Services on Demand
- Cited by SciELO
- Access statistics
- Cited by Google
- Similars in SciELO
- Similars in Google
On-line version ISSN 0718-560X
Lat. Am. J. Aquat. Res. vol.40 no.1 Valparaíso Mar. 2012
Lat. Am. J. Aquat. Res., 40(1): 236-242, 2012
First record of Hydrolagus melanophasma James, Ebert, Long & Didier, 2009 (Chondrichthyes, Chimaeriformes, Holocephali) from the southeastern Pacific Ocean
Primer registro de Hydrolagus melanophasma James, Ebert, Long & Didier, 2009 (Chondrichthyes, Chimaeriformes, Holocephali) en el Océano Pacífico suroriental
Carlos Bustamante1,2, Hernán Flores2, Yhon Concha-Pérez2, Carolina Vargas-Caro2,Julio Lamilla2 & Mike Bennett1
1 School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Queensland St Lucia, Queensland 4072, Australia.
2Laboratorio de Elasmobranquios (ELASMOLAB), Instituto de Ciencias Marinas y Limnológicas Universidad Austral de Chile, P.O. Box 567, Valdivia, Chile.
ABSTRACT. The eastern Pacific black ghost shark, Hydrolagus melanophasma is reported from deep waters off Chile and is described from specimens collected off Valdivia at depths of 1150 to 1720 m. This species is distinguished from all other members of the genus by its large, curved dorsal fin spine, which extends beyond the dorsal fin apex; a second dorsal fin of uniform height along the caudal peduncle; large pectoral fins extending beyond the pelvic fin insertion; and a uniform black color of the body. Catch records of this species in Chile suggest a discontinuous distribution along the continental slope of the eastern Pacific Ocean, restricted to the Middle America and Atacama trenches. These observations elevate the number of chimaeroid fishes inhabiting Chile to five species.
Keywords: chimera, Hydrolagus melanophasma, zoogeography, cartilaginous fishes, Chile, southeastern Pacific.
RESUMEN. La quimera negra del Pacífico este, Hydrolagus melanophasma es reportada desde aguas profundas frente a Chile y se describe a partir de especímenes colectados en Valdivia en profundidades ente 1150 y 1720 m. Esta especie se diferencia de los otros miembros del género por su larga y curvada espina dorsal, la cual se extiende más allá del ápice de la aleta dorsal; presenta una segunda aleta dorsal de altura uniforme a lo largo del pedúnculo caudal; grandes aletas pectorales que se proyectan sobre la inserción de las aletas pélvicas, además de su coloración negra uniforme en el cuerpo. Los registros de captura de esta especie en Chile sugieren una distribución discontinua a lo largo del talud continental del océano Pacifico este, restringido a las fosas oceánicas de Atacama y Mesoamérica. Estas observaciones aumentan a cinco el número de especies de peces Chimaeriformes que habitan aguas chilenas
Palabras clave: quimera, Hydrolagus melanophasma, zoogeografía, peces cartilaginosos, Chile, Pacífico suroriental.
Three families of chimaerid fishes (Chimaera: Holo-cephali) are currently recognized with at least 43 extant species (Didier, 2008). The Family Callor-hinchidae with three species restricted to the Southern Hemisphere is the least numerous. The Family Rhinochimaeridae known as "longsnout" or "long-nosed" chimaera, contains three genera and eight species distributed discontinuously in the great oceans. The Family Chimaeridae, with two genera distinguished by the presence, in Chimaera, or absence, in Hydrolagus, of an anal fin. The Chimaera genus contains 11 extant species, and Hydrolagus contains 21 valid species to date (Eschmeyer & Fricke, 2010). Fourteen of the Hydrolagus species are known to occur in the Pacific Ocean, of which ten have a distribution restricted to the western Pacific (Didier, 2004; Andrade & Pequeño, 2006; Barnett et al., 2006; Quaranta et al., 2006). In the eastern Pacific by comparison only six species of Hydrolagus has been reported: two possibly endemic to the Galapagos Islands; two restricted to the coast of Chile and Peru, and two inhabiting the north Pacific off the coast of Mexico and California (Didier, 2008).
