- Citado por SciELO
- Citado por Google
- Similares en SciELO
- Similares en Google
versión On-line ISSN 0717-9707
J. Chil. Chem. Soc. vol.57 no.2 Concepción 2012
J. Chil. Chem. Soc., 57, N° 2 (2012), págs: 1109-1112.
ONE-POT SYNTHESIS OF HIGHLY LUMINESCENT CdTe QUANTUM DOTS USING SODIUM TELLURITE AS TELLURIUM SOURCE IN AQUEOUS SOLUTION
YILIN WANG, * SHENGYAN LIU
College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China. e-mail address: email@example.com
A novel technology has been developed for the synthesis of thioglycolic acid (TGA)-capped CdTe quantum dots (QDs) in aqueous medium. The reaction was carried out in air atmosphere with one-pot by using Na2TeO3 to replace Te or Al2Te3. The mechanism for the formation of CdTe QDs is elucidated. The influences of various experimental variables, including refluxing time, pH value, Cd/Te and Cd/TGA molar ratios, on the luminescent properties of the obtained CdTe QDs have been systematically investigated. Furthermore, the obtained QDs were characterized by fourier transform infrared spectra (FTIR), X-ray powder diffraction (XRD) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM), respectively. The results demonstrate that, under the optimized experimental conditions, the obtained CdTe QDs exhibited a narrow photoluminescence band (fwhm33-45 nm) with reproducible room-temperature quantum yields as high as 28 %, the emission color is tunable from green to orange with increasing diameter of QDs.
Keywords: cadmium tellurium, quantum dots, sodium tellurite, photoluminescence.
Because of their unique optical and electrical properties, CdTe QDs are of great interest in for both fundamental research and technical applications1-4. Up to now, many approaches, including organic synthesis5, 6 and aqueous synthesis7-10, have been developed for the preparation of CdTe QDs. Compared with organic synthesis, aqueous synthesis is more reproducible, cheaper, less toxic, and the as-prepared samples are more water-soluble and bio-compatible. Several improvements of the conventional aqueous synthetic method11 for thiol-capped CdTe QDs have been reported recently by different groups, including the hydrothermal synthesis12, ultrasonic13 or microwave14 irradiation. However, in most of the aqueous approaches, either Te powder15, 16 or Al2Te3 lump17, 18 is used as tellurium sources. When Te powder is used as a source of tellurium, it must first be reduced by NaBH4 to produce NaHTe (an unstable compound for its spontaneous oxidation in the presence of oxygen) precursor at lower temperature. Thus, the synthetic procedure involves in two steps, making tellurium precursor (NaHTe), and then synthesizing CdTe QDs. Although Al2Te3 as an alternative tellurium source can also be used for preparing CdTe QDs, it is moisture-sensitive, and the release of H2Te (a highly toxic and flammable gas) is inevitable in the process of preparation. Therefore, it is very necessary to hunt for a stable and less toxic tellurium source for the synthesis of CdTe QDs.
In our previous report19, we have provided an alternative approach to prepare TGA-capped CdTe QDs using tellurium dioxide as the Te source. Here we employ sodium tellurite as Te source to prepare TGA-capped CdTe QDs in air atmosphere. The influences of refluxing time, the pH value of the original solution, the Cd/Te molar ratio, and the Cd/TGA molar ratio on the luminescence properties of CdTe QDs were investigated systematically. We admit that similar tellurite (potassium tellurite) has been used in CdTe QDs synthesis20. However, reducing agent such as NaBH4 was not used in the preparation, and the experimental conditions were not optimized, the luminescence properties of the obtained CdTe QDs were not very good.
Thioglycolic acid (90 %), CdCl22.5H2O (99 %), NaBH4 (96 %) and Rhodamine 6G (with a photoluminescence quantum yield of 95 % in anhydrous ethanol) were obtained from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd (Shanghai, China), Na2TeO3 (97 %) was obtained from Aladdin Chemistry Co., Ltd (Shanghai, China). All chemicals were used as received without further purification. Double deionized water was used throughout the experiment.
In a typical procedure, 0.4567 g (2 mmol) CdCl22.5H2O was dissolved in 100 ml of deionized water in a 250-ml three-neck flask, and 0.2 ml thioglycolic acid (TGA) was added while stirring, followed by adjusting the pH to 11.5 with 1.0 molL-1 NaOH solution. After several minutes, excess NaBH4 (0.1 g) and 0.0222 g (0.1 mmol) Na2TeO3 was added successively into the above solution. The mixture was then refluxed at 100°C for different time to control the size of the CdTe QDs.
