Biogeographic patterns of Chilean littoral fishes

In this study, we analyzed the biogeographic patterns of the Chilean littoral fish fauna, including latitudinal trends in teleost and chondrichthyan fish species richness, their distribution range patterns, and their level of endemism, both to the Chilean coast and the Southeastern Pacific. We determined the number and percentage of fish taxa within four different groups based on their biogeographic affinities. This was done, both for teleost and chondrichthyan fishes, at the species, genus and family level. In order to recognise the existence ofbiogeographic regions, we applied cluster and ordination analyses to the distribution data, using objective boots trapping techniques at the three taxonomic levels used. We found that littoral fish diversity remains fairly constant along the coast down to around 40° S, declining south of this latitude. We detected two biogeographic regions along the Chilean coast, with a break between them at 40° S. These results lend support to previously recognized biogeographic provinces or faunistic units. These two biogeographic regions are a reflection of the mixed origin of the Chilean littoral ichthyofauna, consisting of northern warm-temperate fishes of subtropical origin and southern cold-temperate fishes of subantarctic origin. While the percentage of fishes endemic to the Chilean coast is not high (18%), a large percentage ofteleost species inhabiting Chilean littoral waters are endemic to the Southeastern Pacific (44%). Dispersal and evolutionary history, rather that other factors, seem to explain the observed patterns of distribution of this particular fish fauna. This study represents a necessary first step towards understanding the biogeography of Southeastern Pacific marine fishes.


INTRODUCTION
One of the most striking geographic features of the mainland Chilean coast is its long latitudinal extension covering almost 4.200 km.This coast has another peculiar characteristic: from Arica (18°20'S) to the northern part of Chiloe Island (ea.41 o 45' ), the coastline is an almost continuos straight line, fully exposed to the prevailing southsouthwesterly winds (Thomas et al. 1994, Strub et al. 1998).On the other hand, the coast from Chiloe to Cape Horn (ea.56°) is highly fragmented with a large number of islands and channels known as the Chilean archipelago region.All these characteristics may explain why this coast has largely attracted the attention of scientists interested in biogeography.As a consequence of this, an important number of studies have analyzed the distribution patterns of several marine floristic and faunistic groups along the Chilean coast (e.g.Balech 1954, Sebens & Paine 1979, Santelices 1980, Jaramillo 1982, Brattstrom & Johanssen 1983, Brattstrom 1990).Most of these studies have suggested biogeographical units based on distributional breaks of selected numbers of marine groups (primarily invertebrates).Despite the fact that most of these biogeographic studies have used different criteria and methodology for selecting their target groups and data analysis (Camus, in press), two faunistic groups have generally been recognized along the Chilean coast, a northern warm-temperate region to the north of 42° S and a southern cold-temperate region to the south of 42° S (Balech 1954, Briggs 1974).A transitional area between 30 and 42° S, where a mixing of both faunas occurs, has also been proposed (Dahl 1960, Dell 1971, Brattstrom & Johanssen 1983).However, the number of biogeographical units (regions, provinces or districts), as well as their limits or boundaries are still under discussion (see Lancellotti & V asquez 1999, Camus, in press).
In this paper, we analyze the latitudinal distribution patterns of littoral marine fishes occurring along the Chilean coast based on available literature.The main aims of the present paper were: (a) to determine latitudinal trends in the number of littoral fish taxa, at the level of species, genus and family occurring along the Chilean coast.(b) to construct latitudinal distribution maps of these fishes with the purpose of identifying groups of taxa with different biogeographic affinities along the Chilean coast.(c) to determine the level of endemism of teleost and chondrichthyan littoral fish species at two spatial scales: endemic to the south-eastern Pacific Ocean and to Chilean waters (18-56° S).(d) Then, by using cluster analyses and ordination techniques on distribution data of littoral teleost and chondrichthyan fishes, we test the most generalized hypothesis emerging from previous biogeographical studies.This hypothesis states that the Chilean littoral marine fauna is composed of two biogeographic regions, a northern warmtemperate region and a southern cold-temperate region, with a boundary between them located at 42°S, and a transitional region within the warmtemperate region stretching from 30-33° S southwards (Brattstrom & Johanssen 1983).

