- Citado por SciELO
versión impresa ISSN 0716-9760
Biol. Res. v.37 n.2 Santiago 2004
Biol Res 37: 287-292, 2004
A Pyranine based Procedure for Evaluation of the Total
ANA MARÍA CAMPOS, CARLOS PATRICIO SOTOMAYOR,1 EDUARDO PINO and EDUARDO LISSI2
1 Facultad de Química, Universidad Católica de Valparaíso, Valparaíso, Chile.
A novel procedure for the evaluation of total reactive antioxidant potentials (TRAP) is described. The method is based on the measurement of the bleaching of pyranine by peroxyl radicals. The addition of the antioxidants produces a clear induction time whose magnitude is directly related to the antioxidant concentration. A comparison of the values obtained with those reported employing closely related methodologies shows that the results are significantly affected by the substrate employed to monitor the steady state free radical concentration. Possible sources of this dependence are discussed.
Key words: Peroxyl radicals, polyphenols, pyranine, total reactive antioxidant potential.
Abbreviations: AAPH: 2,2'-azo-bis (2-amidinopropane) hydrochloride; ABTS: 2,2'-azinobis-(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid); TRAP: total reactive antioxidant potentials.
There is great interest in the evaluation of the antioxidant capacity of pure compounds and/or complex mixtures, such as tea or wine. A large number of methodologies have been developed for this type of determinations (Llesuy et al., 2001). However, the information obtained from these determinations strongly depends upon the procedure employed (Pérez et al., 2000). This is mainly due to the fact that some of the methodologies evaluate the total amount of antioxidants and/or reactive groups in a given compound, while other techniques evaluate the amount and reactivity of the antioxidants present in the sample (Llesuy et al., 2001; Lissi et al., 1995). The former methodologies are generally based on the measurement of induction times (Wayner et al., 1985; Lissi et al., 1995) or the bleaching of pre-formed radicals (Campos and Lissi, 1996; Campos and Lissi, 1997), while methodologies that determine amount and reactivity are generally based on the determination of changes in steady state free radical concentrations (Lissi et al., 1995; Pérez et al., 2000). In a previous work (Pérez et al., 2000), we have shown that even when methodologies that measure only the amount of antioxidants are employed, the results can be widely different. In the present communication we propose a new and simple methodology to measure amounts of antioxidants from induction times, and we compare the data with that obtained by similar methodologies. The results indicate that, even in this case, the results are extremely dependent upon the substrate employed to monitor the change in free radical concentration.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Pyranine (Aldrich), Trolox (Aldrich) and 2,2'-azo-bis(2-amidinopropane) hydrochloride (AAPH) (Wako chemicals) were employed as received. All solutions were freshly prepared in phosphate buffer (10 mM, pH 7.0) employing twice distilled water. The kinetics of pyranine bleaching were evaluated at 37ºC by measuring the change in fluorescence intensity (excitation at 460 nm; emission at 510 nm). Kinetic runs were carried out under air employing 10 mM AAPH and 5 µM pyranine.
Pyranine is a reporter compound whose consumption can be easily measured by fluorescence and/or absorbance determinations. This compound has the advantage of its high reactivity towards peroxyl radicals (Pino et al., 2003) and a strong absorbance and fluorescence that take place at relatively long wavelengths, minimizing the interference by additives and/or their products. Furthermore, its consumption in the presence of a free radical source follows a simple kinetic law, and can be totally inhibited by the addition of antioxidants. In these cases, a clear induction time, associated to the total consumption of the added antioxidants, is defined. Typical results are shown in Figures 1 and 2 for quercetin and rutin. The data of these figures show that both compounds behave as nearly ideal antioxidants. In fact, irrespective of their initial concentration, the protection is almost total, the induction time is clearly defined, and the slope after the induction time is very similar to that obtained in the absence of additives. Furthermore, there is a fair linearity between the amount of additive and the induction time (Fig 3). The same behavior has been observed with other polyphenols (such as cathechin, gallic acid and caffeic acid) or complex mixtures, such as red and white wine (data not shown).
The antioxidant capacity of the pure compounds (TRAP), relative to that of a reference compound such as Trolox, can be obtained from:
where (slope) represents the value of the slope of a plot such as that of Fig. 3 for the considered compound, and (slope)ref is that of the reference compound (Trolox). Since each Trolox molecule is able to trap two free radicals (Llesuy et al., 2001), the number of radicals that can trap each molecule of the considered phenols (n) is given by
Values obtained in the present work are summarized in Table I. This table also includes values reported by Pérez et al. (2000) for n values measured in the AAPH-luminol system and the number of ABTS derived radicals that can remove each polyphenol molecule.
