SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.63 número1ESPEJOS DE NUESTRA EPOCA: BIODIVERSIDAD, SISTEMATICA Y EDUCACIONCOMO CITAR AUTORES BOTANICOS, PARTICULARMENTE EN CACTACEAE índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Gayana. Botánica

versión On-line ISSN 0717-6643

Gayana Bot. v.63 n.1 Concepción  2006

http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0717-66432006000100007 

Gayana Bot. 63(1): 115-118 2006. Comunicación Breve

CHROMOSOME NUMBERS OF CHILEAN PTERIDOPHYTES: FIRST CONTRIBUTION

NUMEROS CROMOSOMICOS DE PTERIDOFITOS CHILENOS: PRIMERA CONTRIBUCION

 

Pedro Jara-Seguel1, Mario Romero-Mieres1 & Claudio Palma-Rojas2

1Escuela de Ciencias Biológicas y Químicas, Facultad de Recursos Naturales, Universidad Católica de Temuco, Casilla 15-D, Temuco-Chile. pjara@uct.cl

2Departamento de Biología, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de La Serena, Casilla 599, La Serena-Chile.


ABSTRACT

Mitotic chromosome counts in Chilean pteridophytes confirm the diploidy described for Equisetum L. (2n = 216) and Blechnum L. (2n = 66), as well as the tetraploidy of Asplenium L. (2n = 144). Megalastrum spectabile (Kaulf.) A.R.Sm. et R.C.Moran is diploid (2n = 82), while in metaphases of Polystichum subintegerrimum (Hook. et Arn.) R.A.Rodr. chromosome numbers from ca. 311 to 328 were counted. Tetraploidy was also described in Adiantum chilense Kaulf. (2n = 116).


 

The analysis of chromosome numbers represents an important step in studies of genetic variation, phylogeny, taxonomy and evolution, as well as in studies on the structure and diversity of the genomes (e.g., genome sizes, ploidy levels, nuclear architecture).

In pteridophytes, chromosome numbers have been documented by Manton (1950), Tryon et al. (1975), Löve et al. (1977), Smith & Mickel (1977), Walker (1985), Dawson et al. (2000), Bennett & Leitch (1997, 2001), Yatabe et al. (2001), Widén et al. (2001), Hanson & Leitch (2002), Obermayer et al. (2002), Tindale & Roy (2002), Buarque et al. (2003), Windham & Yatskievych (2003), Perrie et al. (2003), Buarque et al. (2005), Bennert et al. (2005). Others important contributions are available but are not cited here. Based on all these references, we compiled information on chromosome numbers for at least 641 species (7.12% of the species recognized), which inhabit in Europe, Oceania, North America, Asia and Caribbean Island. In South America, chromosome data for 27 species (included in the total above) have been documented for taxa from Amazonia and north-eastern Brazil (Tryon et al. 1975, Buarque et al. 2003, Buarque et al. 2005). However, species from other South American countries have not been analysed.

Among the South American undersampled taxa are the Chilean pteridophytes. These taxa are all homosporous, and although they are a minor component of the biodiversity of Chilean vascular plants (about 2.3% of vascular plants) (Marticorena 1990), are important due to that historically have been used as medical (Looser & Rodríguez 2004) and ornamental (Macaya 2004) resources. Despite of that, the structure and diversity of their genomes have not been still studied.

In this work chromosome numbers for nine native Chilean species belonging to six genera and five families are shown. Chromosome numbers may be used in first instance to elaborate a chromosome index for Chilean pteridophytes, which may be the basis for future studies on structure, diversity and evolution of the genomes of these vascular plants.

Sporophytes of one accession of each species were obtained from naturally growing populations, and voucher specimens were deposited in the no official herbarium (UCT) of the Escuela de Ciencias Biológicas y Químicas of the Universidad Católica de Temuco (Table I). The taxonomic identification was based on Gunckel (1984) and Rodríguez (1995). In the laboratory, plants were kept with their rhizomes submerged in water subject to constant aeration, in order to favor active growth of adventitious roots. After ten to fifteen days, 5 mm-long root tips were excised from the rhizomes and treated in a solution of 2 mM 8-hydroxiquinoline for 1 h at room temperature followed by 23 h at 8ºC (Buarque et al. 2003). They were then fixed in ethanol_acetic acid (3:1 v/v) for at least 24 h, placed in 70% ethanol, and stored at 4ºC until required. The mitotic chromosomes were obtained by squashing of root tips previously stained with the Feulgen reaction, and photographed with a digital camera OLYMPUS C-5050 connected to microscope OLYMPUS CX31. The chromosome counts were made on magnified printed photograph.

The chromosome numbers are presented in Table I, and metaphases of four species are shown in Fig. 1.


