Services on Demand
- Cited by SciELO
- Access statistics
- Cited by Google
- Similars in SciELO
- Similars in Google
On-line version ISSN 0718-5839
Chilean J. Agric. Res. vol.72 no.1 Chillán Mar. 2012
Chilean Journal of Agricultural Research 72(1) January - March
Nutritional Quality of Beef Produced in Chile from Different Production Systems
Calidad Nutricional de Carne obtenida de Diferentes Sistemas Productivos
Rodrigo Morales1*, Carolina Folch1, Sergio Iraira1, Nolberto Teuber1, and Carolina E. Realini2
1Instituto de Investigaciones Agropecuarias INIA, Ruta 5 Norte km 8, P.O. Box 24-0, Osorno, Chile. "Corresponding author (email@example.com).
2Institut de Recerca i Tecnologia Agroalimentaries (IRTA), Finca Camps i Armet s/n, E-17121, Monells (Girona), Spain.
In recent years, beef industry has improved production processes to ensure quality and certification for overseas meat markets. However, there is limited scientific information about the nutritional quality of beef from Chile. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the nutritional quality of beef produced in Chile from different production systems classified according to the type of finishing diet. Two-hundred and five animals from 13 livestock farms were used, 80 steers were finished on grazing pasture, 79 on pasture supplemented with grain or concentrate and 46 steers were finished on a typical feedlot system in the central zone of Chile. Longissimus thoracis intramuscular fat, fatty acid composition and cholesterol content were determined. Beef from pasture-fed animals showed higher content of vaccenic acid (C18:1 trans-11) rumenic acid (CLA cis-9 trans-11) and n-3 fatty acids, and lower n-6:n-3 ratio than beef from feedlot animals. However, Chilean beef from the three production systems showed similar intramuscular fat percentages and a n-6:n-3 ratio lower than 4.0. Results indicate that the Longissimus muscle from Chilean beef could be recommended as a source of red meat for a healthy diet.
Key words: Fatty acids, pasture, feedlot, Chilean beef quality.
En los últimos anos, el sector de carne bovina en Chile ha desarrollado un notable avance a nivel de mejoramiento de procesos de producción, aseguramiento de calidad, y certificación exportadora. Sin embargo, existe poca información disponible sobre la calidad nutricional de la carne producida en Chile. En el presente estudio se evaluó la calidad nutricional de la carne producida en Chile en diferentes sistemas de producción clasificados de acuerdo con el tipo de acabado. Se evaluó la carne de 205 animales de 13 predios: 80 novillos se finalizaron a pastoreo, 79 fueron finalizados a pastoreo más suplementación, mientras que 46 se terminaron en un típico feedlot de la zona central de Chile. En el músculo Longuissimus thoracis se determinó la cantidad de grasa intramuscular, el perfil de ácidos grasos, y el colesterol. La carne de los animales finalizados a pradera muestra altos niveles de ácido vaccénico (C18:1 trans-11), ácido ruménico (CLA cis-9 trans-11) y ácidos grasos n-3, además de un bajo nivel de la relación n-6: n-3 en comparación con los animales de feedlot. Sin embargo, la carne de los tres sistemas de producción muestra similares niveles de grasa intramuscular y una relación n-6: n-3 bajo 4.0. Los resultados indican que la carne chilena podría ser recomendada como fuente alimenticia para una dieta saludable.
Palabras clave: ácidos grasos, praderas, calidad de carne chilena.
Producers and consumers are both interested in the nutritional quality of beef, due to the added value producers could obtain for their product and for consumers' willingness to eat healthier food.
It is well documented that the animal finishing diet affects the fat content and fatty acid composition of beef (Scollan et al., 2001; Latimori et al., 2008). Latimori et al. (2008) showed that beef from animals raised on pasture has lower fat and cholesterol concentrations, and more polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) than beef from feedlot animals. Other authors have shown that beef from animals fed on pasture contains more n-3 fatty acids and conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) than beef from feedlot animals, due to the high content of linolenic acid (n-3) in pasture lipids (Christie, 1981; Steen and Porter, 2003; Elgersma et al., 2003). Conjugated linoleic acid is an isomer of linoleic acid and is deposited in beef by direct (ruminal biohydrogenation and isomerization) or indirect (endogenous synthesis) pathways (Ip et al., 1994). Whetsell et al. (2003) reported that CLA C18:2 cis-9 trans-11 (rumenic acid) possess anticarcinogenic and immunostimulant properties. It has also been shown that CLA exhibits antioxidant properties, inhibiting the discoloration of meat during storage (Du et al., 2000).
In most developed countries and in Chile, heart disease, diabetes and some types of cancer are the principal causes of death, which are associated with high consumption of saturated and trans fatty acids, and refined carbohydrates, stress and a sedentary lifestyle (DEIS, 2007). Thus, there is consumer interest in increasing healthy and natural food and reducing processed foods in the diet to decrease the damaging impact of saturated fatty acids on health. Therefore, consumers are demanding healthier food, including beef (Ip et al., 1994; Whetsell et al., 2003; Wood et al., 2003; Grunert et al., 2004).
