Services on Demand
- Cited by SciELO
- Access statistics
- Cited by Google
- Similars in SciELO
- Similars in Google
On-line version ISSN 0718-5839
Chilean J. Agric. Res. vol.71 no.1 Chillán Mar. 2011
Chilean Journal of Agricultural Research 71(1):45-51 (January - March 2011)
Crude extracts of Drimys winteri bark to inhibit growth of Gaeumannomyces graminis var. tritici
Inhibición del crecimiento de Gaeumannomyces graminis var. tritici empleando extractos obtenidos de corteza de Drimys winteri.
Nelson Zapata1*, Marisol Vargas1, Manuel Monsálvez1, and Ricardo Ceballos2
1Universidad de Concepción, Facultad de Agronomía, Av. Vicente Méndez 595, Casilla 537, Chillán, Chile. *Corresponding author (firstname.lastname@example.org).
2Instituto de Investigaciones Agropecuarias INIA, Casilla 426, Chillán, Chile.
The aim of this study was to assess the effect of Drimys winteri J.R. Forst. & G. Forst. bark and its extracts, obtained sequentially with n-hexane, acetone, and methanol, against Gaeumannomyces graminis var. tritici (Ggt). Ground bark of D. winteri was mixed with potato dextrose agar growth media at concentrations of 250, 500, 1000, 2000, and 4000 mg L-1 in Petri plates. Each extract was mixed at concentrations of 100, 200, 400, and 800 mg L-1. Petri plates were inoculated in the center with a 5-mm mycelium disk and were incubated at 24 ± 1 ºC. Daily measurements of mycelium radial growth were taken to determine growth rate and growth inhibition (%). A ground bark concentration of 978 mg L-1 was needed to inhibit Ggt growth by 50%, while extracts obtained with n-hexane and acetone only required 198 and 234 mg L-1, respectively. The methanol extract only inhibited Ggt growth by 33% when tested at the highest concentration. In conclusion, ground bark and crude extracts, obtained sequentially with n-hexane, acetone, and methanol, from D. winteri bark inhibit Ggt growth when applied in vitro. The n-hexane extract showed the highest inhibitory growth activity.
Key words: Wheat take-all, soil borne, plant extracts, Ggt.
El objetivo de esta investigación fue evaluar la actividad de la corteza de Drimys winteri J.R Forst. & G. Forst. y sus extractos obtenidos secuencialmente con n-hexano, acetona y metanol sobre el crecimiento in vitro de Gaeumannomyces graminis var. tritici (Ggt). Con este propósito se mezclaron en placas Petri, corteza molida de D. winteri con medio de crecimiento agar papa dextrosa a concentraciones de 250, 500, 1000, 2000 y 4000 mg L-1. Cada extracto fue mezclado a concentraciones de 100, 200, 400 y 800 mg L-1. Las placas se inocularon en su centro con un disco de 5 mm de micelio de Ggt y se incubaron a 24 ± 1 ºC. Diariamente se midió el crecimiento radial del micelio, se determinó velocidad de crecimiento e índice de inhibición del crecimiento (%). Para inhibir el crecimiento de Ggt en un 50% fue necesaria una concentración de 978 mg L-1 de corteza molida. En cambio, cuando se emplearon extractos obtenidos con n-hexano y acetona sólo fueron necesarios 198 y 234 mg L-1, respectivamente. El extracto obtenido con metanol sólo alcanzó a inhibir el crecimiento de Ggt en un 33% a la máxima concentración estudiada. En conclusión, la corteza triturada de D. winteri y sus extractos crudos obtenidos secuencialmente con n-hexano, acetona y metanol inhiben el crecimiento in vitro de Ggt. El extracto obtenido con n-hexano demostró la mayor actividad inhibitoria del crecimiento.
Palabras clave: mal del pie, hongos del suelo, extractos de plantas, Ggt.
