- Citado por Google
- Similares en SciELO
- Similares en Google
versión On-line ISSN 0717-9502
Int. J. Morphol. v.26 n.1 Temuco mar. 2008
Int. J. Morphol., 26(1):89-92, 2008.
Ortopantomographic Blind Test of Mandibular Ramus Flexure as a Morphological Indicator of Sex in Chilean Young Adults
Test Ciego con Ortopantomografía de la Flexura de la Rama Mandibular como un Indicador de Sexo en Adultos Jóvenes Chilenos
*Iván Claudio Suazo Galdames; *Jaime San Pedro Valenzuela; **Nilo Alejandro Schilling Quezada; ** César Eduardo Celis Contreras; **José Alejandro Hidalgo Rivas & *Mario Cantín López
* Department of Normal Anatomy, Faculty of Health Science, Universidad de Talca, Chile.
SUMMARY: Loth & Henneberg (1996) described a simple morphological feature for sex determination by observing the flexure of the posterior margin of the mandibular ramus, at the level of the plane occlusal. The purpose of this study is to analyze the level of agreement for determining the sex by observing the parameters described by Loth and Henneberg, in ortopantomography of totally dentate Chilean young adults. This study is based on 188 files of ortopantomography acquired from the Department of Radiology of the Dental School of Universidad de Talca, Chile. In brief, our studies indicated that in the ortopantomography of females 63.25% (62-64.5%) was correctly sexed, whereas the prediction accuracy was only 48.25% (46.550%) for men. The success percentages were lower than those reported by Loth and Henneberg, which justifies the necessity to evaluate the methods of anthropologicalforensic analysis that are used in our population.
KEY WORDS: Mandible; Sex assessment; Blind test.
RESUMEN: Loth & Henneberg (1996) describieron un sencillo indicador morfológico para la determinación del sexo, mediante la observación de una flexura en el borde posterior de la rama mandibular, a nivel del plano oclusal. El propósito de este estudio fue analizar el nivel de concordancia para la determinación del sexo, mediante la observación de parámetro descrito por Loth & Henneberg, en ortopantomografías de sujetos adultos jóvenes, chilenos, completamente dentados. Se utilizaron 188 ortopantomografías de los archivos del Servicio de Radiología de la Escuela Dental de la Universidad de Talca, Chile. En nuestro estudio, las ortopantomografías de mujeres fueron clasificadas correctamente en un 63,25% de los casos (62-64,5%); para los hombres, la predicción de exactitud sólo fue de 48,25% (46,5 -50%). Los porcentajes de acierto fueron inferiores a los comunicados por Loth & Henneberg, lo que justifica la necesidad de evaluar los métodos de análisis en antropología forense que se utilizan en nuestra población.
PALABRAS CLAVE: Mandíbula; Estimación de sexo; Test ciego.
The diagnosis of sex is a necessary stage in forensic evaluation. Rösing et al. (2007) recommended a first evaluation phase by a simple method of morphologic character before moving to the second phase of molecular analysis. In the morphologic analysis of human bones, pelvis and skull bones account for a major amount of information for sex determination.
Loth & Henneberg (1996) described a simple and highly accurate method for sex determination, through the posterior edge flexure at the level of the occlusal plane in mandibular ramus observation. In agreement with the authors, the mandibular ramus posterior edge exhibits a flexure in the mandibles of adult males, which is absent in the mandibles of females or is on a different level to the occlusal plane. The above method has been questioned and subjected to validation by different authors, with mixed results (Koski, 1996; Coqueugniot & Bruzek, 1997; Donnelly et al., 1998; Indrayana et al., 1998; Haun, 2000; Hill, 2000; Balci et al., 2005), but less than 99% of correspondence was reported by Loth & Henneberg (1996). According to Kemkes-Grottenthaler et al. (2002), the mandibular tooth loss and functional changes can influence the determination of the age by the Loth & Henneberg method. The features described have been analyzed in the mandibles of subadults too (Loth & Henneberg, 2001; Franklin et al., 2007).
