Services on Demand
- Cited by Google
- Similars in SciELO
- Similars in Google
On-line version ISSN 0718-7106
AndGeo vol.36 no.1 Santiago Jan. 2009
Andean Geology 36 (1): 131-136. January, 2009
formerly Revista Geológica de Chile
Tsunamigenic, earthquake-triggered rock slope failures during the April 21, 2007 Aisén earthquake, southern Chile (45.5°S)
Inestabilidades de laderas de roca generadoras de tsunami durante el terremoto de Aisén del 21 de abril de 2007, sur de Chile (45.5° S)
Sergio A. Sepúlveda1, Alejandra Serey1
ABSTRACT. The April 21, 2007 shallow crustal earthquake (Mw 6.2) in the Aisén Fjord area triggered hundreds of landslides around the epicentral zone. Among those, several rock slope failures such as rock slides, rock falls and rock avalanches were induced on the steep fjord slopes. The violent impact of the disrupted rock masses into the fjord generated local tsunamis that caused ten fatalities and extensive damage to salmón farms located along the fjord shores. Field observations suggested that geotechnical and geomorphological factors controlled the landslide locations and failure modes, associated with the presence of faults and topographic relief, respectively. This event is an example of a geological hazard that has not been previously addressed in the Chilean Patagonian fjordland, revealing the need for identifying and understanding these geological phenomena in future hazard assessments in the región.
Keywords: Landslides, Earthquakes, Geological hazards, Aisén, Chile.
RESUMEN. El 21 de abril de 2007 un terremoto superficial cortical (Mw 6,2) en el área del Fiordo Aisén desencadenó cientos de remociones en masa en la zona epicentral. Entre éstas, se generaron varias inestabilidades en laderas rocosas escarpadas, tales como deslizamientos, caídas y avalanchas de rocas. El violento impacto de las masas disgregadas de roca en las aguas del fiordo generó tsunamis locales, que causaron diez víctimas fatales y un importante daño en granjas salmoneras ubicadas a lo largo de las costas del fiordo. Observaciones de terreno sugieren controles geotécnicos y geomorfológicos en la ubicación y modos de falla de las remociones en masa, asociados a la presencia de fallas y relieve abrupto, respectivamente. Este evento es un ejemplo de un tipo de peligro geológico que no ha sido previamente detectado ni abordado en los fiordos de la Patagonia Chilena, revelando la necesidad de identificar y comprender estos fenómenos geológicos en futuras evaluaciones de peligro en la región.
Palabras claves: Remociones en masa, Terremotos, Peligros geológicos, Aisén, Chile.
1. Introduction: The 2007 Aisén Fjord earthquake
On April 21, 2007, a Mw 6.2 (Ms 6.3) earthquake (Global CMT Catalog, 2008; NEIC, 2008) occurred at about 13:50 local time in the Aisén Fjord, Chilean Patagonia (45.5°S, Fig. 1). The intensities reportedby the Chilean Seismological Survey reached VII in the nearby towns of Puerto Aisén and Puerto Chacabuco (Fig. 2). The earthquake represented the peak of a seismic swarm that started on January 22, 2007. During this period, thousands of tremors were detected in the área (Barrientos et al, 2007; Comte et al, 2007). After the April main shock, the activity decreased significantly. The focus depth of the main shock was placed around 12 km according to the global network (CMT Global Catalog, 2008), althoughseveral works suggestthat it may have been shallower (Naranjo et al., 2009, this volume; Barrientos 2007, personal communication). Most of the local seismic network installed during the seismic swarm was damaged or lost due to the tsunamis, avoiding a precise location of the hypocentre (Naranjo et al., 2009, this volume). The main shock focal mechanism was strike-slip with a north-south plañe solution (CMT Global Catalog, 2008), whichfits the orientation of one of the main mapped branches of the Liquiñe-Ofqui Fault Zone (LOFZ), a regional right-lateral strike-slip structure that accommodates the parallel component of the oblique subduction of the Nazca píate beneath the South American píate (e.g., Cembrano and Hervé, 1993; Cembrano et al., 2002; Fig. 1). A source relationship between the LOFZ and the earthquake is discussed by Cembrano et al. (2007), Comte et al. (2007) and Naranjo et al. (2009, this volume). The local geology of the epicentral área is fundamentally composed of intrusive rocks of the NorthPata-gonianBatholith, volcanic deposits fromthe nearby Hudson, Maca and Cay stratovolcanoes, alluvial sediments and a series of small monogenetic cones (Niemeyer et al, 1984; Lahsen et al, 1997). The slopes of the fjord and U-shaped tributary valleys are covered by a thin (less than 2 m) layer of volcanic soils andvegetation.
