versión On-line ISSN 0718-5839
Chilean J. Agric. Res. vol.72 no.1 Chillán mar. 2012
Chilean Journal of Agricultural Research 72(1) January - March
Performance fo Late Sown Wheat in Response to Foliar Application of Moringa oleifera Lam. Leaf Extract
Rendimiento de Trigo sembrado Tarde en Respuesta a la Aplicación Foliar de Extracto de Hojas de Moringa oleifera Lam.
Azra Yasmeen1*, Shahzad Maqsood Ahmed Basra2, Rashid Ahmad2, and Abdul Wahid3
1Bahauddin Zakariya University, University College of Agriculture, Department of Agronomy, Multan, Pakistan. *Corresponding author (email@example.com).
2University of Agriculture, Department of Crop Physiology, Faisalabad-38040, Pakistan.
3University of Agriculture, Department of Botany, Faisalabad-38040, Pakistan.
A rise in temperature during early spring inducing early maturity is a key yield-reducing factor in late sown wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Moringa oleifera Lam. leaves are rich in zeatin, a cytokinin that plays a role in delaying leaf senescence, in addition to other growth-enhancing compounds such as ascorbates, phenolics, and minerals. The objective of this study was to optimize dose and optimum growth stage for foliar-applied moringa leaf extract (MLE) and its role in delaying leaf senescence in late sown wheat. The wheat crop was sown on 16 December 2008; MLE (diluted 30 times) was applied at different growth stages from tillering to heading and heading alone and distilled water was sprayed as a control. All the MLE treatment results were better than the control. However, an increase of 10.73%, 6.00%, 10.70%, and 4.00% was evident in 1000 grain weight, biological yield, grain yield, and harvest index, respectively, with MLE spray at tillering + jointing + booting + heading. The MLE spray used only at heading gave 6.84%, 3.17%, 6.80%, and 3.51% more than the control 1000 grain weight, biological yield, grain yield, and harvest index, respectively. The MLE extended seasonal leaf area duration (Seasonal LAD) by 9.22 and 6.45 d over the control when applied at all growth stages and a single spray at heading, respectively. We conclude that it is possible that the presence of growth-promoting substances in MLE foliar spray can delay crop maturity and extend seasonal LAD and the grain-filling period, thereby leading to greater seed and biological yields in late sown wheat.
Key words: Crop maturity, seasonal leaf area duration, late sowing, Moringa oleifera, wheat.
Aumento en temperatura durante inicios de primavera induciendo madurez temprana es un factor clave en la reducción de rendimiento en siembra tardía de trigo (Triticum aestivum L.). Las hojas de Moringa oleifera Lam. son ricas en zeatina, una citoquinina que tiene rol en retraso de senescencia foliar, además de otros compuestos que mejoran crecimiento como ascorbatos, fenoles, y minerales. Este estudio se planeó para optimizar dosis y estado de crecimiento óptimo para extracto foliar de moringa (MLE) aplicado foliarmente y su rol en retraso de senescencia foliar en siembra tardía de trigo. El cultivo de trigo se sembró el 16 de septiembre y MLE (diluido 30 veces) se aplicó en diferentes estados de crecimiento desde macollamiento hasta espigadura y en espigadura, mientras se asperjó agua destilada como control. En resultados todos los tratamientos MLE fueron mejores que el control. Sin embargo, un aumento de 10,73; 6,00; 10,70 y 4,00% fue evidente en peso de 1000 granos, rendimiento biológico, producción de grano e índice de cosecha, respectivamente, con aspersión de MLE en macollamiento + encanado + estado de bota + espigadura. Aspersión de MLE sólo en espigadura dio 6,84; 3,17 y 3,51% más de peso 1000 granos, rendimiento biológico, producción de grano, e índice de cosecha respectivamente, comparado con control. MLE extendió la duración del área foliar estacional (LAD estacional) en 9,22 y 6,45 d sobre el control cuando se aplicó a todos los estados de crecimiento y aspersión a espigadura, respectivamente. Concluimos que posiblemente debido a la presencia de sustancias, la aspersión foliar de MLE puede retrasar la madurez de cultivo, extender LAD estacional y período de llenado de grano conduciendo, por lo tanto, a mayores producciones de semilla y biológica en trigo sembrado tardíamente.
