SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.13 número2EL AUTORITARISMO PROCESAL (Y LAS PRUEBAS DOCUMENTALES) índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Ius et Praxis

versión On-line ISSN 0718-0012

Resumen

ORELLANA TORRES, Fernando  y  PEREZ RAGONE, Alvaro. RADIOGRAFÍA DE LA REBELDÍA EN EL PROCESO CIVIL: TÓPICOS HACIA UNA ADECUADA REGULACIÓN EN LA NUEVA JUSTICIA CIVIL. Ius et Praxis [online]. 2007, vol.13, n.2, pp. 13-44. ISSN 0718-0012.  http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-00122007000200002.

Default judgments are judgments binding judgments in favor of the plaintiff when the defendant has not responded to a summons or has failed to appear before a court. Their regulation is an important tool of accelerating the legal process and is able to open the enforcing procedure, issued by the civil court or its chancery when certain conditions are met. Primarily it allows for recourse to the court's execution process; it also is final, like all judgments, and it leads to estoppel by resjudicata. The default explains main points between participation and authority and their interaction. The foundations of the constitutional theory of judicial power and the adjudication supported on a real discussion in a legal process should answer the default of cooperation too, in order to the prosecution and conclusion any procedure. Many elements collaborate holistic in the creation of modern and effective civil procedural

Palabras clave : Procedural cooperation; default judgments; civil procedure.

        · resumen en Español     · texto en Español     · pdf en Español