The main shock triggered over three hundred land-slides inthe epicentral área (Sepúlvedaet al, 2008a), in additionto afew ones that nave beenpreviously induced during the largest foreshocks. These landslides nave been mapped and described by Naranjo et al. (20071. 2009), Pavez et al. (2007), Arenas et al. (2008) and Sepúlveda et al. (2008a, 2008b). The mass movements can be classified as shallow soil and soil-rock slides, rock slides, rock falls, rock avalanches and debris flows, and were distributed along the slopes of glacial valleys around the fjord as well as on the steep fjord slopes (Sepúlveda et al, 2008a, 2008b).
This short note is focused on the rock slope failures (see Glossary) that were induced by the April 21 earthquake along the fjord shoreline, which were the source of the tsunamis and configure a complex geological hazard, such as the sequence earthquake-landslide-tsunami. This kind of hazard has significant implications that should be studied in general for all populated fjords or with industrial activities along the LOFZ. A more comprehensive study of these and the other landslides induced by the earthquake is being carried out by the authors and will be published in the near future. A more extended account of the general effects of the April 21 earthquake and the landslide-tsunami relationships is being published by Naranjo et al. (2009, this volume).
2. Rock slope failures in the Aisén Fjord
2.1 Rock Slides and Rock Avalanches
The largest and most significant tsunamigenic landslides (Glossary) were disrupted rock slides that rapidly evolved to rock avalanches. This kind of failure was restricted to high and steep slopes along the fjord shore and cióse to it in narrow lateral valleys (Fig. 2). The rock slides (Glossary) were character-ized by massive, mainly translational movements of rock that were rapidly disintegrated. In many cases, the sudes did not show significant structural control by joint surfaces dipping out of the slopes, but tended to occur in highly fractured rock around shear or fault zones, where the geotechnical quality of the rock mass is reduced. Their thicknesses varied in general between 5 and 15 m, which can be considered as shallow given the slope heights where they occurred, which vary between ca. 200 and 1000 m. The rock sudes mainly occurred along the northern fjord shore, the most significant of which are a landslide complex in front of Mentirosa Island and a large slide in a ravine next to Punta Cola (Figs. 2, 3 and 4). The estimated volumes of these landslides are 7 and 12 millions of cubic metres, respectively (Clavero et al, 2008). A less volumetric shallow soil and rock slide in the southern shore also generated a smaller tsunami southwest of Mentirosa Island (Clavero et al, 2008; Naranjo et al, 2009, this volume).
The disrupted nature and highkinetic energy of the largest rock slides allowed them to transform into rock avalanches (see Glossary). The slides next to Mentirosa Island discharged directly into the fjord water, thus it is not clear whether they can be regarded as avalanches. Onthe otherhand, the large rock slide in the ravine cióse to Punta Cola stripped vegetation from the opposite slope as it continued downstream, withmarks indicating heights of over 20 m (Fig. 4). These marks and the deposits of more than 10 m thick along the gully, suggest a rock avalanche mechanism. The avalanche traveled for about 1 km before it reached the fjord.
2.2 Rock Block Slides and Rock Falls
The second failure mode found in rock slope failures are rock block slides (Glossary, Fig. 5) that in many cases transformed into rock falls due to the high steepness of the fjord coastal bluffs and some glacial valley slopes inland. Some rock falls (Glossary) could also have been inducedby tensile failure along subvertical cracks and joints. Mobilized volumes are highly variable, and can reach up to dozens of thousands of cubic metres.
3. Discussion and conclusions
Whereas the landslides that affected the soil slope cover and the debris flows, which are common around the epicentral área and also occur further away in the case of older events, seem to be related to the high susceptibility of the slopes to fail during either seismic or rainfall triggers, the tsunamigenic rock slope failures seem to be much more spatially restricted to zones where certain geomorphological, geotechnical and geological features can be found.