The absorption and photoluminescence spectra were measured using a UV-2102 spectrometer and a RF-5301 fluorescence spectrometer, respectively. FTIR spectra were recorded on a Nexus-470 spectrometer. X-ray powder diffraction was taken on a D/MAX 2500V diffractometer equipped with Cu Ka radiation (ë=0.15406 nm). The morphology measurement was performed using an H-7650 transmission electron microscopy.
Measurement of quantum yields
The photoluminescence quantum yield( QY) of CdTe QDs was measured according to the method described in ref.21, briefly, rhodamine6G was chosen as a reference standard (QY = 95%, in ethanol), the absorbance for the standard and the CdTe QDs samples at the excitation wavelength and the fluorescence spectra of the same solutions were measured, respectively. The expression to calculate quantum yield is provided as following:
in Eq.(1), the subscripts s and u denote standard (rhodamine 6G) and test samples, respectively, Y is quantum yield, F is the integrated emission peak area, and A is the absorbance at excitation wavelength.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Mechanism for the formation of CdTe QDs
The aqueous synthesis of QDs is often based on the Ostwald ripening phenomenon, and the formation of QDs in solution involves in two stages: nucleation and growth22. In this synthesis process, CdCl22.5H2O and Na2TeO3 were chosen as precursors, TGA was used as the capping ligand. The following mechanism is proposed to explain the formation of CdTe QDs. Firstly, cadmium thiol complexes were formed in the solution (Eq. (2)), when the TeO32- was added to the three-neck flask, it can be reduced by NaBH4 to give Te2- (Eq. (3)) that reacted with the Cd2+-TGA complexes, resulting in the formation of CdTe nuclear (Eq. (4)). With the CdTe nuclear growing gradually, the CdTe QDs were formed at last (Eq. (5)). In our experiments, we obtained TGA-capped CdTe QDs with tunable size-dependent emission from green to orange (Figure 1) by controlling the refluxing time.
|Figure1. Images of the as-prepared CdTe QDs illuminated under an ultraviolet lamp.|
Figure 2 shows typical absorption and PL spectra of a size series of CdTe QDs. The spectra were measured on as-prepared CdTe solutions which were taken from the refluxing reaction mixture at different intervals of time and diluted with water. It can be seen, all samples show a well-resolved excitonic absorption peak, indicating the formation of CdTe QDs with narrow size distribution. After 0.5 h refluxing, an excitonic absorption peak of CdTe QDs appeared at 475 nm, which shifted to longer wavelengths with increasing of reflux time. According to the empirical formula23:
where λ is the first absorption maximum. The mean diameter was estimated to 1.5 (0.5 h), 2.5 (1.5 h), 3.0 (3 h), 3.2 (5 h) and 3.4 nm (9 h), respectively. As described in Figure 2, with reflux time increasing from 0.5 h to 9 h, the PL spectra of CdTe QDs shifts from 509 nm to 582 nm, the full width at half maximum (FWHM) of the PL spectra is about 33 nm (λem = 509 nm) and increases up to 45 nm (λem = 582 nm) . The PL peaks are located close to the absorption thresholds, which indicate that the photoluminescence of CdTe QDs is attributed to band-edge or "excitonic" emission. The PLQY of the five samples were calculated to be 7.2 %, 22.3 %, 28.1 %, 28.0 % and 21.0 %, respectively. The obtained CdTe QDs exhibited high PLQY of 28 % at the emission wavelength of 553 and 566 nm. Such a QY is higher than that of TGA-capped CdTe QDs synthesized using Al2Te3 as the tellurium sources (10 %)11, and close to that of synthesized using Te powder as the tellurium sources (32 %)15.
It has been demonstrated that cadmium and thiol can form different polynuclear complexes in water and that the formation of cadmium thiol complexes strongly depends on pH of the solution24. According to ref.11, the recommended pH value for synthesis of TGA-capped CdTe is 11.2 to 11.8 while the proposed value for the Cd/TGA ratio is 1:2.45. In the present study, the influence of the pH value of the original solution on the optical properties of CdTe QDs was investigated firstly, and the obtained experimental results are shown in Figure 3. Here, with fixed Cd/Te/TGA (1:0.1:1.9) molar ratio, the solution pH value was adjusted to 9.5, 10.5, and 11.5 respectively. As can be seen in Figure 3, the PL peaks of CdTe shift to longer wavelengths with the increasing of initial pH value, in comparison with the CdTe QDs obtained at pH = 9.5 or 10.5, the CdTe QDs formed at pH =11.5 have a longer PL peak. The PLQYs of QDs at different initial pH values all reached a maximum and then declined with the red-shift of PL peak, and initial pH at 11.5 is in favor of synthesizing CdTe QDs with high PLQY.
