- Citado por SciELO
- Citado por Google
- Similares en SciELO
- Similares en Google
versión On-line ISSN 0718-2791
R.C. Suelo Nutr. Veg. v.9 n.2 Temuco 2009
Rev. Cienc. Suelo Nutr. /J. Soil. Sci. Plant Nutr. 9(2): 116-124(2009)
CATALYTIC POTENTIAL OF SOIL HYDROLASES IN NORTHEAST CHINA UNDER DIFFERENT SOIL MOISTURE CONDITIONS
Y.L. Zhang1'2'4, Cc.X. Sun3, L.J. Chen1* and Z.H. Duan2
1Department of Soil and Plant Nutrition, Institute of Applied Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, P. O. Box417, 110016 Shenyang, People's Republic of China.2Cold and Arid Regions Environment and Engineering Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 3Institute of Biotechnology, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110004, People's Republic of China. 4Key Laboratory of Terrestrial Ecological Process, Institute of Applied Ecology, ChineseAcademy of Sciences, Shenyang 110016, People's Republic of China.*Corresponding author: firstname.lastname@example.org
An incubation test with black soil (Phaeozem), Albic soil (Albic Luvisols), brown soil (Cambisols), and cinnamon soil (Chromic Luvisol) from Northeast China was conducted under the conditions of 10%, 20% and30 % field capacity, and the kinetic parameters of soil urease, phosphatase, and arylsulphatase were determined, aimed to study the changes in the catalytic potential of these enzymes under different soil moisture conditions. All test enzymes exhibited typical Michaelis-Menten kinetic behaviors. The test enzymes exhibited the highest enzyme-substrate affinity (l/Km) at 20% or 30% field capacity. With increasing soil moisture content, the Fmax of test soil urease decreased, while that of soil phosphatase and arylsulphatase increased, with the maximum Vmax/Km of urease at 20% field capacity and that of phosphatases and arylsulphatase at 30% field capacity. To control soil moisture condition could be a feasible way in regulating the biochemical transformation processes of soil nutrients catalyzed by soil hydrolases.
Keywords: Soil enzymatic kinetic parameters, soil hydrolase, soil moisture condition
Soil hydrolases are a group of soil enzymes responsible for the catalytic hydrolysis of soil substances (Tabatabai and Bremner, 1971, 1972; Dick and Tabatabai, 1993; Asmar et al, 1994; Amador et al, 1997), among which, urease, phosphatase, and arylsulphatase catalyze the hydrolysis of soil amide N. organic P, and organic S, respectively. being of significance in the N, P, and S uptake by plants (Burns, 1978; Sarapatka and Krskova, 1997). Soil moisture regime had definite effects on the catalytic potential of soil enzymes (Ross, 1987; Garcia et al, 2002; Sardans and Penuelas. 2005). Engasser and Horvath (1976) reported that soil moisture content affects the movement of enzymes and their substrates in soil, while the diffusion limitation of the substrates may directly affect soil enzyme Km. Some researches (Burns, 1978; Ladd, 1985; Boyd and Mortland, 1990; Sardans and Penuelas, 2005) also showed that the changes in soil moisture content had significant effects on the kinetic parameters of soil hydrolases. Therefore, to measure the kinetic parameters of soil hydrolases under different soil moisture conditions will help to the understanding of the changes in the substrate affinity and the catalytic activity of soil hydrolases, and further, help to adopt appropriate measures to regulate soil moisture regime to maintain optimal hydrolase activities.
In this paper, black, albic, brown, and cinnamon soil, the main agricultural soils in Northeast China, were sampled, and an incubation test was conducted to study the catalytic potential of urease, phosphatase, and arylsulphatase as affected by different soil moisture conditions, aimed to approach the appropriate soil moisture regime for these enzymes.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Soil samples collection and preparation
Four sampling sites were installed (Table 1), and 0 - 20 cm soil samples over an approximately 1 ha at each site were collected in early spring before sowing.
In all cases, 50 - 60 subsamples collected were combined into a composite sample, transported to laboratory in isothermal bags, and passed through 2 -mm sieve after removing roots and plant debris. Parts of the subsamples (1000 g, n=3) of each composite sample were pre-incubated at ca. 60% WHC and 25°C for 14 d to stabilize the biological and biochemical characteristics before treatment, and the other parts were air-dried and 2 mm sieved for chemical and physical properties analysis. Some chemical and physical properties of test soils were shown in Table 2.
After pre-incubation, the prepared soil samples were aerobically incubated at room temperature for 14 d. Three treatments with triplicates were installed, i.e., 10%, 20% and 30% field capacity to simulate minimal, normal, and maximum soil humidity, respectively. Distilled water was added daily to compensate the water loss from incubation.