As previously mentioned (Campodónico et al., 1998; Pérez et al., 2000), there is a fair proportionality between the number of phenolic groups and the number of ABTS derived radicals that can be bleached (Fig 4). In fact, the data represented in Figure 4 gives a slope of 1.92, a correlation factor of 0.969 and a p value equal to 0.0015. This implies that titration of complex phenolic mixtures with ABTS derived radicals gives an estimation of the total amount of phenolic groups (Campodónico et al., 1998; Lissi et al., 1999). On the other hand, there is a very poor relationship between number of phenolic groups and TRAP values, irrespective of the procedure employed in its evaluation (Table I). The data obtained in the Pyranine/AAPH system, plotted in Figure 4, give a slope of 0.41, a correlation factor of 0.50 and a p value of 0.305. Furthermore, there is almost no correlation between n values evaluated in the luminol/AAPH and Pyranine/AAPH systems. This is most surprising since both methodologies employ AAPH as the free radical source. In fact, if it is assumed that in the inhibited region (prior to the induction time) the reaction scheme can be simply represented by it can be expected n values between one and two for monofunctional compounds, depending of the relative relevance of reactions (4) and (5). With this scheme
In polyfunctional compounds, n can be higher than two due to the presence of potentially reactive groups in the products arising from processes (4) and/or (5).
A noticeable feature of this reaction scheme is that, in the totally inhibited region, the values of n should be independent of the target molecule employed to monitor the steady state free radical concentration. This simple conclusion is in disagreement with the data presented in Table I. Three plausible explanations can be advanced to explain the strong dependence of n values on the employed methodology:
i) Differences in the solution pH
Unfortunately, possibility i) could not be tested due to the impossibility of carrying out the experiments with pyranine at the high pHs required in the luminol/AAPH system.
Possibility iii) takes into account protection of pyranine by the phenols through the sequence:
as proposed in closely related systems (Pino and Lissi, 2001; Pino et al., 2003). This scheme implies that the value of n will depend upon the capacity of the products formed in reactions (4) and (5) of reacting with the radical PyO* and not with the AAPH derived radicals. The different behavior of these radicals could explain the differences in n values reported in Table I.
The preset results indicate that pyranine bleaching can be employed to determine TRAP values. However, care must be taken when these values are compared to those obtained by different methodologies, even if they employ the same free radical source. Secondary free radical-free radical reactions determine the stoichiometric factors included in the TRAP parameter, and they can be widely different when different substrates are employed.
This work has been supported by the PUC-PBMEC (Molecular Basis of Chronic Diseases Program, Catholic University of Chile), DICYT (USACH) and the project DI 125.754/2002 (UCV).
CAMPODÓNICO P, BARBIERI E, PIZARRO M, SOTOMAYOR CP, LISSI EA (1998) A comparison between total phenol content of wines and their TRAP values measured by the bleaching of ABTS radical cations. Bol Soc Chil Quim 43: 281-285 [ Links ]
CAMPOS AM, LISSI EA (1996) Total antioxidant potential of Chilean wines. Nutrition Res 16: 385-389 [ Links ]
CAMPOS AM, LISSI EA (1997) Kinetics of the reaction between ABTS derived radical cations and phenols. Int J Chem Kinetics 29: 219-224 [ Links ]
LISSI EA, PASCUAL C, DEL CASTILLO MD (1992) Luminol luminiscence induced by AAPH thermolysis. Free Rad Res Comms 17: 299-306 [ Links ]
LISSI EA, SALIM-HANNA M, PASCUAL C, DEL CASTILLO MD (1995) Evaluation of total antioxidant potential (TRAP) and total antioxidant reactivity (TAR) from luminol enhanced chemiluminescence measurements. Free Rad Biol Med 18: 153-158 [ Links ]
LISSI EA, MODAK B, TORRES R, ESCOBAR J, URZÚA A (1999) Total antioxidant potential of resinous exudates from Heliotropium Species. A comparison of ABTS and DPPH methods. Free Rad Res 30: 471-477 [ Links ]
LLESUY S, EVELSON P, CAMPOS AM, LISSI EA (2001) Methodologies for evaluation of total antioxidant activities in complex mixtures. A critical review. Biol Res 34: 51-73 [ Links ]
PÉREZ D, LEIGHTON F, ASPEE A, ALIAGA C, LISSI E (2000) A comparison of methods employed to evaluated antioxidant capabilities. Biol Res 33: 71-77 [ Links ]
PINO E, LISSI EA (2001) Quantitative treatment of the kinetics of free-radical-mediated damage. Protection by free-radical savengers. Helvetica Chim Acta 84: 3677-3685 [ Links ]
PINO E, CAMPOS AM, LISSI EA (2003) 8-Hydroxy-1,3,6-pyrene trisulfonic acid (pyranine) bleaching by 2,2'-azobis(2-amidinopropane) derived peroxyl radicals. Int J Chem Kinetics 35: 525-531 [ Links ]
WAYNER DD, BURTON GW, INGOLD KU, LOCKE S (1985) Quantitative measurement of the TRAP of human blood plasma by controlled lipid peroxidation. FEBS Lett 187: 33-37 [ Links ]
Corresponding author: Dr. Eduardo Lissi. Facultad de Química y Biología, Universidad de Santiago de Chile. Casilla 40, Correo 33, Santiago, Chile. Phone: 56-2-681 2575. Fax: 56-2-6812108. E-mail: email@example.com
Received: March 20, 2003. Accepted: April 25, 2003.