Palabras clave: madurez del cultivo, duración de área foliar estacional, siembra tardía, Moringa oleifera, trigo.
Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) has a prominent position among the cereals that supplement nearly one-third of the world population's diet by providing half of the dietary protein and more than half of the calories (Dhanda et al., 2004). As a result, there is always pressure to harvest higher wheat yields to feed the burgeoning population. Many factors contribute in increasing yield, such as early and on-time sowing (Akhtar et al., 2006; Sattar et al., 2010), seed quality (Farooq et al., 2008), availability of high-yielding varieties (Hussain et al., 1998), judicious use of inputs such as fertilizers and irrigation (Mullaa et al., 1992; Kibe et al., 2006), and effective weed management (Abouziena et al., 2008).
Late sowing of wheat is a major problem in the rice-wheat (Hobbs and Gupta, 2002) and cotton-wheat (Khan et al., 2010) areas of Asia. Hobbs and Morris (1996) observed a 1% decrease for each day that wheat sowing was postponed after the optimum sowing date (15-20 November). Regmi et al. (2002) also reported a yield decline in wheat when it was sown after the third week of November. A major reason for late sowing is the late harvest of the preceding crops. The inputs applied to the wheat crop were not efficiently utilized and resulted in reduced yield under late sowing (Hobbs and Gupta, 2002). In late sown wheat, all the growth stages, such as tillering, flowering, and grain filling, are adversely affected by the shortened growing period. The reduction in the optimum growth period caused by a rise in temperature leads to leaf senescence resulting in a photosynthetic rate that is too low to meet plant C economy (Hensel et al., 1993; Sharma-Natu et al., 2006). As a result, it affects two important yield parameters, i.e., the number of grains per spike and grain weight (Ugarte et al., 2007).
The initiation of leaf senescence is subjected to regulation by both internal and environmental factors. This reduction in growth can be compensated by cultivating short-duration varieties (Tahir et al., 2009) that are generally low yielding. The other effective approach is the exogenous application of plant growth regulators (PGRs) involved in promoting plant growth and development under normal and stressful conditions (Brathe et al., 2002). Although plants are capable of producing PGRs endogenously, they respond well to the exogenous application. Plants can store excessive amounts of exogenously supplied hormones in the form of reversible conjugates that are released in active forms when needed in any plant part during growth (Davies, 1987). It is known that the degree of leaf senescence is inversely proportional to cytokinin content (Xu and Huang, 2009).
Among the PGRs, cytokinins are reported to delay plant senescence (Amin, 2003; Shani et al., 2006) and thus extend the stay-green period. In a field trial applying a commercial product containing cytokinin, cytogen, has been reported to increase yield in corn (Zea mays L., 26.3%), rice (Oryza sativa L., 45.8%), pepper (Piper nigrum L., 24.4%), cucumber (Cucumis sativa L., 62.9%), and cantaloupe (Cucumis melo L., 36.8%) (Mayeux et al., 1983). Gupta et al. (2003) also reported that benzyl adenine, a cytokinin, could be used to improve the sink and source capacity of wheat to increase grain yield. The cytokinin level is positively correlated to final grain weight in maize (Dietrich et al., 1995). Cytokinin-induced seed yield enhancement has also been observed in soybean (Nagel et al., 2001).