Take-all disease caused by the ascomycete fungus Gaeumannomycete graminis (Sacc.) von Arx & Olivier var. tritici Walker (Ggt) (Wiese, 1987) is among the most serious fungal diseases affecting wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) worldwide. This disease is particularly severe in Chilean Andisols with the highest organic matter contents (Campillo et al., 2001). This fungus presents a challenging phytopathological problem since it is rarely identified early and is evident only in advanced stages of cultivation (Madariaga and McMahon, 1981). General plant development is affected, and its production is reduced by the depletion of all yield components (Hornby, 1998). Yield losses can be as high as 50% (Wiese, 1987; Agrios, 2004).
Plants affected by this disease exhibit chlorosis, stunted growth, early maturity, formation of whitened spikes, and sterile or hollow kernels (Latorre, 2004). This phytopathogen, which has enzymes that degrade cell walls, destroys much of the plants root system and basal stem (Dori et al., 1995; Agrios, 2004). Partially or totally damaged stems cannot conduct water and nutrients needed for normal plant development and growth (Apablaza, 1999). Affected plants have few roots, which are short, black-brown in color, and dry; dark Ggt hyphae growths are evident on the root tissue (Apablaza, 1999). This fungus can spread from diseased to healthy plants through root contact, the residue in the soil after harvest, soil lodged in agricultural equipment, and in soil water runoff after rain (Cook, 2003; Latorre, 2004). Additionally, ascospores of this pathogen can be dispersed by wind and rain (Latorre, 2004).
Seed disinfection and soil fumigation with diverse antifungal chemicals are usually recommended to control this disease. However, these methods are not satisfactory given their high cost and marginal effectiveness (Hornby, 1998; Apablaza, 1999; Cook, 2003). Various biological agents have been examined to control Ggt (Wong et al., 1996; Kim et al., 1997; Cook et al., 2002), though, none have been determined to be appropriate for a variety of soil conditions and production systems (Capper and Higgins, 1993; Cook, 2003).
Crop rotation with non-susceptible species appears to be the only effective control method to prevent this phytopathological problem (Cook, 2003; Cunfer et al., 2006). This method is used in Chile, but its effectiveness varies according to climate and soil conditions; it is not necessarily suitable for all technological and economic purposes (Campillo et al., 2001). Since there are few non-susceptible alternative crops to rotate with Chilean wheat crops, it is very likely that phytopathological problems will persist and increase (Andrade, 2004). Thus, it is imperative to develop economically viable methods to control this serious disease (Cook, 2003).
In this context, an interesting alternative to explore can be plants as a source of natural fungicides to control pathogens affecting crops. This is based on the fact that synthesis and production of secondary metabolites by plants are a natural plant defense mechanism against pathogen infection (Wink, 2003; Kliebenstein, 2004). Plants possess extensive qualitative and quantitative bioactive molecule variations that are potentially therapeutic (Oksman-Caldentey and Inzé, 2004; Gershenzon and Dudareva, 2007). Research into the biological activity of crude extracts, essential oils, and metabolites obtained from plants has demonstrated a capacity to control various fungal phytopathogens (Isman, 2000; Lazzeri and Manici, 2000; Wedge et al., 2000; Apablaza et al., 2002; Park et al., 2008).
Drimys winteri J.R Forst. & G. Forst. is an arboreal species of the Winteraceae family, and its metabolites have demonstrated important biological activity against microorganisms and insects (Muñoz et al., 2001; Zapata et al., 2009). Its bark contains drimane-type sesquiterpenes (Rodríguez et al., 2005), as well as abundant essential oils (Barrero et al., 2000).