Few studies have referred to the features of dimorphism in the South American population (Esteves, 1977); according to Steyn & Is¸can (1988), the variations in the skeletal characteristics of different populations can interfere in the diagnosis of sex. Rösing et al. indicate that the robusticity or thinness of the musculature, which determines some visible traits in the skeleton, depends on regional factors.
The identification of posterior edge flexure mandibular ramus is possible through ortopantomographic observation.
The purpose of this study is to analyze the consistency level for determining sex by observing the parameters described by Loth & Henneberg (1996) in the ortopantomography of completely dentate Chilean young adults.
MATERIAL AND METHOD
In this study, 188 files of ortopantomography from the Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology Service, Dental School of Universidad de Talca, were used. All radiographs corresponded to completely dentate Chilean adults, with an average age of 21.13 years (SD 1.25), of which 108 were female and 80 were male, who required diagnosis for the purpose of dental restoration. The sample was evaluated by two observers, who were oral maxillofacial radiological specialists. Instructions on how to evaluate the images were derived from the description of the Loth & Henneberg method (1996, 2000). First the flexure in the mandibles was observed directly and then the flexure in the ortopantomography was observed. Radiologists analyzed the presence or absence of flexure and its level with regard to the occlusal plane.
Each ortopantomography was projected on a negatoscopy for analysis; no evidence of sex was visible in the image diagnosed. Each radiologist independently noted its sample and identified the mandibular ramus posterior edge; if the flexure was present at the level of occlusal plane it was diagnosed as +1 (Fig.1), -1 if flexure was not at or was in a different level to the occlusal plane (Fig.2), and 0 if the presence of a parameter was not clear. As in the Loth & Henneberg classification, +2, +1, and 0 were considered males, whereas -1 and-2 were diagnosed as females.
The diagnoses of each observer were compared and identified in concordance between both and each one, in connection with the sex documented radiographically in the subjects discussed.
In our blind test, 63.25% (6264.5%) of the ortopantomography of females were correctly sexed; for the males, the prediction accuracy was only 48.25% (46.550%). These results are presented in Table I.
The inter-observer concordance presents a moderate indicator, with a Kappa value of 0.457.
In our study, we found a moderate level of accuracy in diagnosing the sex by observing the posterior edge of the mandibular ramus in adult Chilean ortopantomographies. Our results were better for the diagnosis of sex in females than in males, in comparison to what was reported by different authors on work performed directly on the mandibles (Coqueugniot & Bruzek; Donnelly et al.; Indrayana et al.; Haun; Scheuer, 2002).
In our study, it is clear that the accuracy in determining sex is very different from the excellent results reported by Loth & Henneberg (1996) in their original article, which interacts with the radiographic image distortion, inherent to the technique and the equipment used, but in any case agrees with numerous articles that have questioned the accuracy of the method (Koski; Coqueugniot & Bruzek; Donnelly et al.; Indrayana et al.; Haun; Hill; Kemkes-Grottenthaler et al.; Balci et al.), indicating that the posterior edge ramus flexure cannot be used as a single indicator of sex in unknown skeletal remains (Oettle et al., 2005). In our sample, only one subject was completely edentate. Kemkes-Grottenthaler et al. indicated that tooth loss lowered the values of accuracy in the analyzed method. The age of the analyzed subjects is an important factor to consider. Our study analyzes ortopantomography of young adult subjects (mean: 21.13 years) with a low dispersion (SD 1.25). According to Okeson (2003), the forces of the elevator muscles are highest in young adults, which is a determinant in the modeling of the mandibular ramus (Koski) and one of the causes of development in the mandibular ramus flexure (Loth & Henneberg, 1996).
Our results confirm the need to assess the anthropologicalforensic analysis methods used in our population.