In Chile, the number of holocephalans has increased from one, prior to 1950, to four in the present. The first species described for Chile was the elephantfish Callorhinchus callorynchus (Linnaeus, 1758) by Philippi (1893). The bigeye chimaera Hydrolagus macro-phthalmus De Buen, 1959; was described from the continental slope of central Chile and the Pacific spookfish Rhinochimaera pacifica (Mitsukuri, 1895), was reported by Pequeño (1989) from the deep continental slope in central Chile. Recently Andrade & Pequeño (2006) reported the pale ghost shark Hydrolagus pallidus Hardy & Stehmann, 1990; from the Juan Fernández seamounts (ca. 33°S, 77°W) in the bycatch of the orange roughy Hoplosthethus atlanticus Collett, 1889, trawl fishery.
Despite the increased fishing effort in the last 20 years, distribution patterns of chimaerid fishes in the southeastern Pacific are poorly known. Along the Chilean coast are caught as bycatch in trawl, coastal gillnets or longline fisheries; but its capture never is reported or landed (Lamilla et al., 2008) with exception of the artisanal, coastal gillnet fishery targeting C. callorhynchus (Cubillos et al., 2009).
In June 2009, three chimaerid fishes, one male and two females, were incidentally caught during commercial bottom longline fishery targeting the Patagonian toothfish (Dissostichus eleginoides Smitt, 1898) on board L/M Pamela II. Seventeen hauls were made during the cruise, but chimaeroid fishes were caught in three separate occasions along with 121 specimens of eleven elasmobranch species (Lamilla et al., 2010). Additionally, four specimens were bycatch from one haul by the same vessel during November 2009, as indicated in Table 1.
|Table 1. Geographical position of captured specimens. |
Tabla 1. Ubicación geográfica de los especímenes capturados.
Chimaeridae (Didier, 2004). 30 body measurements and eight head lateral-line canals measurements were taken point to point using a dial caliper (0.01 mm) or measuring tape (1 mm). Definition of measurements and their acronyms are based on Compagno et al. (1990), Didier & Nakaya (1999) and Didier & Séret (2002): total length (TL), precaudal length (PCL), body length (BDL), snout-vent length (SVL), trunk length (TRL), head length (HDL), pre-oral length (POR), prenarial length (PRN), pre-orbital length (POB), eye length (EYL), eye height (EYH), pre-first dorsal length (PD1), pre-second dorsal length (PD2), length of first dorsal fin base (D1B), dorsal spine height (DSA), maximum height of first dorsal fin (D1H), maximum height of second dorsal fin (D2H), interdorsal space (IDS), dorsal caudal margin length (CDM), maximum height of dorsal lobe of caudal fin (CDH), total caudal length (CTL), ventral caudal margin (CVM), maximum height of ventral lobe of caudal fin (CVH), caudal peduncle height (CPH, pectoral fin anterior margin (P1A), posterior base of pectoral fin to anterior base of pelvic fin (P2P), pelvic-caudal space (PCA), origin of first dorsal fin to origin of pectoral fin (D1P1), origin of first dorsal fin to origin of pelvic fin (D1P2), origin of second dorsal fin to origin of pelvic fin (D2P2). In the lateral-line canals of head: distance from anterior oronasal fold to center of nasal canal (ONC), length of the rostral canal (LRC), length of the nasal canal measured as a straight line distance from right to left side (LNC), distance between infraorbital and angular canal measured as the straight line distance from junction of the oral and infraorbital canal to the junction of the oral and angular canal (IOA), distance between preopercular canal and main trunk canal measured from their junction with the infraorbital canal (OTM), distance between main trunk canal and supratemporal canal measured from their junctions with the infraorbital and postorbital canals, respectively (OCL), length of supratemporal canal measured across the head from its junctions with the postorbital canal (STL), distance from anterior base of spine to the center of the supratemporal canal (SPS).
