SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.71 número4Influencia del Tiempo de Espera Después de la Inserción de la Base de la Cámara en el Suelo en los Flujos de Gases de Efecto Invernadero ProducidosEstrategias Nutricionales para Mejorar la Eficiencia de uso del Nitrógeno en Vacas Lecheras en Pastoreo índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Chilean journal of agricultural research

versión On-line ISSN 0718-5839

Chilean J. Agric. Res. vol.71 no.4 Chillán dic. 2011

http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-58392011000400018 

Chilean Journal of Agricultural Research 71(4) October - December

RESEARCH

Influence of Conservation Tillage and Soil Water Content on Crop Yield in Dryland Compacted Alfisol of Central Chile

Influencia de la Labranza de Conservación y el Contenido de Agua sobre el Rendimiento del Cultivo en un Alfisol compactado del Secano Central de Chile

Ingrid Martinez G.1*, Carlos Ovalle1, Alejandro Del Pozo2, Hamil Uribe1, Natalia Valderrama V.3, Christian Prat4, Marco Sandoval5, Fernando Fernández1, and Erick Zagal5

1Instituto de Investigaciones Agropecuarias INIA, Casilla 426, ChiMn. Chile. "Corresponding author (imartinez@inia.cl).
2Universidad de Talca, Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias, Casilla 747, Talca, Chile.

3Universidad de Concepción, Facultad de Ingeniería Agrícola, Av. Vicente Méndez 595, Chillán, Chile.
4Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD), Laboratoire d'Étude des Transferts en Hydrologie et Environnement, BP 53, 38041 Grenoble Cedex 9, France.
5Universidad de Concepción, Facultad de Agronomía, Av. Vicente Méndez 595, Chillán, Chile.


Chilean dryland areas of the Mediterranean climate region are characterized by highly degraded and compacted soils, which require the use of conservation tillage systems to mitigate water erosion as well as to improve soil water storage. An oat (Avena sativa L. cv. Supernova-INIA) - wheat (Triticum aestivum L. cv. Pandora-INIA) crop rotation was established under the following conservation systems: no tillage (Nt), Nt + contour plowing (Nt+Cp), Nt + barrier hedge (Nt+Bh), and Nt + subsoiling (Nt+Sb), compared to conventional tillage (Ct) to evaluate their influence on soil water content (SWC) in the profile (10 to 110 cm depth), the soil compaction and their interaction with the crop yield. Experimental plots were established in 2007 and lasted 3 yr till 2009 in a compacted Alfisol. At the end of the growing seasons, SWC was reduced by 44 to 51% in conservation tillage systems and 60% in Ct. Soil water content had a significant (p < 0.05) interaction with tillage system and depth; Nt+Sb showed lower SWC between 10 to 30 cm, but higher and similar to the rest between 50 to 110 cm except for Ct. Although, SWC was higher in conservation tillage systems, the high values on soil compaction affected yield. No tillage + subsoiling reduced soil compaction and had a significant increment of grain yield (similar to Ct in seasons 2008 and 2009). These findings show us that the choice of conservation tillage in compacted soils of the Mediterranean region needs to improve soil structure to obtain higher yields and increment SWC.

Key words: Neutron probe, penetrometer resistance, oat, subsoiling, water erosion, wheat.