Littoral fish species distribution database
We obtained information on the latitudinal distribution of marine teleost and chondrichthyan fish species inhabiting Chilean littoral waters from a wide literature source (see Appendix I), based on the species lists published by Pequefio (1989Pequefio ( , 1997)).We followed the taxonomic nomenclature and classification of fish taxa used by Nelson (1994) and Eschmeyer ( 1998).Fish species registered in small fishery catches in recent years were also included (SERNAP 1996(SERNAP , 1997(SERNAP , 1998)).We also included our unpublished data base of species collected in subtidal and intertidal waters on the northern and central Chilean coast (Ojeda, unpublished data).

Criteria for littoral fish species selection and definition of latitudinal distribution zones
We included fish species that have been captured from subsurface waters down to a maximum depth of 60 m, thus excluding deep-water species and all oceanic fishes that have not been recorded within this depth range.The analysis included fish species inhabiting subtidal waters as well as those have been found in intertidal habitats.We did not consider oceanic island fish species (i.e, Easter Island, Juan Fern:indez Archipelago, and Sala & G6mez Island; see Yafiez-Arancibia, 1975;Randall & Cea-Egafia, 1984;Sepulveda, 1987).We also excluded from the present study those species that have only been registered in Chilean Antarctic Territorial waters (Pequefio 1989), as well as warm water fishes associated with El Nifio events off the coast of northern Chile (Kong et al. 1985).
We divided the Chilean coast into 2° latitudinal sections from 18 to 56° S, determining the presence or absence of each fish taxa at the spec'ies, genus and family levels within each segment of coastline as reported in the literature.Discontinuous distributions of any species, genus or family were assumed to be owing to lack of pub-lished ichthyiological records in the areas where these were apparently absent, and a continuous distribution was assumed for the analysis.

Biogeographic analyses
We determined latitudinal trends in the number of species, genera and families of teleost and chondrichthyan fishes as well as in the total number of fish species along the Chilean coast.The latitudinal distribution range of each fish species, genus and family was represented using distribution maps.These maps allowed us to identify possible biogeographic groups of taxa based on shared latitudinal distribution patterns along the Chilean coast.The number of taxa in these groups was quantified in order to determine their relative contribution to the total number of fish taxa.The groups recognised were: northerly distributed taxa, with distribution ranges from 18 down to as far south as 40° S; widespread taxa with distribution ranges along the entire Chilean coastline; southerly distributed taxa ranging from 56 os northwards up to 38-40° S. Finally, we distinguished narrowly distributed taxa, located anywhere along the Chilean coastline, but whose distribution range within the Chilean coast did not exceed 10°.
The degree of similarity in fish taxa present between pairs of 2° latitudinal sections along the coast of Chile was calculated using Jaccard's coefficient of similarity based on presence/absence of fish taxa.To determine the existence of biogeographic regions, we carried out a cluster analysis on these pairwise Jaccard similarity values.The algorithm used was an unweighted pairgroup method using arithmetic averages, (UPGMA) (Krebs 1999).We then applied boots trapping techniques to objectively determine the level of taxonomic similarity of individual coastal segments at which biogeographic regions could be recognised.For this, we reshuffled the original presence/absence data 1000 times, obtaining pseudo values of similarity, which were then pooled to construct a frequency distribution histogram.We compared our observed similarity values with the generated frequency distribution, and considered those values that exceeded the 95'h percentile as corresponding to greater similarity in taxonomic composition than that expected by chance alone (Manly 1991).Existence of biogeographic regions was also determined through nonmetric multidimensional scaling based on J accard similarity matrices, where similar sections are clustered by an ordination technique (Manly 199I, Clarke and Ainsworth 1993 ).Both these analyses were done for teleosts and chondrichthyans at the species, genus and family levels.

Latitudinal trends in number of fish taxa
We registered a total of 162 fish species, in II4 genera and 66 families in Chilean littoral waters.The number of fish species remains fairly constant between the northern Chilean coast (18° S) and the northern parts of southern Chile (approx.38-40° S), with a mean of I04 ± 3 species (mean ± SD; range 98-I09 species) (Fig. 1).Maximum species richness occurs between 32 and 34° S (109 species), corresponding to ea.Valparafso.South of 40° S, we observed a sharp drop in the total number of species (74 ± 7, mean ± SD.; range 66-82 species), increasing only slightly between 54 and 56° S. A similar pattern is found when only teleost fishes are considered (Fig. I).On the other hand, chondrichthyan species richness is substantially lower throughout the Chilean coast, averaging 21 ± 1 and 14 ± 2 north and south of 40°S, respectively (mean± SD, ranges: 20-22 and 1I-I7 species), but also decreasing from 40° S southward (Fig. I).When we considered higher taxonomic categories (genus and family), a similar pattern was observed in the number of taxa, with a decrease from 40° S southward, both in teleosts and chondrichthyans (Fig. 2a and   b).

