SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.9 issue4Safe use of genetically modified lactic acid bacteria in food: Bridging the gap between consumers, green groups, and industryCotton genetic diversity study by AFLP markers author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Electronic Journal of Biotechnology

On-line version ISSN 0717-3458

Electron. J. Biotechnol. vol.9 no.4 Valparaíso July 2006

http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0717-34582006000400012 

Biotechnology Industry
 

Biotechnology Teaching

Electronic Journal of Biotechnology ISSN: 0717-3458 Vol. 9 No. 4, Issue of July 15, 2006
© 2006 by Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso -- Chile Received July 4, 2005 / Accepted November 9, 2005
DOI: 10.2225/vol9-issue4-fulltext-2  
TECHNICAL NOTE

The lift pool method for isolation of cDNA clones from lambda phage libraries

Janine LeBlanc-Straceski*
Department of Biology and Allied Health
Merrimack College
North Andover Massachusetts 01845
Te: 978 837 5000 / 4357
Fax: 978 837 5180
E-mail: Janine.LeBlancStraceski@merrimack.edu

Pablo Sobrado
University of Wisconsin, Madison
Biochemistry Department
433 Babcock Drive Room 123
Madison, WI 53706
Tel: 608 262 3364 Ext 2110
E-mail: psobrado@biochem.wisc.edu

Sharon Betz
Clinical Molecular Genetics Fellow
McLendon Clinical Labs
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine
University of North Carolina CB #7525
Chapel Hill, NC 27599
Tel: 919 966 4408
Fax: 919 966 6351
E-mail: sbetz@unch.unc.edu

Julie Zerfas
Building K.
Wyeth BioPharma
1 Burtt Rd., Andover, MA 01810
Tel: 978 247 4295
Fax: 978 2474298
E-mail: jzerfas@wyeth.com

Karen Morgan
College of Osteopathic Medicine
University of New England
11 Hills Beach Road
Biddeford, ME 04005-9599
E-mail: kmorgan1@pipeline.une.edu

*Corresponding author

Financial support: The Faculty Development Grant Program of Merrimack College, Merck/AAAS Undergraduate Science Research Program grant, a National Science Foundation-Undergraduate Research Institution grant (NSF-URI) NSF0077516.

Keywords: cDNA, lambda, non-radioactive, PCR, plaque, screening.

Abbreviations:

LP: lift pool
PCR: polymerase chain reaction
Pfu: plaque forming unit
PP: plate pool
SP: super pool
XlMyo1d: Xenopus laevis myosin 1d
XlMyo7a: Xenopus laevis myosin 7a

Abstract
Reprint (PDF)
Abstract
Article
References

A PCR based strategy was developed to screen a Xenopus oocyte λgt10 cDNA library. The PCR-based lift pool (LP) method follows the same two tiered strategy as conventional screening of phage libraries by filter hybridization. Two rounds of plating, one at high density to detect the clone, and one at low density to purify the clone to homogeneity, are performed. In the first round, lysates from high density plates, termed plate pools (PP), serve as template for PCR. In the second round, phage particles adhering to plaque lifts of low density plates are washed off nitrocellulose filters to create LPs, which are used as template for PCR. The integrity of the plaques on the low-density plates is preserved. Once a positive LP has been identified, plaques on the corresponding plate are screened individually by PCR. Using isoform specific primer pairs for Xenopus myosin 7a and myosin 1d, two lambda clones were isolated. Subsequent DNA sequence analysis confirmed their identities as myosin isoforms (GenBank accession numbers: DQ100353 and AF540952). This method offers a time saving, cost-effective alternative to other hierarchical pooling strategies for the repeated screening by PCR of an arrayed lambda phage library.