Since commercial cytokinin sources are cost-intensive, there is a need to explore their natural sources. Various sources, such as seaweed extract, humic acid, and Moringa oleifera leaf extract (MLE) have been introduced; they are inexpensive, environmentally friendly, and feasible under natural soil and plant systems (Crouch et al., 1990; Nabati, 1991; Yan and Schmidt, 1993; Foidle et al., 2001). Since M. oleifera leaves are rich in zeatin, they can be used as a natural cytokinin source (Price, 2007; Basra et al., 2011). Spraying the leaves of many field crops with MLE diluted with water produced some notable effects such as a longer and more vigorous life span, heavier roots, stems, and leaves, bigger fruits, and higher sugar levels (Foidle et al., 2001); this substantiates its potential to be used as a foliar spray to accelerate young plant growth, especially under sub-optimal conditions. Applying MLE produced a 20% to 35% increase in the yield of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.), onion (Allium cepa L.), tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum [L.] Mill.), corn (Zea mays L.), and sugar cane (Saccharum officinarum L.) (Foidle et al., 2001).
In addition to zeatin, MLE is also rich in ascorbates, phenolic compounds, K, and Ca (Makkar et al., 2007), which are being used exogenously as plant growth enhancers. As a natural source with a balanced mix of various growth-promoting substances, MLE may prove to be a potential source to promote plant growth. Many studies have explored its nutritional, cosmetic, and medicinal aspects (Tsaknis et al., 1999; Fahey, 2005), but a few have reported it as a crop growth enhancer, although, to our knowledge, there is no published study available about normal or late sown wheat crops. Wheat is the major staple food for millions of people; however, a heat-induced yield decrease associated with leaf senescence is a major problem in late sown wheat. The objective of this study was to evaluate the potential of MLE as a foliar application on different growth stages of a late sown wheat crop to reduce high temperature stress on crop growth and yield attributes.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Field experiment details
To apply MLE (diluted 30 times) in the field, wheat cv. Sehar was sown in the Agronomic Research Area, University of Agriculture Faisalabad (24° to 37° N, 61° to 76° E) during 2008-2009. The experiment was laid out in a net plot size of 5.0 x 2.0 m in a completely randomized block design (CRBD) with three replicates.
Soil texture was clay loam. The crop was sown in 25 cm spaced rows with a single row hand drill at a seed rate of 110 kg ha-1 on 16 December 2008. Nitrogen and P were applied at 120 and 100 kg ha-1, respectively, with urea and single super phosphate (SSP) as a fertilizer source. Whole P and one third of the N were applied as a basal dose. The rest of the N was applied in two equal splits in the first and second irrigations. The crop was harvested on 14 April 2009.
MLE foliar application
The MLE (diluted 30 times: MLE30) previously optimized in a laboratory study (data not shown) was applied to a field-grown wheat crop with a hand sprayer. Treatment details were: i) foliar spray with water (control), ii) MLE foliar spray at tillering, iii) MLE foliar spray at tillering + jointing, iv) MLE foliar spray at tillering + jointing + booting, v) MLE foliar spray at tillering + jointing + booting + heading, and vi) MLE foliar spray only at heading.
Growth and yield traits
At physiological maturity, growth traits were examined five times during the growing season at 5-d intervals after each foliar spray; leaf area was calculated with plant samples taken from a randomly selected unit area of each plot. Seasonal leaf area duration (Seasonal LAD) = (LAI1 + LAI2) x (T2 - T1)/2, net assimilation rate (NAR) = TDM/LAD g m-2 d-1, and crop growth rate (CGR) = (W2 - W1)/(T2 - T1) g m-2 d-1 were determined (Hunt, 1978) where Seasonal LAD = leaf area duration of the whole crop growing season, LAD = leaf area duration between two harvests, TDM = total DM accumulated between two harvests, W1 = oven-dry weight of first harvest, W2 = oven-dry weight of second harvest, and T2 - T1 = time interval between two harvests.
The crop was harvested when it fully ripened and data regarding agronomic and yield-related traits were recorded by following standard procedures. The harvest index (HI) was calculated as a ratio between grain yield and biological yield.
Data were statistically analyzed by Fisher's ANOVA and least significant difference (LSD) test at P= 0.05 and applied to compare the treatment means (Steel and Torrie, 1997).
