SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.49 número186“Sobreviviendo” la presidencia argentina, 1983-2001Novedades del Sistema de Protección Internacional de Cambio Climático: el Acuerdo de París índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • Em processo de indexaçãoCitado por Google
  • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO
  • Em processo de indexaçãoSimilares em Google

Compartilhar


Estudios internacionales (Santiago)

versão On-line ISSN 0719-3769

Resumo

TIJMES, Jaime. A critical view of arbitration procedures in the World Trade Organization. Estud. int. (Santiago, en línea) [online]. 2017, vol.49, n.186, pp.119-136. ISSN 0719-3769.  http://dx.doi.org/10.5354/0719-3769.2017.45220.

In a conventional compulsory arbitration, the arbitrator faces no restraints in terms of deciding how to settle the dispute. Such arbitrations have certain disadvantages, namely, parties to the dispute have little incentive to reach a mutually satisfactory solution to their dispute during negotiations, and parties also have little incentive to act constructively during arbitration. The World Trade Organization (WTO) dispute settlement system does favor parties to reach a mutually agreed solution to their dispute. Thus, one may wonder why WTO arbitra tions have been carried out so far as conventional compulsory arbitrations. It arguably makes sense to ask if it would make sense to change the arbitration procedure, in order to better achieve the aims of WTO dispute settlement.

Palavras-chave : World Trade Organization; dispute settlement; arbitration.

        · resumo em Espanhol     · texto em Espanhol     · Espanhol ( pdf )