Article
Article
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
References

PCR based screening strategies for lambda libraries have been developed as efficient, non-radioactive alternatives to colorimetric or chemiluminescent detection of nucleic acid probes hybridized to plaque lifts (Rosenberg et al. 1991; Dorfman, 1993; Gonzalez and Chan, 1993; Amaravadi and King, 1994; D'Esposito et al. 1994; McAlinden and Krawetz, 1994; Munroe et al. 1995; Yu and Bloem, 1996; Alphey, 1997; Takumi, 1997; Watanabe, 1997). Conventional screening of λ phage libraries by filter hybridization involves two rounds of plating: one at high density to detect the clone, and one at low density to purify the clone to homogeneity. Many PCR based methods follow this two-tiered strategy invoking similar pooling strategies for initial detection, but different steps to isolate the final purified λ clones of interest. Here we describe a streamlined, robust alternative to the second tier of screening. In the first round, lysates from high density plates, termed plate pools (PPs), serve as template for PCR (Figure 1, steps 1-6). Then, single PPs are re-plated at low density (Figure 1, step 7). Phage particles adhering to plaque lifts of these low density plates are washed off nitrocellulose filters to create lift pools (LPs), which are used as template for PCR (Figure 1, steps 8-9). The integrity of the plaques on the plates is preserved. Once a positive LP has been identified, plaques on the corresponding plate are screened individually, again by PCR (Figure 1, step 10).

Materials and Methods

Primers for PCR were derived from a 93 bp gene specific sequence of the Xenopus laevis myosin 7a (XlMyo7a) homologue, and a 102 bp sequence of XlMyo1d (Sokac and Bement, 2000). Forward, [CACCAAACTTCTGCTCAAGC], and reverse, [CAATAAGGGATTTACCTGTAGGA], primers were used to generate an 88 bp fragment specific to the XlMyo7a isoform. For the XlMyo1d isoform, the forward primer [ATGGGCTACATCTCCAAGGT] and reverse primer [GGGGGTTGGATTTGAGAATA] were used to generate a 79 bp fragment. Each 25 µl PCR reaction contained 2.5 µl, 10 X Sigma Taq polymerase buffer; 2 µl, 2.5 mM dNTPs; 2 µl, 25 mM MgCl2; 0.2 µl (1 unit) of Taq polymerase; 1 µl each of 50 pmol/µl forward and reverse primers; 2 to 5 µl of phage suspension and H2O to 25 µl. Reactions were carried out as follows: 30 cycles of 94ºC, 60ºC and 72ºC for 30 seconds each. All PCR products were electrophoresed through 3% agarose gels in TBE buffer (Sambrook et al. 1989).

BNN102 cells were infected by a λgt10 library (Rebagliati et al. 1985) and were plated on NZCYM agar (Sambrook et al. 1989). After the initial titre was established, 400,000 pfu of the library was plated at a concentration of 2000 pfu per 100 mm plate. 200 plate lysates were prepared according to conventional methods by flooding the plates with SM buffer (Sambrook et al. 1989). Live phage were harvested, treated with CHCl3 and centrifuged to remove cellular debris (Sambrook et al. 1989). These cleared lystes or PPs were stored at 4ºC. Twenty super pools (SPs) were created by pooling 10 µl aliquots of ten PPs. For example, aliquots of PPs 1-10 were combined to create SP1. Phage suspensions were used directly as the source of template DNA for PCR without further purification.

LPs were created from single positively identified PPs. The stored PP lysate was plated at a density of 100 pfu onto forty plates for a total of 4000 pfu. This number is twice the actual number of pfu used to inoculate the PP in order to build redundancy into the screen. After plaques were formed, sterile BA85 (Schleicher and Shuell) nitrocellulose filters were placed on top of the low density plates for 3 min. The filters were carefully removed and placed into a sterile Petri dish containing 3 ml SM buffer on a rocking platform for 5 min. The SM buffer containing phage was carefully removed into a sterile tube, shaken with a few drops of CHCl3 and centrifuged to remove cellular debris. The supernatant or LP was used directly as a source of template DNA for screening by PCR. Finally, plugs containing isolated plaques were removed, vortexed with 100 µl of SM buffer, and centrifuged for 5 min at maximum RPM in a micro-centrifuge to remove agarose and cellular debris. Supernatants were screened by PCR using 2-5 µl of the plaque suspensions.