The large massive rock slides were triggered cióse to the epicentre, in áreas where the observed intrusive rocks are more intensively fractured due to the presence of faults related to the major Liquiñe-Ofqui Fault Zone. Furthermore, the massive rock slides have particular characteristics, such as their shallowness, translational movement, disruption of the rock mass, and the location of the landslide crowns at orvery near the hillside tops. These characteristics are very similar to earthquake-triggered rock slides elsewhere that have been associated with the effect of topographic amplification of the seismic waves (Sepúlveda et al, 2005a, b). Topographic amplification is a local site eífect inducingvery high accelerations at the slope crest, which may genérate landslides in slopes that otherwise would be sufficiently strong to resist such large mass movements. This hypothesis is currently being tested using geotechnical analyses.
The understanding of the failure modes and me-chanics of rock slope failures is essential to correct-ly assess the geological hazard of landslide-induced tsunamis during crustal earthquakes along the LOFZ inthe Chileanfjordland, which seismogenic nature has been shownby the Aisén earthquake and seismicity found in other LOFZ segment (Lange et al, 2008). Landslide volumes and velocities are critical parameters for tsunami modelling that are directly related to landslide mechanics, as detailed by Clavero et al. (2008) and Naranjo et al. (2009). Furthermore, knowledge of the relation-ships of the landslides with structural, geotechnical and geomorphological characteristics of the slopes will allow the more significant conditioning factors for landslide triggering during earthquakes in fjord coastal environments to be defined. This will assist future landslide susceptibility assessments in Aisén and other fjords cióse to the seismogenic Liquiñe-Ofqui Fault Zone.
This work was funded by the Fondecyt Project N° 11070107 and the Millenium Nucleus International Center of Earthquake Research. We thank A. Pavez, L. Lara, S. Barrientes and M. Arenas for their fruitful discussions, G. Orozco for his support in field work and S. Rebolledo, J. Le Roux and referees J. Cembrano, J. Naranjo and A. Hauser for their helpful reviews of the draft manuscript.
1 Naranjo, J. A.; Arenas, M.; Clavero, J.; Lara, L. 2007. Estudio preliminar de peligros por remociones en masa en la zona afectada por el sismo (Mw 6,2) del 21 de abril de 2007, Región de Aisén. Servicio Nacional de Geología y Minería, mayo de 2007 (unpublished report).
Arenas, M.; Naranjo, J.; Clavero, I; Lara, L. 2008. Earth-quake-induced landslides: susceptibility mapping for crisis management. In Congreso Geológico Argentino, No. 17, Actas 1: 255. Salvador de Jujuy. [ Links ]
Barrientes, S.; Bataille, K.; Aranda, C; Legrand, D.; Báez, J.C.; Agüito, H.; Pavez, A.; Genrich, J.; Vigny, C; Bondoux, F. 2007. Complex sequence of earthquakes in Fjordland, Southern Chile. In Proceedings Geosur 2007: 21. Santiago. [ Links ]
Cembrano, J.; Hervé, F 1993. The Liquifle-Ofqui Fault Zone: a major Cenozoic strike-slip duplex in the Southern Andes. In International Symposium on Andean Geodynamics, No. 2: 175-178. Oxford. [ Links ]
Cembrano, J.; Lara, L.; Lavenu, A.; Hervé, F. 2007. Long-term and short-term kinematic history of the Liquiñe Ofqui fault zone, southern Chile: a review and implications for geologic hazard assessment. In Proceedings Geological Society of América Annual Meeting, Denver. [ Links ]
Cembrano, J.; Lavenu,A.; Reynolds,P; Arancibia, G.; López, G.; Sanhueza, A. 2002. Late Cenozoic transpressional ductile deformation north of the Nazca-South America-Antarctica triple junction. Tectonophysics 354: 289-314. [ Links ]