This research study sought to evaluate the in vitro activity of D. winteri bark and its extracts, sequentially extracted with n-hexane, acetone, and methanol, on the growth of Ggt mycelium to establish the groundwork for alternatives to control phytopathogens affecting wheat crops.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Stem bark of adult D. winteri trees was collected during March 2007 (Ñuble Province, Chile). A voucher specimen has been placed in the Herbarium of the Faculty of Agronomy, Universidad de Concepción, Chile. Fresh bark was carefully and extensively washed with distilled water to remove any debris. It was then oven-dried (FD 115 Binder, Tuttlingen, Germany) at 35 °C. Once dried, stem bark was ground to less than 2.0 mm (MF10, IKA, Staufen, Germany), and stored at 4 °C in hermetic plastic containers.
Dried ground D. winteri bark (20 g) was sequentially extracted (from low to high polarity) at room temperature for 48 h with n-hexane (400 mL), 24 h with acetone (400 mL), and 48 h with methanol (400 mL). Each extract was dried in a rotary evaporator at 35° (R-210A, Buchi, Flawil, Switzerland). Extracts were then stored at 4 °C until used in experiments. Extraction yields were: n-hexane = 16.4%, acetone = 10.9% and methanol = 3.6%.
Gaeumannomyces graminis var. tritici was provided by Dr. Orlando Andrade from the Instituto de Investigaciones Agropecuarias INIA Carillanca, Chile. The pathogen grew in potato dextrose agar (PDA) medium and maintained in a growth chamber at 24 ± 1 °C during the experiments.
Experiment with ground bark
In order to determine whether D. winteri ground bark would have an inhibitory effect on Ggt growth in vitro , growth media were prepared by mixing crushed bark with PDA at concentrations of 250, 500, 1000, 2000, and 4000 mg L-1. The mixture was sterilized in an autoclave for 15 min at 121 °C. Medium growths were poured into sterile 100 mm diameter Petri plates, subsequently were inoculated in the center with a 5 mm diameter disk of actively growing Ggt mycelium. Plates were incubated at 24 ± 1 °C in all the experiments. Five replicates were established for treatment, including a control (PDA alone).
Experiments with extracts
Experiments were conducted with each of the extracts (n-hexane, acetone, and methanol). In each experiment, extract was added to the growth medium (PDA) at concentrations of 100, 200, 400, and 800 mg L-1. Bioassays were developed with 100 mm diameter Petri plates. To ensure homogeneous dispersion in the growth medium, extracts were resuspended in ethanol at 1% of total PDA volume before the experiments. Petri plates remained in the incubation chamber for 24 h to facilitate ethanol evaporation from the medium and avoid subsequent potential toxic effects on Ggt. Plates were inoculated in the center with a 5 mm diameter disk of actively growing Ggt mycelium and incubated at 24 ± 1 °C. Five replicates were established for each treatment, including an absolute control (PDA alone) and a partial control (PDA + 1% ethanol).
The four axes of mycelial radial growth in all the experiments were measured daily until the control reached the edge of the plate. Growth rates for each treatment were determined from these measurements. Mycelial growth inhibition (MGI) index was determined in each experiment on the eighth day of assessment as follows: MGI = [(MGC-MGT)/MGC] x 100, where MGC is mycelial growth (cm) in the control, and MGT is growth of mycelium treated with ground bark or extracts. In experiments with extracts, MGI was calculated with the partial control. We also determined the ground bark or extract concentration needed to inhibit Ggt mycelial growth at 50% (MGI50) and 90% (MGI90).
The experimental design for all experiments was completely randomized. Growth rates (simple regression slopes) were compared by the Tukey test. MGI data were subjected to ANOVA, and mean comparison was performed by the Tukey test (P ≤ 0.05) to determine significant differences among concentrations. MGI50 and MGI90 were determined by linear regression analysis with percentage MGI to the logarithm of the applied concentration (Jin et al., 2004). We used Statgraphics Plus Version 5.0 software (STSC, 1987) for data analysis.
