantity, quality, and geographic distribution of paleomagnetic data have expanded greatly. Such expansion has been accompanied by an increase in the knowledge of the deformation periods in the Andes, allowing a more detailed analysis of the temporal and spatial distribution of the detected rotations. We compiled and analyzed the available Cenozoic paleomagnetic data for the region extending between 19° and 27.5°S. The results suggest the possible existence of different rotational domains with distinct characteristics. We propose that in the Southern Central Andes, a close correlation would exist between the style and the temporal and spatial pattern of deformation and the amount of recorded vertical axis rotations. However, in order to further investigate such relationship, new paleomagnetic studies are necessary, particularly in the Eastern Cordillera domain, in Paleogene rocks cropping out in the Altiplano-Puna and in Neogene rocks of the forearc.
Keywords: Southern Central Andes, Paleomagnetic data, Deformation, Rotational domain, Cenozoic.
RESUMEN. En los Andes Centrales se ha identificado un patrón de rotaciones tectónicas según ejes verticales a través de estudios paleomagnéticos. Dichas rotaciones son en sentido antihorario al norte del codo de Arica (~19°S) y en sentido horario hacia el sur. Distintos autores han propuesto diferentes hipótesis y modelos para tratar de explicar el Patrón de Rotaciones de los Andes Centrales (PRAC). Sin embargo, el PRAC sigue siendo objeto de debate. Recientemente, la cantidad, calidad y la distribución geográfica de los datos paleomagnéticos ha aumentado de manera notable. Dicho incremento ha sido acompañado por un importante progreso del conocimiento de los períodos de deformación en los Andes, permitiendo un análisis más detallado de la distribución espacial y temporal de las rotaciones detectadas. En este trabajo se recopilan y analizan los datos paleomagnéticos cenozoicos disponibles para la región que se extiende entre los 19° y los 27,5°S. Los resultados obtenidos sugieren la posible existencia de distintos dominios rotacionales con diferentes características. Aparentemente existe una estrecha correlación entre el estilo y el patrón espacial y temporal de deformación y la magnitud de las rotaciones según ejes verticales. Sin embargo, para investigar de manera más detallada dicha relación, es necesario disponer de un mayor número de datos paleomagnéticos. Especialmente, deberían llevarse a cabo nuevos estudios paleomagnéticos de rocas paleógenas del Altiplano-Puna, de rocas paleógenas y neógenas de la Cordillera Oriental y de rocas neógenas del norte de Chile.
Palabras clave: Andes Centrales del Sur, Datos paleomagnéticos, Deformación, Dominios rotacionales, Cenozoico.
Along the Central Andes a pattern of vertical axis tectonic rotations has been paleomagnetically identified (e.g., Isacks, 1988; Beck, 1988; Dewey and Lamb, 1992; Somoza et al., 1996). This Central Andean Rotation Pattern (CARP, Somoza et al., 1996) is characterized by counterclockwise block rotations north of Arica Deflection (~19°S) (Gephart's symmetry plane; Gephart, 1994) and clockwise rotations to the south. Different hypothesis and models have been proposed to explain the CARP. Isacks (1988) presented a regional oroclinal model, suggesting that an ancient curvature of the margin was enhanced to accommodate along-strike gradient of Neogene horizontal-shortening in the eastern part of the Central Andes. However, Arriagada et al. (2008a) ran a 2-D map view restoration experiment using first-order constraints on the magnitude and age of shortening and rotations in the Central Andes, and concluded that the Arica Deflection formed during the Eocene-Oligocene as a consequence of differential shortening focused in the Eastern Cordillera. According to these authors, Neogene shortening in the sub-Andean zone only slightly enhanced the orogenic curvature of the Central Andes. Alternatively, models suggesting the existence of local block rotations in response to distributed shear have also been proposed (e.g., Beck, 1988; Dewey and Lamb, 1992; Somoza et al., 1996; Beck, 1998). Such distributed shear would result from partitioning of the oblique convergence vector between the Nazca and South American plates into coast parallel and perpendicular components. In such models, the Arica Deflection is considered a primary feature of the Andean chain. Somoza et al. (1996), while agreeing with the local block rotations model, proposed partitioning of the convergence vector into components perpendicular and parallel to ancient structural trends. Some authors (Beck et al., 1994; Butler et al., 1995) developed models which combine oroclinal bending and local block rotations, then each locality would record a local amount of rotation plus a regional (orocline related) rotation. Domino-style models that relate the rotations detected in northern Chile to observable faults in the forearc have also been published (e.g., Forsythe and Chisholm, 1994; Randall et al., 1996; Taylor et al., 1998; Abels and Bischoff, 1999). However, Arriagada et al. (2003) found clockwise tectonic rotations of up to 65° within the forearc domain (Antofagasta region), which would have occurred mainly during the Incaic orogenic event of Eocene-Early Oligocene age. Taylor et al. (2005) also noted that many of the rotations detected in the forearc of northern Chile are particularly large and appear to record a rotational event older than those observed elsewhere in the Central Andes. They argued that such data define a domain marked by large clockwise crustal rotations related to late Paleocene-Early Eocene highly oblique convergence.
Most of the models developed to explain the CARP are of regional character (e.g., Isacks, 1988; Beck, 1988; Beck et al., 1994; Butler et al., 1995) and do not consider the possible existence of different rotational domains in the Central Andes. Local models have also been proposed, but they are focused in the forearc (e.g., Forsythe and Chisholm, 1994; Taylor et al., 1998; Abels and Bischoff, 1999; Ar-riagada et al., 2003; Taylor et al., 2005). Recently, the quantity, quality, and geographic distribution of paleomagnetic data have expanded greatly (Richards et al., 2004; Prezzi et al., 2004; Arriagada et al., 2006; Roperch et al., 2006; Taylor et al., 2007; Barke and Lamb, 2007; Arriagada et al., 2008b; Maffione et al., 2009). The increased paleomagnetic data set has been accompanied by an increase in the current knowledge of the deformation periods in the Andes (e.g., Oncken et al., 2006; Ege et al., 2007; Hongn et al., 2007; Barnes and Ehlers, 2009), allowing a more detailed analysis of the temporal and spatial distribution of the detected rotations. Considering all what has previously been mentioned, the major goal of our work is to further investigate the possible existence of different rotational domains with distinct characteristics, and their correlations with the deformation pattern and morphotectonic units identified in the Central Andes. Taking into account the scarce number of deformation and exhumation studies available for the Northern Central Andes (specially north of 19°) (e.g., Barnes and Ehlers, 2009), we compiled the available cenozoic paleo-magnetic data for the region extending between 19° and 27.5°S (Southern Central Andes).