The Cd/Te molar ratio is another important factor that may influence the PLQY of thiol-capped CdTe QDs. In previous reports25-27, different Cd/ Te molar ratios (changing from 1:0.2 to 1:0.5) were adopted in the aqueous preparation of CdTe QDs using Te powder or Al2Te3 lump as tellurium source. In our experiments, the Cd/Te molar ratio was varied from 1:0.05 to 1:0.3 with fixed Cd/TGA molar ratio at 1:1.9 and pH value at 11.5, we investigated the influence of various Cd/Te molar ratios on the PLQY of CdTe QDs, and the obtained experimental results are shown in Figure 4A. It can be seen that the QDs show distinguishing PLQY dependent on the stoichiometric ratio of Cd to Te precursors used in the synthesis process. Compared with the CdTe QDs obtained with the other four Cd/Te molar ratios, the CdTe QDs prepared at Cd/ Te molar ratio 1:0.05 possess a high PLQY value. The research28 revealed that highly luminescent CdTe QDs possess much fewer Te atoms on the surface than that of CdTe with low luminescence. Here, we suppose that, with fixed the amount of Cd and TGA, increasing the amount of Te, the relative coverage rate of the particle surface with Te atoms will increase, which results in the low luminescence. So a proper Cd/Te molar ratio is important for preparation of high quality CdTe QDs, in our experiment, the optimal ratio is 1:0.05.
The passivation of surface sites by ligand stabilizer molecules results in the formation of a favorable structure to remove the dangling bonds from the surface, which can improve the PLQY of QDs. Therefore, the thiol plays an important role in the synthesis of thiol-capped CdTe QDs. However, in most of the "traditional" aqueous approaches11, 15, the stoichiometric ratio of Cd to thiol was often set as 1:2.45. In our experiments, the Cd/TGA molar ratio was changed from 1:1.3 to 1:3.2 with fixed Cd/Te molar ratio (1: 0.05) and pH value (11.5), we investigated the influence of various Cd/TGA molar ratios on the PLQY of CdTe QDs. The experimental data in Figure 4B show that increasing the Cd/TGA ratio leads to a drastic increase of the PLQY of CdTe QDs, and the maximum PLQYs of CdTe QDs are prepared at Cd/TGA = 1:1.3, which was in accord with the research result of ref. 29.
The FTIR spectra of sodium thioglycolate and TGA-capped CdTe QDs are shown in Figure 5. Compared to the IR spectra of sodium thioglycolate (solid line), significant changes in the IR spectra of TGA-capped CdTe QDs (dashed line) were observed. First, the stretching vibration of the thiol group (2550cm-1) was absent. Additionally, a significant shift in the asymmetric stretching vibration of the carboxyl group (vcoo =1700 cm-1 to 1585 cm-1) were observed. As reported30, due to the formation of covalent bonds between thiols as well as carboxyls and the Cd2+ ions of the surface of QDs, the peaks of -SH and -COOH groups on the surface of QDs dispersed. It proved that TGA-capped CdTe QDs were formed.
Sodium thioglycolate TGA-capp8d CdTe
The crystallinity and structure of CdTe QDs were demonstrated by the XRD pattern as revealed in Figure 6. XRD pattern of CdTe QDs582 exhibits three peaks that can be assigned to (111), (220), and (311) diffractions corresponding to cubic zinc-blende structure. These peaks are broadened due to finite crystalline size. The particle size can be calculated according to Scherrer's equation31:
where L is the coherence length, λ is the X-ray wavelength (0.15406 nm in this study), B is the full width at half maximum of respective diffraction peak, and è is the angle of diffraction for (111) plane. In the case of small crystallites, L =3/4D, where D is the average diameter of QDs. Based on the reflection peak at 2θ of 24.5, an average diameter of QDs582 is calculated as 3.5 nm, which was in accord with the result of the UV-vis absorption peak analysis.
Figure 7 shows the TEM and HRTEM images of QDs582. The TEM image confirmed that the size distribution of the as-synthesized CdTe QDs were nearly monodisperse with the average size of about 5.0 nm. The relatively narrow size distribution from the TEM measurements was consistent with the sharp band edge observed in the absorption spectra. The particles were very crystalline with distinct lattice fringes observed in HRTEM, and the lattice spacing of 3.67 A corresponds to the (1 1 1) plane of CdTe.
A one-pot method for preparing CdTe QDs using sodium tellurite as tellurium source has been described. The pH value of the original solution, the Cd/Te molar ratio and the Cd/TGA molar ratio play important roles in the synthesis of high quality CdTe QDs. Highly luminescent QDs were prepared at Cd/Te/TGA=1:0.05:1.3, and pH=11.5. Compared with Te powder and Al2Te3 lump route, the new Na2TeO3 route is an environment-friendly and low-cost synthesis route, which is suited for large-scale synthesis.
Financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation (61066006) and the Scientific Research Foundation of Guangxi University (XBZ110359) are gratefully acknowledged.
1. C. Gerhards, C. S. Drost, V. Sgobba, et al. J Phys Chem B, 112, 144-82(2008) [ Links ]
2. Y. C. Kobayashi, L. Y. Pan, N. T. Tamai. J Phys Chem C, 113, 11783(2009) [ Links ]
3. B. Y. Han, J. P. Yuan, E. K. Wang. Anal Chem, 81, 5569(2009) [ Links ]
4. X. F. Gao, H. B. Li, W. T. Sun, et al. J Phys Chem C, 113, 7531(2009) [ Links ]
5. C. B. Murray, D. J. Norris, M. G. Bawendi. J Am Chem Soc, 115, 8706(1993) [ Links ]
6. Z. A. Peng, X. G. Peng. J Am Chem Soc, 123, 183 (2001) [ Links ]
7. A. L. Rogach, T. Franzl, T. A. Klar, et al. J Phys Chem C, 111, 14628(2007) [ Links ]
8. H. B. Bao, Y. J. Gong, Z. Li, et al. Chem Mater, 16, 3853(2004) [ Links ]
9. C. L. Wang, H. Zhang, J. H. Zhang, et al. J Phys Chem C, 111, 2465(2007) [ Links ]
10. Y. He, L. M. Sai, H. T. Lu, et al. Chem Mater, 19, 359(2007) [ Links ]
11. N. Gaponik, D. V. Talapin, A. L. Rogach, et al. J Phys Chem B, 106, 71-77(2002) [ Links ]
12. J. Khatei, K. S. R. Koteswara Rao. Mater Chem Phys, 130, 159 (2011) [ Links ]
13. F. D. Menezes, A. Galembeck, S. A. Junior. Ultrason Sonochem, 18, 1008(2011) [ Links ]
14. Y. He, H. T. Lu,L. M. Sai, et al. J Phys Chem B, 110, 13352(2006) [ Links ]
15. Y. H. Zhang, H. S. Zhang, M. Ma, et al. Appl Surf Sci, 255, 4747(2009) [ Links ]
16. Y. L. Wang, J. P. Lu, Z. F. Tong, et al. J Chil Chem Soc, 54, 274(2009) [ Links ]
17. Y. G. Zheng, S. J. Gao, J. Y. Ying. Adv. Mater. 19, 376 (2007) [ Links ]
18. A. Mandal, N. T. Tamai. J Phys Chem C, 112, 8244 (2008) [ Links ]
19. Y. L. Wang, Z. F. Tong, J. P. Lu, et al. CIESC Journal, 62, 875(2011) [ Links ]
20. M. S. Esadek, J. R. Kumar, S. M. Babu. Curr Appl Phys, 10, 317(2010) [ Links ]
21. J. W. Liu, Y. Zhang, C. W. Ge, et al. Chinese Chem Lett, 20, 977(2009) [ Links ]
22. T. Trindade, P. Brien, N. L. Pickett. Chem Mater, 13, 3843 (2001) [ Links ]
23. W. W. Yu, L. H. Qu, W. Z. Guo, et al. Chem Mater, 15, 2854(2003) [ Links ]
24. V. Swayambunathan, D. Hayes, K. H. Schmidt, et al. J Am Chem Soc, 112, 3831(1990) [ Links ]
25. Y. F. Liu, J. S. Yu. J ColloidInterf Sci, 333, 690(2009) [ Links ]
26. Y. L. Zeng, C. R. Tang, H. W. Wang. Spectrochim Acta A, 70, 966(2008) [ Links ]
27. X. J. Feng, Q. K. Shang, H. J. Liu, et al. J Lumin, 130, 648(2010) [ Links ]
28. H. Borchert, D. V. Talapin, N. Gaponik, et al. J Phys Chem B, 107, 9662(2003) [ Links ]
29. A. Shavel, N. Gaponik, A. Eychmu1ller.J Phys Chem B, 110, 19280(2006) [ Links ]
30. M. Y. Li, H. M. Zhou, H. Y. Zhang, et al. J Lumin, 130, 1935(2010) [ Links ]
31. M. S. A. El-sadek, A. Y. Nooralden, S. M. Babu, et al. Opt Commun, 284, 2900(2011) [ Links ]
(Received: July 19, 2011 - Accepted: February 16, 2012).