The results of chromosome count for species of each genus are described as follow:

Adiantum L. (Adiantaceae): A tetraploid number 2n = 116 was described for Adiantum chilense Kaulf. var. chilense, and its base number x = 29 is similar to that documented for A. pedatum L. (Haufler & Soltis 1986). The chromosome numbers described for these two species are the sole recorded for the genus.

Asplenium L. (Aspleniaceae): The tetraploidy documented previously for species of Asplenium (Herrero et al. 2001, Van den Heede et al. 2004) was also found for A. dareoides Desv. (2n = 144). The base number for the genus is x = 36. Inter-specific variations in chromosome numbers in this genus have been compiled by Dawson et al. (2000) for New Zealand taxa, whose larger value was recorded for a hexaploid cytotype of A. trichomanes L. (2n = 216).

Blechnum L. (Blechnaceae): The four species analysed showed a diploid chromosome number 2n = 66, which is similar to the described for fifteen New Zealand species. Besides, a high variation in 2n numbers has been compiled by Dawson et al. (2000), with 2n values from 56 chromosomes for three species (x = 28) to 132 for a tetraploid accession of B. fluviatile (R.Br.) Salomon (x = 33). However, the most frequent base number for the genus is x = 33.


Figure 1. Mitotic metaphases of (a) Blechnum mochaenum var. mochaenum 2n = 66, (b) Megalastrum spectabile var. spectabile 2n = 82, c) Asplenium dareoides 2n = 144, and d) Polystichum subintegerrimum 2n = ca. 311. Bar = 10 µm.

Figura 1. Metafases mitóticas de (a) Blechnum mochaenum var. mochaenum 2n = 66, (b) Megalastrum spectabile var. spectabile 2n = 82, c) Asplenium dareoides 2n = 144 y d) Polystichum subintegerrimum 2n = ca. 311. Barra = 10 µm.

 

Equisetum L. (Equisetaceae): The diploid chromosome number of Equisetum bogotense Kunth. (2n = 216) was similar to that described for others species of the Subgenus Equisetum (Obermayer et al. 2002). Additionally, all species of this Subgenus checked to date are uniform with a high base number x = 108, which is unusual within the pteridophyta. This base number is also presents in hybrid species of the Subgenus Hyppochaete (J.Milde) Baker which were found to be triploid with 2n = 324 chromosomes (Bennert et al. 2005).

Megalastrum Holtt. (Dryopteridaceae): The diploid chromosome number 2n = 82 described for Megalastrum spectabile (Kaulf.) A.R.Sm. et R.C.Moran was similar to that documented previously for its sister genus Dryopteris Adans. (Widén et al. 2001). The base number for these two genera is x = 41.

Polystichum Roth (Dryopteridaceae): Meta-phases with 2n numbers from ca. 311 to 328 chromosomes were observed in Polystichum subintegerrimum (Hook. et Arn.) R.A.Rodr. This high 2n number is nearby to that described previously for the octoploid Polystichum neozelandicum Fée, with n = ca. 164 bivalents in diakinesis (2n = ca. 328) (Perrie et al. 2003). Furthermore, Perrie et al. (2003) pointed out that others species have been described as tetraploid with 2n = ca. 164 chromosomes. The base number for the genus is x = 41. The remarkable similitude in the base number x = 41 among Megalastrum, Dryopteris and Polystichum, suggest a constancy of base chromosome number in the family Dryopteridaceae.

The high chromosome number described for nine Chilean species of pteridophytes is a typical character for homosporous, whose lowest record is x = 27 (Windham & Yatskievych 2003). On the other hand, the allopolyploidy described in many species (Herrero et al. 2001, Van den Heede et al. 2004, Perrie et al. 2003) together with the different diploid numbers reported, may be evidence of a high genome diversity in these vascular plants. However, with aprox. 116 species of pteridophytes recognized for continental Chile, much remains to be done. Further studies in others Chilean families will be reported in the future, thus increasing the information on chromosome numbers in homosporous pteridophytes.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We are grateful to Dr. Julio R. Gutiérrez for reading the manuscript. Financed by DGIUCT Project 2005-4-02.