2. Geologic setting
From W to E, the southern Central Andes can be divided into forearc, magmatic arc and backarc, which include different morphotectonic units (e.g., Jordan et al., 1983; Mpodozis and Ramos, 1990; Allmen-dinger et al., 1997; Kley et al., 1997). The forearc comprises the Coastal Cordillera, the Longitudinal Valley, the Chilean Precordillera and the Preandean depression. The magmatic arc is represented by the Western Cordillera (Fig. 1). The backarc consists of: the Bolivian Altiplano, the Puna, the Eastern Cordillera, the Subandean Ranges, the Santa Bárbara System and the Chaco foreland (Fig. 1).
|FIG. 1. Shaded relief topography (GTOPO30 digital elevation model) showing the different morphotectonic units identified in the Central Andes. Inset shows the study area with relation to South America. FA: forearc; WC: Western Cordillera; AT: Altiplano; PN: Puna; EC: Eastern Cordillera; SAR: Subandean Ranges; SBS: Santa Bárbara System; ChF: Chaco Foreland; Bold black line: Gephart's symmetry plane (Gephart, 1994).|
The Coastal Cordillera is mainly built up by Jurassic to Lower Cretaceous basaltic to andesitic volcanic and plutonic rocks (Mpodozis and Ramos, 1990). The Chilean Precordillera consists of Paleozoic basement, Mesozoic and Cenozoic sedimentary and volcanic rocks, together with Upper Cretaceous to Paleogene plutons (e.g., Scheuber et al., 1994). The present day magmatic arc is represented by the Western Cordillera. Note that the magmatic arc of the Central Andes has been displaced to the east (~200 km) since the Early Jurassic, from the Coastal Cordillera to the Western Cordillera, defining four successive arc systems (e.g., Coira et al., 1982; Scheuber et al., 1994). The Altiplano-Puna plateau is a wide intramountainous basin with Mesozoic-Cenozoic sedimentary infill reaching thicknesses of up to 10 km (e.g., Jordan et al., 1983). The plateau overlies a 30° east-dipping segment of the subducted Nazca plate; north of12°S and south of 28°S the slab is dipping gently and an internally drained plateau is absent (e.g., Jordan et al., 1983; Isacks, 1988), with absence of recent volcanic activity, while in the region of steep slab dip, basaltic-andesitic-dacitic volcanism is active along the arc, with local volcanic buildings present within the plateau. The volcanic arc and local volcanic centres have been active from Miocene to present time (e.g., Stern, 2004; Schurr and Rietbrock, 2004). Since the Late Miocene an ignimbrite flare-up produced a major volcanic province, the Altiplano-Puna Volcanic Complex (de Silva, 1989; Coiia et al., 1993). The Altiplano-Puna is bounded by the Western Cordillera to the west and by the tectonic highlands of the Eastern Cordillera to the east. The Eastern Cordillera is mainly composed of Precambrian to Paleozoic rocks, covered by Cretaceous and Cenozoic sediments (e.g., Giese et al., 1999). Deformation began in the Late Eocene in the Eastern Cordillera (see below) and later in the Altiplano-Puna plateau. Contractional deformation going on since the Miocene, generated a fold-thrust belt system in the back arc region of the Central Andes, now represented by the Subandean Ranges and the Santa Bárbara System. The Subandean Ranges are a thin skinned fold and thrust belt, while the Santa Bárbara System is a thick skinned thrust belt (e.g., Kley et al., 1999).
Shortening in the Central Andes began in the Late Cretaceous at the present-day forearc (Arriagada et al., 2003; Somoza and Zaffarana, 2008; Somoza, 2008) where deformation persisted till the Eocene (Incaic event). During the Eocene shortening propagated to the Eastern Cordillera (Oncken et al., 2006; Hongn et al., 2007). The following stage, occurring between 29 and 20 Ma, affected the whole Altiplano, the entire Eastern Cordillera, and expanded shortening southwards into the Puna domain (Oncken et al., 2006; and references therein). In the period between 19 and 8 Ma, deformation increased in the Puna, slowed down in the Altiplano and began in the eastern flank of the plateau. In the final period (7-0 Ma) the Subandean fold and thrust belt developed (Oncken et al., 2006). It propagated eastwards, somewhat discontinuously (Echavarría et al., 2003).
Opposing models for surface uplift history of the Altiplano-Puna have been proposed, including: 1. a rapid and recent rise whereby ~2.5 km of elevation was obtained between ~10-6 Ma (e.g., Garzione et al., 2006) and 2. a slow and steady rise inferred to be commensurate with deformation that began between ~60-40 Ma (e.g., McQuarrie et al., 2005). Barnes and Ehlers (2009) evaluated both uplift models by synthesizing observations of the Altiplano-Puna lithosphere, the deformation history, sedimentation, exhumation, magmatism, uplift and fluvial incision. They concluded that the slow and steady uplift model is most consistent with available constraints. The rapid uplift model may be an overestimate, while a more protracted Cenozoic uplift history is tenable (Barnes and Ehlers, 2009).
3. Tectonic analysis
3.1. Paleomagnetic data
In order to achieve a better understanding of the CARP we have gathered the available Cenozoic paleomagnetic data for the Southern Central Andes (between 19° and 27.5°S) (Tables 1 and 2). We did not consider the data from the southeastern margin of the Puna (e.g., Aubry et al., 1996) as such rotations have been related to the Tucumán Transfer Zone (Jordan et al., 1983; Allmendinger et al., 1983; de Urreiztieta et al., 1996). Transfer zones can give rise to large local components of rotation making the detection of possible regional ones difficult.
Reliability criteria have not been applied to the data. Beck (1998) applied his own reliability criteria to the paleomagnetic poles from the Central Andes and classified them into five different categories. He determined that there was no significant difference between the results obtained from all the data or only his best categories (IV and V). Rotations have been determined by comparing observed and expected directions (Demarest, 1983) derived from the reference mean paleopoles calculated by Besse and Courtillot (2002) (Tables 1 and 2). Each reference paleopole was used in accordance with the age of the magnetization of each Andean paleomagnetic data. It is important to mention that Taylor et al. (2005) highlighted that no major difference in the pattern of rotations for the past 100 My arose when using global data sets (Besse and Courtillot, 2002) or dominantly South American data (Lamb and Randall, 2001) as reference.
