SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
 número32Contribución al estudio de la "actio quod iussu"El peculio como ente jurídico autónomo y matriz de la "merx peculiaris" índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Revista de estudios histórico-jurídicos

versión impresa ISSN 0716-5455

Resumen

MOKREJS, Caroline. "Propter iuris condicionem in suspenso est": "condicio supervacua", "condicio extrinsecus" and the Condition of Law in "Classic Roman Law". Rev. estud. hist.-juríd. [online]. 2010, n.32, pp. 107-118. ISSN 0716-5455.  http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0716-54552010000100004.

This article refers to the condicio iuris in classic Roman Law and intends to analyse its definition and study the most important sources, which are D 21,1,43,10, D.35,1,21, D 35,1,99 y D 36,2,25,1. Condicio iuris has been related and identified with condicio extrinsecus and condicio supervacua, two types that lack legal effect. This is why condicio iuris is part of the condicio tacita notion, which seems to be right if it is the definition of "in abstracto" condicio iuris. However, when analysing the key fragments, it is clear that up to a certain point this concept and the texts themselves are contradictory. Therefore, it seems that a general definition of condicio iuris in classic Roman Law is not possible.

Palabras clave : condicio iuris; Condicio extrinsecus; Condicio supervacua; Condicio tacita.

        · resumen en Español     · texto en Español     · pdf en Español