En Chile, las zonas de clima mediterráneo se caracterizan por suelos altamente degradados y compactados por erosión, lo que requiere el uso de sistemas de labranza conservacionista para mitigar la erosión hídrica, así como incrementar el contenido de agua en el suelo. Se evaluó una rotación avena (Avena sativa L. cv. Supernova-INIA) - trigo (Triticum aestivum L. cv. Pandora-INIA) establecida bajo los siguientes sistemas conservacionistas: cero labranza (Nt), Nt + curvas de nivel (Nt+Cp), Nt + franjas vivas (Nt+Bh) y Nt + subsolado (Nt+Sb), las que fueron comparadas al sistema de labranza convencional (Ct), para evaluar su influencia en el contenido de agua en el suelo (SWC) en el perfil (10 a 110 cm profundidad), la compactación del suelo y su interacción con el rendimiento del cultivo. Las parcelas experimentales fueron establecidas 3 anos seguidos (2007 al 2009) en un Alfisol compactado. Al final de la temporada, el SWC disminuyó 44 a 51% en los sistemas conservacionistas y 60% en el sistema convencional. El sistema de labranza y la profundidad tuvieron un efecto significativo (p < 0.05) en el SWC; Nt+Sb presentó un menor contenido de agua entre los 10 y 30 cm y similar al resto de los sistemas conservacionistas entre los 50 y 110 cm, sin embargo, superior a Ct. Aunque los sistemas conservacionistas mostraron un mayor SWC, la alta compactación afectó los rendimientos. Cero labranza + subsolado redujo la compactación del suelo e incrementó significativamente el rendimiento en grano (similar a Ct en las temporadas 2008 y 2009). Estos resultados nos muestran que la elección de un sistema conservacionista en suelos compactados de la región mediterránea, requiere mejorar la estructura del suelo para obtener mejores rendimientos e incrementar el contenido de agua en el suelo.

Palabras clave: neutrómetro, resistencia a la penetración, avena, subsolado, erosión hídrica, trigo.


Several studies have shown that water erosion negatively affects many soil-quality indicators such as depth, organic matter content, nutrient status, and aggregate stability (Schj0nning et al., 2004). Water erosion is controlled by four basic factors: climate, soil type, topography, and vegetative cover (Jin et al., 2007). The prevention and control depends on understanding the mechanics of the erosion process and also on the implementation of control practices. In addition, the repeated use of inadequate tillage systems in soils with slopes, and the high concentration and intensity of precipitation are key factors for the occurrence of the erosion process (Ramos and Martínez-Casasnovas, 2006). This is one of the main factors for land degradation and low yields in many areas of the world (Schj0nning et al.,, including Chile's dryland Mediterranean region (Ovalle et al., 2006), where water erosion removes topsoil (horizon A) resulting in highly compacted soils with poor fertility, low infiltration, and water holding capacity (Pala et al., 2007). These negative impacts results in an increase in the bulk density, decreased aeration and increased penetration resistance, which results in impeded root development (Letey, 1985; Batey, 2009). This detrimental effect on root growth becomes greater as compaction increase (Lipiec and Hatano, 2003; Motavalli et al., 2003).

In short-term, conventional tillage reduce runoff and soil compaction, but this effect is lost as soon as the first rainfall occurs producing the crusting effect (Hoogmoed and Stroosnijder, 1984; Rao et al., 1998). On the contrary, conservation tillage systems in rainfed Mediterranean environments avoid crusting and increase water infiltration (Riezebos and Loerts, 1998; Lampurlanés et al., 2001; Pansak et al., 2008; Fuentes et al., 2009; Vidhana Arachchi, 2009). Ramos and Martínez-Casasnovas (2006) found in vineyards in NE Spain, that water infiltration was mostly influenced by rainfall intensity; in high rainfall intensities soil moisture increased in the first strata without significant increases in depth, but in low intensity rainfall, the soil water content increased in the whole profile, especially when conservation.

In Chile, the investigations of soil conservation tillage systems in rainfed areas have been mainly focused in runoff and soil losses with little information on water content in the soil profile (Pena, 1986; Pena and Fuentes, 1987; Rodriguez et al., 2000). This study was conducted in an oat (Avena sativa L.)-wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) crop rotation in a degraded Alfisol of the Mediterranean region of central Chile. Therefore, our objectives were to evaluate the influence of different tillage systems on soil water content, as well as soil compaction and their interactions on crop yield.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Site description
The experiment was carried out in the Instituto de Investigaciones Agropecuarias INIA, Cauquenes Experimental Station (35°97' S, 72°24' W), during the 2007, 2008, and 2009 seasons. This is a subhumid Mediterranean climate region with a mean annual precipitation of 695 mm concentrated in autumn and winter. Annual and monthly precipitation in the 3 yr of the study and monthly mean of 44-yr from INIA Cauquenes station is shown in Figure 1. Annual mean temperature is 14.7 °C with a minimum of 4.7 °C in July and a maximum of 27 °C in January (Del Pozo and del Canto, 1999). The soil is classified as Ultic Palexeralfs (CIREN, 1994; Stolpe, 2006) and is made up of materials of granite origin with a slightly acidic pH (5.9) and low organic matter content (1.50%). Detailed soil physical characteristics are shown in Table 1. The area is hilly and land use is mainly for pastures and cereal crops. The study site has a 15% slope which is representative of the study area.