The Cenozoic Central Andean paleomagnetic data are divided here into two age groups (for the Neogene and Paleogene) (Tables 1 and 2, respectively). The spatial distribution, sense, and amount of rotations for the CARP are shown in figure 2. In general, Neogene data show a larger number of insignificant rotations than Paleogene data. Rotations are considered insignificant when the correspondent confidence interval is larger than the rotation value (e.g., 08±15°). Most Paleogene data in figure 2 arise from northern Chile (forearc zone), while most Neogene data correspond to southern Bolivia and northwestern Argentina (Western Cordillera to Subandean Ranges, Fig. 2). As previously documented by other authors (e.g., Prezzi and Alonso, 2002), it can be observed that rotations recorded in Paleogene rocks are conspicuously larger than the ones recorded by Neogene rocks. No correlations are found between latitude of sampling sites and amount of rotation within each morphotectonic unit. In order to further investigate possible relationships between age and amount of rotation, we plotted the age of magnetization versus the amount of rotation (with the corresponding confidence intervals) for the different morphotectonic units (Fig. 3). In the case of the forearc, Neogene rotations are not significant, while rocks older than 50 Ma record rotations remarkably larger than those reported by 25-50 Ma rocks. The few data available from the Eastern Cordillera appear to present an analogous pattern, with rocks older than 40 Ma showing larger rotation than Neogene rocks. On the other hand, Paleogene and Neogene rotations detected in the Altiplano-Puna are of similar amount and comparable to Neogene rotations registered in the Eastern Cordillera and the Subandean Ranges (Table 1) (Figs. 3 and 4). Only one Neogene sampled zone in the Altiplano (Roperch et al., 2000) and one Paleogene sampled area in the Puna (Prezzi and Alonso, 2002) exhibit large rotation (~40°) (Tables 1 and 2). Roperch et al. (2000) proposed that the large rotation showed by Lower Miocene Rondal volcanics reflects just local conditions, related to activity in both the San Vicente thrust and the Pululus fault zone, two tectonic features surrounding the Rondal locality. Prezzi and Alonso (2002) sampled a narrow stripe (~1.5 km wide and 6 km long) of the Salta Group (Cretaceous-Eocene) (Marquillas et al., 1993), which is longitudinally bounded by two faults (Alonso, 1986), suggesting that the large rotation detected is of local origin.
|FIG. 2. Shaded relief topography (GTOPO30 digital elevation model) showing the spatial distribution, sense, and amount of rotations paleomagnetically detected along the Southern Central Andes. Circles show sampling areas, rotations are indicated by black lines. a. forearc; b. Western Cordillera; c. Altiplano; d. Puna; e. Eastern Cordillera; f. Subandean Ranges; g. Santa Bárbara System.|
|FIG. 3. Age of magnetization versus recorded rotation (with the corresponding confidence intervals) for the different morphotectonic units. Gray dashed line: indicates Neogene-Paleogene limit; gray arrow: indicates onset of deformation; light gray shaded zone: indicates period of maximum shortening rate (Oncken et al., 2006). The data plotted comes from Tables 1 and 2.|
|FIG. 4. Longitude of sampled area versus recorded rotation (with the corresponding confidence intervals) for Neogene and Paleogene paleomagnetic data. The data plotted comes from Tables 1 and 2.|
3.2. Structural development
Deformation along the Central Andes occurred during various periods of shortening and plateau development. Oncken et al. (2006) compiled sources that described in detail the age relationships between growth deposits and structures based on stratigraphic and structural analysis, isotopic age dating, fission track analysis, and estimates of the duration of shortening based thereon. Figure 5 summarizes the current knowledge of deformation periods in the Southern Central Andes in three maps which show different time windows (Deformation Data Bank in Oncken et al., 2006; Ege et al., 2007; Hongn et al., 2007; Somoza, 2008; Somoza and Zaffarana, 2008). Such maps depict an evolution with an initial stage (60-30 Ma) involving only two domains of shortening, one in the Chilean Precordillera and the other in the Eastern Cordillera. This stage includes a main period of transpressional deformation, the Incaic event. The next stage of shortening (29-12 Ma) propagated through the entire orogen (Western Cordillera, Altiplano, Puna, Eastern Cordillera and Santa Bárbara System); only the Subandean Ranges remained unaffected (Fig. 5). During the final period (11-0 Ma) deformation ceased in the Altiplano and northern Puna, continued in the still active southern Puna and shifted to the eastern flank of the plateau, with the development of the Subandean Ranges fold and thrust belt. This low resolution image of deformation was complemented by a detailed analysis of shortening across the plateau at 21°S±1° by Oncken et al. (2006). They used the available data on horizontal shortening (e.g., Kley and Monaldi, 2002; Echavarría et al., 2003; Elger et al., 2005) and recently published ages from synkinematic growth deposits and unconformities (e.g., Horton, 2005; Ege, 2004). They collected such data for all individual structures building each morphotectonic unit of the Southern Central Andes. These authors considered the results from 21°S as representative for the entire plateau between 15 and 23°S for fluctuations over long time spans (>5-10 My), as smaller fluctuations may reflect local variations in the activity of individual structures along strike.
|FIG. 5. Shaded relieftopography (GTOPO30 digital elevation model) showing temporal pattern of deformation in Central Andes (databank and sources in Oncken et al., 2006). Squares show locations with documented deformation ages. a. forearc; b. Western Cordillera; c. Altiplano; d. Puna; e. Eastern Cordillera; f. Subandean Ranges; g: Santa Bárbara System.|
Oncken et al. (2006) documented that significant Cenozoic deformation began in the Chilean Pre-cordillera at ~46 Ma and was active until ~35 Ma. They identified two main stages of shortening across the Altiplano, one in the Oligocene (between ~35-30 and ~25-20 Ma) (Barnes and Ehlers, 2009) and the other in the Middle to Late Miocene (between 20 and 10 Ma), with maximum shortening rates between 15 and 8 Ma. In contrast to this evolution, the Eastern Cordillera deformed over a longer time span, starting at 40 Ma. Deformation spread from its center to the flanks, with maximum shortening rates between ~33-30 and ~20-17 Ma (Barnes and Ehlers, 2009). Deformation in the Eastern Cordillera almost ceased between 12 and 8 Ma, with the formation of the San Juan de Oro surface and the initiation of the Subandean fold and thrust belt (Gubbels et al., 1993; Somoza et al., 2002; Somoza and Tomlinson, 2002a; Oncken et al., 2006). In coincidence with these observations, Arriagada et al. (2008a) noted that Incaic deformation concentrated along the Chilean Precordillera and the Eastern Cordillera of southern Bolivia and northwestern Argentina. Deformation in the Chilean Precordillera began in the Late Cretaceous and peaked between ~45 and ~32 Ma, while shortening in the Eastern Cordillera occurred mainly in the Paleogene-Early Miocene, starting at ~45-40 Ma (Arriagada et al., 2008a).