Results

The LP method (Figure 1) was devised to isolate sequences homologous to two unconventional myosin heavy chain from a Xenopus oocyte λgt10 cDNA library (Rebagliati et al. 1985). Myosin heavy chains constitute a large, multigene family with many classes each containing several isoforms. However, isoform specific sequences exist within all myosin (Sokac and Bement, 2000). Isoform specific primer pairs that amplify an 88 bp region from Xlmyo7a and a 79 bp region of XlMyo1d were used in all screening steps (Figure 2). Before plating the cDNA library, an aliquot was used as template for PCR reactions using the isoform specific primers. Both sets of primers amplified the predicted products (data not shown).

The results of the first round of PCR screening in which the SPs were used as templates are shown in Figure 3. The XlMyo7a screen identified two positive SPs and four SPs were identified in the XlMyo1d screen. The ten PPs each from SP10 (for myosin 7a) and SP6 (for myoisn 1d) were screened in the second round of PCR. Each identified a single PP (data not shown) that was subsequently used to create sets of 40 LPs (Figure 1, steps 7 and 8). 

Figure 4 shows the products of the myosin 7a screen of a set of LPs. The 88 bp product was detected in LP 7 and LP 24. Once the Xlmyo7a positive LPs were identified, plaques from the original low density plates were screened individually (Figure 1, step 10). Subsequent DNA sequence analysis of the individual lambda clones purified from this screen confirmed that they contain the sequence from which the isoform specific primers were derived and that the rest of the sequence is homologous to the myosin 7a isoform. (GenBank accession number: DQ100353). Similar results were obtained for the myosin 1d clone (GenBank accession number: AF540952).

Discussion

The LP method has several distinct advantages and features that make it accessible to researchers on many levels. 1) Screening LPs by PCR eliminates problems with signal-to-noise ratio often encountered with filter hybridization methods. Modifications, such as the use of heterologous or degenerate primers should also be possible. 2) Plate lysates containing live phage can be used directly as template in PCR reactions, eliminating the need for lambda DNA purification. 3) A single lambda clone can be identified in four rounds for a total of 170 PCR reactions (20 SPs; 10 PPs, 40 LPs, 100 pfu = 170). 4) Even with the preparation of PPs, which need to be prepared only once per library, the entire method can be accomplished in under 10 days. If PPs have been prepared for a prior screen, a new clone can be isolated in less than a week. 5) After re-plating positive PPs at low density, LPs can be created in under 1 hr to provide template for the penultimate round of PCR.

The advantages of PCR based screening strategies over traditional filter hybridization based methods, regardless of titre, are many fold. Both approaches require plating of the phage library at high density followed by a plating at low density so the real comparison is at the level of signal detection. First, radioactive probes used to screen libraries must be prepared from cloned fragments or oligo nucleotides of related DNA sequences and modified to contain the radioactive isotope. They have a limited shelf life before having to be prepared again. Although, PCR primers must be designed, synthesized and tested before use, they require no special modification, last indefinitely, and can be used for other applications. Second, a comparison of subsequent steps reveals that the preparation of plaque lifts, hybridization and detection is much more labour intensive than the preparation of plate lysates and direct screening by PCR. The LP method provides an additional benefit of being able to conduct the initial screening for many different cDNA clones without replating the entire library.

The pooling strategy was devised to reduce the number of PCR reactions necessary to identify a positive PP (Figure 1). The number of pfu screened at each round is as follows. In the first round the 20 SPs (a total of 4 x 105 pfu) are screened. One SP identifies 10 PPs (2 x 104 pfu) to be screened in the second round. Thus it takes only thirty PCR reactions in two rounds of PCR to identify a positive PP. This pool is used to inoculate plates at a density of 100 plaques per plate. The low density plates are used to create 40 LPs that are screened in the third round of PCR (4000 total pfu). Finally, in the fourth round, each of the one hundred plaques (100 pfu) on the positively identified low density plate is screened by PCR. The total number of pfu that are screened to identify a single positive cDNA clone in the four rounds of PCR is 424,100. Alternatively, if time is more critical than reagents, all 200 PPs can be screened simultaneously using a multiwell dish and two thermal cyclers.