Sexual maturity in males was determined by its secondary sexual characteristics (Didier, 2004) such as, the emergence of the frontal tenaculum, hardened pelvic claspers and denticles present on frontal tenaculum, prepelvic tenacula and pelvic claspers. Females were considered mature when vitellogenic (yellow) ovarian follicles or distended oviductal openings were present (Ebert, 2003). Specimens were fixed in 10% formaldehyde, stored in 70% ethanol and deposited at the Ichthyology Collection (IZUA-PM) belonging to the Universidad Austral de Chile (UACH) and contrasted with descriptions provided by James et al. (2009). For comparison purposes, the specimen described by Andrade & Pequeño (2006) identified as H. pallidus (PM-IZUA 2341), was examined due to similarities in its external morphology.
All chimaerid fishes were assigned to the genus Hydrolagus on the basis of a ventral caudal fin that was not deeply indented at its origin to form a separate anal fin. All specimens were consistent with the diagnosis for H. melanophasma (Fig. 1), according James et al. (2009). The shape and arrangement of the lateral-line canals of the head; the slightly curved spine of the first dorsal fin, serrated in the posterior margin and greater than the height of the fin; the uniform height of the second dorsal fin; the size of pectoral fins extending beyond insertion of pelvic fins; the trifid clasper which forks about a quarter of the total length and a black uniform coloration which differentiates this species from others described in the region.
Freshly-caught specimens had a uniform dark purple-black body coloration that turned pale after fixation, darker on ventral part of snout, head and trunk. Paired and unpaired fins were black even after fixation. Morphometric measurements are presented in Table 2 and are expressed as percentage of body length (BDL).
Hydrolagus melanophasma is characterized by large-bodied specimens (adults BDL > 705 mm) with a blunt snout that continues the line from the orbit to the tip of the snout; eyes of moderate size, length 19.5% of head length. Snout-vent length is short, 64.6% BDL, slightly bigger than the pelvic-caudal space, 58.2% BDL. Pectoral-pelvic space, 36% BDL, is one-half snout-vent length. Skin firm and robust, not deciduous as in some Hydrolagus (Didier, 2002, 2008). Pectoral fins large, triangular, anterior margin 41.3% BDL that extends to or beyond pelvic fin insertion. Straight anterior margin of pelvic fins and posterior margin strongly convex. First dorsal fin preceded by prominent, slightly curved dorsal spine attached to the first dorsal fin; dorsal fin spine long, 28.5% BDL, larger than first dorsal fin apex. Posterior edge of spine serrated for last 6.3% of spine length. Dorsal spine and first dorsal fin overlap with the second dorsal fin when laid flat. First dorsal fin triangular, base short 20.9% BDL with concave posterior margin. Second dorsal fin long and uniform in height throughout body. Depth of second dorsal fin, 4.5% BDL, is greater than depth of dorsal lobe of caudal fin, 3.0% BDL. There is no measurable separation between insertion of the second dorsal fin and the origin of the caudal fin dorsal lobe. Depth of dorsal and ventral caudal fin lobes is nearly equal. Ventral lobe of caudal fin extends beyond the insertion of the dorsal lobe of caudal fin. No anal fin.
Trifid claspers present in mature males along with frontal tenaculum and prepelvic tenacula. Claspers forked and extend beyond distal edge of pelvic fins. The prepelvic tenacula have four to five denticles along the medial edge. Frontal tenaculum with indistinct rows of 32 pointed, needle-like denticles.
The head lateral line canals are open grooves with wide dilation on the snout. There is a distinct space between the preopercular and oral canals where they branch separately from the infraorbital canal (Fig. 2). The preopercular canal is discontinuous after it branches from the oral or infraorbital before breaking into consecutively smaller pieces. Lateral line canal measurements are presented in Table 3. Trunk lateral line extends the length of the body from junction with post-orbital to whip-like filament and is generally straight with no regular undulations.
Table 3. Morphometric measurements expressed as a proportion of head length (% HDL) of the head lateral line canals of Hydrolagus melanophasma.
Tabla 3. Mediciones morfométricas expresadas como proporción de la longitud de la cabeza (HDM%), de los canales de la línea lateral de la cabeza de Hydrolagus melanophasma.