Figure 1. Mean monthly rainfall distribution for Cauquenes from 2007 to 2009 compared to a 44-yr mean precipitation.

 

Table 1. Study site soil physical characteristics.

 

Field experiment description
Five experimental plots of 1000 m2 (20 x 50 m) were established during seasons 2007 to 2009. Each large plot was located on a hillside with 12.5% slope. Were evaluated four conservation tillage systems: no tillage (Nt), Nt with subsoiling (Nt+Sb) at 40 cm depth conducted in April 2007 before sowing; Nt with Phalaris aquatica barrier hedge (Nt+Bh) at 12.5 m distance; and Nt with contour ploughing (Nt+Cp) every 12.5 m with a 1% slope to remove water from the plot, compared to conventional tillage with animal plowing (Ct). The tillage treatments were cropped with an oat (cv. Supernova-INIA) - wheat (cv. Pandora-INIA) - oat (cv. Supernova-INIA) crop rotation. The sowing and harvesting date were middle of May and middle December every year, respectively. Seed rate for oat was 140 kg ha-1 and wheat 200 kg ha-1. Fertilization was adjusted every year according to soil analysis realized in March. The soil was fertilized with urea, triple super phosphate, and potassium muriate. Fertilizer sources consisted of 110, 80, and 80 kg ha-1 of N, P2O5, and K2O, respectively for oat, and 140, 80, and 80 kg ha-1 of N, P2O5, and K2O, respectively for wheat. On the soil surface in conservation tillage systems, the residue was shredded and left on top of the soil after oat and wheat crop (2.5 Mg ha-1).

Soil and crop measurements
Soil water content was measured with a neutron probe (model 4300 Troxler, Troxler Electronic Lab, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA). Aluminum access tubes with a diameter of 50 mm and a length of 120 cm were installed vertically at a depth of 110 cm at the beginning of the experiment, with three replicates for each treatment, except in Nt+Sb where three tubes were installed per replicate. The first measurement was taken at 0.2 m then at 0.2 increments thereafter to 1 m depth. Monitoring of soil moisture was started after the rainy season from August or September to December. Six access tubes located close to the field experiments were used for calibration; samples were taken at a distance of 0.3 m from each tube and at the same depth as the readings. Regression analysis between gravimetric water content and the neutron probe reading was R2 = 0.84. Gravimetric water content at each depth was converted into soil volumetric water content by strata of 0.2 m. Then, the SWC was obtained in the 10-30, 30-50, 50-70, 70-90, and 90-110 cm strata depths.

Soil compaction as a cone index was measured in the second and third seasons (2008 and 2009) in April prior to sowing the crop by pushing a hand-held cone-tipped (12.8 mm diameter) penetrometer (Field Scout SC900 Soil Compaction Meter; Spectrum Technologies, Plainfield, Illinois, USA). Soil compaction readings were recorded in 2.5 cm increments to 20 cm deep with 20 replicates at each plot.

Above-ground biomass and grain yield were recorded at crop maturity in 1 m2 with four replicates. Root biomass was measured in 10 plants taken at random. Samples of biomass were oven-dried for 48 h at 55 °C (Martinez et al., 2009).

Statistical analysis
Soil water content (SWC) was carried out using split-split-plot design (Undurraga et al., 2009) of the SAS software program (version 9.1.3 Service Pack, SAS Institute, 2002-2003). The ANOVA was performed with the GLM procedure (linear model) and Tukey test to compare means of significant values (p < 0.05) assuming the effects of tillage system, sampling date and depth as fixed effects according to the following model:

where Y is moisture content, μ general mean, αi mean effect of ith level of tillage systems (large plot), πl effect of the 1th block, δk random error of large plot, βj effect of jth level of sampling date (subplot), ap corresponds to interaction between tillage system treatments and sampling date, Xijl subplot random error, 6k mean effect of kth depth (sub-subplot), αβ corresponds to interaction of tillage system treatments and depth, pS interaction of sampling date and depth treatments, apS interaction of the three factors, and £ corresponds to sub-subplot random error.