As mentioned in the introduction, other PCR based screening strategies that utilize hierarchical pooling diverge when it comes to isolating single clones from the smallest pools used in the first few rounds. Watanabe et al. (1997) use a method to isolate single clones which involves three rounds of replica plating followed by overnight elution of the phage from slices of the original plates and then re-plating the lysate at sequentially lower density. Although the creation of PPs is initially somewhat more labour intensive, it offers the advantage of being able to re-screen the library very quickly many times. 

D'Esposito et al. (1994) report a technique that has been used more recently by Kolbinger et al. (1998) to screen 9.5 x105 pfu using a somewhat similar pooling and re-plating scheme. Although the minimum number of individual PCR reactions is only slightly higher in the D'Esposito et al. 1994 (200 vs 170 for the LP method) two additional platings are required. 192 wells of 32, 6 well plates were used to create top level pools analogous to the PPs described here. The lysates from these top level pools were arrayed in 96 well micro titre dishes and mixed row and column. PCR screening and subsequent re-screening identified a top level pool containing 13,000 pfu which was then plated onto 16 well plates and a similar process described above repeated. The level two pool, containing 450 pfu was again plated onto 24 well plates and re-screened. Finally, 48 single plaque containing pools were plated and a single positive plaque was obtained. The advantage of the LP method is that it utilizes only two platings. In both methods the first plating is done only once, but subsequent platings must be done for each clone that is isolated. In the LP method this is only one additional plating as opposed to three for the D'Esposito method (D'Esposito et al. 1994).

As alternative to screening cDNA libraries to obtain clones, methods such as 5' and 3' RACE have been developed (Frohman et al. 1988). PCR amplification to obtain full length cDNAs starting from a small internal sequence requires at least three separate amplifications and several cloning reactions. The 3' extension using oligo dT is relatively straight forward. A single round of PCR amplification, and cloning into appropriately modified vectors can be accomplished in a few days. However, the 5' end requires several enzymatic steps, including the 1) randomly primed reverse transcription of mRNA followed by the 2) addition of an adapter via ligation or PCR onto the newly synthesized cDNA. 3) A subsequent round of PCR amplification, using primers complementary to the adapter and cDNA sequence of interest yields the final 5' end product. Next, the 5' end cDNA has to be cloned and finally recombined with the 3' end product to yield a full length transcript. This method is usually efficient for single cDNA isolation. However, when several cDNAs are to be isolated from a single library, the pooling and LP method proves to be a very efficient method, especially if the library is obtained from a colleague or commercial vendor. Once the PPs are made, the library can be re-screened hundreds of times. A single PP can be identified in only two rounds of amplification. Within a minimum of two additional days, a single clone can be identified. Thus this method is highly efficient for isolation of multiple clones from a single library.

Many applications such as drug discovery and structure/function relationship investigations require full-length cDNA sequences to identify and express the proteins encoded. EST's identified by DNA microarray chip technology are only partial segments of the coding regions of genes. Lambda libraries remain reliable sources of cloned full length, or near full length, cDNAs. The streamlined PCR screening strategy described here improves upon other PCR based methods because the LP technique allows the repeated rapid isolation of specific lambda clones from complex libraries.