Chimaerid fishes, especially species of Hydrolagus, are often difficult to distinguish because they look very similar and their geographic range often overlaps. The morphological characteristics of H. melanophasma clearly differentiate it from two other species of this genus occurring in the southeastern Pacific. The combination of characters, such as body colouration, length and serrations of dorsal spine, and lateral-line canals of the head; constitute useful means for a quick and easy distinction among Hydrolagus species.
Hydrolagus macrophthalmus differs from the H. melanophasma by a number of characters being most conspicuous, such as (a) the length of the dorsal spine, usually shorter or equal than length of the first dorsal fin; (b) larger eyes, 30% HDL; (c) preopercular and oral canals shares a short common branch from the infraorbital canal; and its (d) pale brown body coloration. H. melanophasma differs slightly from the H. pallidus specimen reported from Juan Fernandez seamounts; by its palegray coloration and morpho-metrics (Table 2). Observations onf the head lateral line canals and measurement of precaudal (PCL), pre-second dorsal (PD2), pre-oral (POR) length and the space between the pectoral and pelvic fins (P2P); considerably exceed the size range of the H. melanophasma original description and our observations.
H. pallidus was reported to island slopes of northeast Atlantic (Hardy & Stehmann, 1990) but this geographical divergence, its unusual discrepancy in distribution and the fact that no additional specimens of H. pallidus have been caught or reported from the Pacific allows us to recognize that the first assignment was inadequate. The only specimen (IZUA-PM 2341) reported by Andrade & Pequeño (2005), by its color and morphometrics, could correspond to the pointy-nose blue chimaera Hydrolagus trolli Didier & Séret, 2002 (D. Didier comm. pers.); described from the southwestern Pacific. Recent observations of H. trolli, from deep seamounts around Hawaii and off southern coast of California, raise questions about the species designation by Andrade & Pequeño (2005), which needs to be revised and supported by a comparative analysis to argue species identification.
Based on direct observations, we confirm the presence of H. melanophasma is confirmed for first time in the south Pacific Ocean. The eastern Pacific black ghost shark, H. melanophasma, was described from southern California (USA), along the Pacific coast of Baja California (Mexico) and into the Gulf California. Capture records of H. melanophasma in the southeastern Pacific from Caldera (25°S) (J. Lamilla unpublished data) to Valdivia (40°S) suggests a continuous distribution along the deep continental slope of the southeastern Pacific ocean, restricted to the Middle America and Atacama oceanic trenches.
The identification of H. melanophasma from Chilean waters increases the known Chimaeroid fish species of Chile to five: Hydrolagus macrophthalmus (Pequeño, 1989), H. cf. trolli (as H. pallidus in Andrade & Pequeño, 2005), H. melanophasma (as H. affinis in Lamilla & Bustamante, 2005), Callorhinchus callorynchus and Rhinochimaera pacifica (Pequeño, 1989).
We are very grateful to Oscar Gallo, Luis Fernandez and "L/M Pamela II" crew for provide the study material and all members of the ELASMOLAB involved in "Programa de Conservación de Tiburones (PCT)". Dominique Didier and two anonymous reviewers provided invaluable comments on an early version of the manuscript. This contribution was supported by Fondo de Investigación Pesquera (FIP) project N°2008-60; and Dirección de Investigación of Universidad Austral de Chile (DID-UACH). C. Bustamante was supported by CONICYT-Becas Chile and TUAP-Graduated School of The University of Queensland. This contribution received no specific grant from any funding agency, commercial or not-for-profit sector.