Clavero, J.;Arenas,M.;Naranjo,J.;Lara,L. 2008. Parameterization of earthquake-induced landslides fortsunami modelling in southern Chile. In Congreso Geológico Argentino, No. 17, Actas 1: 267. Salvador de Jujuy. [ Links ]
Comte, D.; Gallego, A.; Russo, R.; Murdie, R.; VanDecar, J. 2007. The Aysen (Southern Chile) 2007 seismic swarm: volcanic or tectonic origin? Eos Transactions, AGU, 88 (23), Joint Assembly Supplement. [ Links ]
Keefer, D.K. 1984. Landslides caused by earthquakes. Geological Society of América Bulletin 95: 406-421. [ Links ]
Lange, D.; Cembrano, J.; Rietbrock, A.; Haberland, C; Dahm, T.; Bataille, K. 2008. First seismic record for intra-arc strike-slip tectonics along the Liquiñe-Ofqui fault zone at the obliquely convergent plate margin of the Southern Andes. Tectonophysics, doi: 10.1016/j.tecto.2008.04.014. [ Links ]
Lahsen, A.; González-Ferrán, O.; Innocenti, F.; Manetti, R; Mazzuoli,R.;Omarioni,R.;Tamponi,M.S. 1997.New occurrence of orogenic volcanism along Liquifle-Ofqui fault sy stem: the Río Pescado volcanic centers, Southern Andes (45°30'S, 73°04'W). In Congreso Geológico Chileno,No. 8,Actas 1: 108-112.Antofagasta [ Links ]
Naranjo, J.A.; Arenas, M.; Clavero, I; Muñoz, O. 2009. Efectos de la crisis sísmica de Aisén 2007. Andean Geology 36(1): 137-145. [ Links ]
Niemeyer, H.; Skarmeta, I; Fuenzalida, R.; Espinosa, W. 1984. Hojas Península de Taitao y Puerto Aisén, Región de Aisén del General Carlos Ibáñez del Campo. Servicio Nacional de Geología y Minería, Carta Geológica de Chile, No. 60-61: 80 p., 1 mapa escala 1:500.000. [ Links ]
Pavez, A.; Sepúlveda, S.A.; Aguilera, R. 2007. Remote sensing analysis of landslides and coastal changes after the 2007 Aysén Mw 6.2 earthquake. In Geosur 2007: 120 p. Santiago. [ Links ]
Sepúlveda S.A.; Murphy, W.; Jibson, R.W.; Petley, D.N. 2005a. Seismically-induced rock slope failures resulting from topographic amplification of strong ground motions: The case of Pacoima Canyon, California. Engineering Geology 80: 336-348. [ Links ]
Sepúlveda S.A.; Murphy, W; Petley, D.N. 2005b. Topographic controls on coseismic rock slides during the 1999 Chi-Chi earthquake, Taiwan. Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology 38: 189-196. [ Links ]
Sepúlveda, S.A.; Serey, A.; Pavez, A.; Barrientes, S.; Lara, M. 2008a. Analysis of earthquake-induced landslides during the 2007 Aysén Fjord seismic swarm, Chilean Patagonia (45.5°S). In International Geological Congress, No. 33. Proceedings, paper GHZ04203L. Oslo. [ Links ]
Sepúlveda, S.A.; Serey, A.;Lara,M.;Rebolledo,S. 2008b. Deslizamientos cosísmicos asociados al terremoto del fiordo aysén de 2007, sur de Chile. In Congreso Geológico Argentino, No. 17, Actas 1: 316-317. Salvador de Jujuy. [ Links ]
Manuscript received: October 6, 2008; accepted: November 4, 2008
Rock Slope Failures: Landslides (mass movements) originated in slopes where the failure occurs in the rock mass. They include rock slides, rock block slides, rock falls, rock avalanches and rock slumps.
Tsunamigenic Landslides: Landslides (mass movements) that genérate tsunami waves. They can be submarine or subaerial in coastal slopes.
The definition of different types of rock slope failures used in this work is based on the classification of earthquake-induced landslides by Keefer (1984):
Rock Avalanches: Landslides that disintegrate into streams of rock fragments that can travel several kilometres on slopes of a few degrees at velocities of hundreds of kilometres per hour.
Rock Block Slldes: One or few blocks that slide on basal shear surfaces that are discontinuities that dip out of slopes, allowing the blocks to move without significant distortion.
Rock Falls: Individual boulders or disrupted masses of rock that descend slopes by bouncing, rolling or free fall.
Rock Slides: Rock masses that are disordered during movement into masses of rock fragments and blocks that slide on planar or gently curved surfaces.