In Chile, there are different beef production systems according to the finishing diet. In the central part of Chile (32° to 38° S), animals are fed in feedlots using rations produced in the farms, such as corn silage, alfalfa hay and grain soiling. Waste by-products from different agro-industries, such as poultry feces as well as fruit and vegetable by-products, are normally used as feed in Chilean feedlots (Claro and González, 2005). Grain usually represents between 20 and 40% of the total diet in Chilean feedlots. In contrast, beef production in the southern regions of Chile (38° to 41° S) relies on direct grazing, where there is a temperate rainy climate and pasture is the main feeding source. In these regions, over 50% of beef and over 70% of milk are produced nationally (INE, 2007). The dairy industry is an important source of animals for beef production because only 20% of the animals produced in Chile are from beef cattle breeds, whereas the rest come from dairy systems (Goic, 2001). There is another type of semi-intensive production system in Chile that combines pasture grazing with supplement.
The beef production system based on pasture has a lower environmental impact and causes lower animal stress than other systems (IICA, 2004). Additionally, consumers positively value beef from animals fed on pasture and raised outdoors (Schnettler et al., 2008). The beef industry plays an important role in the economy of the southern regions of Chile where more than one million hectares of pastures are available for animal production and the country relies on an exceptional sanitary status. In recent years, the beef industry has improved production processes to ensure quality and certification for overseas meat markets. However, there is limited scientific information about the nutritional quality of beef from Chile. In addition, limited research has been focused on the influence of diet from different Chilean production systems on beef fatty acid profile and cholesterol content. The aim of this study was to evaluate the nutritional quality (intramuscular fat and cholesterol content and fatty acid composition) of beef produced in Chile under different production systems classified according to the type of finishing diet.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Animals and diets
Two-hundred and five steers from 13 livestock farms were evaluated. Animals were classified into three production systems according to the type of finishing diet (the last 30 d before slaughter). The predominant animal breed was Friesian and Friesian-crosses from dairy farms whereas the rest were British breeds. The individual animal breed information was not available at the abattoir and some farmers had different breeds in the same slaughter group.
Eighty steers were finished on pasture (P), which consisted of typical native and improved pastures from Los Ríos and Los Lagos Regions in Southern Chile (39°50' to 41°30' S). The predominant species in these grasslands were Lolium perenne L., Trifolium repens L., Bromus spp. and Holcus lanatus L. (Siebald, 2005). Seventy nine steers were finished on pastures and supplemented with grain (wheat or corn) or concentrate (PG). Forty six steers were finished on a typical feedlot system (F) in the central zone of Chile (32° to 38° S). The number of farms and animals, and feed components of the finishing diets from the three production systems are shown in Table 1, and the chemical and fatty acid composition of the finishing diets in Table 2.
SFA: Saturated fatty acids (C14:0 + C16:0 + C18:0); MUFA: monounsaturated fatty acids (C18:1 c-9); PUFA: polyunsaturated fatty acids (C18:2 n-6; C18:3 n-3); P:S: Polyunsaturated: saturated fatty acid ratio; n-6:n-3 fatty acid ratio.
In the diet from Chilean feedlots, a low grain percentage is normally used between 20 and 40% DM (in the present study the grain level was approximately 24%, Table 2), in contrast to that of other countries such as USA (Lawrence et al., 2007). In addition, different sources of fiber are used, such as alfalfa silage and hay, and many different by-products from the fruit and vegetable agro-industries (Claro and González, 2005). The type of by-product used in the feedlot depends on the price, season, and localization of the source. In the present study a typical Chilean feedlot was selected that was representative of the beef produced in central Chile under this system.
Animals between 18 and 24-mo of age and with hot carcass weight ranging from 250 to 300 kg were slaughtered. At 24 h post-mortem, 200 g of Longissimus thoracis were removed from the 8th to the 9th vertebra and transported to the Meat Science Laboratory of the Remehue Regional Research Centre at the Instituto de Investigaciones Agropecuarias (INIA) in Osorno, Chile. Muscle samples were vacuum packed and stored at -18 ± 2 °C until analysis.
Chemical analysis was performed on 100 g of the feedstuff and meat samples. Samples of feedstuff were collected days previous to slaughter. Grass samples were taken from pasture on the animals were grazing whereas grain and concentrate samples were obtained from storage silo. In order to quantify intramuscular fat (IMF) from meat samples, all external fat was removed.
Samples were dried at 60 ± 2 °C by 48 h and ground before analysis. Sample moisture was determined by drying at 105 ± 2 °C until constant weight (Harris, 1970) and total fat and IMF was measured by Soxhlet extraction 920.39 method (AOAC, 1990). Total N was measured by the Kjeldahl 984.13 method (AOAC, 1990) and ash following the 942.05 method (AOAC, 1990).