Andrade, I. & G. Pequeño. 2006. First record of Hydrolagus pallidus Hardy & Stehmann, 1990 (Chondrichthyes: Chimaeridae) in the Pacific Ocean, with comments on Chilean holocephalians. Rev. Biol. Mar. Oceanogr., 41(1): 111-115. [ Links ]
Barnett, L.K., D.A. Didier, D.J. Long & D.A. Ebert. 2006. Hydrolagus mccoskeri sp. nov., a new species of chimaeroid fish from the Galapagos Islands (Holocephali: Chimaeriformes: Chimaeridae). Zootaxa, 1328: 27-38. [ Links ]
Compagno, L.J.V., M. Stehmann & D.A. Ebert. 1990. Rhinochimaera africana, a new longnose chimaera from Southern Africa, with comments on the systematics and distribution of the genus Rhinochimaera Garman, 1901 (Chondrichthyes, Chimaeriformes, Rhinochimaeridae). S. Afr. J. Mar. Sci., 9: 201-222. [ Links ]
Cubillos, L., G. Aedo, M. Araya, R. Meléndez, R. Galleguillos & M. Pedraza. 2009. Estudio biológico-pesquero del recurso pejegallo entre la IV y X Regiones. Informe Final, Proyecto FIP N°2006-18: 126 pp. [ Links ]
Didier, D.A. 2004. Phylogeny and classification of extant Holocephali. In: J.C. Carrier, J.A. Musick & M.R. Heithaus (eds.). Biology of sharks and their relatives. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp. 115-135. [ Links ]
Didier, D.A. 2008. Two new species of the genus Hydrolagus Gill (Holocephali: Chimaeridae) from Australia. In: P.R. Last, W.T. White & J.J. Pogonoski (eds.). Descriptions of new australian chondrich thyans. CSIRO Mar. Atmosph. Res. Pap., 22: 349-356. [ Links ]
Didier, D.A. & B. Seret. 2002. Chimaeroid fishes of New Caledonia with description of a new species of Hydrolagus (Chondrichthyes, Holocephali). Cybium, 26(3): 225-233. [ Links ]
Didier, D.A. & K. Nakaya. 1999. Redescription of Rhinochimaera pacifica (Mitsukuri) and first record of R. africana Compagno, Stehmann & Ebert from Japan (Chimaeriformes: Rhinochimaeridae). Ichthyol. Res., 46(2): 139-152. [ Links ]
Ebert, D.A. 2003. Sharks, rays, and chimaeras of California. University of California Press: Berkeley, California, 284 pp. [ Links ]
Eschmeyer, W.N. & R. Fricke. 2010. Catalog of fishes electronic version [http://www.research.calacademy.org/ichthyology/catalog/fishcatsearch.html]. Reviewed: 25 March 2010. [ Links ]
Hardy, G.S. & M. Stehmann. 1990. A new deepwater ghost shark, Hydrolagus pallidus n. sp. (Holocephali, Chimaeridae), from the Eastern North Atlantic, and redescription of Hydrolagus affinis (Brito Capello, 1867). Arch. Fisch. Wiss., 40(3): 229-248. [ Links ]
James, K.C., D.A. Ebert, D.J. Long & D.A. Didier. 2009. A new species of chimaera, Hydrolagus melano-phasma sp. nov. (Chondrichthyes: Chimaeriformes: Chimaeridae), from the eastern North Pacific. Zootaxa, 2218: 59-68. [ Links ]
Lamilla, J., C. Bustamante, R. Roa, E. Acuña, F. Concha, R. Meléndez, S. López, G. Aedo, H. Flores & C. Vargas-Caro. 2010. Estimación del descarte de condrictios en pesquerías artesanales. Informe Final, Proyecto FIP N°2008-60: 259 pp. [ Links ]
Lamilla, J., R. Roa, P. Barría, C. Bustamante, F. Concha, E. Cortes, E. Acuña, F. Balbontín, M. Oliva, M. Araya & R. Meléndez. 2008. Desarrollo metodológico para la estimación del descarte de Condrictios en las pesquerías artesanales. Informe Final, Proyecto FIP N°2006-31: 246 pp. [ Links ]
Pequeño, G. 1989. Peces de Chile. Lista sistemática revisada y comentada. Rev. Biol. Mar. Oceanogr., 24(2): 1-132. [ Links ]
Philippi, R.A. 1892. Algunos peces de Chile: Las rayas, Callorhynchus i Orthagoriscus chilenos. An. Mus. Nac. Chile, Zool., 3: 1-16. [ Links ]
Quaranta, K.L., D.A. Didier, D.J. Long & D.A. Ebert. 2006. A new species of chimaeroid, Hydrolagus alphus sp. nov. (Chimaeriformes: Chimaeridae) from the Galapagos Islands. Zootaxa, 1377: 33-45. [ Links ]
Received: 19 January 2011; Accepted: 30 December 2011.
Corresponding author: Carlos Bustamante: (email@example.com)