In addition, an ANOVA of mixed effect models was carried out to determine the effect of annual precipitation on SWC in different tillage systems and depths during the most important phenological crop stages, such as tillering (Zadoks stage 23), stem elongation (Zadoks stage 31), spike emergence (Zadoks stage 59), and grain ripening (Zadoks stage 92) (Stapper, 2007). Thus, tillage system (A) was considered as a fixed factor, soil depth (B) was a random factor and the interaction of both (A*B):

yijk= μ.. + αi+ βj + (αβ)ij + εijk,

where μ, is general mean,αi mean effect of ith level of factor A (tillage system) subjected to jth level of factor B (depth).

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Influence of tillage systems on soil water content
During the experimental period (3 yr) there was an important variation on annual precipitation (Figure 1) and therefore it was necessary to evaluate both the effect of soil tillage and annual precipitation on SWC.

Temporal evolution of total SWC (0-110 cm) decreased gradually during crop development in all tillage systems (Figure 2). This is explained by the fact that evaluations were carried out between September and December, period in which rainfall decreases and water extraction by the crop increases. This drying process is dominated by a vertical flow (De Lannoy et al., 2006) in which the development of the plant cover and roots, and water extraction by the crop intervenes, contributing additional variability to the tillage system.


Nt: No tillage; Nt+Sb: Nt + Subsoiling; Nt+Bh: Nt + Barrier hedge; Nt+Cp: Nt + Contour ploughing; Ct: Conventional tillage.

Figure 2. Soil water content (SWC) between 10 to 110 cm layers in the dry period (2007, 2008 and 2009).

In driest years (2007 and 2009), SWC was reduced by 23 to 31%, in which Ct showed the highest decreases in both seasons. However, in a wet year (2008) SWC was reduced by 44 to 51% in conservation systems, while in Ct the reduction was 60% (Figure 2). These results showed that no tillage systems conserve more soil moisture in the profile than traditional tillage; in part it can be explained because in these systems the crop residue is maintained on the surface, producing less evaporation and greater infiltration (Unger et al., 1991; Lampurlanés et al., 2001; McHugh et al., 2007; Jin et al., 2008; Pansak, 2008; Govaerts et al., 2009). At the end of the evaluations (December), SWC stabilized in all depths and was closely related to the tillage system used.

A significant effect (p < 0.05) was observed between tillage systems and depth in the 3 yr of the study (Table 2). By comparing SWC per strata (10-30, 30-50, 50-70 cm; Figure 3) in the profile during season 2008, differences were observed between tillage systems providing two different patterns. In the case of Ct, no real differences were observed between the evaluated depths during sampling time (Figure 3e). This can be explained because the Ct with animal ploughing inverts and mixes the soil (20-30 cm) producing the sealing and crusting of the topsoil with the first rainfall, which reduce infiltration and increase runoff (Lampurlanés et al., 2001; Ramos and Martínez-Casasnovas, 2006; Munodawafa and Zhou, 2008). In fact, in this site during year 2008 an intense rainfall event of more than 300 mm, produced a runoff between 20-30% for conservation tillage systems while in Ct was 70% (Martínez et al., 2009).

Table 2. Comparison of means soil water content (mm) among tillage systems, for each depth (cm).

Nt: No tillage; Nt+Sb: Nt + Subsoiling; Nt+Bh: Nt + Barrier hedge; Nt+Cp: Nt + Contour ploughing; Ct: Conventional tillage.
Values with the same letter in the columns do not show significant differences (p < 0.05).


Nt: No tillage (a); Nt+Cp: Nt + Contour ploughing (b); Nt+Bh: Nt + Barrier hedge (c); Nt+Sb: Nt + Subsoiling (d); Ct: Conventional tillage (e).

Figure 3. Soil water content (SWC) at 10-30, 30-50, and 50-70 cm layer, during 2008.