Crop growth analysis
Foliar application of MLE at different growth stages revealed a significant improvement in growth and development compared with the control (water spray). The crop attained the maximum leaf area index (LAI) 75 d after sowing (DAS) and with the highest LAI value was under foliar application of MLE at tillering + jointing + booting + heading (T + J + B + H). However, MLE at other growth stages produced less LAI than T + J + B + H, but was higher than foliar application of water (Figure 1a). Nonetheless, a decreasing trend was observed in LAI after 75 DAS, but this reduction was minimal in plants with MLE applied at the T + J + B + H stages followed by foliar application at heading, while the maximum reduction was observed in unsprayed plants (Figure 1a). The effect of applying MLE on seasonal leaf area duration (Seasonal LAD) was also significant (P < 0.05) and plants with foliar application of MLE stayed green more than the control. However, higher Seasonal LADs were recorded in plants sprayed at the T + J + B + H stages; this was followed closely by spraying MLE at heading alone (Figure 1b). Foliar spray of MLE caused a gradual rise in crop growth rate of late sown wheat crop and showed a maximum growth rate in foliar spray at the T + J + B + H stages (Figure 1b). Afterwards, the crop growth rate decreased, but the lowest reduction was observed in the case of MLE foliar spray at the four growth stages T + J + B + H and followed by CGR produced by applying MLE at heading, while the highest reduction was in plants sprayed with water (Figure 2a). The maximum gain in the net assimilation rate was observed up to 75 DAS compared with the control under MLE foliar spray at any growth stage with a subsequent reduction; the foliar spray at the T + J + B + H stages showed the least reduction in the net assimilation rate followed by NAR produced in MLE at heading, whereas the highest reduction was exhibited by foliar spraying with water (Figure 2b).
The response of MLE on yield and its related traits was substantiated. The maximum number of fertile tillers and grains per spike, 1000 grain weight, biological and economic yield, and harvest index were recorded when MLE was sprayed at the T + J + B + H growth stages compared with the control (Table 1). Nonetheless, similar numbers of fertile tillers and grains per spike were recorded when MLE was applied at the T + J and T + J + B stages with the control having the lowest values for these traits (Table 1). However, the response of 1000 grain weight, biological and economic yield, as well as harvest index varied among foliar applications at different stages and were the highest in T + J + B + H spray followed by the heading treatment. Spraying MLE at the four critical growth stages caused the highest increase (%) in 1000 grain weight compared with the control for other yield-related traits, i.e., number of fertile tillers, grains per spike, and biological and economic yield. However, there was no significant (P > 0.05) difference for these traits when MLE was applied at tillering, tillering + jointing, and tillering + jointing + booting crop stages (Table 1), while minimum values for these traits were observed in plants when only water was applied. Nevertheless, the performance of MLE at any growth stage was better than the control and the pronounced effects of MLE were observed when it was sprayed at the four crop stages (T + J + B + H) and the maximum was reached when MLE was applied at heading.
T:tillering growth stage; J: jointing growth stage; B: booting growth stage; H: heading growth stage; LSD: least significant difference.