Biogeographic patterns
Four groups with different biogeographic affinities could be recognized according to the distribution ranges of Chilean littoral teleost fishes (n = 133), while only three could be detected amongst chondrichthyans (n = 28) (Fig. 3).The first one includes species with a northern distribution range occurring in Chilean waters from 18° S (northern limit of the Chilean coast) to latitudes ranging between 20 and 40° S, representing 38 and 18% of total number ofteleost (n =50) and chondrichthyan (n = 5) fish species, respectively (Fig. 3).Fish species in this group include the teleosts Aplodactylus punctatus, Scartichthys vi rid is, Labrisomus philippii, Kyphosus analogus, Cheilodactylus variegatus and Hemilutjanus macrophtalmos and chondrichthyans such as Triakis maculata, and Sphyrna zygaena among others.
Species that in Chilean littoral waters have narrow distribution ranges form a third group consisting of 17% of the total number of teleosts (n = 22).Distributional ranges of the representatives of this group do not exceed 10° in latitude (Fig. 3).Examples of species found in this group are the teleosts Auchenionchus variolosus, Bovichthys chilensis, Calliclinus nudiventris, Myxodes ornatus, Scartichthys crapulatus, Kyphosus analogus and Nexilosus latifrons.
We defined a fourth group formed by species with a southerly distribution range, consisting of fishes occurring from 56° S northwards to not further north than 38-40° S (e.g., the teleosts Harpagifer bispinnis, Careproctus crassus, Cottoperca gobio, Patagonotothen sima and P. wiltoni, and chondrichthyans Bathyraja griseocauda and B. magellanica), This group accounts for 26% (n = 34) and 21% (n = 6) of the total number of teleosts and chondrichthyans, respectively.All these chondrichthyan species also have a restricted distribution range along the southern Chilean coast (Fig. 3).
Analysis at the genus and family levels yielded the same four biogeographic groups among teleost fishes (Fig. 4).Northerly-distributed taxa include the genera Anisotremus, Kyphosus and Labrisomus, as well as the families Aplodactylidae, Kyphosidae, Pomacentridae, amongst others, representing 35 and 19% of the total number of teleost genera (n = 32) and families (n = 10), respectively (Fig. 4).Taxa with broad distribution ranges include the genera Aphos, Thyrsites, and Gobiesox, and the families Sciaenidae, Gobiesocidae, Pinguipedidae and Scorpaenidae among others.Genera and families in this group account for 31 and 65% of the total number of teleost genera (n = 29) and families (n = 35), respectively (Fig. 4) .
Narrowly distributed taxa of teleost fishes include the genera Nexilosus, Bovichthys and Ilucoaetes and the families Gadidae and Harpagiferidae, accounting for 15 (N=l4) and 6% (N=3) of the total respectively.Southerly distributed taxa include Careproctus, Heterogobius and Patagonotothen, and the families Channichthidae, Liparidae and Zoarcidae.These taxa account for  Rangos de distribuci6n de generos y familias de condrictios representados en aguas litorales a lo largo de la costa de Chile.Cada barra representa la distribuci6n de un genero o familia.17 (n = 16) and 16% (n = 9) of the total number of teleost genera and families, respectively (Fig. 4).At the genus and family levels, chondrichthyans could be separated into three and two groups, respectively.The first group comprising northerly distributed taxa includes five genera (24%) (Heptranchias, Centroscyllium, Sphyrna, Triakis and Carcharodon) and one family (8%) (Sphyrnidae) which ranged from 18° S down to not further than 40° S (Fig. 5).The second group, comprised of widespread taxa found along the entire Chilean coastline, includes the genera Galeorhinus, Lamna and Schroederichthys and the families Carcharhinidae, Lamnidae and Rajidae, accounting for 48 (n = 10) and 58% (n = 7) of the total number of chondrichthyan genera and families, respectively (Fig. 5).There were no narrowly distributed chondrichthyan genera and families.Only one chondrichthyan genus, Bathyraja, had a southerly distribution, representing 5% of the total number of chondrichthyan genera.