 

Analysis of variance of mixed factors allowed determining the influence of the variability of annual precipitation on the main factors evaluated (tillage system and depth) on SWC during the most important phenological stages (Zadoks stage 23, 31, 59, and 92). Results indicated that the percentage of variance associated with soil depth for 2007 and 2009 ranging between 70% to 82% and 61% to 85%, respectively, whereas in 2008 it ranging between 38 to 64%. These results showed that SWC distribution in the profile was significantly (p < 0.05) affected by tillage systems in the driest years (2007 and 2009; Figure 1). The above suggest that the tillage system play an important role in the availability of SWC in this rainfed area. The results showed that Nt+Sb increased water infiltration towards the deeper strata (50-110, Figure 3 and Table 2) leading to higher grain yield as revealed below. In addition, this infiltration pattern will also depend on soil type, crop rotation (Vidhana Arachchi and Liyanage, 2003; Fuentes et al., 2009; Alvarez and Steinbach, 2009) and the variation and intensity of the rainfall events (De Lannoy et al., 2006; Pala et al., 2007; Song et al., 2009).

Influence of tillage systems on soil compaction
Soil compaction evaluations were carried out in the second (2008) and third year (2009) of the study period. The results are presented for the eight soil depths in Figure 4. In the second year, soil penetration resistance increased from 500 to 1500 kPa in all tillage system at a depth of 2.5-10 cm of depth. Down to 10-20 cm soil penetration resistance changed substantially in Nt, Nt+Cp, Nt+Bh, and Ct tillage systems which exceeded 2000 kPa, compared with the subsoiled treatment (Nt+Sb) which was significantly lower, maintaining an average of 1500 kPa to a depth of 20 cm. In the third year, soil penetration resistance in Nt+Sb markedly increased over the 2000 kPa below 15 cm of depth, while the rest of the conservation treatments exceeded this threshold at 10 cm.


Nt = No tillage; Nt+Sb = Nt + Subsoiling; Nt+Bh = Nt + Barrier hedge; Nt+Cp = Nt + Contour ploughing; Ct = Conventional tillage.

Figure 4. Mechanical resistance profile to measured penetration depth cone index (kPa).

 

The high values of soil compaction in depth are explained by the high percentage of clay in B horizon (18 to 100 cm) and an uniform high bulk density profile (> 1.7 Mg m-3; Table 1), which limit root growth due to a) soil water being held more tightly and b) high soil resistance to root growth (Letey, 1985; Batey, 2009; Jung et al., 2010). In fact, root biomass per plant at the end of the season (Table 3) in the three years under study showed significantly lower values in those treatments where soil depth was highly compacted (Nt, Nt+Cp, and Nt+Bh). In addition, several authors have mentioned that an increase in soil compaction, over than 1500 kPa, may reduce grain yield (Lipiec and Hatano, 2003; Jung et al., 2010).

Table 3. Root biomass per plant at the grain ripening stage (Zadoks stage 92) between 2007 to 2008.

Nt: No tillage; Nt+Sb: Nt + Subsoiling; Nt+Bh: Nt + Barrier hedge; Nt+Cp: Nt + Contour ploughing; Ct: Conventional tillage.

 

Influence of tillage systems on crop yield
In the first year of the study (2007), with average rainfall of only 372 mm, oat grain yield and biomass production of Nt+Sb was significant (p < 0.01) higher than the rest of the treatments, while Nt+Cp and Nt obtained the lowest productivity (Figure 5, 2007 yr). In 2008, with 768 mm of rainfall (more humid year), the highest wheat productivity was observed in the Nt+Sb and Ct treatments, and the lowest in Nt (Figure 5, 2008 yr). Finally, in the third year (with 536 mm, but with spring rainfall) oat crop production was higher in the Nt+Sb, Ct and Nt+Bh treatments compared to Nt (Figure 5, 2009 yr).


Minimun significant difference (MSD) according to Tukey test (p < 0.05).
Nt = No tillage; Nt+Sb = Nt + Subsoiling; Nt+Bh = Nt + Barrier hedge; Nt+Cp = Nt + Contour ploughing; Ct = Conventional tillage.

Figure 5. Relationship between grain yield and biomass production with soil water content during 2007 (oat), 2008 (wheat), and 2009 (oat).