Fatty acid composition
Fat extraction was performed according to that by Bligh and Dyer (1959) and Lumley and Colwell (1991). Previous to analysis 20 g of fresh sample were thawed and grounded and posteriorly extracted using methanol, chloroform and water (80:50:32 mL). After, the samples were homogenized for 30 min. Afterwards, the samples were filtrated through filter paper in a glass funnel and was added water until to observe a biphasic separation. The fat was concentrated in the chloroform layer. The chloroform phase was collected and removed by evaporation and 2.0 mL of n-hexane were added to the extract, which was then stored at -18 ± 2 °C until analysis. Approximately 0.5 g fat was obtained with this extraction. Before the fatty acid C23:0 (Nu-Chek Prep, Elysian, Minnesota, USA) was added to the samples as an internal standard. Transmethylation was carried out according to the method described by Ichihara et al. (1996). One hundred /<L of KOH in 2 N methanol were added and the mixture (sample + 2.0 mL) was agitated for 3 min at room temperature. After phase separation, the supernatant was collected and analyzed by gas chromatography. The fatty acid profile was determined in a gas chromatograph (Clarus 600 Perkin Elmer®, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA) equipped with a flame ionization detector (FID). A capillary column SP-2560™ (Sigma-Aldrich Co., Bellefonte, Pennsylvania, USA) of 100 m x 0.25 mm x 0.25 pim film was used. Helium was used as the carrier gas at 1.0 mL min-1 and inlet pressure of 15 psi, and the method of injection was split (100:1). The injector temperature was fixed at 250 °C and the detector temperature at 260 °C. The injected sample volume was 1.0 piL and the oven temperature was programmed to increase from 140 °C (held for 5 min) to 240 °C (held for 15 min) at 4 °C min-1. Fatty acids were identified by comparing the retention times of the chromatograph peaks with those of the methyl esters from a mixture prepared with a FAME Mix standard of 37 components (Standard: 47885-U, SigmaAldrich Co, St. Louis, Missouri, USA), C18:1 t-11 methyl ester standard (Standard: 46905-U, SigmaAldrich) and octadecadienoic conjugated methyl acid (Standard: O5632, Sigma Aldrich).
Cholesterol extraction was performed in 2 g of sample by direct saponification of 2% KOH in 50 mL of absolute ethanol (Mazalli et al., 2003) with subsequent chromatographic analysis using the following conditions: the injector temperature was fixed at 270 °C and the detector temperature at 300 °C. The sample volume injected was 1.0 piL. The oven temperature was programmed to increase from 160 °C (held for 1 min) to 300 °C (held for 7 min) at 10 °C min-1. A capillary column Elite-1 (Perkin Elmer®, USA) of 30 m x 0.25 mm x 0.25 pim film was used. Cholesterol was quantified by the standard internal method using 5-alpha-cholestane (Supelco Analytical, Bellefonte, Pennsylvania, USA) as reference.
Data were analyzed by ANOVA using the General Lineal Model (GLM) procedure of SAS (SAS Institute, 2001) with the type of finishing diet (pasture, pasture plus supplement, and feedlot) as a fixed effect in the model. Least-square means were separated by Tukey's Studentized range test.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Carcass weight, intramuscular fat percentage and cholesterol content of Longissimus thoracis
Hot carcass weight was higher (P < 0.05) for steers finished on the feedlot diet than those from animals finished on pasture or pasture plus supplement (Table 3). Animals from P and PG production systems in Chile are usually slaughtered, between 470 and 550 kg live weight depending on the breed, whereas steers from the Chilean feedlots are slaughtered at above 550 kg live weight (Goic and Rojas, 2004; Claro and González, 2005).
RMSE: Root mean squared error.
Common letter within a row indicates no significant difference (P > 0.05).
No differences (P > 0.05) were found among groups for IMF percentage despite differences found in carcass weight between the F and the other two P and PG groups. Intramuscular fat values from this study (2.3%, 2.1% and 2.3% for P, PG, and F, respectively) were similar to those reported by Contreras (2006) for Chilean steers (1.9%).
De la Fuente et al. (2009) found similar IMF values to those from the present study in beef from European and Uruguayan animals finished on pasture (1.76% to 2.36%), but higher values in beef from animals fed on pasture with supplement (2.92% to 2.95%). Other authors have reported higher IMF content of Argentinean (Garcia et al., 2008; Schor et al., 2008) and Brazilian (Padre et al., 2006) beef than those reported here. These authors reported IMF values from 2.86% to 3.38% for beef from animals fed on pasture and 3.5% to 4.2% for those from feedlot animals. Besides diet, animal breed, age and weight at slaughter can influence fat deposition among other factors (Lawrence and Fowler, 1997), and it is difficult to draw conclusions regarding the main factor determining differences in IMF deposition among studies.