Effects of ground bark on Ggt growth
According to the results obtained in this study, D. winteri bark exhibited a high inhibitive capacity on Ggt mycelial growth because bark concentration in PDA increased (Tables 1 and 2). The growth rate was significantly lower than the control when growth medium was amended with 1000 mg L-1 ground bark; similarly, growth rate decreased significantly from 1000 to 2000 mg L-1 bark. The growth rate did not vary significantly when concentrations of 2000 and 4000 mg L-1 ground bark were applied (Table 1).
There was virtually no Ggt growth in PDA media treated with 2000 and 4000 mg L-1 ground bark. Cumulative 8 d growth in the medium treated with 2000 mg L-1 bark barely reached 0.14 cm, and there was no growth with 4000 mg L-1. Growth (only PDA) during this same time period totaled 3.8 cm, indicating a 96.26% growth inhibition for the 2000 mg L-1 concentration. Inhibiting Ggt growth by 50% required a 978 mg L-1 bark concentration, whereas 90% required a 2760 mg L-1 concentration (Table 2).
Effects of extracts on Ggt growth
Extracts, sequentially obtained with n-hexane, acetone, and methanol, significantly inhibited Ggt mycelial growth. Moreover, extracts with n-hexane and acetone exhibited higher suppressive activity. When extract concentration in PDA medium was increased, Ggt growth decreased (Tables 3 and 4). When PDA growth medium was treated with extracts obtained with n-hexane or acetone, the growth rate was significantly lower than the controls, even at the lowest evaluated concentration (100 mg L-1). The methanol extract only significantly reduced Ggt growth rate when applied at 800 mg L-1. Control (PDA or ethanol) growth rates were not significantly different (Table 3).
N-hexane extract caused an inhibition halo of 30.19% when applied at a 100 mg L-1 concentration in PDA medium, but inhibition increased to 97.84% at 800 mg L-1. Similar rates were observed with the acetone extract which inhibited growth by 25.19% at a 100 mg L-1 concentration, and 89.28% at 800 mg L-1. However, this trend was not observed with methanol extract which only achieved a growth inhibition of 3.20% when applied at 100 mg L-1 and 33.46% at 800 mg L-1. According to our data, a 198 mg L-1 concentration of n-hexane extract was necessary to inhibit Ggt growth by 50% and 672 mg L-1 to reach 90%. To achieve similar results with the acetone extract, concentrations of 234 and 792 mg L-1, respectively, were required (Table 4).
The suppression of Ggt growth is quite possible with plant compounds, such as flavonoids (Weidenbörner and Jha, 1997), saponins from the Quillaja saponaria Molina tree (Vissuetti, 2004), and saponins (avenacin) in oat roots (Crombie, 1999). These plant compounds, as well as sesquiterpenes from Artemisia sieversiana Ehrh. (Tang et al., 2000), have demonstrated suppressive Ggt growth activity.
Promising results from the study of D. winteri bark on Ggt indicate that the trees compounds have high fungicide activity (Monsálvez et al., 2010). Without extraction, D. winteri ground bark has growth inhibitory effects on Ggt at very low concentrations (< 0.4%). These results are consistent with other studies in which the incidence of soil pathogens with was reduced tree bark, although those concentrations were higher than in this study (Spencer and Benson, 1982; Hoitink and Fahy, 1986; Huang and Kuhlman, 1991; Yu and Komada, 1999). It is important to consider the possible phytotoxic effect on cultivation when crushed bark is added to growth substrates (Hoitink and Fahy, 1986). The low bark concentration used to stop Ggt growth in this study should not be a serious problem. Nonetheless, phytotoxic activity and its actual in vivo effect should be considered in future trials.
The advantage of using D. winteri ground bark to reduce Ggt incidence in wheat crops and other phytopathogenic soil is the low cost of processing the ground bark, thus making it a sustainable agricultural production system. The barks protective effects may be lasting, since the release of active compounds into the growth substrate depends on decomposition (Anaya, 2006).