Our results indicate a common pattern for the three years, where Nt+Sb and Ct treatments showed the highest yield; Nt+Sb reduced SWC between 10-30 cm depth and favored water extraction by the crop leading to higher productivity particularly in dryer years (e.g. 2007), while Ct showed the lowest SWC in the profile (Table 2, Figure 3). Although, Nt systems are potentially better for dryland conditions, because they maintains greater water content in the soil, the higher soil strength reduces root growth and yield.

As expected, the annual rainfall distribution affected SWC and yield. Years with lowest rainfall, 2007 and 2009 showed a different pattern and yield of oat production. In 2007, the highest rainfall period occurred between June-July; however, 2009 has two rainfall periods, one in May-June and the other in August-September, when the crop was at the stem elongation phenological stage (Zadoks stage 31). In both years the biomass production was similar, but the yield was severely affected in 2007 yr.

This investigation suggests that the choice of conservation tillage system without any modification on soil structure will affect crop yield in compacted soils. In addition, in the Mediterranean climate region, the annual rainfall distribution and the water deficit at the end of the growing season is other limiting factor for cereal production, due to the low water infiltration and low root biomass in compacted soils (Sojka et al., 1993; Hong-ling et al., 2008; Alvarez and Steinbach, 2009; Vidhana Arachchi, 2009). Therefore, no tillage combined with subsoiling (Nt+Sb) is particularly relevant in these environments where much of crop growth occurs in spring (at the start of the dry season) and is generally subjected to a water deficit during the grain filling-period of cereals (De Vita et al., 2007; He et al., 2009; Jin et al., 2009).

CONCLUSIONS

Crop residues maintained on the surface and conservation tillage system preserved more SWC in the profile than conventional tillage after the rainy season. This practice is relevant in Mediterranean climate regions where much of crop growth occurs in spring, when the rainfall period is ended. Although, SWC was higher in conservation tillage systems, the high values on soil compaction affected yields. The results of the present study showed that the soil conditions are of major importance to SWC and determine the differences observed between tillage systems. Nt+Sb reduced soil compaction and had a significant increment of grain yield. In this scenery, the benefits of improving soil structure are necessary to obtain higher yields. In addition, this conservation tillage system generates environmental benefits in these highly compacted and degraded soils of the country.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This study was financed by the DESIRE Research Project (037046): Desertification mitigation and land remediation - a global approach for local solutions, Servicio Agrícola y Ganadero (SAG) and the Instituto de Investigaciones Agropecuarias (INIA).

LITERATURE CITED

Alvarez, H.S., and R. Steinbach. 2009. A review of the effects of tillage systems on some soil physical properties, water content, nitrate availability and crops yield in the Argentine Pampas. Soil and Tillage Research 104:1-15.         [ Links ]

Batey, T. 2009. Soil compaction and soil management - a review. >Soil Use and Management 25:335-345.         [ Links ]

CIREN. 1994. Estudio agrológico. VII Región. Descripciones de suelos, materiales y símbolos. Publicación N° 117. 660 p. Centro de Información de Recursos Naturales (CIREN), Santiago, Chile.         [ Links ]

De Lannoy, G.J.M., N.E.C. Verhoest, P.R. Houser, T.J. Gish, and M. van Meirvenne. 2006. Spatial and temporal characteristics of soil moisture in an intensively monitored agricultural field (OPE3). Journal of Hydrology 331:719-730.         [ Links ]

De Vita, P., E. Di Paolo, G. Fecondo, N. Di Fonzo, and M. Pisante. 2007. No-tillage and conventional tillage effects on durum wheat yield, grain quality and soil moisture content in southern Italy. Soil and Tillage Research 92:69-78.         [ Links ]

Del Pozo, A., y P Del Canto. 1999. Áreas agroclimáticas y sistemas productivos en la VII y VIII Regiones. Instituto de Investigaciones Agropecuarias INIA, Centro Regional de Investigación Quilamapu, Chillán, Chile.         [ Links ]

Fuentes, M., B. Govaerts, F. De León, C. Hidalgo, L. Dendooven, K.D. Sayre, and J. Etchevers. 2009. Fourteen years of applying zero and conventional tillage, crop rotation and residue management systems and its effect on physical and chemical soil quality. European Journal of Agronomy 30:228-237.         [ Links ]