Beef from animals fed on pasture-based systems showed lower cholesterol values (Table 3) compared to that from feedlot animals (PG: 66.9 vs. F: 79.9 mg 100 g-1, P < 0.05; and P: 73.1 vs. F: 79.9 mg 100 g-1, P > 0.05, numerical difference). Similar cholesterol values have been observed by other authors (Schor et al., 2008; Orellana et al., 2009), whereas lower cholesterol values (45.6 to 52.3 mg 100 g-1) have been reported for beef from steers fed on pasture by Padre et al. (2006) and feedlot by Rule et al. (2002). However, some authors have indicated that the cholesterol content of muscle does not differ significantly between the feeding regimes of cattle (Wheeler et al, 1987; Taylor and Smith, 1990; Rule et al., 1997).
Longissimus thoracis intramuscular fatty acid composition
Intramuscular fat from steers fed P and PG diets had higher (P < 0.05) proportions of C20:0 and C24:0 compared to beef from feedlot animals, with no differences between treatments in myristic (C14:0) fatty acid (Table 4). Intramuscular fat from feedlot animals showed higher values of all saturated fatty acid (SFA), C15:0, C16:0 (except for PG), C17:0 and C18:0 compared to beef from pasture-based systems. The sum of all monounsaturated fatty acid (MUFA), and particularly oleic acid (C18:1 c-9), was higher in intramuscular fat from animals fed P and PG diets compared with those fed the feedlot diet (43.3% and 42.5% vs. 39.8% MUFA, and 36.1% and 37.2% vs. 34.2% C18:1 c-9, respectively).
RMSE: Root mean squared error; CLA: conjugated linoleic acid; EPA: Eicosapentaenoic acid; DPA: Docosapentaenoic acid; SFA: saturated fatty acids: C14:0 + C16:0 + C17:0 + C18:0 + C20:0 + C24:0; MUFA: monounsaturated fatty acids: C14:1 + C15:1 + C16:1 + C18:1 c-9 + C18:1 t-11 + C20:1 + C24:1; PUFA: polyunsaturated fatty acids: C18:2 n-6 + C18:3 n-3 + C20:2 c-11 c-14 + C20:3 n-6 + C20:3 n-3 + C20:4 n-6 + C20:5 n-3 + C22:5 n-3 + CLA C18:2 c-9 t-11. P:S: polyunsaturated:saturated fatty acid ratio; n-6:n-3: fatty acid ratio.
Common letter within a row indicates no significant difference (P > 0.05).
Longissimus thoracis muscle from P- and PG-fed animals showed lower percentages of C14:1, C15:1, C17:1, C20:1 (except for PG) and C24:1 and a higher percentage of C16:1 compared with F (P < 0.05). There were no differences (P > 0.05) among treatments in the percentage of all PUFA. However, beef from P and PG showed lower percentages of C18:2 n-6, and C20:3 n-3, and higher percentages of C18:3 n-3 and C20:3 n-6 (except for P which did not differ from F) than beef from the F production system (P < 0.05). The percentage of all PUFAs was higher than those reported in other studies using different animal feed sources (Schor et al., 2008), but similar to those found by Padre et al. (2006) and Garcia et al. (2008) for Brazilian and Argentinean beef, respectively.
Intramuscular fat from animals fed on pasture only showed a higher percentage of C18:1 t-11 (vaccenic acid) than the two other finishing diets (P < 0.05). In this sense, other studies have also found that steers fed on grass had higher C18:1 t-11 than those fed on grain-based diets (Leheska et al., 2008; Garcia et al., 2008). Moreover, some studies suggest a linear increase in CLA c-9, t-11 synthesis as the C18:1 t-11 content of the diet increased in human subjects (Salminen et al., 1998; Turpeinen et al., 2002a), whereas, the rate of conversion of C18:1 t-11 to CLA c-9, t-11 was estimated to range from 5 to 12% in rodents to 19 to 30% in humans (Turpeinen et al., 2002b).
CLA c-9, t-11 was higher (P < 0.05) for steers fed pasture only (1.32% and 0.88%) than for steers fed pasture plus supplement (1.08% and 0.70%) or a feedlot diet (0.94% and 0.61%). CLA c-9, t-11 is produced as a result of the biohydrogenation process occurring in the rumen, where unsaturated fatty acids (mainly C18:3 n-3 and C18:2 n-6) from the diet are first isomerized and partially saturated later (Christie, 1981). As was mentioned, CLA c-9, t-11 is also synthesized by endogenous conversion of C18:1 t-11 (trans-vaccenic acid) by the enzyme A-9-desaturase in the adipose tissue and the mammary gland (Griinari and Bauman, 1999). Biohydrogenation efficiency decreases as the concentrate in the animal diet increases (Sauvant and Bas, 2001) and the CLA c-9, t-11 concentration in the adipose tissue is higher when animals are fed on pasture than those fed on stored forages or grain (French et al., 2000). Other studies have also shown that steers finished on pasture had higher CLA c-9, t-11 than those fed on grain-based diets (French et al., 2000; Realini et al., 2004; Nuernberg et al., 2005; Garcia et al., 2008; Leheska et al., 2008; De la Fuente et al., 2009).