Soil chemical properties analysis
Soil moisture content was determined gravimetrically after oven-dried at 105°C, soil pH was determined by glass electrode (soil:water ratio, 1:2.5), soil total organic carbon and total nitrogen (N) were determined by CNS analyzer Elementar Vario EL III (Matejovic, 1995), soil total phosphorus was determined by UV Spectrophotometer (Carry 50, Varían, American) after digest, soil total sulphur (S) was determined by the turbidimetric method after magnesium nitrate oxidation (Fox, 1987), Alkali-hydrolyzed N was determined by boracic acid absorbing NH3 released by NaOH., soil available phosphorous (P) extractable with NaHC03 was determined by Olsen method (Kuo, 1996), and soil available sulfur was determined by the turbidimetric method after acetate and phosphate extraction (Fox, 1987). Particle size distribution was determined by Robinson pipette method and with Calgon as dispersan! These methods are described by Lu (2000).
Soil enzyme activities and kinetic parameters measurement
Enzyme substrates (urea, sodium p-nitrophenyl phosphate, and potassium p-nitrophenyl sulfate) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Inc., Seebio Biotech Inc., and J&K China Chemical Ltd., respectively.
Soil urease (EC 18.104.22.168, 37°C) activity was assayed by the method of Tabatabai and Bremner (1994). 6.0g soil samples were reacted with urea at 37°C for 5 h, and the amount of residual urea was determined by using diacetyl monoxime-antipyrine in KCl-acetic phenyl mercury extract. Soil phosphatases (orthophosphoric monoester phosphor-hydrolases, EC 22.214.171.124, pH 6.5, and EC 126.96.36.199, pH 11) activities and arylsulphatase (EC 188.8.131.52, pH 5.8) activity were also assayed by the method of Tabatabai and Bremner (1994). About 1 g soil sample was reacted with sodium p-nitrophenyl phosphate or potassium p-nitrophenyl sulfate at 37°C for 1 h, and the released p-nitrophenol was measured by colorimetry. All the measurements were performed at optimal pH. The same procedures in enzyme activities measurements were followed for the controls, but the substrates were added to the soil samples after incubation and prior to the analysis of residual substrate or reaction product.
The kinetic parameters Vmax (maximum enzyme velocity) and Km (substrate affinity constant) were calculated by using Michaelis-Menten equation. Seven concentrations (3, 5, 7, 10, 15, 20, and 30 mmol L-1) of urea solution, six (0.2, 0.5, 1, 5, 15, and 50 mmol L-1) of sodium p-nitrophenyl phosphate, and seven (0.5, 1, 5, 10, 15, 25, and 50 mmol L-1) of potassium p-nitrophenyl sulfate were used as the substrates of soil urease, phosphatase, and arylsulphatase, respectively. Each determination was also triplicated. The parameters were calculated by nonlinear regression of the statistical software origin 8.0.
The experiments followed a completely randomized design. All data were presented as the means of triplicate analyses of triplicate samples. All the values reported were expressed as per g oven-dried soil (105°C). The effects of soil moisture content were analyzed by variance analysis (one - way ANOVA), Least significant difference at p = 0. 05. (LSD) and Pearson correlation coefficients (r) were calculated by using SPSS 11.0.
Effects of soil moisture regime on soil hydrolases Km and Fmax Figure 1 showed that the 1/IKm and Fmax values of test soil enzymes varied with soil moisture content and soil type. The substrate affinity (l/Km) of soil urease increased with soil moisture content, with the peak at 30% field capacity in albic, brown, and cinnamon soils and at 20% field capacity in black soil. Soil phosphatase had the highest 1/Km at 10% filed capacity in albic soil, at 30% field capacity in brown and cinnamon soils, and at 20% and 30% field capacity in blank soil; while soil arylsulphatase had the highest 1/Km value at 10% field capacity in albic soil, at 20% field capacity in blank soil, and at 30% field capacity in brown and cinnamon soils.
The Vmax of soil urease was the highest at 10% field capacity in black, albic, and brown soils and at 20% field capacity in cinnamon soil. Soil phosphatase had the highest Vmax at 30% field capacity in blank and albic soils but nearly the same at all test field capacities in brown and cinnamon soils, while that of arylsulphatase was the highest at 30% field capacity in black and albic soils and at 10% field capacity in brown and cinnamon soils.
The 1/Km and Vmax had larger variations at 20% - 30% field capacity than at 10% - 20% field capacity, suggesting their different responses to different soil moisture regimes.