The low polarity compounds present in D. winteri bark could be responsible for high growth inhibition activity against Ggt. Since bark was extracted sequentially with n-hexane, acetone, and methanol (from low to high polarity), it showed decreasing activity. Activity against the fungus observed in this study using extracts of low polarity is not unique to this species of the Drimys genus; extracts of low polarity obtained from Drimys brasiliensis Miers bark also have high antifungal activity (Malheiros et al., 2005).
Sesquiterpenes are the low polarity compounds abundant in D. winteri bark (Jansen and Groot, 2004). These compounds represent a large group possessing a broad spectrum of biological activity, and they apparently play an important role in the plant defense mechanism (Fraga, 2002). The main sesquiterpenes identified in D. winteri extracts obtained with n-hexane are of the drimane type (Rodríguez et al., 2005; Zapata et al., 2009). Among these drimanes, polygodial has the highest concentration in D. winteri dried bark (8.15%) (Rodríguez et al., 2005).
However, the role of polygodial, or other sesquiterpenes of the drimane type present in D. winteri bark in the observed activity on Ggt must still be determined. Given the abundant research on antifungal activity, we believe that polygodial or other sesquiterpenes of the drimane type are involved. Polygodial has shown potent antifungal activity against yeast fungi: Candida albicans, C. utilis, C. krusei, Cryptococcus neoformans, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, and Pityrosporum ovale (Kubo and Taniguchi, 1988; Himejima and Kubo, 1993; Kubo 1993; Lee et al., 1999). Polygodial is also capable of inhibiting growth of the filamentous fungi Epidermophyton floccosum, Trichophyton mentagrophytes, T. rubrum, and Penicillium marneffei (Lee et al., 1999; Malheiros et al., 2005).
In light of the results obtained in this preliminary study, we believe it is very important to further investigate compounds with antifungal activity, as well as to determine their effectiveness both in vivo and in the field. Possible strategies for extract formulation and implementation in the field must be further explored.
Ground bark and its crude extracts obtained sequentially with n-hexane, acetone, and methanol from D. winteri bark,inhibit the growth of wheat take-all (Gaeumannomyces graminis var. tritici) when applied in vitro. The n-hexane extract showed the highest inhibitory growth activity.
We thank O. Andrade from INIA-Carillanca for facilitating the Ggt isolate. This study was funded by the Fondo Nacional de Desarrollo Científico y Tecnológico (FONDECYT Project N° 11070060). M. Vargas thanks CONICYT PBCYT PSD05 Project.
Agrios, G. 2004. Plant pathology. Academic Press, San Diego, California, USA. [ Links ]
Anaya, A. 2006. Allelopathic organisms and molecules: Promising bioregulators for the control of plant diseases, weeds, and other pests. p. 31-78. In Inderjit, K.M., and K.G. Mukerji (eds.) Allelochemicals: Biological control of plant pathogens and diseases. Springer Verlag, Dordrecht, The Netherlands. [ Links ]
Andrade, O. 2004. Efectividad de diferentes desinfectantes de semilla sobre la pudrición radical (Gaeumannomyces graminis var. tritici) del trigo en el sur de Chile. Agricultura Técnica 64:111-126. [ Links ]
Apablaza, G. 1999. Patología de los cultivos, epidemiología y control holístico. Ediciones Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile. [ Links ]
Apablaza, G., M. Díaz, R. San Martín, and E. Moya. 2002. Control de oídio de las cucurbitáceas con saponinas presentes en extractos de Quillay (Quillaja saponaria). Ciencia e Investigación Agraria 29:83-90. [ Links ]