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Bennett, M. & I. Leitch. 2001. Nuclear DNA amounts in Pteridophytes. Annals of Botany 87: 335-345.         [ Links ]

Bennert, W., M. Lubienski, S. Körner & M. Steinberg. 2005. Triploidy in Equisetum subgenus Hippochaete (Equisetaceae, Pteridophyta). Annals of Botany 95(5): 807-815.         [ Links ]

Buarque, A., I. Carneiro & M. Guerra. 2003. Cariologia de algunas espécies de pteriodófitas ocorrentes no nordeste do Brasil. Acta Botanica Brasilica 17(1): 19-26.         [ Links ]

Buarque, A., I. Carneiro & M. Guerra. 2005. Variation in chromosome numbers, CMA bands and 45S rDNA sites in species of Selaginella (Pteridophyta). Annals of Botany 95: 271-276.         [ Links ]

Dawson, M., P. Brownsey & J. Lovis. 2000. Index of chromosome numbers of indigenous New Zealand pteridophytes. New Zealand Journal of Botany 38: 25-46.         [ Links ]

Gunckel, H. 1984. Helechos de Chile. Monografías Anexas a los Anales de la Universidad de Chile Nº 1. Ediciones de la Universidad de Chile. Santiago, Chile. 254 p.         [ Links ]

Hanson, L. & I. Leitch. 2002. DNA amounts for five pteridophytes species fill phylogenetic gaps in C-value data. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 140: 169-173.         [ Links ]

Haufler, C. & D. Soltis. 1986. Genetic evidence suggest that homosporous ferns with high chromosome numbers are diploid. Proceeding Natural Academy Science 83: 4389-4393.         [ Links ]

Herrero, A., S. Pajaron & C. Prada. 2001. Isozyme variation and genetic relationships among taxa in the Asplenium obovatum group (Aspleniaceae, Pteridophyta). American Journal of Botany 88(11): 2040-2050.         [ Links ]

Looser, G. & R. Rodríguez. 2004. Los helechos medicinales de Chile y sus nombres vulgares. Gayana Botánica 61(1): 1-5.         [ Links ]

Löve, A, D. Löve & R. Pichi-Sermolli. 1977. Cytotaxonomical Atlas of the Pteridophyta. J. Cramer, Vaduz, 398 pp.         [ Links ]

Macaya, J. 2004. Helechos nativos de Chile cultivados con fines ornamentales. Chloris Chilensis 7(1) URL: http://www.chlorischile.cl         [ Links ]

Manton, I. 1950. Problems of cytology and evolution in the Pteridophyta. Cambridge: University Press. London. 316 pp.         [ Links ]

Marticorena, C. 1990. Contribución a la estadística de la flora vascular de Chile. Gayana Botánica 47: 85-114.         [ Links ]

Obermayer, R., I. Leitch, L. Hanson, & M. Bennett. 2002. Nuclear DNA C-values in 30 species double the familial representation in Pteridophytes. Annals of Botany 90: 209-217.         [ Links ]

Perrie, L., P. Brownsey, P. Lockhart & M. Largie. 2003. Evidence for an allopolyploid complex in New Zealand Polystichum. New Zealand Journal of Botany 41: 189-215.         [ Links ]

Rodríguez, R. 1995. Pteridophyta. En: Flora de Chile. Vol. 1. (eds. C. Marticorena & R. Rodríguez), pp. 119-350. Ediciones Universidad de Concepción, Concepción.         [ Links ]

Smith, A. & J. Mickel. 1977. Chromosome counts for Mexican ferns. Brittonia 29: 391-398.         [ Links ]

Tindale, M. & S. Roy. 2002. A cytotaxonomic survey of the Pteridophyta of Australia. Australian Systematic Botany 15(6): 839-937.         [ Links ]

Tryon, A., P. Bautista & S. Araujo. 1975. Chromosome studies of Brazilian ferns. Acta Amazonica 5: 35-43.         [ Links ]

Van Den Heede, C., S. Pajaron,  E. Pangua & R. Viane. 2004. Asplenium ceterach and A. octoploideum on the Canary Islands (Aspleniaceae, Pteridophyta) American Fern Journal 94 (2):81-111.         [ Links ]

Walker, T. 1985. Cytotaxonomic studies of the ferns of Trinidad 2. The cytology and taxonomic implications. Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History) 13: 149-249.         [ Links ]

Widen, C., C. Fraser-Jenkins, T. Reichstein & J. Sarvela. 2001. A survey of phenolic compounds in Dryopteris and related fern genera. Part III. Annals Botany Fennici 38: 99-138.         [ Links ]

Windham, M. & G. Yatskievych. 2003. Chromosome studies of cheilanthoid ferns (Pteridaceae: Cheilanthoideae) from the western United State and Mexico. American Journal of Botany 90(12): 1788-1800.         [ Links ]

Yatabe, Y., S. Masuyama, D. Darnaedi & N. Murakami. 2001. Molecular systematics of the Asplenium nidus complex from Mt. Halimun National Park, Indonesia: Evidence for reproductive isolation among three sympatric RBCL sequence types. American Journal of Botany 88(8): 1517-1522.        [ Links ]

Recibido 08.09.05
Aceptado 11.11.05