There were no differences among treatments in the P:S ratio of the intramuscular fat (P > 0.05). A value of 0.4 or higher is recommended for the P:S ratio (Department of Health, 1994). However, De la Fuente et al. (2009) indicated that the P:S ratio is of limited significance because not all saturated fatty acids increase cholesterol. Moreover, the positive effect of monounsaturated fatty acids such as C18:1 c-9 (Lee et al., 1998) for human health is not considered when this ratio is used. C18:1 c-9 increases human HDL-cholesterol and decreases LDL-cholesterol concentrations (Katan et al., 1994), and there is a positive relationship between LDL-cholesterol levels and human cardiovascular diseases. In contrast, HDL-cholesterol reduces the risk of cardiovascular diseases (Kwiterovich, 1997). Beef from P- and PG-fed animals showed higher values of C18:1 c-9 than that from F-fed animals (Table 4). Considerable attention has been paid to the relative proportion of n-6 and n-3 fatty acids, as diets with high n-6:n-3 ratios have been highlighted as risk factors in certain cancers and coronary heart diseases (Hibbeln et al., 2006). A value of 4.0 or less for a diet is recommended for the n-6:n-3 ratio (Department of Health, 1994).
Beef from all production systems evaluated showed n-6:n-3 ratios lower than 4.0. However, beef from steers fed P and PG showed ratio values lower than 2.0 (Table 4), whereas beef from feedlot steers showed a mean ratio value of 2.79 (P < 0.05). Similar results have been reported by other authors (Enser et al., 1998; Nuernberg et al., 2002; Schor et al., 2008; De la Fuente et al., 2009) who have also found that the n-6:n-3 ratio increases as the grain or concentrate content in the diet increases.
The quantitative fatty acid composition in mg of fatty acids per 100 g of muscle is shown in Table 5. Although seafood is the major dietary source of n-3 fatty acids, red meat also constitutes a significant source of n-3 fatty acids for some populations with reduced intake of seafood products (Sinclair et al., 1994). Beef from animals fed on pasture showed higher levels of n-3 fatty acids than that from feedlot animals. Two hundred and fifty grams of beef from pasture-fed animals provided 112.5 mg of n-3 fatty acids, roughly 5.6% of the dietary reference intake for n-3 fatty acids (FAO/WHO, 2008), whereas beef from feedlot animals supplied 80.5 mg of n-3 fatty acids, which would correspond to 4.1% of the recommended value.
RMSE: Root mean squared error; CLA: conjugated linoleic acid; SFA: saturated fatty acids: C14:0 + C16:0 + C17:0 + C18:0 + C20:0 + C24:0; MUFA: monounsaturated fatty acids: C14:1 + C15:1 + C16:1 + C18:1 c-9 + C18:1 t-11 + C20:1 + C24:1; PUFA: polyunsaturated fatty acids: C18:2 n-6 + C18:3 n-3 + C20:2 c-11 c-14 + C20:3 n-6 + C20:3 n-3 + C20:4 n-6 + C20:5 n-3 + C22:5 n-3 + CLA C18:2 c-9 t-11.
Common letter within a row indicates no significant difference (P > 0.05).
Based on the amount of CLA c-9, t-11 needed to reduce cancer in experimental animal studies (Ritzenthaler et al., 2001), humans would need to consume around 620 mg CLA c-9, t-11 d1 for men and 441 mg CLA c-9, t-11 d1 for women to have a cancer protective effect (Ritzenthaler et al., 2001). Results from the present study show that 250 g of Chilean beef from pasture-fed animals would provide 50 mg (8.1% to 11.3%) of the CLA c-9, t-11 requirements, whereas PG and F would contribute 37.8 mg (6.1% to 8.6%) and 35 mg (5.6% to 7.9%), respectively. Thus, Chilean beef from pasture-fed animals, coupled with the consumption of grass-fed dairy products, would provide a higher concentration of CLA c-9, t-11 than beef from feedlot cattle to achieve dietary CLA c-9, t-11 levels closer to the recommended values.
There is limited nutritional information available characterizing the nutritional quality of Chilean beef. Results from the present study provide quantitative information for human nutritionists to provide more accurate consumer recommendations with values from local beef, rather than using data from international nutritional tables. In addition, objective information on the nutritional quality of Chilean beef from different production systems will be valuable for promoting beef consumption in local and international trade.
Beef from pasture-fed animals showed higher contents of C18:1 t-11, CLA c-9, t-11 and n-3 fatty acids, and a lower n-6:n-3 ratio than beef from feedlot animals. Beef from animals fed on pasture supplemented with grain showed a similar composition to that from pasture-fed animals, and intermediate values for some fatty acids between pasture and feedlot diets. However, Chilean beef from the three production systems evaluated showed similar levels of intramuscular fat and a n-6:n-3 ratio lower than 4.0. Results indicate that the Longissimus muscle from Chilean beef could be recommended as a source of red meat for a healthy diet.