Levels of endemism
Of the total number of littoral teleost fishes occurring in Chilean waters, 18 species (13%) are endemic to the Chilean coast (see Appendix 1 ), while 59 species ( 44%) are endemic to the Southeastern Pacific Ocean (i.e., restricted to littoral waters between 0 and 56° S).On the other hand, of the total of 28 chondrichthyan species found along the Chilean littoral waters, only 2 of them (Triakis maculata and Schroederichthys chilensis; 7%) are endemic to the Southeastern Pacific Ocean, with none being endemic to Chilean waters.

Biogeographic regions
Application of an UPGMA cluster analysis on data on the distribution of teleost fishes at the species, genus and family levels indicated two statistically significant latitudinal biogeographic regions along the Chilean coast: one ranging from 18 to 40° S, and the other from 40 to 56° S (Fig. 6a,  c, and e).Ordination of the data through nMDS corroborated the existence of these two biogeographic groups (Figs. 6 b, d, and f).However, within the northern region it is possible to distinguish two subunits at the level of species, genus and family: one ranging from 18 to 32° S, and another from to 40°S (Figs.6a, c, and e).
Similarly, within the southern region there are two groups, one from 40 to 44°S and another from 44 to 56°S (Figs.6a, c, and e).The northernmost and southernmost groups of latitudes reflect the presence of subtropical and subantarctic species, while the latitudes from 32 to 40° S show a mixture of species from the north and south (Figs 3  and 6a).

Similarity
Dimension-1  Analysis of distribution data of chondrichthyan fishes at the species level revealed the existence of two biogeographic regions: 1) a northern region ranging from 18 to 40° S, and 2) a southern region from 40 to 56° S (Fig. 7a), although application of the ordination techniques also showed the existence of a narrow region from 54 to 56° S (Fig. 7b ).On the other hand, at the genus level, four zones were identified, the first one ranging from 18 to 40° S, and three southern regions: 40 to 44° S, 44 to 50° Sand 50 to 56° S. (Fig. 7c and d).At the family level, four regions were also recognized: a northern region ranging from 18 to 40° S, and three southern regions: 40 to 44o S, 44 to 50° Sand 50 to 56° S (Fig. 7e and f).

Biogeographic affinities
Having established two statistically significant latitudinal biogeographic regions along the Chilean coast: a northern warm-temperate region (18-40° S) and a southern cold-temperate region (40-56° S), we analyzed the biogeographic affinities of those teleost species occurring within the northern warm-temperate region whose southern distribution ends at 40° Sand of those occurring within the southern cold-temperate region whose northern distribution limit lies at 40° S. Our results show that of the 50 teleost species with a northerly distribution range (from 18 to 40° S), 8 (16%) are exclusively found in Chilean waters (i.e., up to 18° S), 31 (62%) extend their distribution ranges further north (between 18 and 0° S), and 12 (24%) occur further north than 0°, thus prolonging their distribution range to the Northeastern Pacific.The later two groups include fishes belonging to Blenniidae, Gobiesocidae, Kyphosidae, Pomacentridae, Serranidae, among others.Of the total of 34 teleost species with a southerly distribution (from 40 to 56° S), 29 of them (85%) are also found in Argentinian waters, while only 5 species (15%) are endemic to this southern cold temperate region.The former group includes representatives of Zoarcidae, N ototheniidae, Harpagiferidae and Liparidae.