Barrero, A., M. Herrador, P. Arteaga, A. Lara, and M. Cortés. 2000. Chemical composition of the essential oil from Drimys winteri Forst. wood. Journal of Essential Oil Research 12:685-688. [ Links ]
Campillo, R., O. Andrade, and E. Contreras. 2001. Variaciones del contenido de Mn de dos suelos sometidos a esterilización y su efecto sobre la pudrición radical o mal del pie del trigo. Agricultura Técnica 61:339-351. [ Links ]
Capper, A., and P. Higgins. 1993. Application of Pseudomonas fluorescens isolates to wheat as potential biological control agents against take-all. Plant Pathology 42:560-567. [ Links ]
Cook, R. 2003. Review take-all of wheat. Physiological and Molecular Plant Pathology 62:73-86. [ Links ]
Cook, R., D. Weller, A. Youssef El-Banna, D. Vakoch, and H. Zhang. 2002. Yield responses of direct-seeded wheat to rhizobacteria and fungicide seed treatments. Plant Disease 86:780-784. [ Links ]
Crombie, L. 1999. Natural product chemistry and its part in the defence against insects and fungi in agriculture. Pesticide Science 55:761-774. [ Links ]
Cunfer, B., G. Buntin, and D. Phillips. 2006. Effect of crop rotation on take-all of wheat in double-cropping systems. Plant Disease 90:161-1166. [ Links ]
Dori, S., Z. Solel, and I. Barash. 1995. Cell wall degrading enzymes produced by Gaeumannomyces graminis var. tritici. Physiological and Molecular Plant Pathology 46:189-198. [ Links ]
Fraga, B. 2002. Natural sesquiterpenoids. Natural Product Reports 19:650-672. [ Links ]
Gershenzon, J., and N. Dudareva. 2007. The function of terpene natural products in the natural world. Nature Chemical Biology 3:408-414. [ Links ]
Himejima, M., and I. Kubo. 1993. Fungicidal activity of polygodial in combination anethole and indole against Candida albicans. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 41:1776-1779. [ Links ]
Hoitink, H., and P. Fahy. 1986. Basis for the control of soilborne plant pathogens with composts. Annual Review of Phytopathology 24:93-114. [ Links ]
Hornby, D. 1998. Take-all disease of cereals: A regional perspective. CAB International, Wallingford, UK. [ Links ]
Huang, J., and E. Kuhlman. 1991. Formulation of a soil amendment to control damping-off of slash pine seedlings. Phytopathology 81:163-170. [ Links ]
Isman, M. 2000. Plant essential oils for pest and disease management. Crop Protection 19:603-608. [ Links ]
Jansen, B., and A. Groot. 2004. Occurrence, biological activity and synthesis of drimane sesquiterpenoids. Natural Product Report 21:449-477. [ Links ]
Jin, J., D. Adams, Y. Ko, C. Yu, and C. Lin. 2004. Aviglycines and propargylglycine inhibit conidial germination and mycelial growth of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. luffae. Mycopathologia 158:369-375. [ Links ]
Kim, D., R. Cook, and D. Weller. 1997. Bacillus sp. L324-92 for biological control of three root diseases of wheat grown with reduced tillage. Phytopathology 87:551-558. [ Links ]
Kliebenstein, D. 2004. Secondary metabolites and plant/environment interactions: a view through Arabidopsis thaliana tinged glasses. Plant Cell and Environment 27:675-684. [ Links ]
Kubo, I. 1993. Anethole, a synergist of polygodial and warburganal against Candida albicans. Acta Horticulturae 332:191-198. [ Links ]
Kubo, I., and M. Taniguchi. 1988. Polygodial, an antifungal potentiator. Journal of Natural Products 51:22-29. [ Links ]
Latorre, B. 2004. Enfermedades de las plantas cultivadas. Ediciones Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile. [ Links ]
Lazzeri, L., and L. Manici. 2000. The glucosinolate-myrosinase system: a natural and practical tool for biofumigation. Acta Horticulturae 532:89-96. [ Links ]