This work was funded by the "Inter-American Development Bank (IDB)" through a "Bien Club" negotiated by the "Agencia Regional de Desarrollo Productivo de la Región de Los Lagos" and supported by "Cluster de carne bovina" and "La Corporación de la Carne". We would like to acknowledge the CONICYT (PDA08) for financing Rodrigo Morales's post-doctorate studies with a "Programa Bicentenario de Ciencia y Tecnología (PBCT)" scholarship. We thank Nelly Delgado and Paulina Flores for sample analyses. We are grateful to the slaughterhouse staff for their cooperation in the present study: Jaime Fuchslocher, Rodrigo Soto, Rodrigo Vergara, and Astrid Hernández at FRIGOSORNO S.A.; Italo Mencarini, Héctor Mimica, Javier Ibánez, and Consuelo Rice at FRIVAL; and Javier Navarro at FRIMA S.A; José Godoy, Juan Carlos Letelier, and Deborah Alarcón at AASA.
AOAC. 1990. Official methods of analysis of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists. 15th ed. Vol. II. p. 1298. Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC), Arlington, Virginia, USA. [ Links ]
Bligh, E.G., and W.J. Dyer. 1959. A rapid method of total lipid extraction and purification. Canadian Journal of Biochemistry and Physiology 37:911-917. [ Links ]
Christie, W. 1981. Lipid metabolism in ruminant animals. p. 452. Pergamon Press Ltd., Oxford, UK. [ Links ]
Claro, D., y M. González. 2005. Producción de carne bovina en la zona central. p. 323-349. In A. Catrileo (ed.) Producción y manejo de carne bovina en Chile. Instituto de Investigaciones Agropecuarias INIA, Temuco, Chile. [ Links ]
Contreras, S. 2006. Efecto de la suplementación con cereales y afrecho de soya en la engorda de novillos sobre las características de canal y calidad de carne. Tesis de Medicina Veterinaria. Universidad Austral de Chile, Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias, Valdivia, Chile. [ Links ]
DEIS. 2007. Indicadores básicos de salud 2007. Departamento de estadísticas e Información de Salud (DEIS), Ministerio de Salud, Gobierno de Chile, Santiago, Chile. [ Links ]
De la Fuente, J., M.T. Diaz, I. Alvarez, M.A. Oliver, M. Font i Furnols, C. Sanudo, et al. 2009. Fatty acid and vitamin E composition of intramuscular fat in cattle reared in different production systems. Meat Science 82:331-337. [ Links ]
Department of Health. 1994. Nutritional aspects of cardiovascular disease. Report on Health and Social Subjects N° 46. Her Majesty's Stationery Office (HMSO), The National Archives, London, UK. [ Links ]
Du, M., D.U. Ahn, and J.L. Sell. 2000. Effects of dietary conjugated linoleic acid and linoleic:linolenic acid ratio on polyunsaturated fatty acid status in laying hens. Poultry Science 79:1749-1756. [ Links ]
Elgersma, A., G. Ellen, H. van der Horst, B.G. Muuse, H. Boer, and S. Tamminga. 2003. Comparison of the fatty acid composition of fresh and ensiled perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.), affected by cultivar and regrowth interval. Animal Feed Science and Technology 108:191-205. [ Links ]
Enser, M., K.G. Hallett, B. Hewitt, G.A. Fursey, J.D. Wood, and G. Harrington. 1998. Fatty acid content and composition of UK beef and lamb muscle in relation to production system and implications for human nutrition. Meat Science 49:329-341. [ Links ]
FAO/WHO. 2008. Fats and fatty acids in human nutrition report of an expert consultation. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and the World Health Organization. FAO Food Nutrition Papers 91:1-91. [ Links ]
French, P., C. Stanton, F. Lawless, E.G. O'Riordan, F.J. Monahan, P.J. Caffrey, and A.P. Moloney. 2000. Fatty acid composition, including conjugated linoleic acid of intramuscular fat from steers offered grazed grass, grass silage or concentrate-based diets. Journal of Animal Science 78:2849-2855. [ Links ]
Garcia, P.T., N.A. Pensel, A.M. Sancho, N.J. Latimori, A.M. Kloster, M.A. Amigone, and J.J. Casal. 2008. Beef lipids in relation to animal breed and nutrition in Argentina. Meat Science 79:500-508. [ Links ]
Goic, L. 2001. Descripción y perspectivas de la producción de carne bovina en Chile. Informe final. p. 136-148. In Catrileo (ed.) Taller internacional: Limitaciones y perspectivas del sector cárnico bovino en Chile y el Mercosur. FAO, Universidad Mayor, CECUM, Santiago, Chile.
Goic, L., y C. Rojas. 2004. Sistemas de crianza, recria y engorda en la zona sur. p. 107-120. In A. Catrileo (ed.) Manual de producción de bovinos de carne para la VIII, IX y X regiones. Instituto de Investigaciones Agropecuarias INIA, Temuco, Chile. [ Links ]
Griinari, J.M., and D.E. Bauman. 1999. Biosynthesis of conjugated linoleic acid and its incorporation into meat and milk in ruminants. p. 180-200. In Yurawecz, M.P, M.M. Mossoba, J.K.G. Kramer, M.W. Pariza, and G.J. Nelson (eds.) Advances in conjugated linoleic acid research. Vol. I. AOCS Press, Champaign, Illinois, USA. [ Links ]
Grunert, K.G., L. Bredahl, and K. Bruns0. 2004. Consumer perception of meat quality and implications for product development in the meat sector-a review. Meat Science 66:259-272.