Variations in Nazca and South America relative motions during the Cenozoic have been suggested to exert a primary influence on the deformation pattern of the Central Andes (e.g., Somoza, 1998). Several authors (e.g., Pardo-Casas and Molnar, 1987; Somoza, 1998; Sdrolias and Müller, 2006) determined the existence of two periods of rapid convergence (~15 cm/yr) during the Cenozoic: between ~55 and 40 Ma and between ~28 and 10 Ma. They also noted that convergence was dextral and moderately oblique in Chile (~40° at 22°S) during the Early Cenozoic between ~50 and 28 Ma. At ~28 Ma a change to roughly E-W direction took place; a further change between ~20 and 16 Ma was observed, but it could reflect problems with the reconstruction for the Farallon-Pacific pair or accommodation of a major plate reorganization in the southeast Pacific (Somoza, 1998). Oncken et al. (2006) performed a time series analysis of various features of the Central Andes. They correlated the plate kinematic parameters with the evolution of shortening in the upper plate and observed that neither the convergence rate between Nazca and South America, nor convergence obliquity seemed to be related to the evolution of the shortening rate in the Central Andes. Oncken et al. (2006) proposed that only a weak correlation between an increased shortening rate and enhanced convergence rate may exist for the initial stage of deformation. However, onset of deformation both in the Chilean Precordillera and in the Eastern Cordillera took place during the period of Early Cenozoic oblique convergence (~50-28 Ma), which is contemporaneous with the Incaic transpressional event (Arriagada et al., (2008a). On the other hand, deformation in the Altiplano began later, when convergence was ~E-W.
This temporal distribution of deformation across the Southern Central Andes would provide an explanation for the large rotations registered during the Paleogene in the forearc and the Eastern Cordillera. Rotations in rocks older than 50 Ma from northern Chile are larger (typically between 30° and 60°) (Fig. 3). Taylor et al. (2005) proposed that they would be related to the period of maximum obliquity of Farallón-South America plate convergence. They determined that the data define an anomalous domain, where markedly large rotations seem to predate rotations registered elsewhere in the Central Andes. Paleogene Eastern Cordillera data appear to define another domain of large rotations (typically between 25° and 40°). Such rotations are detected in rocks carrying magnetizations older than 40 Ma (Fig. 3). The large rotations detected in rocks older than 50 Ma from the northern Chile domain predate the onset of deformation in the Chilean Precordillera proposed by Oncken et al. (2006) (~46 Ma), whereas those detected in the Eastern Cordillera may have initiated in concert with deformation in that region (~40 Ma). These temporal relationships would suggest that in northern Chile and Eastern Cordillera, Paleogene rocks would have been exposed to longer and/or more intense periods of transpressional deformation, and consequently would have undergone larger rotations than those of the Neogene (Fig. 3). The existence of more intense Paleogene deformation in the Eastern Cordillera is supported by the results of the 2-D map view model developed by Arriagada et al. (2008a). Arriagada et al. (2008a) stated that the large magnitude of the CARP is better explained if a largest amount of shortening in the Central Andes is considered during the Eocene-Oligocene, with the Incaic event of deformation being important in the Chilean Pre-cordillera, but with major shortening concentrated along the Eastern Cordillera. The exhumation history summarized by Barnes and Ehlers (2009) for the Central Andes supports the existence of longer periods of deformation in northern Chile and Eastern Cordillera. In convergent orogens exhumation histories are assumed to be a proxy for deformation, by considering that the onset of the recorded, rapid erosional exhumation is a signature of the deformation that generates the topography and relief necessary to produce such erosion (Barnes and Ehlers, 2009). Barnes and Ehlers (2009) proposed that exhumation in the Chilean Precordillera began in the Paleocene to mid-Eocene (~60-40 Ma), with exhumation also recorded in the mid-Miocene (~15 Ma). The Eastern Cordillera experienced two phases of exhumation; in Bolivia, during the Late Eocene-Oligocene (~45-40 to ~20 Ma) and Middle-Late Miocene to Recent (~15 to 0 Ma), and in Argentina, during the Middle Eocene-Oligocene (~50 to 30 Ma) and Early Miocene (23 to 15 Ma) (Barnes and Ehlers, 2009). On the other hand, in the Altiplano-Puna, where deformation began later (~at 29 Ma) during E-W convergence, and maximum shortening rates were attained between 15 and 8 Ma, Paleogene and Neogene rocks recorded rotations of similar amount (~10°) (Fig. 3). This can be interpreted in terms that, in the Altiplano-Puna, Paleogene and Neogene rocks would have been exposed to deformation periods of similar duration and/or intensity or were exposed to a unique Neogene period of deformation, with minor strike slip component. Regarding exhumation, in the Altiplano-Puna it began in the Earliest Oligocene (~30 Ma) and continued locally into the Middle-Late Miocene (~18 Ma) or into the Late Miocene-Early Pliocene (~5 Ma) (Barnes and Ehlers, 2009).
In order to further investigate the above proposed correlation between the temporal and spatial pattern of deformation and the amount of recorded vertical axis rotations, each data set corresponding to the different morphotectonic units (forearc, Altiplano-Puna and Eastern Cordillera) was analyzed applying the circular von Mises distribution (von Mises, 1918). The choice of the circular theoretical distribution to be used is not very important for small natural samples of geological orientations, considering that one distribution may converge towards another, as extreme values of their parameters are considered (Borradaile, 2003). The von Mises distribution is a continuous probability distribution on the circle. It may be thought of as a close approximation to the wrapped normal distribution, which is the circular analogue of the normal distribution. The von Mises distribution is more mathematically tractable than the wrapped normal distribution and is the preferred distribution for many applications (Borradaile, 2003). Furthermore, documentation and tests are more developed for this distribution (Borradaile, 2003). It is used in applications of directional statistics, where a distribution of angles is found which is the result of the addition of many small independent angular deviations, such as grain orientation in a granular material. This distribution has two parameters: θ is the mean paleomagnetic direction and k indicates the dispersion of the data. θ is a measure of location (the distribution is clustered around θ), k is a measure of concentration. If k is zero, the distribution is uniform, and for small k, it is close to uniform. If k is large, the distribution becomes very concentrated about the angle θ with k being a measure of such concentration.