Effects of soil moisture regime on soil hydrolases catalytic efficiency (Vmax/Km)
It's shown in Table 2 that soil urease had higher Vmax/Km at 20% field capacity in black soil, at 10% and 30% field capacity in albic and brown soils and at 20% and 30% field capacity in cinnamon soil, soil phosphatase had higher Vmax/Km at 20% and 30% field capacity in black and cinnamon soils, at 10% and 30% field capacity in albic soil and at 30% field capacity in brown soil, and soil arylsulphatase had higher VmaxIKm at 20% and 30% field capacity in black soil and at 10% and 30% field capacity in albic and brown soils, but the same VmJKm at 10%, 20% and 30% field capacity in cinnamon soil.
In general, soil enzyme-substrate affinity (1/Km), similar to free enzyme (Balkan and Ertan, 2007), is increased with increasing soil moisture content because of the enhanced dissolution and translocation of the substrates (Zhou, 1987). However, increasing soil moisture content could decrease substrate concentration, resulting in the decrease of 1/Km. The different variation patterns of the 1/Km in test soils depended partly on how the soil moisture regime affected the distribution of the enzymes and their substrates (Boyd and Mortland, 1990).
Some studies suggested that soil enzyme activity was strongly affected by soil moisture regime (Skujins and Melaren, 1969; Delaune and Patrick, 1970; Kramer and Green, 2000; Wang and Lu, 2006; Yavitt, 2004). There was a significant correlation between soil phosphatase activity and moisture content (Harrison, 1983; Speir and Coling, 1991; Subhani, et al, 2000), and the rank correlation in the study of Bergstrom et al. (1998) indicated the significant relationships between soil enzyme activities (urease, phosphatase, and arylsulphatase etc.) and moisture content, which was further confirmed by this study.
The catalytic efficiency of soil enzymes Vmax/Km (Gianfreda et al, 1995) was highly affected by soil organic matter content and soil texture (Bery et al., 1978; Zaman et al, 1999; Garcia et al, 1993). Higher Vmax/Km of test soil enzymes was found in the test soils containing more organic matter and having better texture. In the meantime, less variation of Vmax/Km was observed in these soils under effects of different soil moisture condition because of the buffering effects of higher organic matter and clay particle contents.
The catalytic potential of test hydrolases in the main agricultural soils of Northeast China was affected by the soil moisture regime in some degree, depending on the organic matter content and texture of these soils. The soils with higher organic matter and clay particle contents had less variation of their catalytic potential under different soil moisture conditions. To control soil moisture condition could be a feasible way in regulating the biochemical transformation processes of soil nutrients catalyzed by soil hydrolases.
This study is supported by the National Basic Research Program (973 Program) (2007CB109307) and the Technology Supporting Program (2006BAD10B01) of China. We thank Professor Zhou LK for his critical review of our manuscript, and the staffs of Department Soil and Plant Nutrition, Institute of Applied Ecology under Chinese Academy of Sciences for their academic and technical assistance.
Amador, J.A., Glucksman, A.M., Lyons, J.B., Gorres, J.H. 1997. Spatial distribution of soil phosphatase activity within a riparian forest. Soil Science. 162, 808-825. [ Links ]
Asmar, R, Eiland, R, Nielsen, N.E. 1994. Effect of extracellular-enzyme activities on solubilization rate of soil organic nitrogen. Biology and Fertility of Soils. 17, 32-38. [ Links ]
Balkan, B., Ertan, R 2007. Production of a-Amylase from P. chrysogenum under Solid-State Fermentation by Using Some Agricultural byproducts. Food Technology and Biotechnology. 45 (4), 439 42. [ Links ]
Bergstrom, D.W., Monreal, CM., Millette, J. A., King, D.J. 1998. Spatial dependence of soil enzyme activities along a slope. Soil Science Society of America Journal. 62, 1302-308. [ Links ]
Bery, Viraj., Goswami, K.P., Brar, S.S. 1978. Urease activity and its Michaelis constant for soil systems. Plant and Soil. 4, 105-115. [ Links ]
Boyd, S.A., Mortland, M.M. 1990. Enzyme interactions with clays and clay-organic matter complexes. In Soil Biochemistry, Vol.6. Bollag J. M. and Stotzky G, Eds. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp 1-28. [ Links ]