Late sowing of wheat shortens the growth period, which is a prerequisite for harvesting higher yields (Farooq et al., 2008). Postponing wheat sowing after mid-November produces a yield reduction of 50 kg ha-1 d-1 (Khan et al., 2010). The rise in temperature during early spring further complicates the problem (Wardlaw and Wrigley, 1994; Mahmood et al, 2010). In cool-season cereal species, heat stress decreased chlorophyll contents leading to a lot of physiological damage and leaf senescence suffered the most (Xu and Huang, 2009). Spano et al. (2003) emphasized that when the assimilates that were supplied to the grain decreased due to accelerated senescence, as in late sown wheat, delaying leaf senescence may be an advantageous attribute. Foliar spray with MLE at T + J + B + H showed the highest value of seasonal leaf area duration (Figure 2) because of delayed leaf senescence, which resulted in a 10.70% increment in grain yield compared with the control. It is reported that foliar application of BAP soon after anthesis results in increased sink size (Hosseini et al., 2008). According to Gupta et al. (2003), exogenously applied BA enhanced wheat grain yield (cvs. Kalyansona and HD 2285) by 8.8% and 13.70%, and 5.66% and 13.33%, under normal and late sown conditions, respectively. Likewise, in the present study, MLE is rich in zeatin (Barciszweski et al., 2000) and other growth-enhancing substances (Nambiar et al., 2005), and foliar spray applied during the four critical growth stages, especially heading, appeared to enhance the plant's sink capacity during the grain filling period. However, we are not certain whether the sink demand has been met via the supply of photoassimilates from subtending leaves (Thomas and Howarth 2000) or retranslocation of reserves from stems (Watanabe et al., 1997) since results reported here were obtained from a single study conducted in a single location; however, these preliminary results are interesting and provide important evidence for future findings. In our study, plants not sprayed with MLE were both limited in source and sink mainly because of the reduced leaf area index (LAI), seasonal leaf area duration (Seasonal LAD), and CGR, while MLE foliar spray enhanced these attributes (Figures 1a, 1b, and 2a). The correlation of LAI, SLAD, and CGR with 1000 grain weight (0.981, 0.995, and 0.980, respectively, n = 6, P < 0.01) and number of grains per spike (0.783, 0.843, and 0.806, respectively, n = 6, P < 0.01) showed that changes in 1000 grain weight were more critical in enhancing sink size than the number of grains per spike; MLE spray at T + J + B + H growth stage, followed by MLE foliar spray at heading alone, effectively fulfilled sink demand.
Applying MLE containing cytokinins exhibits longer seasonal leaf area duration (SLAD) compared with the control. In addition, moringa leaf is also rich in ascorbates, carotenoids, phenols, K, and Ca which are similar to other plant growth enhancers (Foidle et al., 2001). Under combined heat and drought stress, a rise in wheat grain yield, more stable cell membranes, and chlorophyll were observed by exogenously applying cytokinin (Gupta et al. , 2000). Thermotolerance and yield stability in maize were reported by Cheikh and Jones (1994) as a result of high cytokinin content in the maize kernel during the heat stress period. Under late planting of wheat, maintenance of photosynthetic activity due to increased temperatures during maturation (Paulsen, 1994) and efficient utilization of these photosynthates linked with a high harvest index (Gifford and Thorne, 1984; Blum et al, 1994) are two important determinants of grain yield. The highest recorded harvest index (Table 1) for MLE sprayed from the start to the end of wheat growth (T + T + B + H) showed that photosynthetic activity was maintained until maturity, which resulted in both longer seasonal leaf area duration and stay green period. This delayed onset of leaf senescence is reported as causing about 11% more C fixation in Lolium temulentum (Thomas and Howarth, 2000). An extension in the active photosynthetic period may enhance total photosynthate availability in the annual crop life cycle and higher mass per grain can be achieved if the assimilated C supply can be maintained to grain during the grain filling period (Spano et al., 2003).
Applying MLE at the heading stage, although statistically different, closely followed MLE at the four growth stages for values of 1000 grain weight (40.85 g), biological yield (13.65 t ha-1), grain yield (3.19 t ha-1), and harvest index (23.39); this can be due to the ability of maintaining green leaf area duration, "stay green", throughout the grain filling period or remobilizing soluble carbohydrates (stem reserves) during grain filling (Stoy, 1965), and significantly increasing grain weight of wheat by attracting more assimilates towards the developing grain by applying benzyl adenine at anthesis (Warrier et al., 1987). In later grain filling phases, leaf senescence caused a shortage of assimilates, then extended photosynthesis duration by providing more photoassimilates translocated to the grain and improving grain weight as an outcome of amplified carbohydrate content.
In conclusion, the highest harvest index in late sown wheat occurred at heading, the most appropriate stage for foliar spray of MLE30,and any other single stage such as tillering, jointing, and booting produced statistically lower results than the heading stage but significantly better than the control. Thus, in order to improve performance of late sown wheat, MLE30 was an economical growth enhancer when foliar sprayed at four growth stages (T + J + B + H).