Latitudinal patterns in composition and number of species
Diversity of littoral fish species along the Chilean coast presents three clear cut latitudinal patterns: a fairly constant number of species from 18 to approximately 40° S, a sharp drop in species richness south of this latitude, and a marked increase in number of species in the southernmost part of Chile between 54 and 56°.The first break in fish diversity roughly coincides with the southernmost portion of continental Chile, where a major change in topography, climate and hydrography occurs southward.The second break in diversity is determined by the appearance of endemic subantarctic teleosts and chondrichthyans such as Zoarcidae and Rajidae, respectively.
A similar pattern has been observed both in terms of the total number, as well as littoral and shallow water benthic invertebrate species (Brattstrom & Johanssen 1983), except for the rise in species diversity at 54 2 S. In contrast, the total number of species of sublittoral benthic invertebrates and macroalgae increases steadily towards the south of Chile (Santelices 1980, Brattstrom & J ohanssen 1983, Lancelloti & Vasquez 2000).In macroalgae, this pattern results from a southward increase in the contribution of species of subantarctic origin (Santelices, 1980).The drop in diversity southward of 42 2 S has often been attributed to the lack of adequate sampling in this area (e.g., Brattstrom & Johanssen 1983, Lancelloti & Vasquez 2000, Camus, in press).However, the intensive ichthyological research conducted in the southernmost regions of Chile clearly demonstrates that this is not the case for littoral fishes (e.g., Moreno & Jara 1984, Lloris & Rucabado 1991, Pequefio & Lamilla 1995, Pequefio et al. 1995, Pequefio 1999).
On the other hand, our results do not concur with those reported by Sielfeld & Vargas ( 1999) regarding the number of ichthyogeographical sectors occurring between 42 and 57 2 S, which approximately correspond to our south cold temperate region ( 40-56 2 S).Within this biogeographic region we identify two teleost subgroups: one from 40 to 44 2 S and another from 44 to 56 2 S at all taxonomic levels analysed.In contrast, these authors recognised three sectors: a "northern sector" ( 42 to 46-4 7 2 S), an "intermediate sector" ( 47-48 to 51 2 S), and a "southern sector" (52 to 56 2 S).However, their results can be challenged because of their subjectivity in recognising fish associations (i.e., 30% similarity).In another recent study, Pequefio (1999), who analysed the littoral fishes occurring in the Chilean fjords between 47 and 52 2 S, suggests that the southern zone of South America should be recognised as one ichthyogeographic unit that probably extends towards the Atlantic including the Falkland Islands.

Levels of endemism
Few teleost species occur exclusively in Chilean littoral waters (18 species representing 13% of the total number of teleosts), while no chondrichthyan species are endemic to Chile at this level.In contrast, 44% of the 133 teleost species occurring along the Chilean coast are endemic to the Southeastern Pacific coast (i.e., 59 species).Thus, at this spatial scale, the level of endemism of teleosts occurring in Chilean littoral waters is very high.However, only 7% of chondrichthyans (represented by 2 shark species) are endemic to the Southeastern Pacific, a result that is not surprising given that most sharks are widely distributed throughout the world (Compagno 1984a, b).

Biogeographic Regions
Our analysis of latitudinal distribution patterns of Chilean marine teleost littoral fishes suggested the existence of two main biogeographic regions along the coast of Chile, 1) a warm-temperate region stretching from 18 to 40° S, and 2) a coldtemperate region ranging from 40 to 56° S.These two regions were identified irrespective of the taxonomic level considered, (i.e., species, genus or family).Similarly, the analysis of distribution patterns of chondrichthyan fishes indicated the same biogeographic regions.However, a subdivision of the cold-temperate region into different sub-regions was suggested, depending on the taxonomic level studied.These two main biogeographic regions are reflections of marked latitudinal differences in composition and number of fish taxa as shown in the distribution maps and cluster •analyses.
The biogeographic regions identified in this study for Chilean marine littoral fishes correspond to previously recognized provinces or faunistic components based on distribution patterns of benthic invertebrates (Briggs 197 4, Brattstrom & J ohanssen 1983), but do not concur with those described by Santelices (1980Santelices ( , 1989) ) for marine macroalgae.Santelices ( 1980) distinguished a very broad phytogeographic region stretching from northern Peru (5°S) to southern Chile (53° S), and a narrow region (54-55° S) consisting of the area of the Magellan Strait and Cape Horn.
Confirming earlier results, Brattstrom & Johanssen ( 1983) recognized two main regions, a northern warm-temperate region and a southern cold-temperate region, meeting at 42° S, and coinciding with the sharp change in topography from Chiloe Island southwards (see Brattstrom & Johanssen 1983 and references therein).However, recent work on benthic macroinvertebrates has challenged this view, identifying a loosely defined transitional area ranging from 30-33° S to 35-48° S (Lancellotti & V asquez 1999), thus re-jecting the hypothesis of the existence of a major break around 42° S.However, we believe that their results are an artifact of the low level of resolution used, especially in the southern part of Chile (e.g., their Magellan Strait zone).