Balci, Y.; Yavuz, M. F. & Cagdir, S. Predictive accuracy of sexing the mandible by ramus flexure. Homo, 55 (3):229-37, 2005. [ Links ]
Coqueugniot, H. & Bruzek, J. Incurvation de la branche mandibulaire: réévaluation de son importance dans la détermination sexuelle. Colloque des Anthropologistes de Langue Française (GALF): 32, 1997. [ Links ]
Donnelly, S. M.; Hens, S. M.; Rogers, N. L. & Schneider, K. L. Technical note: a blind test of mandibular ramus flexure as a morphologic indicator of sexual dimorphism in the human skeleton. Am. J. Phys. Anthrop., 107(3): 363-6, 1998. [ Links ]
Esteves, R. C. Mandibular dimensional variations of white adults of both sexes through direct and radiographic cephalometry. I. Sexual dimorphism study. Rev. Fac. Odontol. Sao Paulo, 15 (2):243-55, 1977. [ Links ]
Franklin, D.; Oxnard, C. E.; O'Higgins, P. & Dadour, I. Sexual dimorphism in the subadult mandible: quantification using geometric morphometrics. J. Forensic Sci., 52 (1):6-10, 2007. [ Links ]
Haun, S. J. Brief communication: a study of the predictive accuracy of mandibular ramus flexure as a singular morphologic indicator of sex in an archaeological sample. Am. J. Phys. Anthrop., 111(3):420-32, 2000. [ Links ]
Hill, C. A. Technical note: Evaluating mandibular ramus flexure as a morphological indicator of sex. Am. J. Phys. Anthrop., 111(4):573-7, 2000. [ Links ]
Indrayana, N. S.; Glinka, J. & Mieke, S. Mandibular ramus flexure in an Indonesian population. Am. J. Phys. Anthrop., 105(1):89-90, 1998. [ Links ]
Kemkes-Grottenthaler, A.; Löbig, F. & Stock, F. Mandibular ramus flexure and gonial eversion as morphologic indicators of sex. Homo, 53(2):97-111, 2002. [ Links ]
Koski, K. Mandibular ramus flexure--indicator of sexual dimorphism? Am. J. Phys. Anthrop., 101(4): 545-6, 1996. [ Links ]
Loth, S. R. & Henneberg, M. Mandibular ramus flexure: a new morphologic indicator of sexual dimorphism in the human skeleton. Am. J. Phys. Anthrop., 99(3):473-85, 1996. [ Links ]
Loth, S. R. & Henneberg, M. Gonial eversion: facial architecture, not sex. Homo, 51(1):81-9, 2000. [ Links ]
Loth, S. R. & Henneberg, M. Sexually dimorphic mandibular morphology in the first few years of life. Am. J. Phys. Anthrop., 115(2):179-86, 2001. [ Links ]
Oettle, A.C.; Pretorius, E. & Steyn, M. Geometric morphometric analysis of mandibular ramus flexure. Am. J. Phys. Anthrop., 128(3):623-9, 2005. [ Links ]
Okeson, J. P. Tratamiento de oclusión y afecciones temporo-mandibulares. 5 ed. Madrid, Elsevier, 2003. [ Links ]
Rösing, F. W.; Graw, M.; Marre, B.; Ritz-Timme, S.; Rothschild, M. A.; Rotzscher, K.; Schmeling, A.; Schroder, I. & Geserick, G. Recommendations for the forensic diagnosis of sex and age from skeletons. Homo., 58(1):75-89, 2007. [ Links ]
Scheuer, L. A blind test of mandibular morphology for sexing mandibles in the first few years of life. Am. J. Phys. Anthrop., 119(2):189-91, 2002. [ Links ]
Steyn, M. & Iscan, M. Y. Sexual dimorphism in the crania and mandibles of South African whites. Forensic Sci. Int., 98(1-2):9-16, 1998. [ Links ]
Prof. Dr. Iván Suazo Galdames