It can be concluded that the foliar spray of MLE in late sown wheat at tillering + jointing + booting + heading increased seasonal leaf area duration (Seasonal LAD) along with the grain filling period and delayed maturity resulting in 10% more yield than in the control. A 6.8% yield increase was also observed by a single foliar spray at heading under field conditions.
Abouziena, H.F., A.A. Shararafaida, and E.R. El-desoki. 2008. Efficacy of cultivar selectivity and weed control treatments on wheat yield and associated weeds in sandy soils. World Journal of Agricultural Sciences 4:384-389. [ Links ]
Akhtar, M., M.S. Cheema, M. Jamil, and L. Ali. 2006. Effect of time of sowing on some important characters of wheat, Triticum aestivum genotypes. Journal of Agricultural Research 44:255-258. [ Links ]
Amin, A.A. 2003. Physiological effect of gamma irradiation and< kinetin on growth, yield and chemical constituents of wheat. Egypt Journal of Applied Sciences 18(6):34-49. [ Links ]
Barciszweski, J., G. Siboska, S.I.S. Rattan, and B.F.C. Clark. 2000. Occurrence, biosynthesis and properties of kinetin (N6-furfuryladenine). Plant Growth Regulation 32:257-265. [ Links ]
Basra, S.M.A., M.N. Irfan, I. Afzal, and M. Ashfaq. 2011. Potential of moringa leaf extract as seed priming agent in hybrid maize. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology 13:1006-1010. [ Links ]
Blum, A., B. Sinmena, J. Mayer, G. Golan, and L. Shpiler. 1994. Stem reserve mobilization supports wheat-grain filling under heat stress. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 21:771-781. [ Links ]
Brathe, A., G. Andresen, L.L. Gundersen, K.E. Malterudb, and F. Risea. 2002. Antioxidant activity of synthetic cytokinin analogues: 6-Alkynyl- and 6-alkenylpurines as novel 15-lipoxygenase inhibitors. Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry 10:1581-1586. [ Links ]
Cheikh, N., and R. Jones. 1994. Disruption of maize kernel growth and development by heat-stress: Role of cytokinin abscisic-acid balance. Plant Physiology 106:45-51. [ Links ]
Crouch, I.J., R.P. Beckett, and J.V. Staden. 1990. Effects of seaweed concentrate on the growth and mineral nutrient stressed lettuce. Journal of Applied Phycology 2:269-272. [ Links ]
Davies, J.P. 1987. Plant hormones and their role in plant growth and development. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands. [ Links ]
Dhanda, S.S., G.S. Sethi, and R.K. Behl. 2004. Indices of drought tolerance in wheat genotypes at early stages of plant growth. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 190:6-12. [ Links ]
Dietrich, J.T., V. Kaminek, D.G. Belvins, T.M. Reinbett, and R.D. Morris. 1995. Changes in cytokinins and cytokinin oxidase activity in developing maize kernel and the effects of exogenous cytokinin on kernel development. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 33:327-336.
Fahey, J. 2005. Moringa oleifera: A review of the medical evidence for its nutritional therapeutic and prophylactic properties. Part 1. Trees for Life Journal. Online available at http://www.tfljournal.org/article.php/20051201124931586 (accessed 20 April 2011). [ Links ]
Farooq, M., S.M.A. Basra, H. Rehman, and B.A. Saleem. 2008. Seed priming enhancement the performance of late sown wheat by improving chilling tolerance. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 194:55-60. [ Links ]
Foidle, N., H.P.S. Makkar, and K. Becker. 2001. The potential of Moringa oleifera for agricultural and industrial uses. p. 45-76. In L.J. Fuglie (ed.) The miracle tree: The multipurpose attributes of Moringa. CTA Publications, Wageningen, The Netherlands. [ Links ]
Gifford, R.M., and J.M. Thorne. 1984. Crop productivity and photoassimilate partitioning. Science 225:801-807.