Harris, L.E. 1970. Nutrition research techniques for domestic and wild animals. p. 182. Vol. I. Utah State University, Logan, Utah, USA. [ Links ]
Hibbeln, J.R., L.R. Nieminen, T.L. Blasbalg, J.A. Riggs, and W.E. Lands. 2006. Healthy intakes of n-3 and n-6 fatty acids: estimations considering worldwide diversity. American Journal Clinical Nutrition 83:1483S-1493. [ Links ]
Ichihara, K., A. Shibahara, K. Yamamoto, and T. Nakayama. 1996. An improved method for rapid analysis of the fatty acids of glycerolipids. Lipids 31:535-539. [ Links ]
IICA. 2004. Estudio comparativo de dos sistemas de producción de leche: pastoreo y confinamiento. 62 p. Instituto Interamericano de Cooperación para la Agricultura IICA, Oficina Nicaragua, Nicaragua. [ Links ]
INE. 2007. VII Censo Agropecuario y Forestal, Instituto Nacional de Estadísticas (INE), Santiago, Chile. Available at http://www.censoagropecuario.cl/ (accessed 24 March 2011). [ Links ]
Ip, C., J.A. Scimeca, and H.J. Thompson. 1994. Conjugated linoleic acid. A powerful anticarcinogen from animal fat sources. Cancer 74:1050-1054. [ Links ]
Katan, M.B., P.L. Zock, and R.P. Mesink. 1994. Effects of fats and fatty acid on blood lipids in humans: an overview. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 60(suppl. 1):1017-1022. [ Links ]
Kwiterovich, P.O. 1997. The effect of dietary fat, antioxidants and pro-oxidants on blood lipids, lipoproteins and atherosclerosis. Journal of American Dietetic Association 97(supplement):31-41. [ Links ]
Latimori, N.J., A.M. Kloster, P.T. Garcia, F.J. Carduza, G. Grigioni, and N.A. Pensel. 2008. Diet and genotype effects on the quality index of beef produced in the Argentine Pampeana region. Meat Science 79:463-469. [ Links ]
Lawrence, T.L.J., and V.R. Fowler. 1997. Growth of farm animals. 337 p. 2nd ed. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, UK. [ Links ]
Lawrence, J., S. Shouse, W. Edwards, D. Loy, J. Lally, and R.E. Martin. 2007. Beef feedlot systems manual. 28 p. Iowa State University, Iowa Beef Centre, Ames, Iowa, USA. [ Links ]
Lee, K.N., M.W. Pariza, and J.M. Ntambi. 1998. Conjugated linoleic acid decreases hepatic stearoyl-CoA desaturase mRNA expression. Biochemical Biophysical Research Communications 248:817-821. [ Links ]
Leheska, J.M., L.D. Thompson, J.C. Howe, E. Hentges, J. Boyce, J.C. Brooks, et al. 2008. Effects of conventional and grass-feeding systems on the nutrient composition of beef. Journal of Animal Science 86:3575-3585. [ Links ]
Lumley, I.D., and R.K. Colwell. 1991. Extraction of fats from fatty foods and determination of fat content. p. 227-245. In Rossell, J.B., and J.L.R. Pritchard (eds.) Analysis of oilseeds, fats and fatty foods. Elsevier Applied Science, London, UK. [ Links ]
Mazalli, M.R., T. Saldanha, e N. Bragagnolo. 2003. Determina§ao de colesterol em ovos: compara§ao entre método enzimatico e um método por cromatografia liquida de alta eficiència. Revista do Instituto Adolfo Lutz, Sao Paulo 62:49-53. [ Links ]
Nuernberg, K., D. Dannenberger, G. Nuernberg, K. Ender, J. Voigt, N.D. Scollan, et al. 2005. Effect of grass-based and a concentrate feeding system on meat quality characteristics and fatty acid composition of Longissimus muscle in different cattle breeds. Livestock Production Science 94:137-147. [ Links ]
Nuernberg, K., G. Nuernberg, K. Ender, S. Lorenz, K. Winkler, R. Rickert, and H. Steinhart. 2002. N-3 fatty acids and conjugated linoleic acids of Longissimus muscle in beef cattle. European Journal of Lipid Science and Technology 104:463-471. [ Links ]
Orellana, C., F. Pena, A. Garcia, J. Perea, J. Martos, V. Domenech, and R. Acero. 2009. Carcass characteristics, fatty acid composition, and meat quality of Criollo Argentino and Braford steers raised on forage in a semi-tropical region of Argentina. Meat Science 81:57-64. [ Links ]
Padre, R.G., J.A. Aricetti, F.B. Moreira, I.Y. Mizubitu, I.N. Prado, J. Visentainer, et al. 2006. Fatty acid profile, and chemical composition of Longissimus muscle of bovine steers and bulls finished in pasture system. Meat Science 74:242-248. [ Links ]