In our statistical analysis, for each morphotectonic unit, we calculated the parameters θ and k and θ and kp corresponding to rotations recorded by Neogene and Paleogene rocks respectively (Table 3). Then, the statistical test of Watson (1983) was used for each morphotectonic unit to determine if both data sets (Neogene and Paleogene rotations) have a common mean direction, i.e., if they come from the same or from different populations (Table 3). The Neogene parameters for the forearc are: θn = 3.97° and kn =31.7. The Paleogene parameters for the forearc are: θp = 32.83° and kn =9.07. The mean of the Paleogene rotations is considerably larger than the mean of the Neogene rotations. Moreover, the Paleogene rotations show more dispersion than the Neogene rotations. At 95% confidence level, the Paleogene and Neogene data have distinct mean directions, indicating that they would come from different populations (Table 3). In the case of the Eastern Cordillera, the Neogene parameters are: θn = 11.81° and kn=58.79, while the Paleogene parameters are: θp = 26.39° and kp =17.81. The mean of the Paleogene data is considerably larger than the mean of the Neogene data. Again, the Paleogene data show more dispersion than the Neogene data. The same statistical test (Watson, 1983) was applied, resulting that at 95% confidence level, the Paleogene and Neogene rotations have distinct mean directions, indicating that they would come from different populations (Table 3). For the Altiplano-Puna, the Neogene parameters are: θ = 11.39° and kn=38.04, while the Paleogene parameters are: θ = 9.06° and k =9.06. Both means are similar, with Paleogene data showing more dispersion than Neogene data. At 95% confidence level, the test of Watson (1983) indicates that the Paleogene and Neogene rotations have the same mean directions, demonstrating that they come from the same population (Table 3).
Recapitulating, our statistical analysis indicates that Paleogene and Neogene rocks cropping out in the forearc recorded vertical axis tectonic rotations which belong to different data populations. The same result was obtained for the Eastern Cordillera rotations. On the other hand, in the case of the Altiplano-Puna, Paleogene and Neogene rocks recorded vertical axis tectonic rotations which come from the same data population. These results might indicate that the rotations detected during different time spans in distinct morphotectonic units would respond to the style and spatial and temporal pattern of deformation. That is to say, our results agree with the existence of different rotational domains and would suggest that along the Southern Central Andes a close correlation would exist between the different deformation periods and the amount of recorded vertical axis rotations. However, in order to further investigate such relationship, new paleomagnetic data are necessary. Particularly, in the Eastern Cordillera domain the scarce number of available paleomagnetic data and the large confidence interval of many of the recorded rotations, impose an important drawback to the robustness of our analysis. Likewise, new paleomagnetic data of Paleogene rocks cropping out in the Altiplano-Puna are required to further validate our interpretations. Neogene rocks of the forearc should also be sampled, considering the limited number of data available. Such new paleomagnetic data would permit to gain a deeper insight into the issue of Neogene versus Paleogene deformation and vertical axis tectonic rotations. In addition, detailed structural studies should also be conducted to achieve a better knowledge of the relations between vertical axis tectonic rotations and amount of shortening, timing, style of deformation and structural trends in the Central Andes.
The compilation and analysis of the Southern Central Andes Cenozoic paleomagnetic data permit to conclude that:
a. Paleogene and Neogene rotations detected in the Altiplano-Puna would be of similar amount and comparable to Neogene rotations registered in the Eastern Cordillera and the Subandean Ranges.
b. Rotations registered by Paleogene data in northern Chile and Eastern Cordillera are larger than the ones recorded by Neogene rocks in these regions and elsewhere.
c. In northern Chile and Eastern Cordillera, Paleogene rocks would have been exposed either or both to longer and/or more intense periods of transpressional deformation, and consequently would have undergone larger rotation than Neo-gene rocks.
d. In the Altiplano-Puna, Paleogene and Neogene rocks would have been exposed to deformation periods of similar duration and/or intensity with minor strike slip component and accordingly depict similar amount of rotation.
e. In the Southern Central Andes, a close correlation would exist between the style and the temporal and spatial activity of deformation and the amount of recorded vertical axis rotations.
The suggestions of R. Somoza greatly improved an earlier version of this paper. This research was funded by the Universidad de Buenos Aires (UBACyT 2010-2012 20020090200266) and by CONICET (PIP 747/10). Insightful comments from Dr. Ch. Creixell and an anonymous reviewer helped to improve this manuscript.