Rio geographic affinities of littoral fishes
Based on the analysis of latitudinal trends in the number of fish taxa, distribution maps, and the results of the cluster analysis and biogeographic affinities of the different groups conforming this fish fauna, we propose that the littoral fish fauna is clearly composed of two groups of different origins: a warm-temperate group of fish species of tropical and sub-tropical origin, belonging to the Peruvian province, and a cold-temperate group of species of subantarctic origin, belonging to the Magellanic province.The coastal fish fauna occurring from 30 to 42° S (central Chile) is a mixture of subantarctic, subtropical, pan-oceanic and a few endemic fish species, as correctly suggested by Mead (1970).In this sense, this is a transitional zone where both faunas occur.
In this transitional zone, the relative number of species in each group changes along the coast of Chile, with the greatest changes occurring between 32 and 44° S. In this zone there is a gradual replacement of northern teleost species by endemic species restricted to the south-central coast and southern species.This replacement results in the biogeographic differences that give rise to the regions discussed above.Among chondrichthyans, the biogeographic differences are due to the steady drop in the number of northern species southwards of 40° S.
The causes of latitudinal gradients in species diversity have been debated over the last years, with criticism being directed to circular hypotheses, or lack of consistent correlations between diversity and potential causal factors such as latitudinal ranges, area and productivity among others (see Rhode 1992, Rhode et al. 1993).Tests of causal hypotheses of marine latitudinal diversity gradients for marine prosobranch gastropods have found that western Atlantic and eastern Pacific Oceans show similar patterns in diversity, and that these patterns cannot be explained by latitudinal differences in species range-length (Rappoport's rule), species-area effects or recent geologic histories (Roy et al. 1998).In that study, diversity was found to correlate significantly with solar energy input, represented by average sea surface temperature, which was hypothesized to be related to productivity.The implication of this is that diversity would be an evolutionary out-come of trophodynamic processes inherent in ecosystems, and not just a byproduct of physical geographies.On the other hand, Moreno et al. (1979) proposed an ecological hypothesis to explain the latitudinal changes in the diversity of littoral fishes.They observed greater community diversity in the central coast and proposed that this latitudinal variation was due to a more complex environmental matrix consisting of kelp forests at lower latitudes.However, their study was based on the analysis of only two localities, one in central Chile and the other further south.
We believe, however, that the explanation to the latitudinal pattern of coastal Chilean fish diversity found in this study, as well as why there are so few fish species here in comparison to tropical regions, together with the level of endemism observed along the Chilean coast, lies in the analysis of processes related to dispersal and evolutionary history of the different components that conform this coastal fish fauna.Most of the littoral Chilean fish fauna is composed of modern Perciform species ( c.a. 65% ).Perciforms originated in the ludo-Pacific, dispersing along the tropics to the eastern Pacific, and later extending polewards to cold waters of both hemispheres (Myers 1941 ).Because of their tropical origin, it has been strongly suggested that there has not been sufficient time for Perciforms to adapt to the cold environment found at lower latitudes (Mead 1970).This interplay of dispersal and evolutionary origin may well explain the observed decline in fish diversity southwards, and why the Chilean coastal fauna is so depauperate.In fact, Mead ( 1970) has pointed out that the cold temperate Chilean coast is the geographical end point of this radiation, and it is the place most distant from several sources of fish fauna.Another fact that clearly supports this explanation deals with the phenomenon of fish herb ivory along Chilean cold temperate waters.It has been suggested that fish herbivores, which are advanced percoid forms, and a very diverse group in the tropics (Sale 1991) have not yet radiated into cold-temperate waters (Mead 1970).Recent studies suggest this is the case, since the number of herbivore fish species sharply declines towards the poles (Horn 1989, Horn & Ojeda 1999).Along the Chilean coast, this number declines from six in the northern Chilean coast to three in the central Chilean coast to none at all south of Concepci6n (37° S). (Miranda 1967, Ojeda et al. 1990 1 ).
In conclusion, this study shows a steady decline in littoral fish diversity southward of 40° S. Analysis of distribution ranges of fishes indicates two biogeographic regions along the Chilean coast, with a break at 40° S, supporting previously rec-ognized biogeographic provinces or faunistic components.These regions reflect the mixed origin of Chilean littoral fishes.While the percentage of fishes endemic to the Chilean coast is not high ( 18% ), a high percentage of teleost species inhabiting Chilean littoral waters are endemic to the Southeastern Pacific ( 44% ).Dispersal and evolutionary history rather that other factors seem to explain the observed patterns of distribution of this particular fish fauna.This study represents a first step towards understanding the biogeography of Southeastern Pacific marine fishes.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We dedicate this paper to the memory of Dr. Patricio Sanchez ( 1928-1999)

Fig. 1 .
Fig. 1.Total number of fish species, and number of teleost and chondrichthyan species inhabiting littoral marine waters along the coast of Chile.
Fig. 2. Total number of a) teleost and b) chondrichthyan fishes, at the level of species, genus and family, found in littoral marine waters along the Chilean coast.Patrones latitudinales en el numero de a) teleosteos y b) condrictios al ni vel de especie, genero y familia en aguas litorales marinas en la costa de Chile.