Burns, R.G. 1978. Soil Enzymes. 8-250 p. New York: Academic Press. [ Links ]
Delaune, R.D., Whpatrick, J.R. 1970. Urea conversion to ammonia in waterlogged soils. Soil Science Society of America Proceeding. 34(4). 603-607. [ Links ]
Dick, W.A., Tabatabai, MA. 1993. Significance and potential uses of soil enzymes. In: Metting, F.B. Jr (Ed.), Soil Microbial Ecology. Marcel Decker Inc, New Yourk, USA. [ Links ]
Engasser, J.M, Horvath, C. 1976. Diffusion and kinetics with immobilized enzymes. In Applied Biochemistry and Bioengineering, Volume 1 Immobilised enzyme principles. Ed. Wingard L.B., Katchalski-Katzir E. and Goldstein L., pp 127-220. [ Links ]
Fox, RL, Hue, N.V., Parra, A.J. 1987. A Turbidimetric method for determining phosphate-extractable sulfates in tropical soils. Communication in Soil Science and Plant Analysis. 18(4), 343-357. [ Links ]
García, C, Hernández, T., Roldan, A., Martín, A. 2002. Effect of plant decline on chemical microbiological parameters under Mediterranean climate. Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 34, 635-642. [ Links ]
Gianfreda, L., De Cristofaro, A., Rao, M.A., Violante, A. 1995. Kinetic behavior of synthetic organo-and-organo-mineral-urease complexes. Soil Science Society of America Journal. 59, 811-815. [ Links ]
Harrison, A.F. 1983. Relationship between intensity of phosphatase activity and physico -chemical properties in woodland soils. Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 15, 93-99. [ Links ]
Kramer, S., Green, D.M. 2000. Acid and alkaline phosphatase dynamics and their relationship to soil microclimate in semiarid woodland. Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 32, 179- 188. [ Links ]
Kuo, S. 1996. Phosphorus. In: Sparks, D. L., et al. (Eds.), Methods of soil Analysis, Part 3, Chemical Methods. SSSA Book series No. 5. Soil Science of America, Madison, WI, pp. 869-919. [ Links ]
Ladd, J. N. 1985. Soil enzymes. In: Soil organic matter and biological activity. Vaughan D and Malcom RE. Eds. Nijhoff, Dordrecht, pp. 175-222. [ Links ]
Lu, R. K (Ed). 2000. Methods of soil and agro-chemistry analysis. Chinese Agricultural Science and Technology Press, Beijing (in Chinese). [ Links ]
Matejovic, I. 1995. Total nitrogen in plant material determined by means of dry combustion: a possible alternative to determination by Kjeldahl digestion. Communication in Soil Science and Plant Analysis. 26, 2217-2229. [ Links ]
Ross, D.J. 1987. Soil microbial biomass estimated by the fumigation-incubation procedure: Seasonal fluctuation and influence of soil moisture content. Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 19, 397-404. [ Links ]
Sardans, J., Penuelas, J. 2005. Drought decreases soil enzyme activity in a Mediterranean Quercus ilex L. forest. Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 37, 455-161. [ Links ]
Speir, T.W., Cowling, J.C. 1991. Phosphatase activities of pasture plants and soils: relationship with plant productivity and soil P fertility indices. Biology and Fertility of Soils. 12, 189-94. [ Links ]
Subhani, A., Liao, M., Huang, C.G., Xie, Z.M 2000. Effects of some management practices on electron transport system (ETS) activity in paddy soil. Pedosphere. 10(3):257-264. [ Links ]
Tabatabai, M.A. 1994. Soil enzymes. In: Weaver RW, Angle JR, Bottomley PS (Eds). Methods of soil analysis: microbiological and biochemical properties. Part 2. SSSA Book Ser. 5. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Madison, WI. 1994. pp. 775 -833. [ Links ]
Tabatabai, M.A., Bremner, J.M. 1971. Michaelis constant of soil enzymes. Soil Biology Biochemistry. 3, 317 - 323. [ Links ]
Tabatabai, MA., Bremner, J.M. 1972. Assay of urea activity in soils. Soil Biology Biochemistry. 4, 479-487. [ Links ]
Wang, X. C, Lu, Q. 2006. Effect of waterlogged and aerobic incubation on enzyme activities in paddy soil. Pedosphere. 16(4), 532-539. [ Links ]
Yavitt, J. B, Wright, S. J., Wieder, R. K. 2004. Seasonal drought and dry-season irrigation influence leaf-litter nutrients and soil enzymes in a moist, lowland forest. Panama Austral Ecology. 29, 177-188. [ Links ]
Zaman, M., Di, H.J., Cameron, K.C. 1999. A field study of gross of N mineralization and nitrification and their relationships to microbial biomass and enzyme activities in soils treated with dairy effluent an ammonium fertilizer. Soil Use Manage. 5, 188-194. [ Links ]
Zhou, L.K. 1987. Soil Enzymology. Beijing: Science Press (in Chinese). [ Links ]