Abels, A.; Bischoff, L. 1999. Clockwise block rotations in northern Chile: Indications for a large-scale domino mechanism during the middle-late Eocene. Geology 27: 751-754. [ Links ]
Allmendinger, R.; Ramos, V.; Jordan, T.; Palma, M.; Isacks, B. 1983. Paleogeography and Andean structural geometry, northwest Argentina. Tectonics 2: 1-16. [ Links ]
Allmendinger, R.W.; Jordan, T.; Kay, S.; Isacks, B. 1997. The evolution of the Altiplano-Puna Plateau of the central Andes. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences 25: 139-174. [ Links ]
Alonso, R. 1986. Ocurrencia, posición estratigráfica y génesis de los depósitos de boratos de la Puna Argentina, Ph.D. Thesis (Unpublished), Universidad Nacional de Salta, 196 p. Salta, Argentina. [ Links ]
Arriagada, C.; Roperch, P.; Mpodozis, C. 2000. Clockwise block rotations along the eastern border of the Cordillera de Domeyko, Northern Chile (22°45׳23°30-׳S). Tectonophysics 326: 153-171. [ Links ]
Arriagada, C.; Roperch, P.; Mpodozis, C.; Dupont-Nivet, G.; Cobbold, P.R.; Chauvin, A.; Cortés, J. 2003. Paleogene clockwise tectonic rotations in the forearc of central Andes, Antofagasta region, northern Chile. Journal of Geophysical Research 108 (B1), 2032: 24 p. doi: 10.1029/2001JB001598. [ Links ]
Arriagada, C.; Roperch, P.; Mpodozis, C.; Fernández, R. 2006. Paleomagnetism and tectonics of the southern Atacama Desert region (25-28°S) Northern Chile. Tectonics 25, TC4001: 26 p. doi: 10.1029/2005TC001923. [ Links ]
Arriagada, C.; Roperch, P.; Mpodozis, C.; Cobbold, P. 2008a. Paleogene building of the Bolivian Orocline: Tectonic restoration of the Central Andes in 2-D map view. Tectonics 27, TC6014; 14 p. doi: 10.1029/2008TC002269. [ Links ]
Arriagada, C.; Roperch, P.; Mpodozis, C. 2008b. Block rotations in the Puna Plateau. In International Symposium on Andean Geodynamics (ISAG), No. 7, Extended Abstracts: 56-59. Nice [ Links ]
Aubry, L.; Roperch, P.; de Urreiztieta, M.; Rossello, E.; Chauvin, A. 1996. A Paleomagnetic study along the south-eastern edge of the Altiplano-Puna Plateau Neogene tectonic rotations. Journal of Geophysical Research 101: 17883-17889. [ Links ]
Barke, R.; Lamb, S.; MacNiocaill, C. 2007. Late Cenozoic bending of the Bolivian Andes: New paleomagnetic and kinematic constraints. Journal of Geophysical Research 112, B01101: 22 p. doi: 10.1029/2006JB004372. [ Links ]
Barnes, J.; Ehlers, T. 2009. End members models for Andean Plateau uplift. Earth-Science Reviews 97: 105-132. [ Links ]
Beck, M. 1988. Analysis of Late Jurassic-recent Palaeo-magnetic data from active margins of South America. Journal of South American Earth Sciences 1: 39-52. [ Links ]
Beck, M. 1998. On the mechanism of crustal block rotations in the central Andes. Tectonophysics 299: 75-92. [ Links ]
Beck, M.; Burmester, R.; Drake, R.; Riley, P. 1994. A tale of two continents: Some tectonic contrasts between the central Andes and the North American Cordillera, as illustrated by their paleomagnetic signatures. Tectonics 13: 215-224. [ Links ]
Besse, J.; Courtillot, V. 2002. Apparent and true polar wander and the geometry of the geomagnetic field over the last 200 Myr. Journal of Geophysical Research 107 (B11), 2300: 31 p. doi: 10.1029/2000JB000050. [ Links ]
Borradaile, G. 2003. Statistics of Earth Science Data: Their Distribution in Time, Space and Orientation. Springer-Verlag: 351 p. Heidelberg. [ Links ]
Butler, R.; Richards, D.; Sempere, T.; Marshall, L. 1995. Paleomagnetic determinations of vertical-axis tectonic rotations from Late Cretaceous and Paleocene strata of Bolivia. Geology 23: 799-802. [ Links ]
Coira, B.; Kay, S.M.; Viramonte, J.G. 1993. Upper Cenozoic Magmatic Evolution of the Argentine Puna-A Model for Changing Subduction Geometry. International Geology Review 35: 677-720. [ Links ]
Coira, B.; Davidson, J.; Mpodozis, C.; Ramos, V. 1982. Tectonic and magmatic evolution of the Andes of northern Argentina and Chile. Earth Science Review 18: 303-332. [ Links ]
Coutand, I.; Chauvin, A.; Cobbold, P.; Gautier, P. 1999. Vertical axis rotations across the Puna Plateau (northwestern Argentina) from paleomagnetic analysis of Cretaceous and Cenozoic rocks. Journal of Geophysical Research 104: 22,965-22,984. [ Links ]
de Silva, S. 1989. Altiplano-Puna volcanic complex of the central Andes. Geology 17: 1102-1106. [ Links ]
de Urreiztieta, M.; Gapais, D.; Le Corre, C.; Cobbold, P.; Rossello, E. 1996. Cenozoic dextral transpression and basin development at the southern edge of the Puna Plateau, NW Argentina. Tectonophysics 254: 17-39. [ Links ]
Demarest, H. 1983. Error analysis for the determination of tectonic rotation from paleomagnetic data. Journal of Geophysical Research 88: 4321-4328. [ Links ]
Dewey, J.; Lamb, S. 1992. Active tectonics of the Andes. Tectonophysics 205: 79-95. [ Links ]
Dupont-Nivet, G.; Roperch, P.; Gautier, P.; Chauvin, A.; Gérard, M.; Carlier, G. 1996. Clockwise rotations in northern Chile: Oroclinal bending and in situ tectonic rotations? In International Symposium on Andean Geo-dynamics, No. 3, extended abstracts: 355-358. ORSTOM. [ Links ]
Echavarría, L.; Hernández, R.; Allmendinger, R.; Reynolds, J. 2003. Subandean thrust and fold belt of northwestern Argentina: Geometry and timing of the Andean evolution. American Association of Petroleum Geologists, Bulletin 87 (6): 965-985. [ Links ]
Ege, H. 2004. Exhumations-und Hebungsgeschichte der zentralen Anden in Südbolivien (21°S) durch Spaltspur-Thermochronologie an Apatit. Ph.D. Thesis (Unpublished), Freie Universitat: 173 p. Berlin. [ Links ]
Ege, H.; Sobel, E.; Scheuber, E.; Jacobshagen, V. 2007. Exhumation history of the southern Altiplano plateau (southern Bolivia) constrained by apatite fission track thermochronology. Tectonics 26 (1), TC1004: 24 p. [ Links ] doi: 10.1029/2005TC001869.