Fig. 3 .Fig. 4 .
Fig. 3. Distribution ranges of littoral teleost and chondrichthyan species found along the Chilean coast.Each bar represents the distribution of a single species.Rangos de distribuci6n de especies litorales de teleosteos y condrictios a lo largo de la costa de Chile.Cada barra representa la distribuci6n de una especie.genus(N=92)

Fig. 5 .
Fig. 5. Distribution ranges of chondrichthyan genera and families represented in littoral waters along the Chilean coast.Each bar represents the distribution of a single chondrichthyan genus or family.

Fig. 6 .
Fig. 6.Latitudinal similarity phenograms and nMDS ordinations based on the presence or absence of teleost fishes at the level of species (a and b), genus (c and d) and family (e and f).Dotted lines indicate the level of similarity between pairs of latitudinal sections at which significant biogeographic regions could be recognized in the phenograms after application of a bootstrapping procedure.Insets indicate Kruskal stress values for nMDS configuration.Dendrogramas y ordenaciones de nMDS basadas en la presencia o ausencia de teleosteos a! nivel de especie (ay b), genero (c y d) y familia (e y f).Las lfneas punteadas indican el nivel de similitud entre pares de secciones latitudinales al que pudieron distinguirse regiones biogeograficas significativas en Ios dendrogramas luego de aplicar un procedimiento de aleatorizaci6n.Valores de stress de Kruskal se indican en el recuadro inserto en Ios graficos de ordenaci6n de nMDS.

Fig. 7 .
Fig. 7. Latitudinal similarity phenograms and nMDS ordinations based on the presence or absence of chondrichthyan fishes at the level of species (a and b), genus (c and d) and family (e and f).Dotted lines indicate the level of similarity between pairs of latitudinal sections at which significant biogeographic regions could be recognized in the phenograms after application of a bootstrapping procedure.Insets indicate Kruskal stress values for nMDSconfiguration.Dendrogramas y ordenaciones de nMDS basadas en la presencia o ausencia de condrictios a! nivel de especie (ay b), genero (c y d) y familia (e y f).Las lineas punteadas indican el nivel de similitud entre pares de secciones latitudinales al que pudieron distinguirse regiones biogeograficas significati vas en Ios dendrogramas luego de aplicar un procedimiento de aleatorizaci6n.Valores de stress de Kruskal se indican en el recuadro inserto en Ios gnificos de ordenaci6n de nMDS.
, a founder of modern marine biology in Chile, who stimulated the study of zoology, biogeography, and ecology by many of the new generations of marine scientists in Chile.This study was mainly funded by FONDAPO &BMW3 andFONDECYT 1990154 grants to F.P.O.F.A.L. is currently funded by a DIPUC doctoral fellowship and A.A.M. acknowledges a CONICYT doctoral fellowship.FP OJEDA (in press) Structure and trophic organization of subtidal fish assemblages on the northern Chilean coast: the effect of habitat complexity.Marine Ecology Progress Series.BERRIOS V & ME V ARGAS (2000) Estructura del ensamble de peces intermareales de la costa rocosa del norte de Chile.Revista de Biologfa Marina y Oceanografia (Chile)• 35: 73-81.BALECH E (1954) Division zoogeognifica del litoral sudamericano.Revista de Biologfa Marina (Valparafso) 4: 184-195.BRATTSTROM H & A JOHANSSEN (1983) Ecological and regional zoogeography of the marine benthic fauna of Chile.Report no.49 of the Lund University Expedition 1948-1949.Sarsia 68:289-339.BRATTSTROM H (1990) Intertidal ecology of the northernmost part of the Chilean archipelago.Report no.50 of the Lund University Expedition 1948-1949.Sarsia 75: 107-160.BRIGGS JC (1974) Marine zoogeography.McGraw-Hill Co., New York.475 pp.