Lee, S., J. Lee, C. Lunde, and I. Kubo. 1999. In vitro antifungal susceptibilities of Candida albicans and other fungal pathogens to polygodial, a sesquiterpene dialdehyde. Planta Medica 65:204-208. [ Links ]
Madariaga, R., and M. McMahon. 1981. Prospección del mal del pie (Gaeumannomyces graminis var. tritici) en la precordillera de Ñuble y Bío Bío. Simiente 51:28-32. [ Links ]
Malheiros, A., V. Cechinel, C. Schmitt, R. Yunes, A. Escalante, L. Svetaz, et al. 2005. Antifungical activity of drimane sesquiterpenes from Drymis brasiliensis using bioassay-guided fractionation. Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences 8:335-339. [ Links ]
Monsálvez, M., N. Zapata, M. Vargas, M. Berti, M. Bittner, and V. Hernández. 2010. Antifungal effects of n-hexane extract and essential oil of Drimys winteri bark against Take-All disease. Industrial Crops and Products 31:239-244. [ Links ]
Muñoz, O., M. Montes, and T. Wilkomirsky. 2001. Plantas medicinales de uso en Chile. Editorial Universitaria, Santiago, Chile. [ Links ]
Oksman-Caldentey, K., and D. Inzé. 2004. Plant cell factories in the post-genomic era: new ways to produce designer secondary metabolites. Trends in Plant Science 9:433-440. [ Links ]
Park, L., J. Kim, Y. Lee, and S. Shin. 2008. In vivo fungicidal activity of medicinal plant extracts against six phytopathogenic fungi. International Journal of Pest Management http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/title~content=t713797655~db=all~tab=issueslist~branches=54 - v54 54:63-68.
Rodríguez, B., N. Zapata, P. Medina, and E. Viñuela. 2005. Spectral assignments and reference data. Magnetic Resonance in Chemistry 43:82-84. [ Links ]
Spencer, S., and D. Benson. 1982. Pine bark, hardwood bark compost, and peat amendment effects on development of Phytophthora spp. and lupine root rot. Phytopathology 72:346-351. [ Links ]
STSC. 1987. User´s guide Statgraphics. Graphic Software System. STSC Inc., Rockville, Maryland, USA. [ Links ]
Tang, H., J. Hu, L. Yang, and R. Tan. 2000. Terpenoids and flavonoids from Artemisia species. Planta Medica 66:391-393. [ Links ]
Vissuetti, Z. 2004. Evaluación de dos métodos para determinar la retención de extractos de quillay en el suelo y evaluación del efecto de control de este sobre Gaeumannomyces graminis var. tritici en trigo. Tesis Mg.Cs. Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile. [ Links ]
Wedge, D., J. Galindo, and F. Macías. 2000. Fungicidal activity of natural and synthetic sesquiterpene lactone analogs. Phytochemistry 53:747-757. [ Links ]
Weidenbörner, M., and HC. Jha. 1997. Antifungal spectrum of favone and favanone tested against 34 different fungi. Mycological Research 101:733-736. [ Links ]
Wiese, M. 1987. Compendium of wheat diseases. The American Phytopatological Society, St. Paul, Minnesota, USA. [ Links ]
Wink, M. 2003. Evolution of secondary metabolites from an ecological and molecular phylogenetic perspective. Phytochemistry 64:3-19. [ Links ]
Wong, P., J.A. Mead, and M. Holley. 1996. Enhanced field control of wheat take-all using cold tolerant isolates of Gaeumannomyces graminis var. graminis and Phialophora sp. (lobed hyphopodia). Plant Pathology 45:285-293. [ Links ]
Yu, J., and H. Komada 1999. Hinoki (Chamaecyparis obtusa) bark, a substrate with anti-pathogen properties that suppress some root diseases of tomato. Scientia Horticulturae 81:13-24. [ Links ]
Zapata, N., F. Budia, E. Viñuela, and P. Medina. 2009. Antifeedant and growth inhibitory effects of extracts and drimanes of Drimys winteri stem bark against Spodoptera littoralis (Lep., Noctuidae). Industrial Crops and Products 30:119-125. [ Links ]
Accepted: 12 August 2010.