Gupta, N.K., S. Gupta, and A. Kumar. 2000. Exogenous cytokinin application increases cell membrane and chlorophyll stability in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Cereal Research Communication 28:287-291. [ Links ]
Gupta, N.K., S. Gupta, D.S. Shukla, and P.S. Deshmukh. 2003. Differential responses of BA injection on yield and specific grain growth in contrasting genotypes of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Plant Growth Regulation 40:201-205. [ Links ]
Hensel, L.L., V. Grbic, D.A. Baumgarten, and A.B. Bleecker. 1993. Developmental and age-related processes that influence the longevity and senescence of photosynthetic tissues in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 5:553-564. [ Links ]
Hobbs, PR., and R.K. Gupta. 2002. Resource conserving technologies for wheat in rice-wheat systems. In Ladha, J.K., E.H. James, J.D. Duxbury, R.K. Gupta, and R.J. Buresh (eds.) Improving the productivity and sustainability of rice-wheat systems: Issues and impact. ASA Special Publication, ASA, Madison, Wisconsin, USA. [ Links ]
Hobbs, P.R., and M.L. Morris. 1996. Meeting South Asia's future food requirements from rice-wheat cropping system: priority issues facing researchers in the post green revolution era. NRG Paper 96-01. p. 1-45. CIMMYT, Mexico D.F. [ Links ]
Hosseini, S.M., K. Poustini, and A. Ahmadi. 2008. Effects of foliar application of BAP on source and sink strength in four six-rowed barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) cultivars. Plant Growth Regulation 54:231-239.
Hunt, R. 1978. Plant growth analysis. p. 8-38. The Institute of Biology's Studies in Biology N° 96. Edward Arnold Ltd., London, UK. [ Links ]
Hussain, A., M. Maqsood, A. Ahmad, S. Aftab, and Z. Ahmad. 1998. Effect of irrigation during various development stages on yield, component of yield and harvest index of different wheat cultivars. Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Science 34:104-107. [ Links ]
Khan, M.B., M. Ghurchani, M. Hussain, and K. Mahmood. 2010. Wheat seed invigoration by pre-sowing chilling treatments. Pakistan Journal of Botany 42:1561-1566. [ Links ]
Kibe, A.M., S. Singh, and N. Kalrac. 2006. Water-nitrogen relationships for wheat growth and productivity in late sown conditions. Agricultural Water Management 84:221-228. [ Links ]
Mahmood, S., A. Wahid, F. Javed, and S.M.A. Basra. 2010. Heat stress effects on forage quality characteristics of maize (Zea mays) cultivars. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology 12:701-706. [ Links ]
Makkar, H.PS., G. Francis, and K. Becker. 2007. Bioactivity of phytochemicals in some lesser-known plants and their effects and potential applications in livestock and aquaculture production systems. Animal 1:1371-1391. [ Links ]
Mayeux, J.V., R. Beach, and V.L. Illum. 1983. The effect of cytogen™ a bioregulator, on fecundity and yield of cucurbits, pepper and tomatoes. p. 319-323. Proceedings of the 10th Annual Meeting Plant Growth Regulation Society of America, East Lansing, Michigan. 19-23 June. Plant Growth Regulation Society of America, Alexandria, Virginia, USA. [ Links ]
Mullaa, D.J., A.U. Bhattia, M.W. Hammond, and J.A. Benson. 1992. A comparison of winter wheat yield and quality under uniform versus spatially variable fertilizer management. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 38:301-311. [ Links ]
Nabati, D.A. 1991. Responses of two grass species to plant regulators, fertilizer N, chelated Fe, salinity and water stress. Ph.D. Dissertation. Department of Crop and Soil Environmental Sciences CSES, Virginia Tech, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksberg, Virginia, USA. [ Links ]
Nagel, L., R. Brewster, W.E. Riedell, and R.N. Reese. 2001. Cytokinin regulation of flower and pod set in soybeans (Glycine max (L.) Merr.). Annals of Botany 88:27-31. [ Links ]
