SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.76 issue5Estudio descriptivo del cribado de cromosomopatías en el primer trimestre de la gestación, en el Hospital Clínico San Carlos de Madrid, EspañaHisterectomía radical vaginal en cáncer cérvicouterino de estadio precoz author indexsubject indexsearch form
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Revista chilena de obstetricia y ginecología

version ISSN 0717-7526

Abstract

SAINZ B, José A et al. Implementación universal de un cribado de defectos congénitos de garantía en un área sanitaria: área hospitalaria de Valme, Sevilla, España. Rev. chil. obstet. ginecol. [online]. 2011, vol.76, n.5, pp. 325-333. ISSN 0717-7526.  doi: 10.4067/S0717-75262011000500007.

Background: The probability of a newborn presenting some kind of congenital defect at birth is 2-4% and the application of methods of screening for chromosomal and structural abnormalities can reduce the prevalence of these defects at birth. Objectives: The aim of this study is to prove that it is possible to implement a screening for congenital malformations that is standardised (diagnostic sensitivity [Sen]>80% for major structural deformations and Down's syndrome) and universal (90% of pregnant women). We also want to prove that this screening reduces the rate of undiagnosed congenital defects at birth. Methods: Prospective study. We assessed 12,478 pregnant women (July 2006- September 2009). A morphological ultrasound (18-22 weeks) and a combined test were carried out as the methods for screening for congenital defects. Results: The prevalence of congenital defects was 2.26% [95% CI: 1.9-2.5] (282/12478). The ultrasound scan was performed on 99.2% of the pregnant women. There was a Sen of 79.3% [95% CI: 74.3-84.4] (196/247) for structural malformation and 95.6% [95% CI: 91.8-99.3] (110/115) for major malformations). Screening for chromosomal anomalies was performed on 95.1% of pregnant women with a Sen of 88.5% [95% CI: 79.9-99] (31/35). Conclusions: A standardised and universal screening for congenital defects reduced the prevalence of undiagnosed congenital defects at birth to 0.5%.

Keywords : Congenital defects; congenital malformation; Down's syndrome; chromosomal anomalies; prenatal diagnosis.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish     · pdf in Spanish