References

ALPHEY, Luke. PCR-Based method for isolation of full-length clones and splice variants from cDNA libraries. BioTechniques, March 1997, vol. 22, no. 3, p. 481-486.         [ Links ]

AMARAVADI, Lakshmi and KING, Michael W. A rapid and efficient, non-radioactive method for screening recombinant DNA libraries. BioTechniques, January 1994, vol. 16, no. 1, p. 98-103.         [ Links ]

D'ESPOSITO, Maurizio; MAZZARELLA, Richard; PENGUE, Gina; JONES, Carmela; D'URSO, Michele and SCHLESSINGER, David. PCR-based immortalization and screening of hierarchical pools of cDNAs. Nucleic Acids Research, November 1994, vol. 22, no. 22, p. 4806-4809.         [ Links ]

DORFMAN, David M. Amplification of bacteriophage library inserts using polymerase chain reaction. Methods in Enzymology, 1993, vol. 218, p. 336-340.         [ Links ][CrossRef]

FROHMAN, Michael A.; DUSH, Michael K. and MARTIN, Gail R. Rapid production of full-length cDNAs from rare transcripts: amplification using a single gene-specific oligonucleotide primer. Proceeding of the National Academic of Science of the United States of America, December 1988, vol. 85, no. 23, p. 8998-9002.         [ Links ]

GONZALEZ, Daniel H. and CHAN, Raquel L. Screening cDNA libraries by PCR using lambda sequencing primers and degenerate oligonucleotides. Trends in Genetics, July 1993, vol. 9, no. 7, p. 231.         [ Links ][CrossRef]

KOLBINGER, Frank; STREIFF, Markus B. and KATOPODIS, Andreas G. Cloning of a human UDP-galactose: 2-acetamido-2-deoxy-D-glucose 3beta-Galactosyltransferase catalyzing the formation of type 1 chains. The Journal of Biological Chemistry, January 1998, vol. 273, no. 1, p. 433-440.         [ Links ]

McALINDEN, T.P. and KRAWETZ, S.A. A practical method to screen libraries of cloned DNA. Analytical Biochemistry, April 1994, vol. 218, no. 1, p. 237-238.         [ Links ][CrossRef]

MUNROE, D.J.; LOEBBERT, R.; BRIC, E.; WHITTON, T.; PRAWITT, D.; VU, D.; BUCKLER, A.; WINTERPACHT, A.; ZABEL, B. and HOUSMAN, D.E. Systematic screening of an arrayed cDNA library by PCR. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, March 1995, vol. 92, no. 6, p. 2209-2213.         [ Links ]

REBAGLIATI, M.R.; WEEKS, D.L.; HARVEY, R.P. and MELTON, D.A. Identification and cloning of localized maternal RNAs from Xenopus eggs. Cell, October 1985, vol. 42, no. 3, p. 769-777.         [ Links ][CrossRef]

ROSENBERG, Helene F.; CORRETTE, Stephanie E.; TENEN, Daniel G. and ACKERMAN, Steven J. Rapid cDNA library screening using the polymerase chain reaction. BioTechniques, January 1991, vol. 10, no. 1, p. 53-54.         [ Links ]

SAMBROOK, Joseph; FRITSCH, Edward F. and MANIATIS, Thomas. Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual. 2nd ed. New York, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 1989. 999 p. ISBN 0-87969-309-6.         [ Links ]

SOKAC, Anna M. and BEMENT, William M. Regulation and expression of metazoan unconventional myosins. International Review of Cytology, 2000, vol. 200, p. 197-304.         [ Links ][CrossRef]

TAKUMI, T. Use of PCR for cDNA library screening. Methods in Molecular Biology, 1997, vol. 67, p. 339-344.         [ Links ]

WATANABE, Kenji; SAKAI, Fumie and ORII, Hidefumi. Stepwise dilution screening of a cDNA library by polymerase chain reaction. Analytical Biochemistry, October 1997, vol. 252, no. 1, p. 213-214.         [ Links ][CrossRef]

YU, Lei and BLOEM, Laura J. Use of polymerase chain reaction to screen phage libraries. Methods in Molecular Biology, 1996, vol. 58, p. 335-339.         [ Links ]

Note: Electronic Journal of Biotechnology is not responsible if on-line references cited on manuscripts are not available any more after the date of publication.

Supported by UNESCO / MIRCEN network