SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.18 issue2CONTRIBUTION OF THE JUDICIAL DISSENT MODEL TO THE POLITICAL SYSTEM: JUDICIAL PLURALISM AND DEMOCRATIC DEBATEA LOOK AT THE CAUSE DOCTRINE AND IT'S DIFFERENT VERSIONS IN THE CHILEAN CIVIL CODE author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Revista de derecho (Coquimbo)

On-line version ISSN 0718-9753

Abstract

DELGADO CASTRO, Jordi  and  DIAZ GARCIA, L. Iván. THE UNIFICATION OF JURISPRUDENCE ALLEGED BY AN EXTRAORDINARY REMEDY: ADVANTAGES AND PROBLEMS. RDUCN [online]. 2011, vol.18, n.2, pp. 275-304. ISSN 0718-9753.  http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-97532011000200010.

The draft of the Civil Procedure Code which is in revision in the Chilean National Congress contains a unique innovation in the recursive scope. This is an extraordinary remedy whose purpose is, in essence, to unify the civil jurisprudence. This claim presents clear advantages associated with the equal application of the law, legal certainty, reducing economic costs and the legitimacy of the judiciary. However, while fulfilling its unifying purposes, it will encounter insurmountable obstacles if it is kept the current policy. These obstacles are related to a specific concept and a particular practice of law in continental- European family and in the legal Chilean field in particular.

Keywords : Civil Proceedings; Procedural reform; Procedural remedies; Extraordinary remedy; Unification of jurisprudence.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish     · pdf in Spanish