Nambiar, V.S., R. Mehta, and M. Daniel. 2005. Polyphenol content of three indian green leafy vegetables. Journal of Food Science and Technology 42:312-315. [ Links ]
Paulsen, G.M. 1994. High temperature responses of crop plants. p. 365-398. In Boote, K.J., J.M. Bennett, T.R. Sinclair, and G.M. Paulsen (eds.) Physiology and determination of crop yield. CSSA-ASA-SSSA, Madison, Wisconsin, USA. [ Links ] Price, L.M. 2007. The moringa tree. ECHO Technical Note. 19 p. Educational Concerns For Hunger Organization ECHO, North Fort Myers, Florida, USA. [ Links ]
Regmi, A.P, J.K. Ladha, H. Pathak, E. Pasuquin, D. Dawe, P.R. Hobbs, et al. 2002. Analyses of yield and soil fertility trends in a 20-year rice-wheat experiment in Nepal. Soil Science Society of America Journal 66:857-867. [ Links ]
Sattar, A., M.A. Cheema, M. Farooq, M.A. Wahid, A. Wahid, and B.H. Babar. 2010. Evaluating the performance of wheat cultivars under late sown conditions. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology 12:561-565. [ Links ]
Shani, E., O. Yanai, and N. Ori. 2006. The role of hormones in shoot apical meristem function. Plant Biology 5(9):488-489. [ Links ]
Sharma-Natu, P, K.V. Sumesh, V.D. Lohot, and M.C. Ghildiyal. 2006. High temperature effect on grain growth in wheat cultivars: An evaluation of responses. Indian Journal of Plant Physiology 11:239-245. [ Links ]
Spano, G., N. Di Fonzo, C. Perrotta, C. Platani, G. Ronga, D.W. Lawlor, et al. 2003. Physiological characterization of 'stay green' mutants in durum wheat. Journal of Experimental Botany 54:1415-1420. [ Links ]
Steel, R.G.D., and J.H. Torrie. 1997. Principles and procedures of statistics: A biometrical approach. p. 187-188. McGraw Hil Company, New York, USA. [ Links ]
Stoy, V. 1965. Photosynthesis, respiration, and carbohydrate accumulation in spring wheat in relation to yield. Physiologia Plantarum Suppl. IV: 1-25. [ Links ]
Tahir, M., A. Ali, M.A. Nadeem, A. Hussain, and F. Khalid. 2009. Effect of different sowing dates on growth and yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) varieties in district Jhang, Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Life and Social Sciences 7:66-69. [ Links ]
Thomas, H., and C.J. Howarth. 2000. Five ways to stay green. Journal of Experimental Botany 51:329-337. [ Links ]
Tsaknis, J.S., V. Lalas, V. Gergis, V. Dourtoglou, and V. Spiliotis. 1999. Characterization of Moringa oleifera variety Mbololo seed oil of Kenya. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 47:4495-4499. [ Links ]
Ugarte, C., D.F. Calderini, and G.A. Slafer. 2007. Grain weight and grain number responsiveness to pre-anthesis temperature in wheat, barley and triticale. Field Crops Research 100:240-248. [ Links ]
Wardlaw, I.F., and C.W. Wrigley. 1994. Heat tolerance in temperate cereals. An overview. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 21:695-703. [ Links ]
Warrier, A., S.N. Bhardwaj, and P.C. Pande. 1987. Effect of benzyladenine on grain growth in aestivum wheat. Plant & Cell Physiology 28:735-739. [ Links ]
Watanabe, Y., Y. Nakamura, and R. Ishii. 1997. Relationship between starch accumulation and activities of the related enzymes in the leaf sheath as a temporary sink organ in rice (Oryza sativa). Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 24:563-569. [ Links ]
Xu, Y., and B. Huang. 2009. Effects of foliar-applied ethylene inhibitor and synthetic cytokinin on creeping bentgrass to enhance heat tolerance. Crop Science 49:1876-1884. [ Links ]
Yan, J., and R.E. Schmidt. 1993. Effects of fortified seaweed extract on cell membrane lipids and drought tolerance in ryegrass. Agronomy Abstract ASA, Madison, Wisconsin, USA. [ Links ]
Received: 23 May 2011.
Accepted: 20 December 2011.