Govaerts, B., K.D. Sayre, B. Goudeseune, P. De Corte, K. Lichter, L. Dendooven, and J. Deckers. 2009. Conservation agriculture as a sustainable option for the central Mexican highlands. Soil and Tillage Research 103:222-209.         [ Links ]

He, J., N.J. Kuhn, X.M. Zhang, X.R. Zhang, and H.W. Li. 2009. Effects of 10 years of conservation tillage on soil properties and productivity in the farming-pastoral ecotone of Inner Mongolia, China. Soil Use Management 25:201-209.         [ Links ]

Hong-ling, Q., G. Wang-sheng, M. Yue-cun, M. Li, Y. Chun-mei, Ch. Zhe, and Ch. Chun-lan. 2008. Effects of subsoiling on soil moisture under no-tillage for two years. Agricultural Sciences in China 7:88-95.         [ Links ]

Hoogmoed. W.B., and L. Stroosnijder. 1984. Crust formation on sandy soils in the Sahel I. Rainfall and infiltration. Soil and Tillage Research 4:5-23.         [ Links ]

Jin, K., W.M. Cornelis, D. Gabriels, W. Schiettecatte, S. De Neve, J. Lu, et al. 2008. Soil management effects on runoff and soil loss from field rainfall simulation. Catena 75:191-199.         [ Links ]

Jin, H., L. Hongwen, W. Xiaoyan, A.D. McHugh, L. Wenying, G. Huanwen, and N.J. Kuhn. 2007. The adoption of annual subsoiling as conservation tillage in dryland maize and wheat cultivation in northern China. Soil and Tillage Research 94:493-502.         [ Links ]

Jin, H., W. Qingjie, L. Hongwen, L. Lijin, and G. Huanwen. 2009. Effect of alternative tillage and residue cover on yield and water use efficiency in annual double cropping system in North China Plain. Soil and Tillage Research 104:198-205.         [ Links ]

Jung, K., N.R. Kitchen, K.A. Sudduth, K. Lee, and S. Chung. 2010. Soil compaction varies by crop management system over a claypan soil landscape. Soil and Tillage Research 107:1-10.         [ Links ]

Lampurlanés, J., P. Angás, and C. Cantero-Martínez. 2001. Root growth, soil water content and yield of barley under different tillage systems on two soils in semiarid conditions. Field Crops Research 69:27-40.         [ Links ]

Letey, J. 1985. Relationship between soil physical properties and crop production. Advances in Soil Science 1:277-294.         [ Links ]

Lipiec, J., and R. Hatano. 2003. Quantification of compaction effects on soil physical properties and crop growth. Geoderma 116:107136.         [ Links ]

Martínez I., C. Ovalle, E. Zagal, N. Stolpe, y C. Prat. 2009. Resultados preliminares sobre los efectos de sistemas de labranza conservacionista en la mitigación de la erosión hídrica en un suelo Alfisol con una rotación de cultivo Avena-Trigo en una zona de clima mediterráneo. XI Congreso Nacional de la Ciencia del Suelo, Chillán, Chile. Universidad de Concepción, Chillán, Chile.         [ Links ]

McHugh, O.V., T.S. Steenhuis, B. Abebe, and E.C.M. Fernández. 2007. Performance of in situ rainwater conservation tillage techniques on dry spell mitigation and erosion control in the drought-prone North Wello zone of the Ethiopian highlands. Soil and Tillage Research 97:19-36.         [ Links ]

Motavalli, P.P., W.E. Stevens, and G. Hartwig. 2003. Remediation of subsoil compaction and compaction effects on corn N availability by deep tillage and application of poultry manure in a sandy-textured soil. Soil and Tillage Research 71:121-131.         [ Links ]

Munodawafa, A., and N. Zhou. 2008. Improving water utilization in maize production through conservation tillage systems in semi-arid Zimbabwe. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth 33:757-761.         [ Links ]

Ovalle, C., A. Del Pozo, M.A. Casado, B. Acosta, and J.M. de Miguel. 2006. Consequences of landscape heterogeneity on grassland diversity and productivity in the Espinal agroforestry system of central Chile. Landscape Ecology 21:585-594.         [ Links ]

Pala, M., J. Ryan, H. Zhang, M. Singh, and H.C. Harris. 2007. Water-use efficiency of wheat-based rotation systems in a Mediterranean environment. Agricultural Water Management 93:136-144.         [ Links ]

Pansak, W., T.H. Hilger, G. Dercon, T. Kongkaew, and G. Cadisch. 2008. Changes in the relationship between soil erosion and N loss pathways after establishing soil conservation systems in uplands of Northeast Thailand. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 128:167-176.         [ Links ]

Pena, L. 1986. Control de erosión hídrica en suelos volcánicos (Dystrandept) mediante labranza de conservación. Agro-Ciencia 2:59-64.