Realini, C.E., S.K. Duckett, G.W. Brito, M. Dalla Rizza, and D. De Mattos. 2004. Effect of pasture vs. concentrate feeding with or without antioxidants on carcass characteristics, fatty acid composition, and quality of Uruguayan beef. Meat Science 66:567-577. [ Links ]
Ritzenthaler, K., M.K. McGuire, R. Falen, T.D. Shultz, N. Dasgupta, and M.A. McGuire. 2001. Estimation of conjugated linoleic acid intake by written dietary assessment methodologies underestimates actual intake evaluated by food duplicate methodology. Journal of Nutrition 131:1548-1554. [ Links ]
Rule, D.C., K.S. Broughton, S.M. Shellito, and G. Maiorano. 2002. Comparison of muscle fatty acid profiles and cholesterol concentrations of bison, beef cattle, elk, and chicken. Journal of Animal Science 80:1201-1211. [ Links ]
Rule, D.C., M.D. MacNeil, and R.E. Short. 1997. Influence of sire growth potential, time on feed and growing-finishing strategy on cholesterol and fatty acids of ground carcass and Longuissimus muscle of beef steers. Journal of Animal Science 75:1525-1533. [ Links ]
SAS Institute. 2001. Statistical analysis system release 8.01. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, North Carolina, USA.
Salminen, M.M., M. Mutanen, M. Jauhiainen, and A. Aro. 1998. Dietary trans-fatty acids increase conjugated linoleic acid levels in human serum. Journal Nutrition Biochemistry 9:93-98. [ Links ]
Sauvant, D., et P. Bas. 2001. La digestion des lipids chez le ruminant. INRA Productions Animale 14:303-310. [ Links ]
Schnettler, B., R. Silva, L. Vallejos, and N. Sepúlveda. 2008. Consumer perception of animal welfare and livestock production in the Araucania Region, Chile. Chilean Journal of Agricultural Research 68:80-93. [ Links ]
Schor, A., M.E. Cossu, A. Picallo, J. Martinez Ferrer, J.J. Grigera Naón, and D. Colombatto. 2008. Nutritional and eating quality of Argentinean beef: A review. Meat Science 79:408-422. [ Links ]
Scollan, N., N-J. Choi, E. Kurt, A. Fisher, M. Enser, and J.D. Wood. 2001. Manipulating the fatty acid composition of muscle and adipose tissue in beef cattle. British Journal of Nutrition 85:115-124. [ Links ]
Siebald, E. 2005. Praderas naturalizadas para la producción de carne bovina. p. 61-74. In A. Catrileo (ed.) Producción y manejo de carne bovina en Chile. Instituto de Investigaciones Agropecuarias INIA, Temuco, Chile. [ Links ]
Sinclair, A.J., L. Johnson, K. O'Dea, and R.T. Holman. 1994. Diet rich in lean beef increase arachidonic acid and long-chain omega 3 polyunsaturated fatty acids levels in plasma phospholipids. Lipids 29:337-343. [ Links ]
Steen, R., and M. Porter. 2003. The effects of high-concentrate diets and pasture on the concentration of conjugated linoleic acid in beef muscle and subcutaneous fat. Grass and Forage Science 58:50-57. [ Links ]
Taylor, D.G., and L.W. Smith. 1990. The influence of breed and type of feed on the cholesterol content of the M. longissimus dorsi of steers. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 30:797-799. [ Links ]
Turpeinen, A.M., M. Mutanen, A.S.I. Aro, S.P.D. Basu, and J.M. Griinar. 2002a. Bioconversion of vaccenic acid to conjugated linoleic acid in humans. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 76:504-10.
Turpeinen A.M., M. Mautanen, A. Aro, I. Salminen, S. Basu, and D. L. Palmquist. 2002b. Bioconversion of vaccenic acid to conjugated linoleic acid in humans. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 76:504-10.
Wheeler, T.L., G.W. Davis, B.J. Stoecker, and C.J. Harmon. 1987. Cholesterol concentration of longuissimus muscle, subcutaneous fat and serum of two beef cattle breed types. Journal of Animal Science 65:1531-1537. [ Links ]
Whetsell, M., E. Raybun, and J.D. Dossier. 2003. Human health effects of fatty acids in beef. Pasture-Based Beef Systems for Appalachia Project, Extension Service. West Virginia University, Morgantown, Virginia, USA. [ Links ]
Wood, J.D., R.I. Richardson, G.R. Nute, A.V. Fisher, M.M. Campo, E. Kasapidou, et al. 2003. Effects of fatty acids on meat quality: A review. Meat Science 66:21-32. [ Links ]
Received: 20 June 2011.
Accepted: 4 January 2012.