Elger, K.; Oncken, O.; Glodny, J. 2005. Plateau-style accumulation of deformation-the Southern Altiplano. Tectonics 24, TC4020: 19 p. doi: 10.1029/2004TC001675. [ Links ]
Forsythe, R.; Chisholm, L. 1994, Paleomagnetic and structural constraints on rotations in the northern Chilean coastal ranges. Journal of South American Earth Sciences 7: 279-294. [ Links ]
Garzione, C.; Molnar, P.; Libarkin, J.; MacFadden, B. 2006. Rapid late Miocene rise of the Bolivian Altiplano: evidence for removal of mantle lithosphere. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 241: 543-556. [ Links ]
Gephart, J.W. 1994. Topography and subduction geometry in the central Andes: Clues to the mechanics of a noncollisional orogen. Journal of Geophysical Research 99: 12279-12288. [ Links ]
Giese, P.; Scheuber, E.; Schilling, F.; Schmitz, M.; Wigger, P 1999. Crustal thickening processes in the Central Andes and the different natures of the Moho-discontinuity. Journal of South American Earth Sciences 12: 201-220. [ Links ]
Gubbels, T.L.; Isacks, B.L.; Farrar, E. 1993. High level surfaces, plateau uplift, and foreland development, Central Bolivian Andes. Geology 21: 695-698. [ Links ]
Hartley, A.; Jolley, E.; Turner, P. 1992. Paleomagnetic evidence for rotation in the Precordillera of northern Chile: Structural constraints and implications for the evolution of the Andean forearc. Tectonophysics 205: 49-64. [ Links ]
Hongn, F.; del Papa, C.; Powell, J.; Petrinovic, I.; Mon, R.; Deraco, V. 2007. Middle Eocene deformation and sedimentation in the Puna-Eastern Cordillera transition (23°-26°S): control by preexisting heterogeneities on the pattern of initial Andean shortening. Geology 35: 271-274. [ Links ]
Horton, B.K. 2005. Revised deformation history of the central Andes: Inferences from Cenozoic foredeep and intermontane basins of the Eastern Cordillera, Bolivia. Tectonics 24, TC3011. doi: 10.1029/2003TC001619. [ Links ]
Isacks, B. 1988. Uplift of the Central Andes plateau and bending of the Bolivian Orocline. Journal of Geophysical Research 93: 3211-3231. [ Links ]
Jordan, T.; Isacks, B.; Allmendinger, R.; Brewer, J.; Ramos, V.; Ando, C. 1983. Andean tectonics related to geometry of the subducted Nazca Plate. Geological Society of America Bulletin 94: 341-361. [ Links ]
Kley, J.; Monaldi, C. 2002. Tectonic inversion in the Santa Bárbara system of the central Andean foreland thrust belt, northwestern Argentina. Tectonics 21(6), 1061: 18 p. doi: 10.1029/2002TC902003. [ Links ]
Kley, J.; Monaldi, C.; Salfity, J. 1999. Along strike segmentation of the Andean foreland: Causes and consequences. Tectonophysics 301: 75-94. [ Links ]
Kley, J.; Müller, J.; Tawackoli, S.; Jacobshagen, V.; Manutsoglu, E. 1997. Pre-Andean and Andean-age deformation in the Eastern Cordillera of S Bolivia. Journal of South American Earth Sciences 10: 1-19. [ Links ]
Lamb, S.H. 2001. Vertical axis rotations in the Bolivian orocline, South America: 1. Paleomagnetic analysis of Cretaceous and Cenozoic rocks. Journal of Geophysical Research 106: 26605-26632. [ Links ]
Lamb, S.H.; Randall, D.E. 2001. Deriving palaeomagnetic poles from independently assessed inclination and declination data: Implications for South American poles since 120 Ma. Geophysical Journal International 146: 349-370. [ Links ]
MacFadden, B.; Anaya, F.; Argollo, J. 1993. Magnetic polarity stratigraphy of Inchasi: A Pliocene mammal-bearing locality from the Bolivian Andes deposited just before the Great American Interchange. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 114: 229-241. [ Links ]
MacFadden, B.; Anaya, F.; Swisher Jr., C. 1995. Neogene paleomagnetism and oroclinal bending of the central Andes of Bolivia. Journal of Geophysical Research 100 (B5): 8153-8167. [ Links ]
MacFadden, B.; Anaya, F.; Pérez, H.; Naeser, C.; Zeitler, P.; Campbell, K. 1990. Late Cenozoic paleomagnetism and chronology of Andean basins of Bolivia: evidence for possible oroclinal bending. Journal of Geology 98: 541-555. [ Links ]
Maffione, M.; Speranza, F.; Faccenna, C. 2009. Bending of the Bolivian orocline and growth of the central Andean plateau: Paleomagnetic and structural constraints from the Eastern Cordillera (22-24°S, NW Argentina). Tectonics 28, TC4006, 23 p. doi: 10.1029/2008TC002402. [ Links ]
Marquillas, R.; Salfity, J.; Monaldi, C. 1993. Regional development of the Salta Group facies in the Argentine Puna. In International Symposium on Andean Geodynamics, No. 2. ORSTOM, Paris. [ Links ]
McQuarrie, N.; Horton, B.; Zandt, G., Beck, S.; DeCelles, P. 2005. Lithospheric evolution of the Andean fold-thrust belt, Bolivia, and the origin of the central Andean plateau. Tectonophysics 399: 15-37. [ Links ]
Mpodozis, C.; Ramos, V. A. 1990. The Andes of Chile and Argentina. In Geology of the Andes and its relation to hydrocarbon and energy resources. Circum-Pacific Council for Energy and Hydrothermal Resources (Ericksen, G.E.; Cañas, M.T.; Reinemund, J.A.; editors). American Association of Petroleum Geologists, Earth Science Series 11: 59-90. Houston, Texas. [ Links ]
Oncken, O.; Hindle, D.; Kley, J.; Elger, K.; Víctor, P.; Schemmann, K. 2006. Deformation of the Central Andean Upper Plate System-Facts, Fiction, and Constraints for Plateau Models. In The Andes, active subduction orogeny (Oncken, O.; Chong, G.; Franz, G.; Giese, P.; Götze, H.-J.; Ramos, V.; Strecker, M.; Wigger, P. ; editors). Springer 1: 3-27. Berlin. [ Links ]
Pardo-Casas, F.; Molnar, P. 1987. Relative motion of the Nazca (Farallon) and South American plates since Late Cretaceous time. Tectonics 6: 233-248. [ Links ]
Prezzi, C. 2001. Estudio paleomagnético de rocas cenozoicas aflorantes en la Puna Austral. Revista de la Asociación Geológica Argentina 56 (3): 293-303. [ Links ]
Prezzi, C.; Vilas, J. 1998. New evidence of clockwise vertical axis rotations south of the Arica elbow (Argentine Puna). Tectonophysics 292: 85-100. [ Links ]
Prezzi, C.; Alonso, R. 2002. New Paleomagnetic data from the Northern Argentine Puna: Central Andes Rotation Pattern Reanalysed. Journal of Geophysical Research 107 (B2), 2041: 18. doi: 10.1029/2001JB000225. [ Links ]
Prezzi, C.; Caffe, P.; Somoza, R. 2004. New paleomagnetic data from the northern Puna and western Cordillera Oriental, Argentina: a new insight on the timing of rotational deformation. Journal of Geodynamics 38: 93-115. [ Links ]
Randall, D.; Taylor, G.; Grocott, J. 1996. Major crustal rotations in the Andean margin: Paleomagnetic results from the Coastal Cordillera of northern Chile. Journal of Geophysical Research 101: 15783-15798. [ Links ]
Randall, D.; Tomlinson, A.; Taylor, G. 2001. Paleomag-netically defined rotations from the Precordillera of northern Chile: Evidence of localized in situ fault-controlled rotations. Tectonics 20: 235-254. [ Links ]
Reynolds, J.; Galli, C.; Hernández, R.; Idleman, B.; Kotila, J.; Hilliard, R.; Naeser, C. 2000. Middle Miocene tectonic development of the Transition Zone, Salta Province, northwest Argentina: Magnetic stratigraphy from the Metán Subgroup, Sierra de González. Geological Society of America Bulletin 112 (11): 1736-1751. [ Links ]
Richards, D.; Butler, R.; Sempere, T. 2004. Vertical-axis rotations determined from paleomagnetism of Mesozoic and Cenozoic strata of the Bolivian Andes. Journal of Geophysical Research 109, B07104: 21 p. doi: 10.1029/2004JB002977. [ Links ]
Roperch, P.; Fornari, M.; Hérail, G.; Parraguez, G. 2000. Tectonic rotations within the Bolivian Altiplano: Implications for the geodynamic evolution of the central Andes during the late Tertiary. Journal of Geophysical Research 105: 795-820. [ Links ]
Roperch, P.; Sempere, T.; Macedo, O.; Arriagada, C.; Fornari, M.; Tapia, C.; García, M.; Laj, C. 2006. Counterclockwise rotation of late Eocene-Oligocene fore-arc deposits in southern Peru and its significance for oroclinal bending in the central Andes. Tectonics 25, TC3010: 30 p. [ Links ] doi: 10.1029/2005TC001882.