Pena, L., y V. Fuentes. 1987. Evaluación de erosión en trumaos. Estudio preliminar. Agro-Ciencia 3:143-150.

Rao, K.P.C., T.S. Steenhuis, A.L. Cogle, S.T. Srinivasan, D.F. Yule, and G.D. Smith. 1998. Rainfall infiltration and runoff from an Alfisol in semi-arid tropical India. II. Tilled systems. Soil and Tillage Research 48:61-69.         [ Links ]

Ramos, M.C., and J.A. Martínez-Casasnovas. 2006. Impact of land levelling on soil moisture and runoff variability in vineyards under different rainfall distributions in a Mediterranean climate and its influence on crop productivity. Journal of Hydrology 321:131146.         [ Links ]

Riezebos, H.T., and A.C. Loerts. 1998. Influence of land use change and tillage practice on soil organic matter in southern Brazil and eastern Paraguay. Soil and Tillage Research 49:271-275.         [ Links ]

Rodríguez, N., E. Ruz, A. Valenzuela, y C. Belmar. 2000. Efecto del sistema de laboreo en las pérdidas de suelo por erosión en la rotación trigo-avena y praderas en la precordillera andina de la región centro-sur. Agricultura Técnica 60:259-269.         [ Links ]

SAS Institute. 2002-2003. Software. 9.1.3. Service Pack. SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina, USA.         [ Links ]

Schj0nning, P., S. Elmholt, and B.T. Christensen (eds.) 2004. Managing soil quality: Challenges in modern agriculture. 368 p. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, UK.

Sojka, R.E., D.T. Westermann, M.J. Brown, and B.D. Meek. 1993. Zone-subsoiling effects on infiltration, runoff, erosion, and yields of furrow-irrigated potatoes. Soil and Tillage Research 25:351368.         [ Links ]

Song, X., S. Wang, G. Xiao, Z. Wang, X. Liu, and P. Wang. 2009. A study of soil water movement combining soil water potential with stable isotopes at two sites of shallow groundwater areas in the North China Plain. Hydrological Processes 23:1376-1388.         [ Links ]

Stapper, M. 2007. High-yielding irrigated wheat crop management. Irrigated Cropping Forum. Available at http://www.icf.org.au/ proj_f/pdf/Irrigated%20Wheat%20Crop%20Management.pdf (accessed January 2011).         [ Links ]

Stolpe, N.B. 2006. Descripción de los principales suelos de la VIII Región de Chile. 84 p. Universidad de Concepción, Facultad de Agronomía, Chillán, Chile.         [ Links ]

Undurraga, P., E. Zagal, G. Sepúlveda, and N. Valderrama. 2009. Dissolved organic carbon and nitrogen in Andisol for six crop rotations with different soil management intensity. Chilean Journal of Agricultural Research 69:445-454.         [ Links ]

Unger, PW., B.A. Stewart, J.F. Parr, and R.P. Singh. 1991. Crop residue management and tillage methods for conserving soil and water in semi-arid regions. Soil and Tillage Research 20:219-240.         [ Links ]

Vidhana Arachchi, L.P. 2009. Effect of deep ploughing on the water status of highly and less compacted soils for coconut (Cocos nucifera L.) production in Sri Lanka. Soil and Tillage Research 103:350-355.         [ Links ]

Vidhana Arachchi, L.P., and M. De S. Liyanage. 2003. Soil water content under coconut palms in sole and mixed (with nitrogen-fixing trees) stands in Sri Lanka. Agroforestry Systems 57:1-9.         [ Links ]


Received: 6 April 2011.
Accepted: 9 August 2011.