SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
 número35¿FILOSOFÍA EN LA BIBLIA? EL PENSAMIENTO NEOTESTAMENTARIO COMO UNA PROPUESTA FILOSÓFICAUNE LETTRE DE IOANNES TZETZES AU PROTOSÉBASTE ISAAC FRÈRE DE L’EMPEREUR BYZANTIN JEAN II índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • Em processo de indexaçãoCitado por Google
  • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO
  • Em processo de indexaçãoSimilares em Google

Compartilhar


Byzantion nea hellás

versão On-line ISSN 0718-8471

Resumo

CURTA, FLORIN. THEOPHYLACT SIMOCATTA REVISITED: A RESPONSE TO ANDREAS GKOUTZIOUKOSTAS. Byzantion nea hellás [online]. 2016, n.35, pp.195-209. ISSN 0718-8471.  http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-84712016000100010.

In a reply to a previous article published in Byzantion Nea Hellás, the Greek historian Andreas Gkoutzioukostas has claimed that in a passage in Book VIII of Theophylact Simocatta’s History, the word Sklavinia was used as an adjective, not as a noun, and that the Byzantine historian frequently used adjectives derived from ethnic names. This article is a demonstration that both claims are in fact wrong, as Theophylact had very precise reasons for avoiding adjectives derived from ethnic names. Such reasons have much more to do with the narrative strategies that he employed than with the norms of the Greek language. His usage of Sklavinia is also mirrored by Hugeburc of Heidenheim’s transcription of St. Willbald’s account of his pilgrimage to the Holy Land.

Palavras-chave : Theophylact Simocatta; Slavs; ethnicity; barbarians; Vita S. Willibaldi; Theophanes.

        · resumo em Espanhol     · texto em Espanhol     · Espanhol ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License Todo o conteúdo deste periódico, exceto onde está identificado, está licenciado sob uma Licença Creative Commons