Scheuber, E.; Bogdanic, T.; Jensen, A.; Reutter, K. 1994. Tectonic development of the north Chilean Andes in relation to plate convergence and magmatism since the Jurassic. In Tectonics of the southern central Andes (Reutter, K.; Scheuber, E.; Wigger, P.; editors). Springer: 7-22. Berlin Heidelberg New York. [ Links ]
Schurr, B.; Rietbrock, A. 2004. Deep seismic structure of the Atacama basin, northern Chile. Geophysical Research Letters 31, L12601, 4 p. doi: 10.1029/2004GL019796. [ Links ]
Sdrolias, M.; Müller, R. 2006. Controls on back-arc basin formation. Geochemistry Geophysics Geosystems 7 (4), Q04016: 40 p. doi: 10.1029/2005GC001090. [ Links ]
Somoza, R. 1998. Updated Nazca (Farallon)-South America relative motions during the last 40 My: implications for mountain building in the central Andean region. Journal of South American Earth Sciences 11 (3): 211-215. [ Links ]
Somoza, R. 2008, Major mid-Cretaceous plate reorganization as the trigger of the Andean orogeny. In International Symposium on Andean Geodynamics, No. 7, IRD-University of Nice. Extended Abstracts: 509-512. Paris. [ Links ]
Somoza, R.; Tomlinson, A. 2002a. Los Andes Centrales del sur durante el Neógeno: Observaciones e hipótesis sobre la cinemática horizontal. In Congreso Geológico Argentino, No. 15, Actas 1: 82-87. [ Links ]
Somoza, R.; Tomlinson, A. 2002b. Paleomagnetism in the Precordillera of northern Chile (22°30'S): implications for the history of tectonic rotations in the Central Andes. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 194 (3-4): 369-381. [ Links ]
Somoza, R.; Zaffarana, C.B. 2008. Mid-Cretaceous polar standstill of South America, motion of the Atlantic hotspots and the birth of the Andean cordillera. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 271: 267-277. [ Links ]
Somoza, R.; Singer, S.; Coira, B. 1996. Paleomagnetism of upper Miocene ignimbrites at the Puna, an analysis of vertical-axis rotations in the Central Andes. Journal of Geophysical Research 101: 11387-11400. [ Links ]
Somoza, R.; Singer, S.; Tomlinson, A. 1999. Paleomagnetic study of upper Miocene rocks from northern Chile: implications for the origin of late Miocene-Recent tectonic rotations in the southern central Andes. Journal of Geophysical Research 104: 22923-22936. [ Links ]
Somoza, R.; Tomlinson, A.; Prezzi, C. 2002. Los Andes Centrales en el Cenozoico Tardío: aumento de la tasa de acortamiento y disminución en la velocidad de convergencia. In Congreso Geológico Argentino, No. 15, Actas 2: 181-186. [ Links ]
Stern, C.R. 2004. Active Andean volcanism: its geologic and tectonic setting. Revista Geológica de Chile 31 (2): 161-206. [ Links ]
Taylor, G.; Grocott, J.; Pope, A.; Randall, D. 1998. Mesozoic fault systems, deformation and fault blocks rotation in the Andean forearc: A crustal scale strike-slip duplex in the Coastal Cordillera of northern Chile. Tectonophysics 299: 93-109. [ Links ]
Taylor, G.; Dashwood, B.; Grocott, J. 2005. Central Andean rotation pattern: Evidence from paleomagnetic rotations of an anomalous domain in the forearc of northern Chile. Geology 33: 777-780. [ Links ]
Taylor, G.; Grocott, J.; Dashwood, B.; Gipson, M.; Arévalo, C. 2007. Implications for crustal rotation and tectonic evolution in the central Andes fore arc: New paleo-magnetic results from the Copiapó region of northern Chile, 26°-28°S. Journal of Geophysical Research 112, B01102: 22 p. doi: 10.1029/2005JB003950. [ Links ]
Viramonte, J.; Reynolds, J.; Del Papa, C.; Disalvo, A. 1994. The Corte Blanco garnetiferous tuff: A distinctive late Miocene marker bed in northwestern Argentina applied to magnetic polarity stratigraphy in the Río Yacones, Salta Province. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 121: 519-531. [ Links ]
Von Mises, R. 1918. Über die "Ganzzahligkeit" der Atomgewichte und verwandte Fragen. Physikalische Zeitung 19: 490-500. [ Links ]
Watson, G. 1983. Large sample theory of Langevin distribution. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 8: 245-256. [ Links ]
Manuscript received: May 19, 2010; revised/accepted: September 28, 2011; available online: November 8, 2011.